Category Archives: Pols and Pundits

Did Hitler Live In Exile In Argentina Until 1971?

Posted on by

Huffington Post:

Basti’s theory of Hitler’s escape and particularly his route via the Canary Islands has also been backed up by veteran CIA agent Bob Baer, who claims to have proof the German leader faked his own death and fled to Tenerife.

Appearing on a History Channel series in January, Baer and his team analysed 700 pages of declassified information, with one stating: “American Army officials in Germany have not located Hitler’s body nor is there any reliable source that Hitler is dead.”

Circumstances of the dictator’s death were also clouded in 2009 when American researchers claimed DNA tests on a fragment of skull, said to belong to Hitler, revealed it actually belonged to an unidentified woman, the Guardian reported.

The skull fragment, complete with bullet hole, was supposedly taken from the bunker by the Russians and went on display in Moscow in 2000, where it was presented as irrefutable evidence Hitler had committed suicide.

Argentina was seen as something of a haven to leaders of the Third Reich, with ‘Angel of Death’ Joseph Mengele seeking refuge there
Argentina was seen as something of a haven to leaders of the Third Reich, with ‘Angel of Death’ Joseph Mengele seeking refuge thereKEYSTONE VIA GETTY IMAGES
Hitler biographer Werner Maser has also declared the fragment to be a fake, the BBC reports.

The post World War II connection to South America is widely known, with archaeologists last year stumbling upon what they believed were the ruins of a secret jungle lair built especially for Nazi leaders of the Third Reich, should they have been forced to flee Germany.

A series of stone ruins located in Argentina’s Teyu Cuare provincial park in the north of the country with its border with Paraguay were discovered by researchers hacking their way through the undergrowth with machetes.

In the event, the lair was not needed, as Argentinian president Juan Peron welcomed thousands of Nazis and Italian fascists to the country with open arms.

Joseph Mengele, a doctor who conducted barbaric experiments at the Auschwitz concentration camp and Nazi mastermind Adolf Eichmann, were known to have fled there.

Eichmann was kidnapped by Israeli agents in 1960, taken to Israel where he was tried and executed.

In 2000 Argentinian President Fernando de la Rua issued a formal apology for the country’s role in harbouring Nazi war criminals.

But as yet there has been no formal comment or evidence of Hitler’s own presence in the

Scott Walter On Jane Mayer’s Fraudulent Journalism

Posted on by

Scott Walter at Capital Research.org:

In her last book, Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right, Mayer bewails the “100 biggest known donors in 2014,” who spent “nearly as much money on behalf of their candidates as the 4.75 million people who contributed $200 or less.” Who were those terrible donors? Mayer says, “A few of the biggest spenders were now Democrats.”

Check her source in the endnotes, and you find how many “a few” equals:

Donors who gave exclusively or primarily to Democratic candidates and groups held down 52 of the top 100 spots—including by far the biggest donor of disclosed 2014 cash: retired San Francisco hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer.

I chose Mayer’s “a few” as the worst lie in the book, but I had to write a long review to catalog all her other distortions and falsehoods. One book chapter had previously appeared as a New Yorker hit piece, and my earlier dissection of that partisan journalism drew this response from John Hinderaker of Powerline:

Walter’s article was perhaps the most devastating refutation of a magazine article I have ever read. In a calm, dispassionate manner, he laid waste to Mayer to a degree that in a more just world would end her career in journalism.

Hinderaker asked readers to leave comments at Mayer’s blog, begging her to respond, but of course she refused. Silence is golden when you’re a wealthy New Yorker from a famous banking family, writing for prestige media whose business model is to give an overpaid, underinformed audience only what it wants to hear.

New Cambridge Study Of Disinformation Is Full Of Disinformation

Posted on by

The latest effort of the academic-media complex to steer citizens in the direction that the powers-that-be prefer comes in the shape of “The Disinformation Age,” edited by Lance Bennett and Steven Livingston, Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Despite the prestigious publisher, a cursory glance is enough to tell me that this is the usual reverse-engineered history, by which I mean that the authors already know what their conclusions are going to be and are determined to rewrite history to fit them.

Just one small example. The book dwells on the influence of the Koch brothers on the establishment libertarian think-tanks like the Mercator Center and the Cato Institute, NEVER mentioning that that “beltway libertarianism” is only one form of right libertarianism, and not the most radical or convincing by any means. That brand of libertarianism is in fact constantly criticized by anarchist libertarians as well as by minarchists.

What’s more, the Cambridge book has the nerve to source the term “Kochtopus,” coined by the libertarians at Mises.org/Lew Rockwell, to the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, whose use of it came several years later and whose knowledge of the whole history of the Kochtopus is at second-hand, filtered through liberal-left tropes, and filled with suspicious gaps and elisions.

LRC: 2008 March 25 How Libertarian Is the Kochtopus

MindBodyPolitic.com:  2009, April 3,  The Libertarian Kochtopus

New Yorker: 2010:  The Koch Brothers’ Covert Ops

Mayer, a documentedly uninformed and lazy investigator got the whole Kochtopus network notion from bloggers who picked it up from the Ron Paul libertarians, which included me at the time, whom Matt Taibbi, a fellow left-lib journalist, was following, plagiarizing, and misrepresenting.

According to  this Cambridge disinfo guide, “Kochtopus” is the term Jane Mayer “likes to call the network”…. no mention of the piddling fact that dozens if not hundreds of people had analyzed the network and called it that long before she did, all of them with a world-view diametrically opposite hers.

The charge of plagiarism surfaced fairly soon, but the New Yorker did its own misleading pseudo- investigation and came to the unsurprising conclusion that there was no there there.

Not surprising, since Mayer is a prime product of the nepotistic and incestuous media culture.

InfluenceWatch tells us the following:

Mayer’s maternal grandfather was Allan Nevins, founder of American Heritage magazine and winner of two Pulitzer Prizes. Mayer’s great-great-grandfather was Emanuel Lehman, who founded the investment bank Lehman Brothers. [15]

That’s who decides what’s disinformation and what isn’t. Plagiarists and propagandists live in a bubble all their lives, sheltered from any necessity to defend their ideas honestly, and the result is false, empty history.

,

Controlled Opposition: Strawman Arguments Versus Reality

Posted on by

Matthew Ehret via LRC suggests that any attempt at questioning the kind of opposition figures that are thrown up is wrong, because if the opposition were always controlled, the globalists would have long ago achieved their goals and the situation is hopeless.

He may have qualified this opening remark on the rest of the show, which I didn’t watch, so possibly I have him wrong.

In any case, let me refute his argument for the strawman it is.

NO ONE is saying that EVERY opposition to the globalist project is run by the globalists themselves. That is so obviously a distortion of any reasonable understanding of the dialectic as to be a red herring.

Thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of people are wide awake and know what is going on. I draw that conclusion from looking at comment sections, usually pseudonymous, on the web. None of these people is controlled except to the degree they censor themselves, out of prudence or moderators and trolls distort and tar their comments.

HOWEVER, this opposition, while certainly visible at a lower level and indirectly influential, does not directly affect the power centers, whose operating assumptions have already factored in their discontent and channelled it into much more visible and directly influential TALKING HEADS, who are almost always vetted and in conformity to certain parameters, while allowed leeway to argue WITHIN those parameters.

What about patriotic and influential groups within the power network, such as, intelligence or military groups, who disclose or leak information to scuttle ongoing globalist plans?

OF COURSE these are real points of opposition. And the proof is that some globalist projects are at least temporarily scuttled.

Ehret argues that the globalists should already have accomplished their goals, if there was that much controlled opposition.

Here, I need to rub my eyes.

Where the devil does Matt Ehret live? When I read the papers, I see millions of people, even those with access to the net and the leisure to read, walking around with face masks, getting multiples injections, locking themselves up in their homes, announcing their pronouns, and displaying other signs of complete capitulation to the demands of the government. That looks like mission accomplished to me.

I see two sets of Orthodox Slavs busy inflicting tremendous damage to their motherland, to their churches, their people, their economies, and their future, while ENABLING and DISTRACTING from the globalist policies that have actually exported inflation and starvation around the world. I see NATO, which was irrelevant before, now thriving and expanding, and the military industrial awash with new money.

I see millions if not billions of small businesses shut down forever, ancient crafts destroyed for eternity and their owners expropriated and enslaved to debt,  over the last decade or so and hardly any articles in the media about this ongoing catastrophic destruction.

Instead, the leaders of resistance genuflect before the golden calf, beg forgiveness for trivial statements from idolators of the calf, and jail and silence its critics. And you tell me they are NOT leaders controlled by the system and I should SWALLOW their claims without any qualification?

If the globalists have postponed some of their plans, missed targeted outcomes here and there and do stand exposed for their machinations, this is NOT due to highly visible semi or fully controlled FIGURE HEADS, but due to tens of thousands of internet warriors, many long dead or disappeared who have spoken out truthfully over the decades  and indeed centuries [through republished samizdat texts revived by the web] to inform the world.  Whether they were at one time agents or compromised, whether they were bigots or racists, or jihadis, or Nazis, or Bolsheviks, Gentiles, Talmudists, snake charmers or wizards ultimately does not matter, if their material was truthful.

TRUTH percolates up from the ground. It grows like a mustard seed from the ground.

ASTRO TURF, NEEDING MONEY, BRANDING, NETWORKS, AND PARAMETERS, COMES FROM ABOVE.

 

 

 

 

 

Boris Johnson’s Ashkenazy & Donmeh Jewish Roots

Posted on by

The Jewish Chronicle:

[Boris] Johnson, on the other hand, not only has the virtue of being almost the polar opposite of Red Ken [Livingstone], but is also a trenchant supporter of Israel, an enemy of politically correct anti-Zionism and immensely proud of his own Jewish ancestry — the Henley MP’s great grandfather, Elias Avery Lowe, being the Moscow-born son of a shmutter merchant. “I feel Jewish when I feel the Jewish people are threatened or under attack, that’s when it sort of comes out,” he declares. “When I suddenly get a whiff of antisemitism, it’s then that you feel angry and protective.”

Haaretz.com:

While Rachel, Boris and their two younger brothers have some Jewish ancestry on their mother’s side — their maternal great-grandfather, says Rachel, was a rabbi from Lithuania — their Jewish identity, inasmuch as they have or ever had one (Boris identifies as an Anglican) comes by way of their father, Stanley Johnson.

A non-Jew with royal British and Turkish heritage in his ancestral mix, Stanley, divorced from his children’s mother — the painter Charlotte Johnson — remarried a woman from a well-known Anglo-Jewish family: Jenny, the stepdaughter of philanthropist Zionist businessman Teddy Sieff, who had served as chairman of Marks and Spencer and once survived an assassination attempt by Ilich Ramirez Sanchez, better known as Carlos the Jackal.

Armenian Weekly.com:

Johnson’s royal British and Turkish heritage is described in an article about his great grandfather, Ali Kemal Bey, a Donmeh Jew.

In time, [Ali] Kemal developed an ‘Ottomanist’ ideology. He argued for a free and multicultural Ottoman Empire, united under a civic Ottoman identity rather than ethnic nationalism. He had been vocal about the Empire’s treatment of its minorities such as the Armenians. Kemal’s family wealth afforded him the luxuries of travel, and London quickly became a favorite destination. He met his first wife, a British woman named Winifred Brun in one such sojourn. By the time she died while giving birth in 1910 to Osman Kemal Wilfred Johnson—Boris Johnson’s grandfather (are you connecting the dots now?)—the situation in Kemal’s native Constantinople was changing rapidly.

Follow the Plan: Is Putin Doing A Trump?

Posted on by

As I posted before, I am not in a position to do much writing and can just post a few things.  But looking through my own research and back and forth about V. V. Putin, I have come to some hard conclusions and feel burdened to put them down.

Putin is “doing a Trump.”

He comes out of the same Russian Jewish Chabad matrix that Trump came from. He is as beholden to Chabad as Trump is.

That is their nexus, not some phony election-meddling charge.

Then again, like Trump, Putin is of Jewish descent, as has been believed for long. I thought these were just unproven rumors, but saw something more convincing recently.

Rabbi Yosef began by saying “according to the Jewish tradition, your leadership is decided by the kingdom of G-d, King of the world, and therefore we bless you: Blessed is the One who gave of His glory to flesh and blood.

Apparently, this manner of address to a national leader is reserved for Jewish leaders, not non-Jewish, who would have been referred to not as “flesh and blood,” but as creatures. It is of course possible that the reporting of the address is false and/or disinformation.

Putin supposedly is of peasant background, but the name itself is of a clan that has ties to European nobility, just as Trump and every other US president had.

That is the first issue, but for me it is by no means the important one.

It is Putin’s conduct of the war, the decision to intervene this year, rather than earlier, and his excessive deference to Israeli and Jewish sensibilities, that inclines me to think he is playing a deep game.

Unlike Trump, who I believe was played, Putin may be more sagacious and doing some of the playing himself.

Trump’s followers, or disinformation artists posing as followers were always chanting “follow trust the plan” and claiming Trump was playing 5th dimensional chess against his dimwit opponents. Each time he blundered or was caught out, they doubled up on the support. In Putin’s case too all we hear from staunch supporters is “everything is going according to the plan.”

Doesn’t the similarity of the words ring a bell?

The latest ambiguous and unnecessary “apology,” although likely spun that way by Israel, was left uncorrected by Mr. Putin.

I do believe that Putin will proceed against Israel in due course, driving Jewish Americans and many Israelis out of their countries, perhaps to Ukraine, which is now rapidly emptying of its native population.

Perhaps that was the reasoning all along, I cannot help but think.

I have never subscribed to the belief that Russia is at the head of some kind of global “resistance” to colonialism or imperialism.

The creation of an opposition to the American led West was always part of the globalist project. However, I had hopes that Putin was indeed acting in the best interests of his country and faith and was sincere in the counterpoint he offered to Western hegemony.  I am not so sure now.

Are Orthodox Slavs in Ukraine and Russia best served by this war?  Was there no other way?

I hope I am wrong but I wonder if this “resistance” is only an exercize in revealing to the powers that be where each person’s sympathies lie. Just as January 6, which Trump encouraged, swept thousands of Trump followers into the government’s net, this Special Military Operation may have helped to reveal those most antagonistic to  the globalist regime in the West and expose them to government retribution, via the DHS.

I supported Donald Trump after he was elected [not before], because his rhetorical assault on the globalist powers was invigorating and useful and he did do a number of good things in office, although many of them were later reversed by executive order by Biden.

I still think Trump was the best on offer and the best we have had in a long time.

In that sense , I also appreciate V. V. Putin.

But that said, there are just too many things amiss with this war for me to be sanguine that all is as it seems.

 

Freud’s Seduction “Theory” And His Grandson’s Rape Practice

Posted on by

From Independent.ie:

One hundred and thirty years ago Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, presented his “seduction theory” at a major forum in Vienna. His idea was that most neuroses – female neuroses particularly – could be traced back to repressed memories of sexual interference on the part of fathers. The proposition was met with widespread outrage – the idea that fathers would sexually molest their daughters was shocking at the time – and Freud later shifted away from it, instead claiming that most of the memories of abuse, which he heard from patients, were false, with their subconscious unable to discern between fantasy and reality. Freud believed that Victorian men should be allowed indulge in forbidden sex (indeed he thought that incest was important to civilisation) with one caveat: that it must be “discreet”.

It was a word, with all of its dark undertones, that seemed to echo down the ages this week with the revelation that Clement Freud, grandson of Sigmund, had sexually abused girls, including one whom he brought up as a daughter. Sylvia Woosley said Freud befriended her family in 1948, when he was working at a hotel in the South of France, and started abusing her when she was 10. Another woman told ITV that Freud started abusing her in the 1970s, when she was 11, and eventually raped her when she was 18, by which time he was a Liberal MP.

The rape was so violent and brutal she said, that she bled for a week afterward. It has been suggested that there may be more revelations and more victims still to tell their stories. The allegations are being investigated by British police and in the meantime have caused enormous embarrassment to one of the most storied families in Britain. Whether art, media, politics, fashion or high finance, the Freuds have their fingers in every pie.