A circular from Occupy Building 7:
On Saturday November 19 and Sunday November 20, we will march from Liberty Plaza to Building 7 and occupy the park in front of Building 7 until nightfall. We hope this will mark the beginning of a sustained Occupy Building 7 movement that will grow and finally bring meaningful attention to the obvious demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 and the dire need for a new 9/11
investigation. ……..OccupyBuilding7.org
Comment
My fear is that the natural desire to find out what really happened on 9-11 might be in the process of being co-opted. A new investigation, for example, might end up like the show trial that featured a convenient patsy, a mid-level employee of Goldman Sachs, Fabrice Toure, while overlooking the serious criminal allegations against the firm.
Similarly, a “new” investigation might only subject us to the next layer of disinformation that suits whatever is currently on the agenda of the globalists. It is a dance of the seven veils and we are nowhere near the raw booty. My guess is, with the Middle East in uproar, the powers that be might well decide to show a bit of skin to distract us, at this point. A Copperfield thigh flash (thank you, Deep Capture) that will show us Saudi complicity or Iranian or Pakistani, but not CIA or MI6 or Mossad. That would of course provide ammunition for further war.
The Occupy Wall Street movement seems to have attracted a lot of top-down input despite its obviously populist strains. So too the grass roots movement for 9-11 Truth might be in the process of being co-opted. “9-11 Truth” might end up providing more justifications for war, while at the same time being permanently discredited and silenced.
After all, if the connections of Pakistani intelligence or Saudi intelligence to 9-11 are revealed, but not those of British or American or Israeli intelligence, where does the 9-11 movement go from there? Will it not be caught between a rock (more justification for war, if it accepts flawed findings once again) and a hard place (allegations of anti-Semitism, if it refuses to accept them)?