“There are no “Blue” states, only blue cities. The rural and much of the suburban population in both “Blue” and “Red” states consists of net payers of taxes; what Steven Malanga of the Manhattan Institute properly calls the “tax eater sector” is overwhelmingly an urban phenomenon (and former “community organizer” Barack Obama is a pure product of the urban tax parasite constituency Malanga describes).What this means, of course, is that the schism between urban tax-eaters and rural/suburban tax victims will grow steadily wider until something – either the present political/economic system, or the people ruled by it – collapses altogether.
With the government now little more than a full-service plundering arm of Wall Street, now is the best time for states to withdraw from the corporatist unitary state and repudiate its system of taxation, fiat money, inflation, and debt.
Unfortunately, if there is one thing that both Red State national socialists and Blue State socialist nationalists enjoy more than hating and baiting each other, it’s nurturing the prospect of ruling the other side – and this simply can’t be done if the “other side” if permitted the option of exercising the right to peaceful secession.
So the exercise in mutual self-oppression continues, and the “New Unhappy Lords” ruling from behind the scenes continue to make us poorer and less free….”
1. With the creation of the federal monopoly on money, the US government became the plundering arm of the investment banking industry (aka “Wall Street”) in 1787 via a Constitutional Convention that was PACKED (in the political sense) with banking officials and their friends and investors (like Benjamin Franklin). (“A Republic…if you can keep it!” my butt: the US was an oligarchy from the word “We”.)
2. A “Right to Life” implies a “right” of free access to land, otherwise capital-rich people could buy up all the land and extort cheap labor from everybody else. Oh wait, that’s exactly what happened.
3. Since governments are the mechanism by which land is privatized, governments may be considered to owe compensation to everyone whose right of “free access to land” they have impaired. (That would be everyone, since even current property owners have to pay – and continue paying – for “their” land.)
4. If governments were forced (or, better yet, volunteered)to pay such compensation, there would be no “tax eaters” and there would be no need for socialist economic redistribution schemes, and the cost of labor would be a heck of a lot higher and there would be more use of cybernation and the credit crisis would be solved and we could get rid of all the socialist schemes that only serve to keep the sheep tranquil while they are getting drilled from behind.
and you have nothing to say about any of that?