From Wikipedia, a note on Discordianism:
“Here follows some psycho-metaphysics.If you are not hot for philosophy, best just to skip it.The Aneristic Principle is that of apparent order; the Eristic Principle is that of apparent disorder. Both order and disorder are man made concepts and are artificial divisions of pure chaos, which is a level deeper than is the level of distinction making.
With our concept-making apparatus called “the brain” we look at reality through the ideas-about-reality which our cultures give us.
The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled “reality” and unenlightened people are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other cultures, see “reality” differently.
It is only the ideas-about-reality which differ. Real (capital-T) True reality is a level deeper than is the level of concept.
We look at the world through windows on which have been drawn grids (concepts). Different philosophies use different grids. A culture is a group of people with rather similar grids. Through a window we view chaos, and relate it to the points on our grid, and thereby understand it. The order is in the grid. That is the Aneristic Principle.
Western philosophy is traditionally concerned with contrasting one grid with another grid, and amending grids in hopes of finding a perfect one that will account for all reality and will, hence, (say unenlightened westerners) be True. This is illusory; it is what we Erisians call the Aneristic Illusion. Some grids can be more useful than others, some more beautiful than others, some more pleasant than others, etc., but none can be more True than any other.
Disorder is simply unrelated information viewed through some particular grid. But, like “relation”, no-relation is a concept. Male, like female, is an idea about sex. To say that male-ness is “absence of female-ness”, or vice versa, is a matter of definition and metaphysically arbitrary. The artificial concept of no-relation is the Eristic Principle.
The belief that “order is true” and disorder is false or somehow wrong, is the Aneristic Illusion. To say the same of disorder, is the Eristic Illusion.
The point is that (little-t) truth is a matter of definition relative to the grid one is using at the moment, and that (capital-T) Truth, metaphysical reality, is irrelevant to grids entirely. Pick a grid, and through it some chaos appears ordered and some appears disordered. Pick another grid, and the same chaos will appear differently ordered and disordered.
Reality is the original Rorschach. Verily! So much for all that.
—Malaclypse the Younger, Principia Discordia, Pages 00049–00050
And this from the Principia Discordia‘s very beginning, a Discordian koan:
Greater Poop: Is Eris true?Malaclypse the Younger: Everything is true.GP: Even false things?
M2: Even false things are true.
GP: How can that be?
M2: I don’t know man, I didn’t do it.”
My Comment:
Honestly, this exchange is an answer to a question most people never ask. They don’t ask it because, with the common sense that often eludes intellectuals, they know that “reality” cannot be confused with “language about reality.”
And that’s why I have always been bored with philosophy. Unless it analyzes how language performs certain tasks (in rhetoric and literature)…
Or unless it teaches techniques to transform yourself..or reality.
And then it’s not philosophy. It’s what we call religion… or magick.
That reminds me how I once naively asked a professor in graduate school why Wittgenstein was considered so important. He said it was because he had demonstrated that much of philosophy was actually analysis of language and nothing more. I laughed and blurted out – whoever thought it was anything else? I saw from his face that this had hit a sore spot. No academic of his stature could ever accept that he’d swallowed something an ordinary person had been able to see through.
“The essential fact is simply that all the pictures which science now draws of nature, and which alone seem capable of according with observational fact, are mathematical pictures. . . . They are nothing more than pictures–fictions if you like, if by fiction you mean that science is not yet in contact with ultimate reality. Many would hold that, from the broad philosophical standpoint, the outstanding achievement of twentieth-century physics is not the theory of relativity with its welding together of space and time, or the theory of quanta with its present apparent negation of the laws of causation, or the dissection of the atom with the resultant discovery that things are not what they seem; it is the general recognition that we are not yet in contact with ultimate reality. We are still imprisoned in our cave, with our backs to the light, and can only watch the shadows on the wall.” – Sir James Jeans
This post about Discordianism made me think of this quote I read in the book Quantum Questions. It may not be exactly what the post was referring to, but I believe it deals with the same concept of “grids” and how they’re irrelevant to (capital-T) Truth, ultimate reality.
For the record, I don’t completely agree that we are not yet in contact with ultimate reality, because I believe everything, no matter how infinitesimal, is a part of whatever (capital-T) Truth is. With that said, I understand what he was saying.
Love your blog, Lila.