Mark Mitchell at Deep Capture ventures into controversial theorizing:

“After Ptech was raided, a woman named Indira Singh went on a mission, ostensibly seeking to “expose” Ptech by giving interviews to dozens of journalists. Singh, who said she was a former employee of JP Morgan, focused her allegations on Ptech’s acquisition of data from the big banks, saying that Ptech had something to do with the collapse of Enron in November 2001, shortly after the Al Qaeda attacks of September 11.

But at the same time, Ms. Singh seemed to go to lengths to discredit herself by suggesting that Ptech was, in fact, a front for the CIA, that it was somehow involved with Skull and Bones and child sex parties, and that it was tied in with a CIA plot to demolish the World Trade Center and wipe out the financial markets – all part of a wide-ranging, top-secret CIA scheme to create a shadow government that would rule the world.

Indira Singh’s eccentric notions have inundated the internet, so that anyone doing a quick search on the Ptech case would quickly conclude that all people who believe that Ptech gained access to sensitive financial data must necessarily be psychotics. Thus, Indira Singh effectively discouraged mainstream journalists and politicians from continuing to investigate the Ptech scandal.

Which is interesting, because Indira Singh had actually worked for the SAAR Network of terrorist financiers. She had been a consultant to Mr. Mirza, bag-man to “Specially Designated Global Terrorist” Yasin al Qadi. So it is possible that she had some motivation for scaring people away from telling the truth about Ptech, lest they be seen as allying themselves with people who believed that the CIA was trying to take over the world.

Either that, or she was merely echoing perceptions that are common in jihadi circles.

In any case, most people in positions of authority did not seem keen to address the Ptech scandal. After a brief flurry of media stories, nobody (other than the 9-11 Truth crowd) paid much attention to it.”