Update:

Julian Assange has shown up at the protests at the London Stock Exchange. More theater. Ayatollah Khameini (whom many libertarians consider part of the globalist crowd) has claimed it will topple capitalism (talk about seeding memes).

Hate to do the color-coding of the optics of this public spectacle here, but I couldn’t help noticing that most (not all) of the OWS protests in New York seemed to be white. And the names of all the protests in London sound like the folks would be white.

But when they were arresting insider traders all this while, so many of those faces turned out to be, you know, Sri Lankans, various Chinese and Middle-Eastern folks and other non-whites, although most people know that most of Wall Street is….. um…. well….. not to put too fine a point on it….. white.

Notice those nationalities I mentioned – Chinese, Middle Eastern, and Sri Lankans – are in the cross-hairs of both the nationalist imperialists and the “anti-empire” transnationalists (via International Criminal Court and human rights abuses, enter Francis Boyle and Bruce Fein).

Empire and anti-empire both co-opted by the Anglo-Zio elites.

So do you get the subtle message being sent that crimes when they are committed are largely by all those non-whites?

But when there is global resistance, truth-telling, and salvation of the masses, then it’s always… um…. well…… not to put too fine a point on it…..white.

Such is the language of empire, to those of us who have been listening to its subtexts for a lifetime.

POST

The New York Times has a piece that references someone else who supports OccupyWallStreet, John Paulson, a speculator who seems to have ties to the banking mafia behind the 2008 market collapse. Interesting. Soros supports OWS, which,  as I have already noted, is going out of its way to instill fear that it is anti-middle class, not just against financial corruption or “the rich”.

Correction: I incorrectly included John Paulson, the speculator, in this group, because I misread what he said. Apparently, he is completely AGAINST OccupyWallStreet.  Well, that is good news.  Maybe, he’s aware of how dangerous this could be.  However, Jim Chanos, apparently has lent support to it].

Now why would they do that? Why would they hold up signs against “white collars”, make explicit references to the middle-class as “contributing nothing”? How does that help them? Why is it that student loans are such a big part of the protests, according to some? What is the common thread?

The explanation that fits all these facts is that this is a deliberate attempt by the powers-that-be, the very same people who caused the collapse, to create a fake opposition that deliberately provokes the middle-class libertarians who form the bulk of Paul supporters and anti-Fed activists, who really do know where the problem lies. By doing so, it steals their following and muddies their message.  Thus the focus on student loans hints that the target audience of this theater is NOT the working classes all over the world, but the western middle class, which is being directed to think along certain lines.

By antagonizing that class, the movement corners popular anger, claims the mantle of anarchist from anti-state anarchists,  increases support for a global regulatory regime and central control, while also staying on top of all real anarchist opposition and discrediting it.

The New York Times:

“Generally, bankers dismiss the protesters as gullible and unsophisticated. Not many are willing to say this out loud, for fear of drawing public ire — or the masses to their doorsteps. “Anybody who dismisses them publicly is putting a bull’s-eye on their back,” the hedge fund manager said.
I’ll come back to this and add some links so you’ll see what I’m saying.