Business Insider has run an article claiming that Peter Schiff, and by extension, all libertarians who believe in freedom of association, are actually covert (and not so covert) racists. The claim is they want to avoid hiring minorities, and are using “libertarianism” as a cover for that.

Well, freedom of association is not a cover for anything.  It is a cardinal principle of liberty.  Peter Schiff can and should be able to hire whom he wants in his private business.

But while Peter might not be a racist, he is almost certainly a good German..that is to say, a good Zionist. Which, these days, is also a good American. And latterly even a good Indian.

Like most good Americans, most good Israelis, and even quite a few good Indians, he sees the Anglo-Israeli “lebensraum” as legitimate, justified, and extending to other people’s property.  Indeed, everywhere. Full spectrum lebensraum.

What is the sound of a property right, if it is bull-dozed away in the night?

Can you hear it? Can you defend it?

If you don’t, doesn’t that make you a good Zionist? And isn’t a good Zionist no different from a good German?

What were the Germans doing except “getting what they had been denied before” ? Room to live. Even if the room was already occupied. Even if it meant driving the occupants into the streets. Or killing them. Or robbing them.

What are the property rights of Palestinians? How many Muslim lives does it take to keep Christendom guilt-free of its own Judenhass?

And should the rest of us, whose consciences aren’t burdened by any such guilt, make sure that no future age will judge us guilty likewise