So here we have the principals:

Sangeeta Richard, a Syrian

(Correction: I went back and checked and I cannot find evidence that she was a Syrian Christian. She is from Kerala and Christians there can be either Syrian Christian, Latin Christian or CSI).

the Kerala Christian maid whose in-laws once worked for a senior US diplomat – that would likely be Wayne May, who is a member of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, which is the security and law enforcement arm of the US Department of State.

Let that sink it.

Sangeeta Richard’s immediate family was working for the USD security detail in India (and other members were working for the US embassy) when SHE APPROACHED Khobragade to get a job in 2012.

It was she who REQUESTED THAT MONEY BE DEPOSITED IN INDIA, which is the reason the second contract was drawn up.

Devyani K. drew it up at Sangeeta’s request.

Sangeeta had always wanted to emigrate to the US. That is documented.

Sangeeta [at least, from the diary that was published] was just fine with her work at the Khobragade’s.

Then,  Wayne May, colluding with officials of the State Dept (of which he is a part) and with lawyers from Safe-Horizon (which is funded by the US government and US corporations) concocted a case that turned the investigation against Khobragade.

The Indian court that looked into the charges of extortion was ignored and the maid was “evacuated” out of India,  fraudulently using Indian tax law exemptions intended for diplomats.

Meanwhile, Preet Bharara, also a part of the Democrat political machinery and a politically ambitious “fixer” who has ignored the serious crimes of the big banks in favor of low-hanging dark-skinned fruit (Rajat Gupta, for sure; Matthew Martoma, quite likely), gets in on the act.

This is clear from his outrageous use of the word “evacuate” to describe the plot to spirit Sangeeta out of India.

Then, there’s the illegality of the arrest, first, because it turns out that DK actually had full immunity at the time;

second, because diplomatic protocol under the Vienna Convention argues against it;

third, because if the contract shown to the Visa office was a fraud, the visa office is fully complicit in the fraud, since it knows the salaries of Indian diplomats and Indian maids and has OK’d many such contracts;

and fourth, because under UN terms, maids traveling on official passports given by lawful governments cannot by definition be trafficked.

The only unusual aspect of the matter was the second contract, which was drawn up expressly at the instigation of the maid, which, in the circumstances, makes the whole affair a text-book entrapment.

If we add to all this, the simultaneous tour of sensitive areas in India by Safe-Horizon’s chief; her liaising with media in those same sensitive regions; and the USG’s advocacy of software -sharing with India, it  is an easy guess that the whole Khobragade scandal was planned to coincide with the high-profile corporate “modern slavery” campaign, yet another episode in the ongoing Rothschild/Soros-funded  “color revolution” in India.