Knickerless schticks – also known as bare-a**ed lies – are all over the Internet.

One such cess-pool of Zionist disinformation, posing as the living waters of Christian truth-telling is the subject/target of the following revealing comments at a site called  the Phora, of which I know nothing except that on this occasion at least they’ve struck a home-run of epic proportions.

Be warned, the sentiments and language below are frank and non-PC and I do not subscribe to all of them.

I do not consider Jews as a people  or culture “demonic,” only excessively tribal and brain-washed (a historical contingency, I suppose);

I dislike the use of the word “n**” (first time I’ve heard it, but I can guess its meaning), although I agree with the larger argument being made;

and I think “whites”  are certainly biologically viable….as long they part from the (white) Jewish ruling class’s party line and start treating non-whites as fellow-sufferers from the malady of oligarchy-gone-mad rather than untermenschen in a melanin-free gulag ruled by a consortium of corporations, regional governments, and private police.

TAC refers to The American Conservative, a paleo-conservative magazine.

07-19-2006, 12:56 PM

The article Fade posted, by n**-hatin’ uber Zionist Nicholas Stix, is in actuality little more than a jig of glee danced by someone for whom Priority One is hands off Israel.

The irony is that this was TAC’s modus operandi. By never wishing to blow what it saw as its opportunity to shape policy from the inside, TAC took great pains to phrase its criticism of Israel as criticism of Israel, and in the gentlest and most reasonable of language…….

…The run of the magazine amounted to a few years’ worth of mild chiding of people already firmly in control of government – people who never considered the magazine’s staff to be any better than Holocaust-denying white trash to begin with.Taki and Buchanan’s only hope would’ve been to step up their harshness exponentially….but they didn’t want to risk the hollers of anti-Semite! and Nazi! that waking up America would have certainly entailed. Too bad. 

Of course, to Stix and those of his genre, any criticism at all was tantamount to little more than “Die Juden, er, Neocons, sind unser Unglueck!”….although interestingly enough, anything short of printing boat tickets back to Africa was equivalent to TAC caving in on race without even putting up a fight.

That’s Zionist “realism” for you:

TAC failed because it was a national-affairs magazine that dealt with the ever-widening Middle East firestorm threatening to explode into WW3, instead of dealing sensibly with the issue of Leroy, his violent demeanor, and the need for a free society to sterilize him.

Buchanan has a scathing new article up about Israel.

Yes, of course he does!….now, a day late and dollar short, with his magazine deader than vaudeville and the foreign-policy dominoes already falling one after the other!

 

WFHermans

07-19-2006, 02:20 PM

Pat’s latest article:Armistice in the Culture War?
By Patrick J. Buchanan

States’ rights show the way

Has anyone bothered with a direct correspondence with this man? Shall we passively sit around waiting for him to “get racial”? Fade?

wintermute

07-19-2006, 03:41 PM

QUOTE: Of course, to Stix and those of his genre, any criticism at all was tantamount to little more than “Die Juden, er, Neocons, sindunser Unglueck!”….although interestingly enough, anything short of printing boat tickets back to Africa was equivalent to TAC caving in on race without even putting up a fight. END QUOTE

Mr. Stix (not his Christian name, I assume) should probably be seeking employment at American Renaissance, fomenting Race War between Whites, Blacks, and Mexicans while denying or distorting any information that links our Elder Brothers in Faith and the upcoming WWIII (their title, not mine).As for the ‘neocon’ business – what cowardice that was! Is Judith Miller, who ran the WMD stories on the front page of the NYT, a ‘neocon’? No. She’s not a liberal, either, though she poses as one: the whole NYT ‘poses’ as a liberal publication. But when both parties: the Sulzbergers, Rosental, and Miller, were faced with the difficult journalistic decision – tell the truth or betray America to Jewish interests – they didn’t even blink.White House falsified documents don’t have any impression on world politics unless papers of record disseminate them to the world. The whole war on Iraq was NOT a “Neocon” thing – it was a Jewish thing, with Jews on both sides of the ideological line working together to bring the highest quality disinformation to the goyim.

Now it seems that the paper trail leads to Michael Ledeen. What makes me want to give up is, people will still insist that this has something to do with the fact that he is either a rightist, a leftist, a libertarian, an advocate for democracy, or some other mask in his traveling trunk. ……..

[Lila: This is an excessive generalization, but not entirely unwarranted by the facts, which demonstrate Jewish self-interest behind practically every position taken by major Jewish media figures.]

“Ledeen concocts it, The “White House” (Wolfowtiz, Perle, Frum, Feith) sells it to the President, the New York Times broadcasts it to the news, and Sulla (or those grown from the same vat, i.e. half our population) enters into a war frenzy, hysterically grasping the latest set of Jewish lies and heaping volcanic scorn on any who would dare question.

…Whites: probably not biologically viable.”