The mainstream media is using the cash starvation of India to tom-tom digital payment platforms, ranging from Visa and Master card, Amazon, Flipkart, and Alibaba, to Paytm, Paylatr and a host of similar ventures.
Behind them are globalist/intel-subservient multinationals like Alibaba (Paytm) and Blackrock (Paylatr).
The same goes for digital currency like Bitcoin, which, as I’ve blogged over and over, is an intelligence-operation, with the signature of the NWO all over it.
So what does the aam admi in India do?
Here are my proposals, shorn of any detail that would allow the government to queer them in advance:
- Minimize or even end your use of Visa and Master card as soon as possible. Let these corporations feel the same pain felt by millions of small businesses destroyed by the stooge of the multinationals.
- Consider filing suit against any of the major corporations that have profited from this scheme. Research and document any ties they have to the NGOs (like Arthkranthi) that proposed the cash ban to Modi. Consider actions against such NGOs. Modi is only a useful tool. Making Modi alone the target of popular outrage (as the CIA-backed outfit Avaaz does) is a limited hang-out option.
- Voice your outrage openly and educate as many people as you can.
- Oppose all of Modi’s other digital surveillance projects, from his diabolical DNA bank and central monitoring system to his proposal to link aadhar cards and smart phones via e-wallets.
- Avoid getting an Aadhar card yourself. If you have to, consider multiplying and confusing your data so as to render it useless. I will leave you to figure out what that means. In that spirit, use every loophole you can to get out of the government’s surveillance data-base…..but don’t blog your methods, lest the authorities penalize you and end the loop-hole.
Talking of Avaaz. I think that Avaaz is a leftist front to aid in the destruction of nation states. I have just put up a petition on Avaaz for Donald Trump to ban the site! Please sign and share: https://avaaz.org/en/petition/Donald_Trump_Shut_Down_Avaaz/
Avaaz is one of those change agents in foreign countries sponsored by the left wing of the Democrat party. They are often on top of stories like this but note that they insist that all opposition to Modi coalesce. Why? Why should all opposition always proceed under one banner, for example, by branding it with the name OCCUPY?
If all coalesce, then the sins of one faction will discredit the resistance from another faction. I personally prefer to “go your own way”. This makes the whole resistance unpredictable, spontaneous, and incapable of co-option.
Yes Lila, there is a constructive theory behind chaos and anarchy. I once read a manual on decentralized-leaderless resistance and if I remember its name, I’ll let you have it. But I don’t believe it is useful. As the Urdu couplet demonstrates, mauj hai darya mein, bairoon-e-darya kuch nahin. To make a tidal wave of resistance that is not mob resistance, you need coming together. Not necessarily under one banner, put certainly in a common cause against common enemy that is coordinated and not merely random Brownian movements — no amount of Brownian motion can control and redirect the flow of river from anyplace else but downstream. What you describe can be made effective as very very local phenomenon perhaps, not global. I don’t know — am no expert, just saying. thanks. zahir
No, no. I am not saying we shouldn’t come together. Obviously, I think we should or I wouldn’t be quoting leftists and communists like Mamata Banerjee regarding Modi.
But I don’t think we should be all gathered onto one platform in the way the Occupy movement suggests. Because invariably that platform will have an agenda set by the leaders that might have nothing to do with the grass-roots. In some ways, I think what I am saying is already proven by the existence of India. It is kind of an ungovernable country because everyone goes their own way. This has its bad points but it also has its good. The problem is that because of the net and social media, a top-down strait-jacket has been placed over the media and over intellectual discourse that is restraining this chaotic character and forcing it into preplanned channels. Not sure if I am being clear.