Rahul Gandhi has come out with the revelations he’s been promising for a few days – evidence that Modi was bribed in his Gujarat days by the now-jailed owner of the Sahara group conglomerate.
Glancing at Sahara’s resume, I was struck by this piece at Crain’s that suggests that Sahara works closely with and is beholden to the powers-that-be:
Next month’s auction for the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan was canceled after the holders of the mortgage reached a deal to give the borrowers more time to sell the property and pay back the loan, said a person with knowledge of the matter.
The hotel’s ownership has been in limbo for two years. Billionaire brothers David and Simon Reuben [Lila: Iraqi Jews born in India] hold the mortgage on the five-star hotel and had scheduled a foreclosure auction for April 26, according to the person, who asked not to be named because the deal is private. The Reubens bought the loan from Bank of China Ltd. after a default by the property’s current majority owner, Sahara India Pariwar, last year. Sahara is controlled by Subrata Roy, who was imprisoned in India in early 2014 for defrauding investors.
A spokesman for the Reuben brothers didn’t immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment.
The chateau-like Plaza, located at the corner of Fifth Avenue and Central Park South, has changed owners many times over its 109-year history. Presidential candidate Donald Trump bought the Plaza in 1988 and married his second wife, Marla Maples, there. Trump sold it to a group including Prince Alwaleed bin-Talal of Saudi Arabia, who then sold it to Israel’s Elad Group, which converted some of the hotel rooms to condominiums. Bin-Talal retains a minority stake in the Plaza, as does an entity tied to hotelier Sant Singh Chatwal.
For sale were the Plaza’s hotel rooms, its restaurants and retail space, according to the person with knowledge of the matter. It was to be sold in a package with the Dream Downtown hotel, a trendy property in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood that is located one block from the elevated High Line park, the person said.
The two hotels serve as collateral for the Bank of China loan and are cross-collateralized with the Grosvenor House hotel in London. The Dream hotel is owned by Sahara’s Roy and Chatwal. The combined mortgages for the New York properties total about $500 million, the person with knowledge of the matter said.”
So who is Sant Singh Chatwal? The Sikhs have been working closely with the NWO elites and it is a religion with a large number of Jewish (in the modern ethnic sense) converts.
Chatwal’s position as a major donor to Ms. Clinton, along with Lyn Forester de Rothschild, is depicted at Muckety.com.
The Reuben brothers come from the immensely powerful Iraqi Jewish family of the Sassoons, long-term associates of the Rothschilds.
Like Rothschild-front Khodorkovsky, the Reubens got rich buying Russian public assets at auction during the shock-therapy administered in that country under Yeltsin, until Vladimir Putin came into power:
A profile of the two in The Guardian notes that what paid off for them was the entry into Russia when other investors were wary of doing anything in the post-Soviet, “chaotic capitalist” market. Transworld bought large chunks of the privatised Russian aluminium sector but had to sell it off for 300 million pounds to oil giant Sibneft in 2000 as the business climate in the country turned hostile for them under Vladmir Putin. “Transworld enjoyed 7 percent market share in the global aluminium market.”
According to the piece from which the above is excerpted, the brothers have ties to the Russian Mafia, which, as noted elsewhere on this blog, works with the globalist elites.
All this, including the presence of Prince Alwaleed bin Talal and Donald Trump, in the mix, makes it certain that Sahara was an agent or front for Rothschild interests in the first place.
Which means Modi, Sahara’s bribed errand boy, is nothing more than their agent too.
Which is why Rahul Gandhi made mention of the 99 percent and the 1 percent in his diatribes.
On the face of it, this was a denunciation of the ruling elites of the NWO.
But Gandhi’s language betrays him as controlled opposition.
The 99 and the 1 percent is a Kabbalistic meme used by the powers-that-be to frame the debate about globalism in terms of inequality, about the rich versus the poor.
But inequality in itself is not the problem.
It is, at its worst, a symptom.
The problem is totalitarianism, the end to which the centralization of finance tends.
The problem is central banks and the fiat money system and their corrosive effect on every aspect of life.
Lila, hi. First, let me say that your internet research skills are awesome. Thank you for your labors. As I plough through the material you have uncovered, I am filled with a strange angst. Foreboding? Harken back to Malthus, and to Kissinger, with intermediate hops through various Fabian philosophers like Bertrand Russell in Impact of Science on Society, all speaking to the idea of food as a weapon, food controlled genocide.
In the United States National Security Strategy Memorandum NSSM 200, Henry Kissinger in 1974, under the subheading “An Alternative View”, outlined these ideas:
begin excerpt
* Should the U.S. make an all out commitment to major limitation of world population with all the financial and international as well as domestic political costs that would entail?
* On what basis should such food resources then be provided? Would food be considered an instrument of national power? Will we be forced to make choices as to whom we can reasonably assist, and if so, should population efforts be a criterion for such assistance?
* Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?
* Should the U.S. seek to change its own food consumption patterns toward more efficient uses of protein?
* Are mandatory population control measures appropriate for the U.S. and/or for others?
end excerpt
Okay, so how do we get food? Money.
What appears to be transpiring in India, apart from everything else you have written, I fear is an experiment. A social experiment of Malthusian proportions. India, and SE Asia in what was previously the subcontinent (such a large landmass that it was said to be subcontinent) has the largest mass of humanity comprising of what the ubermensch think are “useless eaters”. Robert Strange McNamara, who preceded Kissinger in war-mongering, once he became the head of the World Bank after leaving office as the United States Sec. of Defence under Kennedy and Johnson, stated the following to the assembled banksters at a private meeting:
begin quote
“It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.” October 2, 1970 (quoted by Antony Sutton in ‘Trilaterals over America’, pg. 79)
end quote
And the financial oligarchy, of which both were, and Kissinger still is, a part, visibly led in the United States by David Rockefeller (and in Europe by the same banksters clique the most publicly prominent member of which is the House of Rothschild, but is just the tip of the iceberg as the majority leaders of this cabal prefer to remain in the shadows), who stated the following at a UN Ambassador’s Dinner (I transcribed the following from the video of his speech available on youtube):
begin quote
“Ironically however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which raise the spectre of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health, has caused the world’s infant mortality rate to decline by 60 percent over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world’s average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 1950s to 63 years today. This is a development which as individuals we can only applaud. However the result of these positive measures is that the world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6 billion people, and can exceed easily 8 billion by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary eco-systems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world’s supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern. And the toxic by products of widespread industrialization and increased atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth over consumption of resources and environmental degradation, prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened.”
end quote
So, I think something like that may be going on here as an experiment. You can see that resistance solutions (some that you outlined) and alternate means such as barter, do not really work. Food – is the ultimate weapon. Like air, that we all have to breathe, we all have to eat. Two days without food, seven days without food…. you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to see what can happen.
Look at barter, that only works when you want something that I have and you can give me something that I want. Take for instance the Banarsee sarees example you noted, of a cottage industry on the brink for the want of cash. Which store is going to give them food for sarees? Barter, an idea of a primitive existence, when everyone was a producer of life’s essentials. Not for sarees.
Any way, I think, among things, people’s mass reactions is being studied. Just like during the Invasion from Mars depiciton by Orson Wells in New York that led to mass panic and exodus by New Yorkers who thought tha the play being broadcast was actually news broadcast. Later, much later, I think it was decades later, that it was revealed that it was an exercise funded and monitored by the Rockefeller Foundation to study mass panic.
Anyway, I hope I am wrong.
I am sorry to hear you speak of your ageing parents, and of the people of India, suffering this social experiment. If it succeeds, by whatever metric the oligarchy has in mind, it will be reproduced throughout the subcontinent, Africa, Indonesia, in fact, in all of the 13 countries in the list of LDU (Least Developed Nations) noted in NSSM-200 with large populations and large birth-rates who are the first target of population reduction. Coupled to biowarfare, and who knows what’s in the vaccines such that in two or three generation, the offspring will be increasing sterile (it has already been tested on mice and I think the patent for the gene that causes this was first developed by a company with name that ryhmes with “cybite” but I can’t recall it now, and it was licensed by the combine of big-pharma and big-agri and I forget which companies exactly — but you can find it with your research skills on the web) population of earth has to be reduced.
I don’t really know how this can be resisted — I mean how food as weapon can be resisted. All the other fears you have noted are of course right on.
Take care,
with sympathies,
zahir ebrahim
project humanbeingsfirst.org
Hi Zahir,
I am glad I was able to provide the concrete details that you rightly asked for when I first diagnosed this whole cash ban as a Rothschild-engineered scam. One can suspect but it is useful to find the actual documented ties. Of course, the Sahara details are still before the Supreme Court in India and Rahul Gandhi himself is named in another alleged scam – the Agusta-Westland deal, thereby tarnishing the credibility of both accuser and accusation…which might be the point. Nonetheless, it is a very serious charge, the evidence is not manufactured or trivial, and there are names and dates for reportedly 9 times that Modi was directly bribed by Sahara.
On your point about food, well, I think urban farming on some scale is the way to go. I see that that has begun in the US but is only in its very nascent stage in some major cities in India.
I truly am worried that this will become a Holodomor situation in India….or alternatively, that this will be all the proof necessary that we cannot live without big agribusinesses. The rapist will rape and then provide first aid to his victim, who has no option but to accept the “aid” of his attacker.
“On your point about food, well, I think urban farming on some scale is the way to go. I see that that has begun in the US but is only in its very nascent stage in some major cities in India.” — Lila, I believe that United Nations Agenda 21 controls that under the rubric of carbon footprint. You cannot grow in your frontyard/backyard. And I think you are correct that this is also convenient justification for big-agri and big-food. So no, I don’t think individual farmig is a solution either, becase it is alreadly legally co-opted and is now akin to “controlled substance” in Agenda 21.
Anyway, do you think my overall fears are justified?
Thanks. zahir.
I didn’t know that you cannot grow in your front or back yard. If that is the case, why is it that urban farming is possible in the US? Also community gardens and the like. I am actually planning on interspersing food crops into my back and front yard in an inobtrusive manner. Are you saying that runs afoul of the UN and exactly how does UN laws apply in my backyard?
It is coming Lila. UN Agenda 21 while a global plan is implemented locally. See Agenda 21 for dummies: http://print-humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/2013/03/agenda-21-for-dummies.html
What I have there is just the tip of the iceberg. Take a look at the video presentations.
It is being implemented in the developed West first, and by the evidence I have seen, on the American continent first, and in the US first and foremost. The map I have seen of what the US looks like bt 2050, if it comes to pass, and of course it may not, but that’s what they are trying to do unless people start resisting locally, the US will have vast majority of its spaces off limits to man. How much you can emit in carbon footprint, includes how much electricity you can consume (smart meters), how much emissions you can release in the air, and what I don’t understand myself is why limit what you can grow in your own front and back yards – because plants take in CO2 and turn it into O2 (if that realy was the concern in the first place, but it isn’t). But I have seen evidence that those trying to do it in some communities are being forced, coerced, in the name of food safety, community safety. Where did I see that? It may be in the video presentations, I forget.
How Agenda 21 relates to carbon foot-print, pls see:
http://humanbeingsfirst.blogspot.com/p/global-warming-climate-change-religion.html
I hope I am wrong Lila. There is more in the universe than the plans of mice and men.
zahir.
I have blogged about Agenda 21, but didn’t think it had yet got to the point when FedGov could tell you not to grow your own veggies. Isn’t that what Michelle Obama has been telling us to do?
I think it is driven locally through ICLEI — a global initiative with local community level chapters throughout the world. Perhaps the acronym is different. This is from memory. in any case, they use the mantra of 1) Sustainable Development and 2) Community-personal safety; intrude into homes with that pretext…. anyway, study it for yourself. I am just saying what I have seen. I don’t know how effective it will be in the long run; but then again, they have, on their side, local police and law enforcement agencies. regards, Some communities, like the one in Alaska legislature, threw them out and refused to implement agenda 21. I don’t remember the details. Biut it’s not a secret. It is out in the open. many activists are engaged in challenging it. One of these is Rosa Koire, and she as a “post sustainability institute” andwebsite with more details. She is left-wing. There is the same activism in the right-wing conservatives, and they too oppose these measures. Sorry I cant’ remember their names, but it is in the educational videos in agenda 21 for dummies. Regards, zahir