Every piece of evidence that I can gather so far suggests that the clash between “Christians” and “far-right nationalists” and foreign refugees/migrants in Europe is stage-managed.
Take a look at Hungary, where the populist government of Viktor Orban has come in for a lot of flak for anti-refugee and anti-Semitic commentary.
This in variably pinned on Hungarian Christians.
Orban is a reform Calvinist, it is said.
But even so, his Christianity was merely nominal until after the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe in the 1990s, when he began voicing Christian positions, a change said to be influenced by his wife’s Roman Catholicism.
Orban’s wife is rumored to be of Jewish extraction.
There was a story (later retracted) that Orban himself is Jewish.
[Added: This Armenian paper reaffirms the story. Orban has a Jewish mother. That makes him legally Jewish and proves once again that it no conspiracy theory at all that the leading mouth-pieces of the New World Order are of ethnic Jewish descent:
Viktor Orbán heads the Nationalist Party of Hungary. His father was a Gipsy and mother was of Jewish descent. Orbán is married to Anikó Lévai.”
On a thread at a Human Biodiversity forum, Levai is cited as a text-book example of Pamirid (Iranian/Central Asian) descent and Orban himself of Iranian-Indid.
Indid would be the Gypsy side and Iranian would be the Iranian-Jewish side, perhaps.
In addition, one of Orban’s most powerful former ministers, responsible for networking in the US, is Tamas Fellegi who is Jewish and active in government propgrams opposing anti-Semitism.
Neither is Orban a nationalist of the anti-EU kind.
He is actively pursuing Hungarian entry into the European currency union. He is no Euroskeptic.
And now, following German chancellor ex (?)- communist Angela Merkel’s decision to shut off the border to Austria, Orban has declared emergency in certain parts of Hungary:
In response to Germany’s decision to reestablish border controls in order to stem the inflow of refugees, the Hungarian government has declared a state of emergency in the southern Hungarian counties of Bács-Kiskun, Békés and Csongrád, as well as in Pest county.”
What an excellent pretext the Sanhedrin’s intelligence agencies now have to create Fortress Europe and play out civilizational war through proxies in the heartland of Europe, filled with the memories and monuments of Christianity.
Let us look further at Orban, this great Hungarian “Christian,” with his “right-wing” party, Fidesz:
It turns out that the ranks of the party is drawn from Orban’s own background in the left, not from the right:
In fact, Orbán’s circle, before its sharp turn to the right in 1993 (a purely political manoeuvre), had been drawn in the 1980s from both of the two groups that are now the main opponents of his Fidesz party – first the reform communists, the predecessor of today’s Socialist Party, which founded the ‘elite colleges’ for Orbán’s generation, and later the Democratic Opposition, the predecessor of today’s liberal Alliance of Free Democrats.”
Moreover, in public perception this “nationalist Hungarian Christian”- as he is promoted in the Rothschild media – is identified with an open looting of the state on behalf of corrupt cronies that is seen as a worse and more shameless version of communist corruption:
Orbán’s government, although managing not to halt the growth, behaved vis-à-vis the economy in a plundering way that was almost far-left in character. It re-nationalised much of the economy, and siphoned off immense resources of taxpayers’ money to the private accounts of ‘friendly’ companies, thus ending any possibility for the public to exert any control or supervision; then solidified this outrageous lack of transparency by using loopholes and unconstitutionally majoritarian institutional and legislative coups.
In a word, Orbán’s rule was utterly nepotistic – and here comes his ideological innovation compared to the former communists. Yes, Orbán did all this in the name of a belated anti-communist sociological revolution. But that populism is read in Hungary (unlike in Scruton’s study room) as a return to communist ways rather than a healing of the injustice that the nomenklatura-bourgeoisie inflicted on the nation. It is understood as stealing openly, while claiming an ideological justification. Does this sound familiar?”
A little research shows that Orban’s father was actually an ardent Communist and his Catholic wife’s father was an informer for the state.
Orban himself might have been recruited as a Communist spy at one time, although he says he rejected the proposal:
In a short phone interview on Sunday afternoon, Fidesz former economic director and a long-time friend of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Lajos Simicska told Mandiner.hu that thirty years ago Orbán told him he is “supposed to file reports” on Simicska for the secret service. Simicska (pictured right) claims that he believed Orbán (pictured left) when he told him the communist secret service was unsuccessful in recruiting him, but that he does not “believe this to be true any more.”
The media oligarch explained that he started entertaining doubts a year ago, “following the Russian-Hungarian Paks II agreement.” He added that the Russians might have extensive copies of Hungarian secret service documents containing the prime minister’s records, even if Hungarian archives could not locate them. Simicska thinks that Russian President Vladimir Putin might be using these documents to blackmail Orbán into cooperating because “publishing such information could turn this country upside down.”
and
“He recalled that during a relatively friendly conversation, his army station officer told him he had seen his file “which was already ten centimeters thick, even though I was only 22 at the time.” He said that after the 1989 regime change, he was unable to identify his folder.”
and
” In a recent interview former prime minister Miklós Németh told Index that photocopies of the shredded files might still exist in Moscow, because Soviet advisors copied most of these files before retreating from Hungary.”
This allegation has led opposition parties to ask Orban to resign, since blackmail would pose a severe security risk to the country.
Whatever records exist in Hungary are no longer accessible to the public.
In 2014, the Hungarian supreme court forced the Institute of Political History to turn over all its archives (which contained the records of the Hungarian Socialist Worker’s Party and its predecessors – trade unions, socialist and communist groups).
Even if we discount allegations of communist spying as unproven (and unprovable), the facts suggest that Orban is less a Christian nationalist and more a corrupt opportunistic populist, with some outside agenda, as noted here:
Given that political Catholicism outside Hungary moved on from this in 1945, Orbán seems be sixty-five years behind the times. Indeed, it brings to mind the old joke that the difference between liberals and the right in Hungary is that while the former haven’t realized what country they are living in, the right are not clear on which period they are in!
This raises for me two questions. Although Orbán is not unintelligent he is no political philosopher, and we really do have to ask who is influencing his agenda.”
Who?
Well, oddly, for such an “anti-Semitic Christian nationalist” – the identity he is advertising in his performance – Orban has the support of the extraordinarily corrupt Ashkenazy Chief Rabbi for Israel who lobbied for Orban to come to power :
In November 2013 Rabbi Yona Metzger was arrested in Israel on suspicion of corruption and the Magistrate’s Court ordered him to be kept in custody. According to investigators, Rabbi Metzger accepted bribes of an “unprecedented scope”; he received 2.5 million dollars over 10 years while serving as Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel. Mr. Metzger has denied all accusations.
Another suspect in the case is Haim Nissan Eisenstat, who worked as Mr. Metzger’s driver and personal assistant. He was also accused of taking bribes, fraud and money laundering and now he is the star witness against Mr. Metzger.
The investigation has lasted for two years and Attorney-General Yehuda Weinstein is ready to issue a tough indictment against Mr. Metzger. Although Rabbi Metzger’s attorneys have indicated that they are willing to accept less severe charges, the prosecutors have rejected their proposal.
As Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi maintained close relations with the Orbán Government and also a group of Hungarian Chabad emissaries. He first visited Budapest in 2003 when Chabad invited him to speak at their Yeshiva.
In 2008 Chief Rabbi Metzger met with then-opposition leader Viktor Orbán in Budapest and discussed, among other things, strategies on how to fight anti-Semitism. After Mr. Orbán’s election as Prime Minister in 2010, Rabbi Metzger frequently met with Deputy Prime Minister, Mr. Zsolt Semjén, and Budapest Mayor, Mr. István Tarlós. Mr. Metzger was also the featured speaker at the inauguration of a Chabad Synagogue in Budapest led by Rabbi Shlomo Köves. At that time Mr. Metzger met with the entire Fidesz leadership.
In a 2012 letter, Chief Rabbi Metzger thanked Prime Minister Viktor Orbán for the “magnificent relationship” that he was fostering with the Jews in Hungary. He wrote that he was praying (!) that Orbán should “continue to successfully lead” the country “with dignity, understanding and wisdom.” He added, “may it be His will that the difficult economic situation affecting Europe be put behind you rapidly, and that you will enjoy the benefit of a better and more stable economic situation, that the citizens of Hungary will all be content and at peace in your country, enjoying peace and security.”
As a response to allegations of anti-Semitism made against his government, Prime Minister Orbán quoted Rabbi Metzger’s praise in a memorable speech he gave at the World Jewish Congress Plenary Assembly in Budapest, in 2013.
Details of the criminal charges against Rabbi Metzger are not public yet and there are no specific accusations that he or his associates received bribes for “favors” from Hungarian officials. However, Israeli authorities have indicated that the Rabbi’s corrupt conduct was unprecedented and far reaching.”
