Econ-job: Should Big Ben strike….and strike…and strike again?

Pimco’s Bill Gross takes the minority position that Bernanke is right to side with US home-gambling and risk a run on the dollar:

“PIMCO’s view is that a U.S. Fed easing cycle historically has required a destination of 1% real short rates or lower. Under a conservative assumption of 2½% inflation, that implies Fed Funds at 3¾% or so over the next 6-12 months. Actually that’s only two, 50 basis point reductions, something that could, but probably won’t, be accomplished by year-end. Don Kohn’s asymmetric elevator will likely be interrupted by false hopes of a housing bottom, fears of a dollar crisis, or misinterpreted one month’s signs of employment gains and faux economic strength. The downward path of home prices, however, will dominate Fed policy over the next several years as will the lingering unwind of related financial structures and derivatives that have yet to be discovered by the public, and marked to market by their conduit holders.Know nothing? Perhaps they now know more than I or Jim Cramer gave them credit for on that raucous day in August. If they do, however, their options are limited by Republican political orthodoxy, the receding willingness of the private sector to extend credit, and a still exuberant global economy. What do they know? I suspect at the very least they know they’re in a pickle, and a sour one at that.

Your betting we get below 3.75% analyst,

 

One thought on “Econ-job: Should Big Ben strike….and strike…and strike again?

  1. Pingback: Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *