Irresponsible…..that’s what we are….

LONDON – Can his fractured fiddle — a million-dollar Guadagnini — be fixed? It’s too early to tell.

David Garrett, a former model who has been called the David Beckham of the classical scene, said he tripped while carrying his 18th century violin as he was leaving London’s Barbican Hall after a performance, smashing it to bits.”

More here at NPR.

Comment:

What has this to do with the body politic in the US? Everything. Who in his right mind would run down the stairs with a priceless old violin in his hand?

Answer: someone who has insurance. “Irresponsible….that’s what we are….” (Sorry Nat).

The moral hazard problem in a nutshell. Insurance increases the chance that the very behavior it’s calculated to offset will happen.

That’s what this credit crunch is all about. People twiddling, fiddling, and diddling with all sorts of complex instrumentalities they wouldn’t normally dream of getting their tongues around, let alone, put their money into, because they knew someone else – you, dear tax-payer – was always there like the everlasting arms to catch them if they fell down the stairs.

It’s called TBTF — Too Big Too Fail – a theme (with variations) first composed by Alan Greenspan when he fiddled at the Chicago Board, as Bill Engdahl points out.

After that solo performance, he began stringing the economy farther and farther along by tuning interest rates lower and lower.

Yep. They didn’t call him the Maestro for nothing.

Ron Paul Revolution: Ron versus Group-think on the Jack Stockwell show

Mobs Messiah’s and Markets
By Jack Stockwell Show
Listen to Darrell interview Lila Rajiva co-author of Mobs Messiah’s and Markets where you’ll learn what gives the media so much power in determining who the candidates will be in any election. Plus! Enjoy a look into “Group-think” as …
THE JACK STOCKWELL SHOW – http://jackthis.com

Ron Paul Revolution hits #1 on Amazon

Ron Paul’s Manifesto (out on April 30, 2008) – The Revolution – is now Number 1 on Amazon for biographies, and in the top 10 overall. Amazing.

But on FOX on Sunday, as the talking heads debated the front runners for the Republican nomination, was there a word about Paul?

Did anyone point out that if conservatives are unhappy with John McCain’s commanding lead and don’t think Romney is really a conservative, they only have to look at the INVISIBLE MAN of the campaigns (invisible, that is, on mainstream shows) – Ron Paul.

Ron Paul is a real conservative. If non-intervention and anti-imperialism sound un-conservative to you, you might want to double-check your own understanding of conservatism…..

Notice that the candidates that have fallen behind the front runners in the last few days are BOTH closely identified with their party’s establishment: Clinton is the Democrat establishment and Romney is the Republican establishment.

Note that Barack Obama – an African-American with a Muslim name, born in Asia – represents the effort of mainstream Democrats to show their disaffection for politics as usual and to affirm traditional Democrat values – in this case, racial reconciliation and domestic economic issues. Note that John McCain – a former Vietnam vet who was tortured as a POW – does the same for mainstream Republicans, in so far as he represents national security and homeland defense.

What that says is there really is a public hunger for anti-establishment figures. Too bad, it’s being fed by Obama and McCain, neither of them anti-establishment, except in a cosmetic sense. On the burning issues of debt and war I expect neither of them to do anything very radical at all.

The media should allow the public to have an in-depth look at a real anti-establishment candidate. The only one who is heading a real, if stealth, revolution against the vested interests that govern us.

Suhayl Saadi: Martin Amis embraces the sirens of destruction

The Second Plane – Martin Amis

Losing a war against cliché

David Sandison

Martin Amis

 

Reviewed by Suhayl Saadi

Friday, 1 February 2008

This collection of essays, articles, book reviews and fiction delineates its author’s political trajectory since the destruction of the World Trade Centre in 2001. The opening piece sensitively evokes the horrific aftermath in the Big Apple, while in “The Wrong War”, Martin Amis presciently identifies the disastrous centrifugality and “natural ramification of pure power” that was the invasion of Iraq.

His comments on creative writing in “The Voice of the Lonely Crowd” and “Terror and Boredom” suggest an exciting and fruitful professorial sojourn at Manchester University. Amis explores the writer’s position with regard to religion and deftly exposes the inner space common to imagistic terrorism and reality TV: “the canonisation of the nobody”.

The short stories are masterful and transcendent. “In the Palace of the End”, a hallucinatory satire set in a totalitarian state, is transfigured by its insistent humanity. The protagonist in “The Last Days of Muhammad Atta” descends from Camus; Islamism is as much pornographic spectacle as nativist puritanism. In general, the earlier pieces work best, although a review of Ed Husain’s The Islamist provides one of the very few beneficent portrayals of Muslim people.

However, the author’s comprehension of Islam and Islamism remains inadequate. He tends to discount violence inflicted on the economic periphery, and displays wilful ignorance of history, economics and global politics. From the title onwards, Amis buys into the febrile irrationalism that “9/11 changed the world” and that “our current reality is unforeseeable, so altogether unknowable”. These dominant sophistries seem to have displaced the earlier flatus about the “end of history”. His worthy identification of “the moral crash” supposedly consequent upon September 2001 conveniently ignores the train-wreck of history, and the systemic amorality of empires and nation states.

Amis rightly criticises the cultish reductiveness of Islamism. In its “intellectual vacuity”, this malevolent pantomime is a paradigm of patriarchy, neo-colonial humiliation and big bucks. But for Amis and Islamists, alike, the world has become simple. He follows psy-operators like the historian Bernard Lewis into disinformation, medieval tropes and the High Victorian fixation with sex and camels. Amis correctly accuses Islamists of lacking a sense of temporality, yet he himself displays the identical deficiency: “The West had no views whatever about Islam per se before September 11, 2001”. Tell that to Bacon, Burton, Burckhardt, Bin Laden’s CIA handlers or, indeed, Bernard Lewis.

Christianity, Islam and Judaism form a syncretic civilisation, yet Amis tiresomely essentialises, as in, “the Muslim male”, and seems content to subjugate intellect to atavism: “All religions, unsurprisingly, have their terrorists… We are hearing from Islam.” One presumes that this is the tribal, rather than the royal, “we”. He iterates a link between Nazism and Islam, yet the Pope was in bed with Hitler and the Holocaust was a millennial culmination of dehumanisation in European Christendom. Bizarrely, Amis seems to think that Israel-in-Bavaria would have faced only lederhosen.

The Axis of Greed has systematically subverted secularism, rationality and economic independence throughout the Oil Belt. The result is militarism and theocratic psychosis. Ignoring this history, in “Iran and the Lords of Time”, Amis instead seems energised by pessimism and strategies of tension. Like his irony, his compassion is largely unipolar. Rather than offering a reasoned analysis of war as economic driver, as the book goes on, criticism of US-UK policy is restricted to the uncontentious, the tabloid and the tactical.

Amis implicitly concurs with Mark Steyn’s hysterical thesis in America Alone, which boils down to this: “Be very afraid: soon, you will be swamped”. Population growth is determined by poverty and female literacy levels. If, in Afghanistan, “the population has increased by 25 per cent” since 2001, it is because of returning refugees, not because of “‘genogenesis'”. Ultimately, Amis’s prose degenerates into propaganda: “the forces of darkness are arrayed against the forces of light”.

With occasional exceptions (“his smile… is a rictus, and his eyes are as hard as jewels”), “On the Move with Tony Blair” is fatuous and indulgent. Anti-war protest is depicted as “an incensed but microscopic goblin” while, up close, Bush becomes “generous and affectionate”. Embedded with the former PM, our fearless, flak-helmeted author descends on Iraq, just another chorister for the powerful.

In distortions of history, we are informed that the Nazis were “pagans”, that the First World War was “made in Berlin” and, in a Borgesian contradiction of his earlier self, that the intention of the Bush administration in invading Iraq was “a dramatic (and largely benign) expansion of American power”. The “dame on the Clapham bus” in Cairo, Lahore or Tehran, to whom Amis denies any expression in this book, has greater awareness of the architectures of power and history than soulful literati granted licence to intellectualise visceral bigotries, wrestle with mannequins and indulge in onanistic battle-talk. These writers display so much of what Amis calls “moral unity and will” that their prose tends towards the indistinguishable. “In politics it is surprisingly easy to move from side to side while staying in the same place.” Indeed: for the likes of William Shawcross, Christopher Hitchens, David Aaronovitch, Melanie Phillips and now Martin Amis, time’s arrow points always towards war.

Global and domestic realities demand a sustained and lucid critique of the intertwined pathologies of Islamism and capitalist war doctrine, and a resolute exploration of alternatives. Far from being morally relativistic, this represents a rational resistance against these ferocious and mutually reinforcing dogmas of guns, butter and God. Unlike novels and drama, life is neither reducible nor dualistic, and Amis does a great disservice by pretending otherwise. It is sad but revealing that such a talented man has abrogated reason and embraced the sirens of destruction. This book is a document of surrender.

Suhayl Saadi’s novel ‘Psychoraag’ is published by Black & White; his ‘The Queens of Govan’ will be premiered this month by Scottish Opera
Jonathan Cape £12.99 (214pp) £11.69 (free p&p) from 0870 079 8897

Who’s the most bigoted of them all?

“It’s been said that industrialized nations are becoming more intolerant of foreigners, and a provocative new paper in the August issue of Kyklos tries to quantify just how bigoted Western nations are.

The paper’s authors used responses from a question in the Human Beliefs and Values Survey — a twice-a-decade survey of social and political attitudes around the world — which asked respondents how they would feel about living next to: People of different ethnicities, Muslims, Jews, immigrants or foreign workers, and homosexuals.

The researchers used these answers as a proxy for bigotry in each country.(The survey took place in 1999-2000).

And the most prejudiced country? Drumroll please…

Northern Ireland with an estimated 44 percent of its population saying they wouldn’t want to live next to one of the above five groups took the top “prize.” Breathing down it’s neck was Greece with 43.2 percent and at 37.6 percent Italy rounded out the top three.

The least bigoted nations were dominated by Scandinavian countries: Sweden (13.4%), the Netherlands (17.2%), Iceland (18.4%), Canada (21.5%), Denmark (21.9%).

(Germany joins the ranks of the most bigoted nations using an alternative measure based on how strong bigoted feelings were among those who had them, the researchers found.)

The United States was estimated to have a 30.4 percent level of bigotry.

On average, about one out of every three people in the 19 countries used in the study were bigoted.

By far the most hated group were homosexuals with an overall average of 19.6 percent of people saying they wouldn’t want them as neighbors. Next up were Muslims with 14.5 percent, but since the survey was taken before September 11th, those results might be much different today.”

More here in a report produced by researchers from the Universities of Ulster and Queensland.

Back to Blogging

Back to the blog after quite a hiatus.

What have I learned from it, dear reader, that would be of any use to me and you this new year?

Two for you, first:

1. Resting from work that you love is stressful and boring. Working at what you love is restful.

2. Talking to like-minded strangers (readers on the web) is usually more civilized and productive than talking to flesh- and- blood colleagues who are out of step with you.

Two for me:

1. My old posts still get hits even when I don’t update the blog. I get as many hits now from not blogging as I got from blogging when I first began. That’s a big improvement. It means what I write has some value beyond the moment.
2. I am now a confirmed bloggerette (a female married to her website). Living without blogging seems pale. The life unblogged doesn’t seem quite worth it. What’s an experience unless you can get a post out of it?

Bottom Line:

Those four points add up to one. The virtual world is as “true” and human as the real world. Maybe more.

Actionable Item:

The Internet is a mental and emotional world first, a physical one only second. On the other hand, the real world out there works in reverse of that. On the net, ideas move people. In the physical world, people move ideas.

Just a thought.

Kuala Lumpur impressions…

Here in Kuala Lumpur my thoughts about liberty are turning in a different direction….

But first, my impressions of the city so far:

KL airport is huge — but you don’t feel it. Everthing feels leisurely and spacious, no where as full as it really is. But that’s only because it’s laid out intelligently. KLIA is said to be rapidly overtaking Singapore as the best airport round here and a major hub for Asia.

The girls at the desk…sorry, young women…are dressed in a charming Muslim way – heads covered, long skirts and blouses — not in depressing black, but in pastel colors and soft textures. I can see potential for a Islamic high style — fitted, with graceful lines, not bulky and shapeless ..more definition. With droves of rich Saudis moving here, I imagine there will be a market. A Malay shop girl laughed scornfully and told me they were dumb and easy to fleece, and then returned to pouring contempt on the Chinese for taking advantage of the Bumiputra.

The train into town is first class (I wanted to say first world, but I don’t like the term. It says more than I want to say – turning economic development into a high school report, complete with A, B and C students). The landscape is green with palms, lots of thick green foliage, well-paved roads wetted down with a faint drizzle. The roads are narrower than I remember in Buenos Aires, but there’s a faint resemblance to the Argentine city because of the vegetation and the tiled roofs of the houses. In both cities even the modern houses have a charm entirely missing from one of those prefab McHouses that blight the suburbs in the US.

A light drizzle on and off, but the air is muggy and hot. It’s December and it feels like a late summer day in Baltimore. According to the papers, we didn’t go above 30 C, but to me it feels much higher. We’re near the equator after all. Maybe the number and size of the buildings contributes. The Petronas Towers, which is close to where I am staying in Bukit Bintang, are the world’s tallest twin towers.

I’m living above an Indian restaurant and round the corner from restaurants from every Asian country. There’s also that ubiquitous sign of expats – Starbucks (who would want Starbucks in Asia, home to the most interesting concoctions of tea and coffee around?) and a McDonalds. But what really got me was the hotel that I used as a landmark to find my way round to my place — Agora. Quite odd to see a Greek name that’s also the name of the company of my co-author Bill Bonner, who by the way, is in India right now, working on opening an office there. He’s very India positive, unlike investors like Jim Rogers. More on that at another time.

Ron Paul Rivals: Mike Huckabee wants a planet in every pot…

Jesus was too smart to run for politics– that was Mike Huckabee’s great line during the Wednesday night debate.

Too bad politicians aren’t smart enough to quit playing Jesus…

I’m listening to Chris Matthews and Huckabee this evening around 5, on MSNBC, mangling theology.

Matthews at least has an excuse. What’s Huckabee’s? He used to be an evangelical pastor.

Was Jesus all-sweetness and light and forgiveness?

Huckabee kept quoting the line “In as much as you do this unto the least of my brethren, you do it unto me.”

No quarrel with that. But is a government program the proper definition of”doing unto the least”?

Who is the least? Is poverty the definition of being least?

Remember, this is the Jesus who also said this:

“For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

The law Jesus refers to here is the law of the old testament, which is based on justice and the concept of “deserving.”

This is in no way different from similar notions in the major religions, like the Hindu ideal of alms-giving, which is required to be directed toward the deserving if it is to be called dharmic (i.e., lawful, dutiful).

Now, in monetary terms, it’s true that what welfare expends is a mere drop next to the oceans that go to subsidize defense contractors, the space program, and Wall Street.

But the smallness of an error in physical terms doesn’t change its magnitude in terms of meaning.

We see the gospel through the eyes of socialism and then wonder at the results we get. Oddly, the same people who are dismayed by references to Biblical teaching when the subject is gender or reproductive rights are just fine with references to Jesus when the subject is taxes and welfare.

In other words, the gospel is used as nothing more than an imprimatur on whatever it is any constituency wishes for itself.

This was transparently clear from the quality of questions asked last night. Personally, I wouldn’t have entertained that level of argument in an undergraduate seminar, let alone a presidential debate.

But, none of the questioners themselves (or the moderators who allowed them) seemed to care that their questioning betrayed an attitude toward citizenship that was grasping, venal and self-centered in the extreme.

What’s in it for me was the sum of their inquiries. And with a couple of honorable exceptions, to a man, the Republicans were only too willing to be — or seem to be — all things to all people.

A chicken in every pot, and if we’re to believe Huckabee, a man on every planet. Fortunately, Duncan Hunter brought him back into orbit.

Ron Paul, like Hunter, seemed to be the only one aware that the only space we should be thinking about now is the big hollow space at the center of the US economy.

A lot of puffed up goo on the outside and nothing inside.

Like a dough-nut. Or more accurately, a no-more- dough-nut.

Charles Krauthammer on FOX News at 6 was clearly displaying an anti-Southern animus when he found nothing appealing about Huckabee. He would have been right on target if he’d found nothing conservative about the witty governor.