Category Archives: Ideology

Eduard Hodos: Chernobyl And The Third Khazaria

Posted on by

Read this and consider if  Putin, the great benefactor of Chabad from all accounts, is only denazifying the Ukraine or is he playing a necessary role in the desertification of the Ukraine that Hodos speak about below:

Eduard Hodos:

It bears mentioning that Chernobyl has always been regarded by members of the sect [Lila: Chabad Lubavitch] as a sacred place of requital and punishment. You see, it was there that Bogdan Khmelnitsky wiped out the “Chernobyl branch” of Chabad’s forefathers by fire and sword. And it’s no accident that the catastrophe which took place at Chernobyl, which the whole world regards as a “tragedy” and a “catastrophe”, is referred to by Lubavitchers as “The Chernobyl Wonder”. It’s no accident either that beginning in the 1990’s — the period of the establishment of the Third Khazaria — Lubavitchers “opened season” on ritual bacchanalias in Pripiat’, the epicenter of the Chernobyl Wasteland. [Unfortunately the author doesn’t elaborate on these “ritual bacchanalias”. — Editor]

That’s why my theory of a planned diversion, the generous financing of which was able to guarantee the well-known consequences at Chernobyl, has a perfect right to exist.

But let’s return to the Third Khazaria, at whose foundations lies the “desert ideology” posited by my theory. What’s the essence of this ideology, whose very name deprives us of any hint of optimism?

Well really, to understand what I’m talking about, all you need to do is remove your “blinders”, take a look around you, and try to make sense of what you see. I hope it won’t be necessary for me to strain myself in depicting the obvious “achievements” of the generously-financed Third Khazarian “experiment”, which has ravaged our land like a tornado.

All of us are like addicts who were deprived of the “needle” of our socialist “stagnation”, writhing for more than ten years in the hellish “withdrawal” of Khazarian “reforms”. We continue to hope against hope that soon, very soon, things will get better — the main thing is to be patient. But with every day the number of those who were unable to survive their Khazarian “overdose” rises.

In my books I’ve repeatedly attempted to show just what kind of fate is being prepared for us who are still — for the time being — alive on this [post-Soviet] land. On our holy, long-suffering land, over which the Khazarian Sword of Damocles once again hangs.

To support my words I’ll once again cite a passage from my previous book. I’m referring to an article in the newspaper “Argumenty i Fakty” which I used in The Jewish Syndrome-2 and which will help you achieve understanding of the “desert ideology” of “The Third Khazaria”.

The name of the article is “The Country’s Dying. Quietly, but Quickly” (cited here in shortened form):

The decline of Ukraine’s demographic indicators was first established in 1993. Since that time one can observe a steady escalation in the crisis. Today we’re witnessing the lowest birth rate for the whole postwar period; it lags the death rate by nearly a factor of two. In the first nine months of 2001, 260 000 fewer people have been born in the Ukraine than have died. Adding to this figure data about the active emigration of our countrymen abroad, authors of numerous publications on the given topic have come to the following conclusion: Given the current rate of population decline, every 25-30 years the population of the country will decline by half, so if yet another 50-60 years pass the world map will be deprived of the mighty ox-shaped contours of the Ukraine, which is striving so mightily today to integrate itself into Europe!

There’s yet another “spicy” detail in the experts’ forecasts: the sharp reduction of the native population could trigger an intensive influx of immigrants, mainly from the Asian and African continents, and the proportional weight of the non-European population (which is not suffering at all from the demographic point of view — the only problem is in finding living space) will grow at a rate comparable with the dying-out of the native population. Racism is ugly and a sin, but once the Moors have move in to occupy the Dnieper you won’t be singing “We’re not dead yet…” any longer.

Optimists love to remind us that a few developed countries have an even lower birth rate than us. Yes, Italy, Spain, San Marino and Hong Kong are breeding even more slowly. But their process of depopulation is accompanied by a corresponding decrease in mortality and the rise in average life-expectancy. If we compare the last-mentioned criteria in the Ukraine to that of developed countries, we see that our “fleeting life” is more nine years more fleeting than that of Western Europeans’ and twelve years more than the Japanese’.

It’s been established that our demographic decline is determined above all by the use of birth control among women. But why is this happening? If in Europe the maternal instinct has been “deadened” by the ideals of career and emancipation, our far less feminized women are hindered by the fear of miscarriage or giving birth to a “defective” child: The quantity of unhealthy young women has risen sharply.

A certain “stability” is observed by the experts only in the primary causes of death, which have remained unchanged over the course of decades. First place among causes of death in the Ukraine is occupied by circulatory diseases. Second place — by malignant tumors. Next come accidents, poisoning, trauma and respiratory failure.

To round out the above-mentioned factors which are leading to the “emptying” of our country one can add epidemiological data: tuberculosis, which takes 9 000 lives annually, and social pathologies resulting from the low standard of living. Even more alarming than tuberculosis are HIV-related diseases. Their “advance” seems to indicate that an AIDS explosion may lie ahead.

 

Falsifying the History of the Russian Revolution

Posted on by

Today, it is fashionable to assert that Bolshevism was a Russian phenomenon and that any reference to Judeo-Bolshevism is an anti-Semitic slander.

Yet, even the critics are forced to admit the “over representation” of Jews among the ranks of the revolutionaries. How they fudge the admission is to create a straw-man, which is that defenders of the term Judeo-Bolshevism make a complete identity between communism and the Jews, as though there were no other impetus behind the revolution at all.  The philo-Semites then call this identification Nazi.

Now, while Nazis may indeed make such assertions, it would be hard to ascertain, since that would involve reading Nazi tracts, which, in this age of censorship and guilt by association, can hardly be undertaken without attracting the very opprobrium that such research seeks to avoid. So, in the first place, that is an assertion impossible to refute.

Secondly, it is a lie, in so far as non-Nazi individuals also make similar assertions about the Jews and the revolutionaries, but do not make the two identical. The argument that they do is a straw-man. What non-Nazi usage of the term Judeo-Bolshevism asserts is not the pure identity of the two, nor, on the other hand, “over-representation,” which is a lie of a different kind.

The Jews were not merely over-represented in the Russian revolution; they dominated the revolution. And while all revolutionaries were not Jewish and all Jews were not revolutionaries, in the same way as all Germans were not Nazis nor were all Nazis Germans [some were of Jewish ethnicity], it is absolutely the case that the Russian revolution is inextricably linked to the Jews as a group, that Jews financed, led, and propagandized for the revolution, committed its worst excesses and boasted of all this among themselves, even if those facts are now being obfuscated among non-Jewish peoples.

Douglas Reed, a veteran journalist and reliable observer of international affairs, stated without equivocation [and in this he is supported by the ardent Zionist and part-Jewish Winston Churchill]:

The Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly ‘Socialist’ or other nonCommunist parties… were 55 Jews and 6 others.”

Douglas Reed, The Recompense of Zion, Durban, 1978,  p. 274, cited in Vladimir Moss, “The Russian Jewish Revolution,” Academy.edu, Feb-March 2017.

In April 1917, almost half the members of the Petrograd Soviet bureau were Jews and on October 23, 1917, 5 out of the 12 members of the Bolshevik Central Committee were Jews, according to Enzo Traverso, “Intermezzo: The Jews and the Russian Revolution 1917-1937,” in “The Jewish Question,” Brill, October 2, 2, 2018.

Consider that the Jews constituted only around 2% of the population of the Soviet Union at the time, even though the Soviet Jews were still the largest Jewish population in the world, according to the Jerusalem Post, surely not an anti-Semitic outlet:

The roughly three million Jews of the Soviet Union at the time of the revolution constituted the largest Jewish community in the world, but they were only around 2% of the USSR’s population. They were concentrated in the Pale of Settlement (a western region of Imperial Russia) and in Ukraine and Belarussia, where they were 5% to 10% of the population, whereas in Russia itself the 1926 census found only 600,000 Jews.

For the Jews to be only over-represented in the Revolution, we need find them to be represented above 2% in the Soviet bureaucracy. Even double their actual proportions in the population would only mean about 4% of the Soviet administration would have been Jewish. But the proportion of Jews was not anywhere near 4%. It was 50% [the Petrograd Soviet Bureau], over 66% [Soviet secret police central committee], 75% [Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party] and over 85% [Bolshevik state high officials in 1918]. That is, the Jews were represented at all levels of the Revolution at a rate more than 20 times greater than their representation in the population. And that is a conservative estimate.

Judeo-Bolshevism, therefore, is not a racist characterization at all.

It is an accurate description of the nature of the revolution in Russia. Those who attack or characterize the description as anti-Semitic are apologists for crimes that are arguably quantitatively and qualitatively worse than those of the Nazis. The critics of the term Judeo-Bolshevism need to apologize for white-washing the monstrous crimes of their co-ethnics and slandering honest historians.

 

Dugin Promotes Patriotic Queer, Nationalist Androgyne

Posted on by

Log cabin Republicans, move over, Sasha’s here.

Counterpunch

Given what we know about Dugin’s far-right affiliations, it is tempting to imagine that his presentation of sex and gender in the Fourth Political Theory will take those of the previous three in more extreme directions. But this is not the case. Having given an overview of gender in the previous three political theories, the very first thing Dugin states is, “The Fourth Political Theory represents an aspiration to overcome the gender construction of the three political theories of modernity.” In other words, Dugin signals from the start that he does not wish to perpetuate traditional understandings of gender.

Dugin initially grapples with the attributes of gender in the Fourth Political Theory, first through the process of negation (in other words, what it is not): “In the face of this construction of ‘man’ as he who possesses reason, wealth, responsibility, city, white skin color, and so on, we revolt. This image of man must die; he doesn’t have a chance to survive, as he is closed inside modernity’s historical deadlock.” So, traditional masculinity is gone. Dugin then looks to positive attributes of gender in the Fourth Political Theory: to the “pre-logical” world of children, madness, intellectual transgression and, more generally, those who are “non-White/European, insane, nonurban or defined by a constructed landscape … the ecologist or aboriginal.”

It is in his discussion of the gendered subject of the Fourth Political Theory that Dugin starts to sound eerily like a queer theorist as he suggests it should be in a state of “between.” Dugin opts for the model of “Dasein,” referring to Heidegger’s understanding of existential being, which “can somehow be sexualized, but that sex which it has cannot be either male or female. It may make sense to speak about it in terms of the androgyne.” Even then Dugin does not want us to get stuck in the rut of thinking the androgyne is a combination of a binary sex or gender: “Should we say that the Fourth Political Theory may be addressed to the androgynous being, and its gender is the androgyne? Perhaps, but only if it is possible not to project onto the androgynous the obviously split models of sex as halves of a whole.” He wants us to think of the androgyne “not as a result of a combination of the man and the woman,” rather “primordial, untouched unity.”

New Cambridge Study Of Disinformation Is Full Of Disinformation

Posted on by

The latest effort of the academic-media complex to steer citizens in the direction that the powers-that-be prefer comes in the shape of “The Disinformation Age,” edited by Lance Bennett and Steven Livingston, Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Despite the prestigious publisher, a cursory glance is enough to tell me that this is the usual reverse-engineered history, by which I mean that the authors already know what their conclusions are going to be and are determined to rewrite history to fit them.

Just one small example. The book dwells on the influence of the Koch brothers on the establishment libertarian think-tanks like the Mercator Center and the Cato Institute, NEVER mentioning that that “beltway libertarianism” is only one form of right libertarianism, and not the most radical or convincing by any means. That brand of libertarianism is in fact constantly criticized by anarchist libertarians as well as by minarchists.

What’s more, the Cambridge book has the nerve to source the term “Kochtopus,” coined by the libertarians at Mises.org/Lew Rockwell, to the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, whose use of it came several years later and whose knowledge of the whole history of the Kochtopus is at second-hand, filtered through liberal-left tropes, and filled with suspicious gaps and elisions.

LRC: 2008 March 25 How Libertarian Is the Kochtopus

MindBodyPolitic.com:  2009, April 3,  The Libertarian Kochtopus

New Yorker: 2010:  The Koch Brothers’ Covert Ops

Mayer, a documentedly uninformed and lazy investigator got the whole Kochtopus network notion from bloggers who picked it up from the Ron Paul libertarians, which included me at the time, whom Matt Taibbi, a fellow left-lib journalist, was following, plagiarizing, and misrepresenting.

According to  this Cambridge disinfo guide, “Kochtopus” is the term Jane Mayer “likes to call the network”…. no mention of the piddling fact that dozens if not hundreds of people had analyzed the network and called it that long before she did, all of them with a world-view diametrically opposite hers.

The charge of plagiarism surfaced fairly soon, but the New Yorker did its own misleading pseudo- investigation and came to the unsurprising conclusion that there was no there there.

Not surprising, since Mayer is a prime product of the nepotistic and incestuous media culture.

InfluenceWatch tells us the following:

Mayer’s maternal grandfather was Allan Nevins, founder of American Heritage magazine and winner of two Pulitzer Prizes. Mayer’s great-great-grandfather was Emanuel Lehman, who founded the investment bank Lehman Brothers. [15]

That’s who decides what’s disinformation and what isn’t. Plagiarists and propagandists live in a bubble all their lives, sheltered from any necessity to defend their ideas honestly, and the result is false, empty history.

,

China Cancelling Christians On The Web

Posted on by

Pravmir.com

Christian websites in China have been suspended as new digital content regulations take effect.

The measures, which require internet users who wish to post religious content to obtain a permit, were introduced in March in an attempt to regulate religious content posted online. The Christian charity Open Doors says the move is “tightening the screws on China’s churches and Christian media.”

A licence is only available for state-approved religious institutions such as the Three Self Patriotic Movement and Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association.

Open Doors says: “The goal is to further limit the scope of public sharing of faith and to force all religions to align with Chinese socialism.”

Bergoglio Betrays Dissident Chinese Cardinal To CCP Secret Police

Posted on by

Note: Zen did receive funds from  CIA- related provocateur and color revolution fomenter Jimmy Lai, so perhaps the situation is not as black and white, however, that still does not absolve Bergoglio from his failure to meet him.

Lifesitenews, via LRC

On Wednesday it was announced that Cardinal Joseph Zen had been arrested by the authorities in Hong Kong. The investigation and arrest was made by the special police section set up by the government of Beijing to watch over Chinese national security, that is, to suppress any form of dissent or protest over the violations of human rights committed by the Chinese dictatorship…………

In September 2020, on the eve of the renewal of that infamous agreement, Cardinal Zen came to Rome to meet Bergoglio, who humiliated him with an indignant refusal to meet with him because of the Chinese Cardinal’s well-known position on the Sino-Vatican Agreement and its repeated violations. This affront against a Prince of the Church gave a clear signal to the Chinese dictatorship, which then felt free to act without fearing consequences or that the Vatican would take a position. The tenant of the Vatican, however, finds time to receive high-ranking representatives of the New World Order, representatives of globalism and usurious finance, dictators and war criminals, and even the wives of the soldiers fighting in the neo-Nazi Azov battalion, which in the past few days used civilians as human shields during the Russian siege of the Azovstal steel plant. Someone pointed out that the Russian-Canadian activist Pyotr Verzilov accompanied two Ukrainian wives to the papal audience: he is the founder and spokesman of the feminist group P*ssy Riot, known for carrying out profanations and sacrileges against Orthodox churches in Russia, following the model of Femen in the West. It leaves us disconcerted that the representative of an anti-Christian movement that has made blasphemy the heart of its subversive action has been admitted to an audience at the Vatican.

This attitude of unequalled duplicity, that is anything but ambiguous, shows how Bergoglio’s deep church is totally aligned not only with the psycho-pandemic narrative but also with the insane management of the Russian-Ukrainian crisis by the deep state. Cardinal Zen is added to the dubia Cardinals in the list of those to whom Bergoglio has never responded to or received in audience, even as he has personally handwritten a letter of support to James Martin, S.J. With that umpteenth endorsement, Bergoglio confirms that he intends to normalize the pan-sexualism of the infamous LGBTQ ideology within the Catholic Church, and along with it the consequent eternal perdition of many souls.

 

 

AbortiFascists: Target Catholics With Violence/Vandalism/Obscenity

Posted on by

Lifesite News

Miyares’ [Virginia Attorney-General] vow to protect Catholic Virginias’ right to worship comes after radical pro-abortion groups publicly stated their plan to storm Catholic churches during Mass starting this coming Sunday.

The most notable group, called “Ruth Sent Us,” named after the former pro-abortion Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, took to Twitter last Tuesday to encourage people across the U.S. to storm their local parish starting on Sunday, May 8 – which is Mother’s Day in the U.S. – as a way to protest a possible overturning of Roe v. Wade by six Supreme Court justices, as was revealed in a leak last Monday.

The protests are anticipated to last all week, from May 8 through 14.

“Whether you’re a ‘Catholic for Choice’, ex-Catholic, of other or no faith, recognize that six extremist Catholics set out to overturn Roe,” the group tweeted. “Stand at or in a local Catholic Church Sunday May 8.” 

The tweet was accompanied by a video showing members of the group dressed in Handmaid’s Tale costumes and disrupting a Mass in a Catholic church by shouting a pro-abortion chant, demanding “abortion on demand and without apology!”? 

The same group also published the locations of six pro-life Supreme Court justices’ home addresses on their website last week, encouraging members to attend protests at their private residences.   

Acts of violence and vandalism have also multiplied across the U.S. since the leak. On Tuesday, a violent and vulgar protest by pro-abortion activists in Los Angeles resulted in at least one police officer being injured and parts of city being vandalized with obscene graffiti.

Follow the Plan: Is Putin Doing A Trump?

Posted on by

As I posted before, I am not in a position to do much writing and can just post a few things.  But looking through my own research and back and forth about V. V. Putin, I have come to some hard conclusions and feel burdened to put them down.

Putin is “doing a Trump.”

He comes out of the same Russian Jewish Chabad matrix that Trump came from. He is as beholden to Chabad as Trump is.

That is their nexus, not some phony election-meddling charge.

Then again, like Trump, Putin is of Jewish descent, as has been believed for long. I thought these were just unproven rumors, but saw something more convincing recently.

Rabbi Yosef began by saying “according to the Jewish tradition, your leadership is decided by the kingdom of G-d, King of the world, and therefore we bless you: Blessed is the One who gave of His glory to flesh and blood.

Apparently, this manner of address to a national leader is reserved for Jewish leaders, not non-Jewish, who would have been referred to not as “flesh and blood,” but as creatures. It is of course possible that the reporting of the address is false and/or disinformation.

Putin supposedly is of peasant background, but the name itself is of a clan that has ties to European nobility, just as Trump and every other US president had.

That is the first issue, but for me it is by no means the important one.

It is Putin’s conduct of the war, the decision to intervene this year, rather than earlier, and his excessive deference to Israeli and Jewish sensibilities, that inclines me to think he is playing a deep game.

Unlike Trump, who I believe was played, Putin may be more sagacious and doing some of the playing himself.

Trump’s followers, or disinformation artists posing as followers were always chanting “follow trust the plan” and claiming Trump was playing 5th dimensional chess against his dimwit opponents. Each time he blundered or was caught out, they doubled up on the support. In Putin’s case too all we hear from staunch supporters is “everything is going according to the plan.”

Doesn’t the similarity of the words ring a bell?

The latest ambiguous and unnecessary “apology,” although likely spun that way by Israel, was left uncorrected by Mr. Putin.

I do believe that Putin will proceed against Israel in due course, driving Jewish Americans and many Israelis out of their countries, perhaps to Ukraine, which is now rapidly emptying of its native population.

Perhaps that was the reasoning all along, I cannot help but think.

I have never subscribed to the belief that Russia is at the head of some kind of global “resistance” to colonialism or imperialism.

The creation of an opposition to the American led West was always part of the globalist project. However, I had hopes that Putin was indeed acting in the best interests of his country and faith and was sincere in the counterpoint he offered to Western hegemony.  I am not so sure now.

Are Orthodox Slavs in Ukraine and Russia best served by this war?  Was there no other way?

I hope I am wrong but I wonder if this “resistance” is only an exercize in revealing to the powers that be where each person’s sympathies lie. Just as January 6, which Trump encouraged, swept thousands of Trump followers into the government’s net, this Special Military Operation may have helped to reveal those most antagonistic to  the globalist regime in the West and expose them to government retribution, via the DHS.

I supported Donald Trump after he was elected [not before], because his rhetorical assault on the globalist powers was invigorating and useful and he did do a number of good things in office, although many of them were later reversed by executive order by Biden.

I still think Trump was the best on offer and the best we have had in a long time.

In that sense , I also appreciate V. V. Putin.

But that said, there are just too many things amiss with this war for me to be sanguine that all is as it seems.