Tag Archives: putin

Eduard Hodos: Chernobyl And The Third Khazaria

Posted on by

Read this and consider if  Putin, the great benefactor of Chabad from all accounts, is only denazifying the Ukraine or is he playing a necessary role in the desertification of the Ukraine that Hodos speak about below:

Eduard Hodos:

It bears mentioning that Chernobyl has always been regarded by members of the sect [Lila: Chabad Lubavitch] as a sacred place of requital and punishment. You see, it was there that Bogdan Khmelnitsky wiped out the “Chernobyl branch” of Chabad’s forefathers by fire and sword. And it’s no accident that the catastrophe which took place at Chernobyl, which the whole world regards as a “tragedy” and a “catastrophe”, is referred to by Lubavitchers as “The Chernobyl Wonder”. It’s no accident either that beginning in the 1990’s — the period of the establishment of the Third Khazaria — Lubavitchers “opened season” on ritual bacchanalias in Pripiat’, the epicenter of the Chernobyl Wasteland. [Unfortunately the author doesn’t elaborate on these “ritual bacchanalias”. — Editor]

That’s why my theory of a planned diversion, the generous financing of which was able to guarantee the well-known consequences at Chernobyl, has a perfect right to exist.

But let’s return to the Third Khazaria, at whose foundations lies the “desert ideology” posited by my theory. What’s the essence of this ideology, whose very name deprives us of any hint of optimism?

Well really, to understand what I’m talking about, all you need to do is remove your “blinders”, take a look around you, and try to make sense of what you see. I hope it won’t be necessary for me to strain myself in depicting the obvious “achievements” of the generously-financed Third Khazarian “experiment”, which has ravaged our land like a tornado.

All of us are like addicts who were deprived of the “needle” of our socialist “stagnation”, writhing for more than ten years in the hellish “withdrawal” of Khazarian “reforms”. We continue to hope against hope that soon, very soon, things will get better — the main thing is to be patient. But with every day the number of those who were unable to survive their Khazarian “overdose” rises.

In my books I’ve repeatedly attempted to show just what kind of fate is being prepared for us who are still — for the time being — alive on this [post-Soviet] land. On our holy, long-suffering land, over which the Khazarian Sword of Damocles once again hangs.

To support my words I’ll once again cite a passage from my previous book. I’m referring to an article in the newspaper “Argumenty i Fakty” which I used in The Jewish Syndrome-2 and which will help you achieve understanding of the “desert ideology” of “The Third Khazaria”.

The name of the article is “The Country’s Dying. Quietly, but Quickly” (cited here in shortened form):

The decline of Ukraine’s demographic indicators was first established in 1993. Since that time one can observe a steady escalation in the crisis. Today we’re witnessing the lowest birth rate for the whole postwar period; it lags the death rate by nearly a factor of two. In the first nine months of 2001, 260 000 fewer people have been born in the Ukraine than have died. Adding to this figure data about the active emigration of our countrymen abroad, authors of numerous publications on the given topic have come to the following conclusion: Given the current rate of population decline, every 25-30 years the population of the country will decline by half, so if yet another 50-60 years pass the world map will be deprived of the mighty ox-shaped contours of the Ukraine, which is striving so mightily today to integrate itself into Europe!

There’s yet another “spicy” detail in the experts’ forecasts: the sharp reduction of the native population could trigger an intensive influx of immigrants, mainly from the Asian and African continents, and the proportional weight of the non-European population (which is not suffering at all from the demographic point of view — the only problem is in finding living space) will grow at a rate comparable with the dying-out of the native population. Racism is ugly and a sin, but once the Moors have move in to occupy the Dnieper you won’t be singing “We’re not dead yet…” any longer.

Optimists love to remind us that a few developed countries have an even lower birth rate than us. Yes, Italy, Spain, San Marino and Hong Kong are breeding even more slowly. But their process of depopulation is accompanied by a corresponding decrease in mortality and the rise in average life-expectancy. If we compare the last-mentioned criteria in the Ukraine to that of developed countries, we see that our “fleeting life” is more nine years more fleeting than that of Western Europeans’ and twelve years more than the Japanese’.

It’s been established that our demographic decline is determined above all by the use of birth control among women. But why is this happening? If in Europe the maternal instinct has been “deadened” by the ideals of career and emancipation, our far less feminized women are hindered by the fear of miscarriage or giving birth to a “defective” child: The quantity of unhealthy young women has risen sharply.

A certain “stability” is observed by the experts only in the primary causes of death, which have remained unchanged over the course of decades. First place among causes of death in the Ukraine is occupied by circulatory diseases. Second place — by malignant tumors. Next come accidents, poisoning, trauma and respiratory failure.

To round out the above-mentioned factors which are leading to the “emptying” of our country one can add epidemiological data: tuberculosis, which takes 9 000 lives annually, and social pathologies resulting from the low standard of living. Even more alarming than tuberculosis are HIV-related diseases. Their “advance” seems to indicate that an AIDS explosion may lie ahead.

 

Dugin Promotes Patriotic Queer, Nationalist Androgyne

Posted on by

Log cabin Republicans, move over, Sasha’s here.

Counterpunch

Given what we know about Dugin’s far-right affiliations, it is tempting to imagine that his presentation of sex and gender in the Fourth Political Theory will take those of the previous three in more extreme directions. But this is not the case. Having given an overview of gender in the previous three political theories, the very first thing Dugin states is, “The Fourth Political Theory represents an aspiration to overcome the gender construction of the three political theories of modernity.” In other words, Dugin signals from the start that he does not wish to perpetuate traditional understandings of gender.

Dugin initially grapples with the attributes of gender in the Fourth Political Theory, first through the process of negation (in other words, what it is not): “In the face of this construction of ‘man’ as he who possesses reason, wealth, responsibility, city, white skin color, and so on, we revolt. This image of man must die; he doesn’t have a chance to survive, as he is closed inside modernity’s historical deadlock.” So, traditional masculinity is gone. Dugin then looks to positive attributes of gender in the Fourth Political Theory: to the “pre-logical” world of children, madness, intellectual transgression and, more generally, those who are “non-White/European, insane, nonurban or defined by a constructed landscape … the ecologist or aboriginal.”

It is in his discussion of the gendered subject of the Fourth Political Theory that Dugin starts to sound eerily like a queer theorist as he suggests it should be in a state of “between.” Dugin opts for the model of “Dasein,” referring to Heidegger’s understanding of existential being, which “can somehow be sexualized, but that sex which it has cannot be either male or female. It may make sense to speak about it in terms of the androgyne.” Even then Dugin does not want us to get stuck in the rut of thinking the androgyne is a combination of a binary sex or gender: “Should we say that the Fourth Political Theory may be addressed to the androgynous being, and its gender is the androgyne? Perhaps, but only if it is possible not to project onto the androgynous the obviously split models of sex as halves of a whole.” He wants us to think of the androgyne “not as a result of a combination of the man and the woman,” rather “primordial, untouched unity.”

Follow the Plan: Is Putin Doing A Trump?

Posted on by

As I posted before, I am not in a position to do much writing and can just post a few things.  But looking through my own research and back and forth about V. V. Putin, I have come to some hard conclusions and feel burdened to put them down.

Putin is “doing a Trump.”

He comes out of the same Russian Jewish Chabad matrix that Trump came from. He is as beholden to Chabad as Trump is.

That is their nexus, not some phony election-meddling charge.

Then again, like Trump, Putin is of Jewish descent, as has been believed for long. I thought these were just unproven rumors, but saw something more convincing recently.

Rabbi Yosef began by saying “according to the Jewish tradition, your leadership is decided by the kingdom of G-d, King of the world, and therefore we bless you: Blessed is the One who gave of His glory to flesh and blood.

Apparently, this manner of address to a national leader is reserved for Jewish leaders, not non-Jewish, who would have been referred to not as “flesh and blood,” but as creatures. It is of course possible that the reporting of the address is false and/or disinformation.

Putin supposedly is of peasant background, but the name itself is of a clan that has ties to European nobility, just as Trump and every other US president had.

That is the first issue, but for me it is by no means the important one.

It is Putin’s conduct of the war, the decision to intervene this year, rather than earlier, and his excessive deference to Israeli and Jewish sensibilities, that inclines me to think he is playing a deep game.

Unlike Trump, who I believe was played, Putin may be more sagacious and doing some of the playing himself.

Trump’s followers, or disinformation artists posing as followers were always chanting “follow trust the plan” and claiming Trump was playing 5th dimensional chess against his dimwit opponents. Each time he blundered or was caught out, they doubled up on the support. In Putin’s case too all we hear from staunch supporters is “everything is going according to the plan.”

Doesn’t the similarity of the words ring a bell?

The latest ambiguous and unnecessary “apology,” although likely spun that way by Israel, was left uncorrected by Mr. Putin.

I do believe that Putin will proceed against Israel in due course, driving Jewish Americans and many Israelis out of their countries, perhaps to Ukraine, which is now rapidly emptying of its native population.

Perhaps that was the reasoning all along, I cannot help but think.

I have never subscribed to the belief that Russia is at the head of some kind of global “resistance” to colonialism or imperialism.

The creation of an opposition to the American led West was always part of the globalist project. However, I had hopes that Putin was indeed acting in the best interests of his country and faith and was sincere in the counterpoint he offered to Western hegemony.  I am not so sure now.

Are Orthodox Slavs in Ukraine and Russia best served by this war?  Was there no other way?

I hope I am wrong but I wonder if this “resistance” is only an exercize in revealing to the powers that be where each person’s sympathies lie. Just as January 6, which Trump encouraged, swept thousands of Trump followers into the government’s net, this Special Military Operation may have helped to reveal those most antagonistic to  the globalist regime in the West and expose them to government retribution, via the DHS.

I supported Donald Trump after he was elected [not before], because his rhetorical assault on the globalist powers was invigorating and useful and he did do a number of good things in office, although many of them were later reversed by executive order by Biden.

I still think Trump was the best on offer and the best we have had in a long time.

In that sense , I also appreciate V. V. Putin.

But that said, there are just too many things amiss with this war for me to be sanguine that all is as it seems.

 

Putin More Christian Than the Pope

Posted on by

In President Putin’s well-considered and judicious remarks to the UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres on April 26, I note two statements that shed an interesting light on his larger goals in pursuing the war in Ukraine and more generally on the position Russia has taken up as the head of the resistance to the universal hegemony of the West:

We are also surprised to hear statements by our colleagues that imply that some in the world have exceptional status or can claim exclusive rights because the Charter of the United Nations reads that all participants in international communication are equal regardless of their strength, size or geographical location. I think this is similar to what the Bible reads about all people being equal. I am sure we will find the same idea in both the Quran and the Torah. All people are equal before God. So, the idea that someone can claim a kind of exceptional status is very strange to us.

Since every word from Putin’s mouth is considered, I take the manner in which he has articulated his concerns about certain UN members to be highly significant.

First, it should be noted that he is attacking exceptionalism of any kind, which would imply both American exceptionalism and any other exceptionalism.

Now, exceptionalism is much the same thing as supremacism.

President Putin of course has positioned himself  very publicly  against Nazism, specifically the Nazism exhibited by some parts of the Ukrainian government. That is well known. However, he has for some time been hinting at something more.

And here he is clarifying what that is. It is the more general category to which Nazism belongs, supremacism.

The political point Putin is making to the Secretary-General is that actions of member-states that are similar should be treated similarly by the UN. If Kosovo could declare itself independent and this was recognized by the International Court, then the independence of the Donbass should be treated equally. Equality before the law cannot co-exist with an exceptionalist treatment of one country, permitting it a leeway  in action none other has. American exceptionalism is clearly the target here.

Then, significantly, President Putin, derives the equality of member- states in the UN from  the notion of equality among human beings given to us in religious scripture. And here he does something very illuminating.  He lists the religious texts that support the notion of equality: the Bible, the Koran, and the Torah.

Notice that he omits the Talmud and he omits any Hindu scripture, such as the Vedas or Upanishads, but since Hinduism is not represented in Russia in any substantial way, so that is not a surprise. What is a surprise is his omission of the Talmud, which is the scripture that most regulates Jewish practice, since Judaism, especially Chabad, is well-represented in Russia.  In fact, Chabad is the most powerful Jewish community in the country. Now, there is no question that there is in Chabad a supremacist vein, found in such texts as Ha Tanya, as well as, more generally, in the Talmud. Thus, when President Putin omits any reference to the Talmud and instead directly mentions the Torah, it is significant, since the Torah is most important among true Torah following Jews, who are anti-Zionist and constitute a very small group, and among the equally small group of Karaite Jews.

Besides that omission, the order of the list is also significant. President Putin mentions the Bible first, giving pride of place to Christianity among the traditional Russian faiths. He then mentions the Koran, giving Islam the second place, and with the Torah, gives Judaism its due. This particular ordering might be linked to the size of the demographic each religion represents in the Russian federation, with the state aligning itself first with the Orthodox faith and presenting itself as the defender of that faith.

From the political context, it is clear that President Putin is opposing his defense of equality to the supremacism practiced by two exceptionalist groups, the one in Ukraine which has a pagan and occult basis, and the one embodied in NATO and the West, that also draws on the pagan and the occult. I will leave it open whether one should extrapolate from Mr. Putin’s words an implicit indictment of Talmudic supremacism or not.

Now, contrast this with the words of the head of the Catholic church, Pope Francis, in a speech to Congress on September 24, 2015, in which he called for inclusion and fraternity. The Pope managed to mention both Moses and Mohammed but omitted the name of Jesus Christ. Clearly, in that at least President Putin is a more forthright defender of the Christian faith in the public sphere.

West Provoking Putin For The Sake Of Ukrainians Oligarchs

Posted on by

An article in Forbes in 2014 presciently advises the US to stop humiliating and provoking Putin:

. Despite what you read in the Western press, he [Putin] didn’t protest about NATO expansion, he gave up on a number of important Russian military bases, and acted aggressively only when he felt that Russia’s back yard was threatened. Annexation of Crimea, while responding to very strong popular demands both in Russia and Crimea, was a limited operation that enabled Putin to save his face after “losing” Ukraine. Since then he has given plenty of indications that he is ready to call it a day. His limited goals are acknowledged in the writings and interviews of such people as former ambassador to Russia Jack Matlock, or former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. But what needs to be stressed is that the next Russian leader might not be that accommodating, especially in light of continuous and needless bullying on the part of the US. Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s NATO representative and a serious political figure on the right, has already declared that next time he’ll fly into Ukraine and Moldova on military bomber after these countries didn’t allow his plane to use their airspace. What gave rise to Hitler was Germany’s continuous humiliation after World War I. The policy of public humiliation of Putin, the talk of “punishing” him or Russia for bad behavior, is insulting to the Russian leader and his countrymen. In contrast to Germany in 1939, Russia still has plenty of nuclear arms. Had Russia intended to enslave the US or its allies with its threat of nuclear bombs, I would be more than happy to repeat after New Hampshire: “Live Free or Die.” But is it worth it to taunt and threaten an already angry and frustrated nuclear power for the sake of handing Ukraine to the likes of Mr. Kolomoisky and his motley crew of oligarchs, nationalists, and subservient politicians? Those Western politicians and journalists, who confuse the issue of defending freedom with the power games that the current Ukrainian elite is playing, should be aware that they are not serving, but rather betraying, cherished American principles.

Putin Jails Top Spy Chief, Possibly For Leaks

Posted on by

AFR.com

From the The Telegraph UK

Vladimir Putin has thrown a top spy chief in prison amid concern over apparent leaks to the US about Russia’s plans in Ukraine, according to reports.

A report on Monday suggested that Colonel General Sergei Beseda, head of the FSB’s foreign intelligence unit, has been taken to Moscow’s high-security Lefortovo prison, typically used for those suspected of treason.

Poisoning Of Ukrainians/Roman Abramovich: False-Flag?

Posted on by

NY Post:

Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich and several Ukrainian officials were apparently poisoned while negotiating an end to Moscow’s invasion at a meeting where they were only served water and chocolate, according to reports Monday.

Abramovich, who accepted a Ukrainian request to help deescalate the warfare, and at least two senior members involved in negotiations suffered from peeling skin on their faces and hands, constant and painful tearing, and red eyes following a meeting in Kyiv earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The billionaire owner of the British soccer club Chelsea FC‘s eyesight also “completely disappeared” for several hours, while a member of the Ukrainian delegation, the parliamentarian Rustem Umerov, became partially blind, two sources told the Financial Times.

We are supposed to believe from this that Vladimir Putin poisoned Abramovich and did it so incompetently that not only did Abramovich and the other Ukrainian negotiators survive, but they figured out they were poisoned and they know from where the poison came, because there were only two items at the meal.

Does anyone think that a colonel of the KGB, who came up from a humble background in the dangerous, tough world of post-Soviet Russian politics to become one of the most powerful men in the world is that stupid?

Besides, what is not mentioned in the piece is telling. We are told that Zelensky invited Abramovich to participate in the negotiations, which reports as early as the end of February confirm,   but we are not told that Putin is also close to Abramovich. He certainly approved of his mediation.

And Putin would seem to have everything to gain from Abramovich’s help and nothing to gain from poisoning him. Indeed, he has everything to lose by a false step,  which accounts for  his restraint in the face of ever-more deranged denunciations emanating from the US President.

Putin has already accomplished most of his goals, from liberating the Donbas and taking Mariupol from Azov, to destroying most of Ukraine’s military infrastructure, turning water on for the Crimea, and securing evidence of war-plans and biological weapons manufacture that vindicate his decision to go in.

For an operation lasting more than a month, there are relatively few civilian casualties, and most of them are a direct result of the Ukrainian military/government/Nazi battalions giving weapons to civilians, firing on them, placing them intentionally in harm’s ways, refusing to allow them to use the humanitarian corridors, and using them as hostages/military cover. Russia has lost more soldiers than they need have in trying to minimize the damage to the Ukrainians. Had they gone in with full force, there would have been a far greater number of casualties.

Widening the war at this point would endanger all Putin’s gains and would be reckless. So far all the signs point to Putin being a  prudent, competent leader.

Not so Zelensky, who foolishly gambled on NATO troops on the ground in a reckless, double-talking game that he has lost.

Zelensky must know it too because he has already started talking about accepting neutrality for Ukraine and has given up on NATO membership.

That means two of the most important strategic goals of Putin are in the process of being wrapped up. Why would he jeopardize things at this stage?

An outright war with NATO would have no winners except the global elites. With Russians suffering enormously from the sanctions, as well as Russian partners like China and India, poisoning negotiators risks alienating allies and widening the war.

On the other hand, the wider the war, the better for Zelensky, who has every reason to manufacture a provocation to get what he now sees slipping from him, NATO admission and NATO intervention.

So Zelenksy does have a motive to create a false-flag.

And his behavior so far supports this theory. Zelensky has been warning almost daily of possible chemical strikes by Russia.  He recently repeated claims that strikes on chemical factories and the use of phosphorus bombs by Russia constitute a use of chemical weapons that warrants NATO intervention. But in truth neither constitutes chemical weapons usage. Phosphorus bombs are not even categorized as chemical weapons. They’re widely used by militaries all over the world, although they should never be used against civilians because of the hideous injuries they inflict. They were used indiscriminately by the US in Fallujah in Iraq, which did constitute a war crime, but Fallujah was a horror show that is very, very far from what is happening in Ukraine now, despite what the mainstream media psyops tells you.

Still, Zelensky keeps claiming such attacks, which means he thinks that a provocation has its uses.

And if he cannot find one, he has every reason to manufacture one. A poisoning is after all a “chemical attack.” If the poison used is a radioactive substance, then that is a “nuclear attack.” And haven’t we been warned by Zelensky that the Russians will commit chemical and nuclear attacks? Voila, here we have it.

Is there anything else that supports this argument? Yes.

Just recently it was Zelenksy who lobbied the West to exclude Abramovich from the economic sanctions that have hit Russians, ostensibly because he was helping the negotiations.

UK and EU officials are skeptical about the claim, which is from unnamed sources in the US government, but reports are that Biden and Zelensky have been on the phone. Remember Maidan and Biden’s instructions to the Ukraine government to get rid of the prosecutor before he investigated Hunter Biden and Burisma’s corruption?

Today we know Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca was directly funding US biolabs in Ukraine in violation of international conventions. We know there is evidence supporting ethnic cleansing/genocide directed against Russian-speaking Slavs that goes back directly to the Pentagon, to Metabiota, to Hunter Biden, among many others. All these are international crimes. Does Joe Biden’s increasingly hysterical pronouncements have anything to do with revelations about the Biden crime family’s dealing in the Ukraine? Does he stand to gain from a widening of the war which could distract and cover up his crimes? Did he and Zelensky work out a quid pro quo that might provoke such a widening?

Abramovich got his exemption. It must have been in return for something.

I suggest that it was for Abramovich agreeing to go along with this false-flag.

There is some further circumstantial evidence.

The alleged poisoning follows on J. K. Rowling’s recent high-profile attack on Putin, who had just defended her in a speech denouncing cancel culture in the West.

In her rejoinder to Putin, Rowling explicitly referred to Putin “poisoning” his opponents, charges that have been circulating in the West for a long time but have never been proved. [see below, for details.]

A further point is that Rowling’s allegations of poisoning were made in a speech blaming Putin alone for civilian deaths in the Ukraine, indicating that she is fully behind the mainstream narrative on the war.

Given the extraordinary media coverage given to this children’s writer and the manner in which that has been spun off into manufacturing her as a voice for establishment liberal  positions in the culture war, isn’t there a good chance that Rowling herself is an intelligence plant or at least coopted to play her part in intelligence operations?

Consider this: In 2016 the Russian orthodox church along with the Russian Ministry of Culture and the Military cast Harry Potter and NATO as the Satanically -inspired foreign powers threatening Russia in a cartoon called Kids Against the Sorcerers. They are defeated by Russian military school cadets in a story that according to the narrator  “takes place in the present, past and future”.

Not only is the story about “belief in God” against the occult, but also against the Western pursuit of wealth, propagated by an unnamed “enemy” army “seeking a rematch for its defeat during WWII” and about uniting “different people such as the Greeks and the Serbs by common faith and tradition.”

Apparently,  Mr. Putin was trolling J. K. Rowling. She fell into the role cast for her in the film perfectly.

Addendum:. 

The most notorious poisoning case was that involving Putin critic and ex-KGB spy turned British agent,  Alexander Litvinenko, who died in the UK  from radioactive polonium-210 poisoning.

A British court found two Russians, one a member of the Russian parliament, guilty, but the court used conjectural language in suggesting the crime had the Russian state and Putin directly behind it.

The two Russians, both of whom apparently didn’t know the nature of the poison they were carrying,  said Litvinenko did it to himself.

The poisoning was rather suspicious, to my mind.

In the first place, a state like Russia has ample resources to come up with an untraceable poison. If that were not possible, the Russians would have staged the poisoning so as to make it look like an illness or an accident, so that investigation would be delayed until the poison was no longer detectable. And even if they could not disguise the poisoning, the Russians would have disguised the source, perhaps by making sure the poisoning took place at a public event where there was so much food from so many sources and so many people became ill that no one could be sure where or when the poison had been administered, let alone by whom.

If Putin were the ruthless gangster the West says he is, it would have been nothing to kill innocent people to disguise an assassination. It’s done all the time in the West. Or if he wished to send a message, he could at least have disguised the proximate cause of the assassination.

The Litvinenko case instead has all the hallmarks of being cooked-up to attack Putin. Radioactive plutonium may have been a bad choice for a Russian poisoning, as it would point back to Russia instantly. But it was the perfect choice for a false-flag poisoning to blame the Russian government. Litvinenko’s handlers in the West or elsewhere could have set him up to get rid of him and at the same time blame  Putin.

 

 

Senile Puppet Biden Pouring Oil On Ukraine Fire

Posted on by

So useful to have as president an elderly man in dire need of cognitive rehabilitation. Whenever Biden manages to get his tongue around his handlers’ more incendiary prompts and there is an outcry,  it can be explained away and the public can blame it on the president’s failing brain.

There is no brain failure in these verbal bombs someone’s feeding the president.

They are deliberate provocations.

The world is on the brink of nuclear war over a NATO proxy state in eastern Europe and the only way out is for NATO to back off and give Russia a reason to negotiate.

Instead, the slavering wolves driving this war throw their heads back and bay louder, escalating tension and making the possibility of an accident or a paranoid  reaction even greater.

March 17: Biden calls Putin a “war criminal.”

March 18: Biden calls Putin a “murderous dictator,” a “pure thug.”

March 23: Biden claims that Russia is planning a chemical attack.

The claim is contradicted by US intelligence and is a diversion from the official confirmation of US biological labs in Ukraine.

The Grayzone has deconstructed the British psyops operative, who has resurfaced from the Syrian war to make the same inflammatory and conjectural accusations in Ukraine.

March 25: Biden tells US troops in Poland that they will be in Ukraine.

March 26:  Biden calls Putin a “butcher.”

March 26: Biden says Putin “cannot remain in power.”