Tag Archives: controlled opposition

Controlled Opposition: Strawman Arguments Versus Reality

Posted on by

Matthew Ehret via LRC suggests that any attempt at questioning the kind of opposition figures that are thrown up is wrong, because if the opposition were always controlled, the globalists would have long ago achieved their goals and the situation is hopeless.

He may have qualified this opening remark on the rest of the show, which I didn’t watch, so possibly I have him wrong.

In any case, let me refute his argument for the strawman it is.

NO ONE is saying that EVERY opposition to the globalist project is run by the globalists themselves. That is so obviously a distortion of any reasonable understanding of the dialectic as to be a red herring.

Thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of people are wide awake and know what is going on. I draw that conclusion from looking at comment sections, usually pseudonymous, on the web. None of these people is controlled except to the degree they censor themselves, out of prudence or moderators and trolls distort and tar their comments.

HOWEVER, this opposition, while certainly visible at a lower level and indirectly influential, does not directly affect the power centers, whose operating assumptions have already factored in their discontent and channelled it into much more visible and directly influential TALKING HEADS, who are almost always vetted and in conformity to certain parameters, while allowed leeway to argue WITHIN those parameters.

What about patriotic and influential groups within the power network, such as, intelligence or military groups, who disclose or leak information to scuttle ongoing globalist plans?

OF COURSE these are real points of opposition. And the proof is that some globalist projects are at least temporarily scuttled.

Ehret argues that the globalists should already have accomplished their goals, if there was that much controlled opposition.

Here, I need to rub my eyes.

Where the devil does Matt Ehret live? When I read the papers, I see millions of people, even those with access to the net and the leisure to read, walking around with face masks, getting multiples injections, locking themselves up in their homes, announcing their pronouns, and displaying other signs of complete capitulation to the demands of the government. That looks like mission accomplished to me.

I see two sets of Orthodox Slavs busy inflicting tremendous damage to their motherland, to their churches, their people, their economies, and their future, while ENABLING and DISTRACTING from the globalist policies that have actually exported inflation and starvation around the world. I see NATO, which was irrelevant before, now thriving and expanding, and the military industrial awash with new money.

I see millions if not billions of small businesses shut down forever, ancient crafts destroyed for eternity and their owners expropriated and enslaved to debt,  over the last decade or so and hardly any articles in the media about this ongoing catastrophic destruction.

Instead, the leaders of resistance genuflect before the golden calf, beg forgiveness for trivial statements from idolators of the calf, and jail and silence its critics. And you tell me they are NOT leaders controlled by the system and I should SWALLOW their claims without any qualification?

If the globalists have postponed some of their plans, missed targeted outcomes here and there and do stand exposed for their machinations, this is NOT due to highly visible semi or fully controlled FIGURE HEADS, but due to tens of thousands of internet warriors, many long dead or disappeared who have spoken out truthfully over the decades  and indeed centuries [through republished samizdat texts revived by the web] to inform the world.  Whether they were at one time agents or compromised, whether they were bigots or racists, or jihadis, or Nazis, or Bolsheviks, Gentiles, Talmudists, snake charmers or wizards ultimately does not matter, if their material was truthful.

TRUTH percolates up from the ground. It grows like a mustard seed from the ground.

ASTRO TURF, NEEDING MONEY, BRANDING, NETWORKS, AND PARAMETERS, COMES FROM ABOVE.

 

 

 

 

 

Follow the Plan: Is Putin Doing A Trump?

Posted on by

As I posted before, I am not in a position to do much writing and can just post a few things.  But looking through my own research and back and forth about V. V. Putin, I have come to some hard conclusions and feel burdened to put them down.

Putin is “doing a Trump.”

He comes out of the same Russian Jewish Chabad matrix that Trump came from. He is as beholden to Chabad as Trump is.

That is their nexus, not some phony election-meddling charge.

Then again, like Trump, Putin is of Jewish descent, as has been believed for long. I thought these were just unproven rumors, but saw something more convincing recently.

Rabbi Yosef began by saying “according to the Jewish tradition, your leadership is decided by the kingdom of G-d, King of the world, and therefore we bless you: Blessed is the One who gave of His glory to flesh and blood.

Apparently, this manner of address to a national leader is reserved for Jewish leaders, not non-Jewish, who would have been referred to not as “flesh and blood,” but as creatures. It is of course possible that the reporting of the address is false and/or disinformation.

Putin supposedly is of peasant background, but the name itself is of a clan that has ties to European nobility, just as Trump and every other US president had.

That is the first issue, but for me it is by no means the important one.

It is Putin’s conduct of the war, the decision to intervene this year, rather than earlier, and his excessive deference to Israeli and Jewish sensibilities, that inclines me to think he is playing a deep game.

Unlike Trump, who I believe was played, Putin may be more sagacious and doing some of the playing himself.

Trump’s followers, or disinformation artists posing as followers were always chanting “follow trust the plan” and claiming Trump was playing 5th dimensional chess against his dimwit opponents. Each time he blundered or was caught out, they doubled up on the support. In Putin’s case too all we hear from staunch supporters is “everything is going according to the plan.”

Doesn’t the similarity of the words ring a bell?

The latest ambiguous and unnecessary “apology,” although likely spun that way by Israel, was left uncorrected by Mr. Putin.

I do believe that Putin will proceed against Israel in due course, driving Jewish Americans and many Israelis out of their countries, perhaps to Ukraine, which is now rapidly emptying of its native population.

Perhaps that was the reasoning all along, I cannot help but think.

I have never subscribed to the belief that Russia is at the head of some kind of global “resistance” to colonialism or imperialism.

The creation of an opposition to the American led West was always part of the globalist project. However, I had hopes that Putin was indeed acting in the best interests of his country and faith and was sincere in the counterpoint he offered to Western hegemony.  I am not so sure now.

Are Orthodox Slavs in Ukraine and Russia best served by this war?  Was there no other way?

I hope I am wrong but I wonder if this “resistance” is only an exercize in revealing to the powers that be where each person’s sympathies lie. Just as January 6, which Trump encouraged, swept thousands of Trump followers into the government’s net, this Special Military Operation may have helped to reveal those most antagonistic to  the globalist regime in the West and expose them to government retribution, via the DHS.

I supported Donald Trump after he was elected [not before], because his rhetorical assault on the globalist powers was invigorating and useful and he did do a number of good things in office, although many of them were later reversed by executive order by Biden.

I still think Trump was the best on offer and the best we have had in a long time.

In that sense , I also appreciate V. V. Putin.

But that said, there are just too many things amiss with this war for me to be sanguine that all is as it seems.

 

Did Amy Kremer and Chris Barron Sabotage the Capitol Rally?

Posted on by

Note: This still needs additional research and links, but I am posting it to identify how the walk to an area near the Capitol building was sabotaged.

SUSPECTED SABOTAGE OF JAN 6 EVENT BY WOMEN FOR AMERICA EMPLOYEES 

I previously posted the signed public statement by the founder of STOPTHESTEAL, Ali Alexander, that he has had information for some time that the march to the Capitol on January 6, 2021,  was sabotaged by two people, one of whom worked for Women For America First, a group founded by the Kremer family; the other is a Trump campaign advisor.

He adds that there was “at least one campaign advisor,” which suggests that there may have been more than two saboteurs.

STOPTHESTEAL is one of several groups involved in the two Capitol Hill events and was permitted to use Lot 8, near the Capitol building, for its ONE NATION UNDER GOD event. The first event, the Save America rally, was held at the Ellipse, which was permitted to Women For America First.

It is this group that Ali claims produced the two saboteurs.

WHO ARE THE SUSPECTED WOMEN FOR AMERICA FIRST SABOTEURS?

Women For America First put out this statement about the aftermath of the Capitol, denouncing the violence and distancing itself from it.

SUSPECTED SABOTEUR I:   CHRIS BARRON

Note: These are my suspicions based on the resumes of the people involved, their history of subversion. Most likely, the suspects acted through underlings whose names will only surface from a police investigation. However, the underlings would not have been able to act without the go ahead from their superiors. So, fingering these two people is justifiable in the context of the awful national consequences of what happened on January 6.

Barron’s Current Position

The founder of WAF is listed as Amy Kremer and the press statement gives a contact, Chris Barron. with an email address with the domain name rightturnstrategiesdc.com

Right Turn Strategies is a PR/lobbying/strategizing group, adept at working both inside and outside DC and they explain what they do thus:

“Within our communications practice we offer a variety of services including traditional public relations, marketing support and brand development, media training, and crisis management.  As a result, we are fluent in crafting both proactive and reactive strategies. We understand that some clients seek us out to raise their profiles- or that of their business- while others have come to us in an effort to stay “under the radar.” 

Experienced in both paradigms, we quickly assess the situation, and craft and execute a plan to further our client’s objective.  

More often than not, the most important component of a successful strategy is getting the messaging right for the targeted audience. In today’s world, this might mean crafting multiple, nuanced messages to reach different audiences.”

The reference to crisis management and under the radar operations suggests that the group might be adept at subverting a movement from within using deceptive techniques.

Chris Barron seems to be the “Trump campaign advisor” that Ali Alexander refers to in his allegation, since Barron’s biography at the end of a  piece on NeverTrumpers has this:

Chris Barron is President of Right Turn Strategies. He is a contributor to The Hill, and a regular on the Kennedy Show on FOX Business and Unfiltered on Headline News. He was a media surrogate for the Trump campaign and organized LGBT for Trump.

An LGBT advocate is going to have a hard time with the conservative Christian positions of the mainstream of the pro Trump movement and his presence in the campaign seems like a plant.

I think we have one of the two suspects in the sabotage.

Sabotage has also been the modus operandi of the Lincoln Project, which poses as Republican, but actually makes common cause with Democrats to subvert more traditional Republicans, in this case, Trump supporters.

Barron’s History of Subversion

Confirming this suspicion, only a few years ago, Chris Barron was the spokesman of a liberal Republican group [one that is Republican in Name Only] called Mainstream Republicans  whose sole purpose was to undermine limited government groups, like the Tea Party and Freedom Works, and substitute big government, liberal positions for theirs:

Main Street Advocacy, a Republican establishment advocacy group that received seed money from K street, is an organization created expressly to fight limited-government groups who challenge Republican Party officials and to promote liberal and moderate Republicans in government positions.

The group believes that the Tea Party is costing them valuable seats in the Congress.

So Barron has a history of creating astroturf Republican outfits, using money from K street, which was created to finance groups advocating lower taxes,  to undermine genuine grass-roots small government outfits.  To make the situation worse, the original Tea Party formed from a base of anti-Federal Reserve, pro-hard money, Christian conservative, and anti-NWO groups that were followers of Republican candidate Ron Paul, had by then itself been subverted into the later Tea Party, funded by the Koch brothers.

This latter Tea Party, already closer to the statist mainstream than its original base, was the one targeted by Barron’s deceptively named Mainstream Republicans.

MR’s positions in truth more resembled those of mainstream liberal  Democrat groups. Indeed, the two worked together to undermine first, the Tea Party, and then its resurgence in the shape of MAGA [Make America Great Again].

Barron’s profile and history show clear evidence of intentionally subverting the base that became the core of Trump’s following.

So why was he an advisor to the campaign and a coordinator of the single most important public event in the entire Trump presidency?

II SUSPECTED SABOTEUR II:  AMY KREMER

Amy and Kylie Jane Kremer’s Position

We find the same profile and history in the case of Amy Kremer, the other suspected saboteur, who with her daughter is the founder of Women For America First, a 504c foundation. 504c’s  do not need to reveal the sources of their funding.

Kremer’s daughter Kylie Jane is the  director of Women for America First and the permit for the January 6 event was in her name.

Amy Kremer’s History

Kylie Jane’s mother is referred to as a former Tea Party activist, but further research shows that Amy Kremer is actually a liberal Republican or RINO with a history of subverting the Tea Party, just like that of Chris Barron.

Kremer founded Tea Party Patriots, which left-liberal reporter David Wiegel, who followed and misrepresented the Tea Party movement for years, describes as the original grass roots movement.  However, TPP was only created in 2010 and the original Tea Party came out of the Ron Paul libertarians around 2005- 2007. By 2010, that movement had been coopted by mainstream Republicans receiving Koch funding and a rift existed between the two groups’ motivations and goals. Kremer’s TPP was thus, already a mainstream Republican group, something Wiegel’s unreliable narrative fails to state.

On top of that, Kremer then subverted this group by leaving it to form Tea Party Express, a spin- off from another astro-turf group and locked down TPP’s resources during her exit, thereby effectively neutering it. It’s likely that that was her goal all along, which means she too has a history of turning grass roots Republican movements into  liberal Republican or RINO projects.

Exactly like Chris Barron.

HOW THE PLANNED EVENTS OF JAN 6 WERE SUBVERTED

The Jan 6 events were subverted in two distinct ways:

  1. The main speakers, including Trump, were lined up only 2-3 days before the first event at the Ellipse, although PDJT had been promoting the event from mid- December onward. To add to the confusion, at least one data science speaker was cancelled a couple of days before the event and didn’t even go to DC. The slots for the remaining data scientists, Patrick Byrne, and General Flynn, were all cancelled at the meeting itself. No special preparations had been made for them, reportedly, so the decision to cancel was seemingly not last-minute, but taken earlier, while the speakers were notified at the last minute. This suggests that the person who cancelled didn’t want to allow for explanations, substitutions, or any fall-back planning. That is a sign of sabotage not confusion.
  2. The second event at Lot 8 was also sabotaged, because programming and instructions about how to get there from the Ellipse were never given at the first event, which was the original plan.  People observed a younger crowd, smelling of marijuana, and dressed in ways unusual for Trump supporters, coming in to the previous night’s event, as well as the events of Jan 6. Some of this younger crowd seems to have left before Trump’s speech got under way and gone on ahead to the Capitol building, from where they got into the building and engaged in some vandalism. The police appear to have been negligent in protecting the building and were also seen in many videos actively helping people enter and looking the other way, on one hand, while also engaging in unprovoked aggression, including pepper- spraying, tasering, and releasing smoke-bombs.

From StopTheSteal’s statement above and other news items, we get the following:

  1. There was an event at the Ellipse of the President’s Park or South Lawn, permitted to Women For America First, hosted by a variety of groups, including Ali Alexander’s StopTheSteal, Women for Trump, and Women for America First, etc.
  2. The permitted event was to begin at 9 AM and continue to 5 PM
  3. President Trump’s speech was scheduled for 11 AM but it was delayed by and hour and went on to 1 PM??. It seems that while POTUS boosted the event from mid-December onward, he only knew he was scheduled to speak on January 3rd, on the weekend before the event. Could this be why the speech sounded mundane? The Trump team denied that any member of his campaign staff was involved in the organization, operation, or funding of the rally. And if any contractors or former members were, it was without the authorization of the campaign. Thus, Barron as a media liaison of the campaign, would have acted on his own.
  4. Patrick Byrne, Michael Flynn had been told they would speak on January 6 at the invitation of Women For Trump, according to Patrick Byrne. Byrne implies he was told sometime after January 2 and before January 6, which fits with when Trump was told.  On January 5, he was told that one of the 3 or 4 scientists and analysts who had been asked to speak for a few minutes each had had his slot cancelled.  When Byrne and Flynn got to the Ellipse on the 6th, there was no slot for them. They listened to the speeches right up through some of Trump’s. Flynn was later invited on stage by an embarrassed organizer, but he refused. The two left in the beginning or middle of POTUS’ speech.
  5. Eric and Don Jr. gave speeches.
  6. Alex Jones was told that he would be leading a procession to the Capitol and his signal would be the moment when Secret Service police came up to him at the event. But he found that people had gotten there ahead of him.
  7.  The second part of the event was the One Nation Under God event at Lot 8 near the Capitol building, which was organized by and permitted to StopTheSteal. Programming and instructions about walking over there from the Ellipse were supposed to be given to the audience and televised on a large screen at the first event at the Ellipse. Through the deliberate sabotage of  two employees of the Women For America, according to Ali Alexander, this never happened.  Instead, the crowd was left to wander over  mistakenly to the Capitol building itself, where, unknown to them, a trap was ready to be sprung.
  8. At Lot 8,  Senator Paul Gosar [R- Arizona] was supposed to raise the original objection to the election certification and then Senator Ted Cruz [R-Texas] was to propose a Commission to review the merits of the objections. StopTheSteal anticipated that the gathered crowd of OVER A MILLION would add their voices to strengthen the resolve of the wavering Republicans. This and only this was what President Trump intended. Not the march to the physical Capitol building, where, again, unknown to the protestors, additional security had been refused, security had been told to let in people, and infiltrators of many stripes were present, posing both as Trump supporters, as well as opposition, like BLM and Antifa. There were actual BLM supporters present, as well as agent provocateur right- wing groups like Proud Boys posing as BLM, thus adding dense confusion to the events that followed.

 

 

Matt Taibbi: Gonzo Journalist Or Establishment Plant?

Posted on by

Note 1: This web post by the anti-fascist author of several books on mind-control and propaganda, Alex Constantine, is perhaps a bit harsh in its conclusions. Taibbi might simply not know enough to steer clear of disinformation. Also, to be fair, he’s a more talented writer than Constantine gives him credit for being. Continue reading →