Tag Archives: psyop

With Friends Like NATO, Ukraine Doesn’t Need Russia As Enemy

Posted on by

Scott Ritter at Russia Today:

The former US intelligence officer explained that in the event of a breakdown, the Ukrainians would not be able to use the weapon. Ritter reported that the M777 towed 155mm howitzer had weaknesses. It is lighter than the previous version and is unstable when fired. This howitzer also wears out quickly in combat. Its effectiveness decreases already on the fourth day of use. The howitzer becomes completely useless within a week. To address this shortcoming, the US military stepped up maintenance on the ground. But it required highly qualified personnel and high-quality logistics. The Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have such capabilities and howitzers will very quickly become unrepairable.

Similar difficulties will be caused by the maintenance of German “Leopards” and American M133 armored vehicles. These weapons are outdated, worn out and will fail soon after the outbreak of hostilities.

Scott Ritter stated that with such friends as NATO, Ukraine does not need enemies.

Earlier, Scott Ritter said that Europe is over. In his opinion, if the current positions regarding Russia do not change, the continent will suffer irreparable damage, which has not been seen since the end of World War II.

St Seraphim of Sarov Church Burned Down In Paris

Posted on by

St Seraphim of Sarov church in Paris, built in the 1930s, a favorite spot of the French Orthodox community but owned by the Moscow Patriarchate has been burned down.

As you can see, it is Russian Orthodoxy that is under attack, under the pretext of overthrowing a “brutal dictator.” As though, under the right circumstances, the US has not always run directly into the embrace of brutal dictators.

 

 

Poisoning Of Ukrainians/Roman Abramovich: False-Flag?

Posted on by

NY Post:

Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich and several Ukrainian officials were apparently poisoned while negotiating an end to Moscow’s invasion at a meeting where they were only served water and chocolate, according to reports Monday.

Abramovich, who accepted a Ukrainian request to help deescalate the warfare, and at least two senior members involved in negotiations suffered from peeling skin on their faces and hands, constant and painful tearing, and red eyes following a meeting in Kyiv earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The billionaire owner of the British soccer club Chelsea FC‘s eyesight also “completely disappeared” for several hours, while a member of the Ukrainian delegation, the parliamentarian Rustem Umerov, became partially blind, two sources told the Financial Times.

We are supposed to believe from this that Vladimir Putin poisoned Abramovich and did it so incompetently that not only did Abramovich and the other Ukrainian negotiators survive, but they figured out they were poisoned and they know from where the poison came, because there were only two items at the meal.

Does anyone think that a colonel of the KGB, who came up from a humble background in the dangerous, tough world of post-Soviet Russian politics to become one of the most powerful men in the world is that stupid?

Besides, what is not mentioned in the piece is telling. We are told that Zelensky invited Abramovich to participate in the negotiations, which reports as early as the end of February confirm,   but we are not told that Putin is also close to Abramovich. He certainly approved of his mediation.

And Putin would seem to have everything to gain from Abramovich’s help and nothing to gain from poisoning him. Indeed, he has everything to lose by a false step,  which accounts for  his restraint in the face of ever-more deranged denunciations emanating from the US President.

Putin has already accomplished most of his goals, from liberating the Donbas and taking Mariupol from Azov, to destroying most of Ukraine’s military infrastructure, turning water on for the Crimea, and securing evidence of war-plans and biological weapons manufacture that vindicate his decision to go in.

For an operation lasting more than a month, there are relatively few civilian casualties, and most of them are a direct result of the Ukrainian military/government/Nazi battalions giving weapons to civilians, firing on them, placing them intentionally in harm’s ways, refusing to allow them to use the humanitarian corridors, and using them as hostages/military cover. Russia has lost more soldiers than they need have in trying to minimize the damage to the Ukrainians. Had they gone in with full force, there would have been a far greater number of casualties.

Widening the war at this point would endanger all Putin’s gains and would be reckless. So far all the signs point to Putin being a  prudent, competent leader.

Not so Zelensky, who foolishly gambled on NATO troops on the ground in a reckless, double-talking game that he has lost.

Zelensky must know it too because he has already started talking about accepting neutrality for Ukraine and has given up on NATO membership.

That means two of the most important strategic goals of Putin are in the process of being wrapped up. Why would he jeopardize things at this stage?

An outright war with NATO would have no winners except the global elites. With Russians suffering enormously from the sanctions, as well as Russian partners like China and India, poisoning negotiators risks alienating allies and widening the war.

On the other hand, the wider the war, the better for Zelensky, who has every reason to manufacture a provocation to get what he now sees slipping from him, NATO admission and NATO intervention.

So Zelenksy does have a motive to create a false-flag.

And his behavior so far supports this theory. Zelensky has been warning almost daily of possible chemical strikes by Russia.  He recently repeated claims that strikes on chemical factories and the use of phosphorus bombs by Russia constitute a use of chemical weapons that warrants NATO intervention. But in truth neither constitutes chemical weapons usage. Phosphorus bombs are not even categorized as chemical weapons. They’re widely used by militaries all over the world, although they should never be used against civilians because of the hideous injuries they inflict. They were used indiscriminately by the US in Fallujah in Iraq, which did constitute a war crime, but Fallujah was a horror show that is very, very far from what is happening in Ukraine now, despite what the mainstream media psyops tells you.

Still, Zelensky keeps claiming such attacks, which means he thinks that a provocation has its uses.

And if he cannot find one, he has every reason to manufacture one. A poisoning is after all a “chemical attack.” If the poison used is a radioactive substance, then that is a “nuclear attack.” And haven’t we been warned by Zelensky that the Russians will commit chemical and nuclear attacks? Voila, here we have it.

Is there anything else that supports this argument? Yes.

Just recently it was Zelenksy who lobbied the West to exclude Abramovich from the economic sanctions that have hit Russians, ostensibly because he was helping the negotiations.

UK and EU officials are skeptical about the claim, which is from unnamed sources in the US government, but reports are that Biden and Zelensky have been on the phone. Remember Maidan and Biden’s instructions to the Ukraine government to get rid of the prosecutor before he investigated Hunter Biden and Burisma’s corruption?

Today we know Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca was directly funding US biolabs in Ukraine in violation of international conventions. We know there is evidence supporting ethnic cleansing/genocide directed against Russian-speaking Slavs that goes back directly to the Pentagon, to Metabiota, to Hunter Biden, among many others. All these are international crimes. Does Joe Biden’s increasingly hysterical pronouncements have anything to do with revelations about the Biden crime family’s dealing in the Ukraine? Does he stand to gain from a widening of the war which could distract and cover up his crimes? Did he and Zelensky work out a quid pro quo that might provoke such a widening?

Abramovich got his exemption. It must have been in return for something.

I suggest that it was for Abramovich agreeing to go along with this false-flag.

There is some further circumstantial evidence.

The alleged poisoning follows on J. K. Rowling’s recent high-profile attack on Putin, who had just defended her in a speech denouncing cancel culture in the West.

In her rejoinder to Putin, Rowling explicitly referred to Putin “poisoning” his opponents, charges that have been circulating in the West for a long time but have never been proved. [see below, for details.]

A further point is that Rowling’s allegations of poisoning were made in a speech blaming Putin alone for civilian deaths in the Ukraine, indicating that she is fully behind the mainstream narrative on the war.

Given the extraordinary media coverage given to this children’s writer and the manner in which that has been spun off into manufacturing her as a voice for establishment liberal  positions in the culture war, isn’t there a good chance that Rowling herself is an intelligence plant or at least coopted to play her part in intelligence operations?

Consider this: In 2016 the Russian orthodox church along with the Russian Ministry of Culture and the Military cast Harry Potter and NATO as the Satanically -inspired foreign powers threatening Russia in a cartoon called Kids Against the Sorcerers. They are defeated by Russian military school cadets in a story that according to the narrator  “takes place in the present, past and future”.

Not only is the story about “belief in God” against the occult, but also against the Western pursuit of wealth, propagated by an unnamed “enemy” army “seeking a rematch for its defeat during WWII” and about uniting “different people such as the Greeks and the Serbs by common faith and tradition.”

Apparently,  Mr. Putin was trolling J. K. Rowling. She fell into the role cast for her in the film perfectly.

Addendum:. 

The most notorious poisoning case was that involving Putin critic and ex-KGB spy turned British agent,  Alexander Litvinenko, who died in the UK  from radioactive polonium-210 poisoning.

A British court found two Russians, one a member of the Russian parliament, guilty, but the court used conjectural language in suggesting the crime had the Russian state and Putin directly behind it.

The two Russians, both of whom apparently didn’t know the nature of the poison they were carrying,  said Litvinenko did it to himself.

The poisoning was rather suspicious, to my mind.

In the first place, a state like Russia has ample resources to come up with an untraceable poison. If that were not possible, the Russians would have staged the poisoning so as to make it look like an illness or an accident, so that investigation would be delayed until the poison was no longer detectable. And even if they could not disguise the poisoning, the Russians would have disguised the source, perhaps by making sure the poisoning took place at a public event where there was so much food from so many sources and so many people became ill that no one could be sure where or when the poison had been administered, let alone by whom.

If Putin were the ruthless gangster the West says he is, it would have been nothing to kill innocent people to disguise an assassination. It’s done all the time in the West. Or if he wished to send a message, he could at least have disguised the proximate cause of the assassination.

The Litvinenko case instead has all the hallmarks of being cooked-up to attack Putin. Radioactive plutonium may have been a bad choice for a Russian poisoning, as it would point back to Russia instantly. But it was the perfect choice for a false-flag poisoning to blame the Russian government. Litvinenko’s handlers in the West or elsewhere could have set him up to get rid of him and at the same time blame  Putin.

 

 

The Holodomor Happened, First Reported By A Never-Credited Jewish Journalist

Posted on by

Yet another dishonest debate raging in the Unfree World, stirred up by the war in Ukraine.

The Holodomor has been politicized for decades and it is now being contested in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Those who believe that the Ukrainians support Nazi collaborators [a belief I also share although I dispute this reading of the Holodomor] are jumping on a post by a Canadian professor who says it’s an invention of the globalist/imperialist British think-tanks, including the Fabian Society and the Round Table, to which the best known reporters on the Holodomar, Gareth Jones and Malcolm Muggeridge, have connections.

Meanwhile, The New York Times has repudiated its own reporting by Pulitzer prize- winning Walter Duranty, for glossing over the famine as genocide-denial. It is true that the NY Times circulates disinformation during contemporary crises, as it is part of the Mockingbird [CIA disinformation] media.  Granted also that The Times repudiated Duranty most likely only in order to preserve its own credibility, once it became widely-known that Duranty’s propaganda was coerced by sexual blackmail by the KGB, ala Epstein. But we need not jump like Pavlovian dogs to the opposite side.

Consider which ethnicity was represented in the greatest proportion in the ranks of the notorious NKVD, the Stalinist secret police, which enforced the Red Terror:

As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past. And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the “bloodthirsty dwarf.”

Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book “Stalin: Court of the Red Star”, Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.

Stalin’s close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the “first Stalinist” and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao’s terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.

Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We’ll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD’s special department and the organization’s chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.

In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges. In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a “carnival of mass murder,” “fantasy of purges”, and “Messianism of evil.” Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history.

The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and “Soviet people.” Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and “play dumb”: What do we have to do with them? But let’s not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things.”

Consider that Canada is in the US’s backyard and a lot of intelligence operations take place there out of the purview of American journalists and under the thumb of Zionist/Jewish think-tanks/institutions whose primary focus is to make sure that sacred victims stay forever sacred lest the entire globalist project unravels.

Let the Slavic world, both Ukrainian and Russian, be careful not to be provoked by outside forces, into a war of Orthodox Slav against Orthodox Slav that only destroys Christendom for a third time.

The Holodomor happened and its truth depends neither on Jones nor Muggeridge though Jones himself did not get the credit that Muggeridge did at the time:

To begin with, it was Jones’s name, more than any other, that was associated with speaking out about Stalin’s famine. True, the Manchester Guardian had broken the story one day before Gareth Jones, in three unsigned articles published on 25, 27, and 28 March 1933 under the byline “An Observer’s Notes.” (2) But by an accident of history, their author, Malcolm Muggeridge, was able to reposition himself as the sole champion of the starving, while the public record of Jones’s role languished in newspaper archives and his diaries and letters gathered dust in the family home. So there was little reason to disbelieve Muggeridge when he wrote in his 1973 memoir: “no other foreign journalist had been into the famine areas in the USSR except under official auspices and supervision, so my account was by way of being exclusive.” (3)

The truth is rather different. On 29 March 1933, Gareth Jones had turned up in Berlin, his notebooks full. He held a press conference at which he described what he had witnessed of the lethal consequences of Stalin’s Five-Year Plan. It made headlines in several U.S. papers and was reported in the British press: “Famine Grips Russia. Millions Dying. Idle on Rise, says Briton. Gareth Jones, Lloyd George Aide, Reports Devastation. Tours Farm Areas, Finds Food Gone.” (4) (One of the jobs Jones had already packed into his short career was aide to former British Prime Minister David Lloyd George.) Jones then went back to England and wrote a front-page article, the first of several under his own byline, for the Daily Express. (5) The episode should have launched Jones on a career as stellar as Muggeridge’s, but within two years he was dead–murdered by Chinese bandits in Inner Mongolia, a day short of his 30th birthday. (6)

Jones himself was preceded by another unknown journalist, which those who have resurrected Jones’ reputation and those who have vilified it both fail to even mention.

This silence suggest that the current Canadian debate is intelligence-created and intended to polarize and inflame the debate.

It does nothing for truth or peace.

To repeat, the Holodomor story was broken BEFORE Jones and Muggeridge might have appropriated it for their own end [if we grant that they did].

It was broken by Rhea Clyman an unknown Jewish journalist whom no one ever credited.

 

Rhea Clyman, a Canadian freelance journalist, was the first reporter to witness the start of the Holodomor in September 1932. In an attempt to inform her readers of how fifteen years of communism had treated the ordinary Soviet citizen, she packed up a car with provisions, supplies and gasoline and embarked on a four week long road trip through the southwestern parts of the Soviet Union. Starting from Moscow, passing through Ukraine, the Don Cossack Republic and ultimately ending in the Caucasus. As Clyman passed through the Ukrainian villages, she encountered the grim reality of collectivization:
The villages were strangely forlorn and deserted. I could not understand at first. The houses were empty, the doors flung wide open, the roofs were caving in. I felt that we were following in the wake of some hungry horde that was sweeping on ahead of us
and laying all these homes bare. In one village I thought I heard a dog barking. I wanted to go back and look, but there was something in the stoical abandon of these homes that terrified the intuition of a stranger. When we had passed ten, fifteen of
these villages I began to understand. These were the homes of those thousands of expropriated peasants?the kulaks?I had seen working in the mines and cutting timber in the North. We sped on and on, raising a thick cloud of dust in front and behind, but still those empty houses staring out with unseeing eyes raced on ahead of us.116
Clyman stopped in another village, attempting to buy some extra provisions from the peasants, but she was quickly informed that her money was useless here. The food was long gone, and the children of the village had been reduced to eating grass in order to survive: The woman explained that in this village no one had any eggs or milk to sell; the cows and chickens had been slaughtered long ago. They were all starving in the spring.
[…]
?We are good, hard-working peasants, loyal Soviet citizens, but the village Soviet has taken our land from us. We are in the collective farm, but we do not get any grain.
Everything, land, cows and horses, have been taken from us, and we have nothing to eat. Our children were eating grass in the spring….? I must have looked unbelieving at this, for a tall, gaunt woman started to take the children‘s clothes off. She undressed them one by one, prodded their sagging bellies,
116 42
pointed to their spindly legs, ran her hand up and down their tortured, mis-shapen, twisted little bodies to make me understand that this was real famine. I shut my eyes, I could not bear to look at all this horror. ?Yes,? the woman insisted, and the boy
repeated, ?they were down on all fours like animals, eating grass. There was nothing else for them.?117
After this shocking discovery Clyman vowed to herself to share the peasants‘ desperate message with the world, and expose the suffering that was caused by Stalin‘s collectivization.
However, on 27 September Clyman was arrested by the GPU in Tbilisi on the final leg of her journey, and forcibly removed from the country on charges of publishing defamatory articles about the Soviet Union. A claim that was based on her previous articles describing conditions
in Soviet prison camps in Karelia.118 Upon her return in Canada in the Autumn of 1932, she wrote a series of twenty two articles based on her experiences in Ukraine for The Toronto
Evening Telegram entitled ?Famine–Land?. Curiously enough, the paper decided to delay publication of Clymans stories until May 1933, weeks after Jones had broken the news of the
famine internationally. And despite Clymans compelling account of events, her articles had little international impact.
It remains unclear whether Jones had any knowledge of what happened to Rhea Clyman and her stories of the famine. She is never mentioned in any of his articles, diaries and notes.”

The Snowden-Soros-Greenwald-Ukronazi-Biowar Connection

Posted on by

I was watching the Oliver Stone interviews of Putin and wanted to take a look at how Putin saw Snowden, given my distaste for the kind of stunt he was involved in.

Turns out that Putin’s way of looking at agents like Edward Snowden and at the surveillance state in the USA actually matches my own.

In the US, on the contrary, there is the usual cartoonish debate [probably fostered by intelligence], in which either Snowden is a traitor who needs execution or he is the greatest hero of modern times.

Well, I was early to deconstruct Snowden accurately and to say he didn’t go about things in the right way, but opportunistically and ultimately counter-productively, even though the substance of his criticism was accurate.

And, yet, though Snowden was a creation of intelligence, I did note that he didn’t deserve to be called a traitor, because the NSA’s global spying really is a problem and not worthy of the name of state-craft of any kind. It is illegal both under domestic and international law. That is the point Putin makes in the interview, that, while there maybe intelligence gathering in  Russia, it is lawful….or so he says.

Snowden turns out also to be connected to the Soros network via Greenwald, Poitras, etc, and it is obvious why Soros would have objected to NSA spying…… his own activities would be obstructed by it.

I am linking a piece I posted back in 2013 by a researcher, Shimatsu, which ties biowarfare to the Greenwald-Omidyar-Snowden-Soros-Ukronazis nexus

You will need to also go into the links to my previous posts on Soros and Ukraine, including his connection to FEMEN and sex trafficking there.

You will also need to know that the Omidyar network is a sister company to Booz Allen Hamilton, which is an extremely large important government contractor, involved in many, many defense-related industries/technology, including biodefense, biowarfare, and the making of BSL-4 cabinets, which would be the kind of cabinets in which you would keep viruses like the Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus, which was being researched in Ukraine, and which has both immediate bioweapon potential as well as long-term pandemic potential, through gain-of-function innovation.

It  all makes for mind-boggling rereading today, whereas at the time, I wondered if it the biowarfare part was disinformation, it seemed so far-fetched. Today, it feels spot on.

Anyway, the good sense in what Putin says makes me wonder whether a lot of what is written about him is just Western disinformation. He comes across as more on the level and much more sober than people like Biden, Obama, the Clintons or the Bushes.

WHO told Ukraine to Destroy Pathogens

Posted on by

The cover up begins.

Responding to an inquiry by the globalist intelligence mouthpiece Reuters, WHO claims it asked Ukraine to destroy its pathogens to avoid accidental spills, in the run up to the war.  Notably, it did not say when it told Ukraine to do this. And notably also, it didn’t explain why it hasn’t said so before.

When the Russian documents have been discussed in the media for a few days, WHO didn’t immediately and forthrightly claim it had given the instructions. Why?

Does that strike anyone as plausible?

Especially, as WHO does not seem to have had any direct input into those biolabs, in which the most dangerous pathogens were under the direct supervision of the US.

StopTheSteal Blames Women For America First For Jan 6 Chaos

Posted on by

From Ali Alexander of STOPTHESTEAL:

“….Women for America First and at least one Trump campaign advisor betrayed President Trump by intentionally eliminating the clear directions meant for the million-plus patriots Stop the Steal had assembled to hear President Trump.

President Trump was unaware of this catastrophic failure when he gave his keynote address. His general comments about walking to the US Capitol were meant to point people to what was supposed to be the previously mentioned Lot 8, permitted to us by the Capitol Police not the physical building itself.

This is the first time this information is being made available to the general public.

This last minute negligence by Women for America First–run by the Kremer family–spiraled the nation into chaos. Stop the Steal remains in support of federal investigations probing the decision-making processes that led to the civil unrest, as well as civil wrongful death claims from families who lost loved ones. We were all hijacked.

In contrast to the chaos at the Capitol, the Stop the Steal movement for election integrity remained peaceful. Over a 10-week period, Stop the Steal hosted nearly two million Americans in approximately 600 to 1000 protests in all 50 states.

The premeditated actions of bad actors not only disgraced our Capitol but also disrupted both the Stop the Steal sponsored event at the Ellipse and the Stop the Steal organized event at Lot 8 on Capitol Hill permitted by US Capitol Police….

This evidence exonerates any claims of incitement. Our non-association with these photographed and recorded agitators proves both Stop the Steal and President Trump did not participate in any conspiracy to commit insurrection….

….I, Ali Alexander, am publicly stating what I’ve already privately told officials: I remain ready to publicly testify before Congress and Almighty God to the events that led to and occurred on January 6, 2021.

Christ is King.

###

Donate via Crypto

Fake News Claims Nameless Frenchman Funded Capitol Protest

Posted on by

Probably in an attempt to create a counter-narrative to the massive globalist coup that stole the election for Joe Biden, the mainstream media has come up with a story that one inflammatory speaker at the Capitol protest, Nick Fuentes, was funded by “dark money,” including a $500,000 contribution in BitCoin from a 35 year old French computer programmer, who wanted to leave his money to people and causes he believes in, and so sent it in BtC to Fuentes largely, but also to various Alt Right groups, including anti-immigration groups like VDare and others, such as,the Unz Review…

The Unz Review and VDare are part of the mainstream “dissent” category and that itself suggests a bogus story, besides the convenient fact that the computer programmer has now supposedly committed suicide and his obituary, even in a Google web cache has been wiped clean. Google. Uh huh.

We are to take this claim at face value, but affidavits,IP addresses, captured packets of data, images from hardware, statistical analysis…all the mountain of evidence behind Italygate and StoptheSteal is pure guff, outlandish conspiracy, and alternative reality.

Yes, the real foreign interference is not the documented mega- hack by Iranians, Chinese, NATO members and others, directed by the transnational climate-change cabal, but this  BTC- loving corpus-ex-machina.

See, this is why I oppose cryptocurrencies and any amateurish encryption.

At least, if you stick to your own credit-card, a check- book, paper receipts and cash, there is a trail you can use to prove you were framed. If you play around with BTC and VPNs, anyone can pin anything on you…

What’s the real story? I haven’t got deep into this, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some globalist/cabal affiliated group sent money to the Trump protest through these controlled opposition groups.

The reliable and shrewd Mish Shedlock thinks it was stolen money...which is again quite possible with untraceable cryptocurrencies.

At the very least, the whole story is extremely odd.

 

 

The Most Unusual “Inauguration” In US History

Posted on by

I would not call the Biden event an “inauguration.” The correct term for it is “installation.”

For instance, the Japanese empire installed the puppet Manchukuo regime in 1932.

The globalist cabal has shunted aside the overwhelming will of the people; committed the gravest of crimes, from fraud to extortion to treason; and, having sedated us with a witch’s brew of legal hocus pocus and media legerdemain, is now trying to induce over a hundred million people to say that what they saw happen on election night did not happen; that if enough powerful people say so, a lie is better than the truth; and that statistics, forensics, data, and affidavits only count if they add up on their side of the ledger, not ours.

Joe Biden, a man whose mental condition would not fit him to drive a car responsibly, is now behind the wheel of the most powerful nation on earth despite overwhelmingly losing the presidential election.

To assert as much is no longer possible on social media without a black-out of your account. In the real world, it will cost you your job, publishing contracts, and your social circle…. it may well haunt you for the rest of your life.

There has even been talk in mainstream circles of detention camps and cult deprogramming for Trump supporters and indeed anyone with the temerity to deny the official narrative that black is white, up down, and 2+2, 5.

In keeping with that fun house mirror of reality, Biden’s installation has now racked up the following “unique” identifiers [my comments are in color below]:

1.The first virtual inauguration.

Corona virus is the excuse, as it was with the mail-in votes; the real reason is to conceal Biden’s overwhelming lack of popular support and by corollary the fraud of his supposed “election.”

2.The first inauguration where crowds of supporters will be replaced by some 200,000 flags from all over the country.

Quite fitting, since he was installed by a consortium of enemy nations and domestic traitors who decided what was best for the American people, because they didn’t like the answer they got when they asked.

3. The first inauguration where the sitting president has not called the successor to congratulate him on winning.

Why would he? Trump knows Biden didn’t win. Biden knows Biden didn’t win. Everyone knows Biden didn’t win.

4. The first inauguration where the previous president has never officially conceded to the new one, despite the MSM mislabeling as concession a speech in which Trump mentioned a new administration without naming it in anyway.

He didn’t concede because he didn’t lose.

5.The first inauguration for a man whose name has never been mentioned in any speech by the current administration.

Perhaps this is because Biden’s is only a puppet regime whose strings are being pulled by the globalist cabal. He is completely replaceable by any other puppet. The only question is which side, Americanist or Globalist, will emerge victorious from the power struggle now unfolding behind the scenes, as well as overtly.

6.The first inauguration where the sitting president has not invited his successor to  the White House, as is customary. Melania Trump has also refused to meet Jill Biden and has not invited her for the customary walk through the private quarters of the White House. However, to demonstrate that it was not personal pettiness that made him break with tradition, but rather his knowledge of the fraudulent nature of the election, PDJT did write a gracious, personal note to Biden.

Biden broke into the White House, via cyber fraud. Denying him the official  White House tour reflects that reality.

7. The first inauguration in which the current president has limited his cooperation during the transition. PDJT’s civilian advistors have reportedly withheld from the Biden team pre-decision information such as those relating to troop strengths and movements and special operations missions related to counter-intelligence, as well as the vaccine distribution effort, Operation Warp Speed. However, they claim it is the Biden team that has made an overwhelming number of demands for information and that a transition team is not authorized to access sensitive classified information.

Rightly so. Biden has been documented to be the corrupt tool of the Chinese government and the Globalist climate cabal with HQ at the Vatican/City of London and any sovereign government would be loathe to let him share national security intelligence for any reason whatever.

9. The first inauguration in which the current president will not be in attendance.

See 5 and 6.

10. The first inauguration where the successor has been denied [by PDJT] the usual government-sanctioned military plane to fly him in to DC. The Bidens flew in to Andrews Joint Base on a private charter from Delaware.

This is not a matter of pettiness, as it is being described by the mainstream media. Trump was lawfully elected; Biden is simply a pawn installed through a conspiracy of domestic and foreign enemies. These enemies plotted and executed a seditious and treasonous coup that they are now propagandizing as a valid succession, but the military and PJDT are not buying it.

11. The first inauguration in which the number of National Guard troops and a smaller contingent of military  on the ground exceeds the number deployed by the military in Iraq and Afghanistan. Troop numbers have been estimated at around 30,000 in DC, with many more around the country, although the mainstream media is underestimating that by over 10,000. At least one official has used the figure 65,000. In addition, unlike deployments at previous inaugurations, these troops are armed lethally and are authorized to use lethal force. And although vastly in excess of any threat detected so far, they look like they’re sticking around.

12. The first inauguration in which reports are that large numbers of the National Guard turned their back on the pretender’s motorcade.

13. The first inauguration in which FLOTUS’ wardrobe conveyed political messages to the base.

Notice that Melania Trump wore a black suit in the signature style of Jackie Kennedy, shortly after PDJT was virtually assassinated by his vice president in collusion with the cabal, in much the same way that decades ago, Kennedy was physically assassinated by his vice-president Lyndon Johnson, at the behest of the cabal. Files on the Kennedy assassination were among the FBI files declassified in a massive dump by POTUS over the last few days. Melania Trump’s dress, with orange hexagons, recalls the military symbol for fire, according to some observers.

14. The first inauguration where the Capitol is surrounded by a 7 ft high security fence topped with razor wire, rather than barbed wire, with multiple roads and bridges blocked off, and military check points for entry and exit.