Category Archives: Media

Eduard Hodos: Chernobyl And The Third Khazaria

Posted on by

Read this and consider if  Putin, the great benefactor of Chabad from all accounts, is only denazifying the Ukraine or is he playing a necessary role in the desertification of the Ukraine that Hodos speak about below:

Eduard Hodos:

It bears mentioning that Chernobyl has always been regarded by members of the sect [Lila: Chabad Lubavitch] as a sacred place of requital and punishment. You see, it was there that Bogdan Khmelnitsky wiped out the “Chernobyl branch” of Chabad’s forefathers by fire and sword. And it’s no accident that the catastrophe which took place at Chernobyl, which the whole world regards as a “tragedy” and a “catastrophe”, is referred to by Lubavitchers as “The Chernobyl Wonder”. It’s no accident either that beginning in the 1990’s — the period of the establishment of the Third Khazaria — Lubavitchers “opened season” on ritual bacchanalias in Pripiat’, the epicenter of the Chernobyl Wasteland. [Unfortunately the author doesn’t elaborate on these “ritual bacchanalias”. — Editor]

That’s why my theory of a planned diversion, the generous financing of which was able to guarantee the well-known consequences at Chernobyl, has a perfect right to exist.

But let’s return to the Third Khazaria, at whose foundations lies the “desert ideology” posited by my theory. What’s the essence of this ideology, whose very name deprives us of any hint of optimism?

Well really, to understand what I’m talking about, all you need to do is remove your “blinders”, take a look around you, and try to make sense of what you see. I hope it won’t be necessary for me to strain myself in depicting the obvious “achievements” of the generously-financed Third Khazarian “experiment”, which has ravaged our land like a tornado.

All of us are like addicts who were deprived of the “needle” of our socialist “stagnation”, writhing for more than ten years in the hellish “withdrawal” of Khazarian “reforms”. We continue to hope against hope that soon, very soon, things will get better — the main thing is to be patient. But with every day the number of those who were unable to survive their Khazarian “overdose” rises.

In my books I’ve repeatedly attempted to show just what kind of fate is being prepared for us who are still — for the time being — alive on this [post-Soviet] land. On our holy, long-suffering land, over which the Khazarian Sword of Damocles once again hangs.

To support my words I’ll once again cite a passage from my previous book. I’m referring to an article in the newspaper “Argumenty i Fakty” which I used in The Jewish Syndrome-2 and which will help you achieve understanding of the “desert ideology” of “The Third Khazaria”.

The name of the article is “The Country’s Dying. Quietly, but Quickly” (cited here in shortened form):

The decline of Ukraine’s demographic indicators was first established in 1993. Since that time one can observe a steady escalation in the crisis. Today we’re witnessing the lowest birth rate for the whole postwar period; it lags the death rate by nearly a factor of two. In the first nine months of 2001, 260 000 fewer people have been born in the Ukraine than have died. Adding to this figure data about the active emigration of our countrymen abroad, authors of numerous publications on the given topic have come to the following conclusion: Given the current rate of population decline, every 25-30 years the population of the country will decline by half, so if yet another 50-60 years pass the world map will be deprived of the mighty ox-shaped contours of the Ukraine, which is striving so mightily today to integrate itself into Europe!

There’s yet another “spicy” detail in the experts’ forecasts: the sharp reduction of the native population could trigger an intensive influx of immigrants, mainly from the Asian and African continents, and the proportional weight of the non-European population (which is not suffering at all from the demographic point of view — the only problem is in finding living space) will grow at a rate comparable with the dying-out of the native population. Racism is ugly and a sin, but once the Moors have move in to occupy the Dnieper you won’t be singing “We’re not dead yet…” any longer.

Optimists love to remind us that a few developed countries have an even lower birth rate than us. Yes, Italy, Spain, San Marino and Hong Kong are breeding even more slowly. But their process of depopulation is accompanied by a corresponding decrease in mortality and the rise in average life-expectancy. If we compare the last-mentioned criteria in the Ukraine to that of developed countries, we see that our “fleeting life” is more nine years more fleeting than that of Western Europeans’ and twelve years more than the Japanese’.

It’s been established that our demographic decline is determined above all by the use of birth control among women. But why is this happening? If in Europe the maternal instinct has been “deadened” by the ideals of career and emancipation, our far less feminized women are hindered by the fear of miscarriage or giving birth to a “defective” child: The quantity of unhealthy young women has risen sharply.

A certain “stability” is observed by the experts only in the primary causes of death, which have remained unchanged over the course of decades. First place among causes of death in the Ukraine is occupied by circulatory diseases. Second place — by malignant tumors. Next come accidents, poisoning, trauma and respiratory failure.

To round out the above-mentioned factors which are leading to the “emptying” of our country one can add epidemiological data: tuberculosis, which takes 9 000 lives annually, and social pathologies resulting from the low standard of living. Even more alarming than tuberculosis are HIV-related diseases. Their “advance” seems to indicate that an AIDS explosion may lie ahead.

 

Falsifying the History of the Russian Revolution

Posted on by

Today, it is fashionable to assert that Bolshevism was a Russian phenomenon and that any reference to Judeo-Bolshevism is an anti-Semitic slander.

Yet, even the critics are forced to admit the “over representation” of Jews among the ranks of the revolutionaries. How they fudge the admission is to create a straw-man, which is that defenders of the term Judeo-Bolshevism make a complete identity between communism and the Jews, as though there were no other impetus behind the revolution at all.  The philo-Semites then call this identification Nazi.

Now, while Nazis may indeed make such assertions, it would be hard to ascertain, since that would involve reading Nazi tracts, which, in this age of censorship and guilt by association, can hardly be undertaken without attracting the very opprobrium that such research seeks to avoid. So, in the first place, that is an assertion impossible to refute.

Secondly, it is a lie, in so far as non-Nazi individuals also make similar assertions about the Jews and the revolutionaries, but do not make the two identical. The argument that they do is a straw-man. What non-Nazi usage of the term Judeo-Bolshevism asserts is not the pure identity of the two, nor, on the other hand, “over-representation,” which is a lie of a different kind.

The Jews were not merely over-represented in the Russian revolution; they dominated the revolution. And while all revolutionaries were not Jewish and all Jews were not revolutionaries, in the same way as all Germans were not Nazis nor were all Nazis Germans [some were of Jewish ethnicity], it is absolutely the case that the Russian revolution is inextricably linked to the Jews as a group, that Jews financed, led, and propagandized for the revolution, committed its worst excesses and boasted of all this among themselves, even if those facts are now being obfuscated among non-Jewish peoples.

Douglas Reed, a veteran journalist and reliable observer of international affairs, stated without equivocation [and in this he is supported by the ardent Zionist and part-Jewish Winston Churchill]:

The Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly ‘Socialist’ or other nonCommunist parties… were 55 Jews and 6 others.”

Douglas Reed, The Recompense of Zion, Durban, 1978,  p. 274, cited in Vladimir Moss, “The Russian Jewish Revolution,” Academy.edu, Feb-March 2017.

In April 1917, almost half the members of the Petrograd Soviet bureau were Jews and on October 23, 1917, 5 out of the 12 members of the Bolshevik Central Committee were Jews, according to Enzo Traverso, “Intermezzo: The Jews and the Russian Revolution 1917-1937,” in “The Jewish Question,” Brill, October 2, 2, 2018.

Consider that the Jews constituted only around 2% of the population of the Soviet Union at the time, even though the Soviet Jews were still the largest Jewish population in the world, according to the Jerusalem Post, surely not an anti-Semitic outlet:

The roughly three million Jews of the Soviet Union at the time of the revolution constituted the largest Jewish community in the world, but they were only around 2% of the USSR’s population. They were concentrated in the Pale of Settlement (a western region of Imperial Russia) and in Ukraine and Belarussia, where they were 5% to 10% of the population, whereas in Russia itself the 1926 census found only 600,000 Jews.

For the Jews to be only over-represented in the Revolution, we need find them to be represented above 2% in the Soviet bureaucracy. Even double their actual proportions in the population would only mean about 4% of the Soviet administration would have been Jewish. But the proportion of Jews was not anywhere near 4%. It was 50% [the Petrograd Soviet Bureau], over 66% [Soviet secret police central committee], 75% [Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party] and over 85% [Bolshevik state high officials in 1918]. That is, the Jews were represented at all levels of the Revolution at a rate more than 20 times greater than their representation in the population. And that is a conservative estimate.

Judeo-Bolshevism, therefore, is not a racist characterization at all.

It is an accurate description of the nature of the revolution in Russia. Those who attack or characterize the description as anti-Semitic are apologists for crimes that are arguably quantitatively and qualitatively worse than those of the Nazis. The critics of the term Judeo-Bolshevism need to apologize for white-washing the monstrous crimes of their co-ethnics and slandering honest historians.

 

Scott Walter On Jane Mayer’s Fraudulent Journalism

Posted on by

Scott Walter at Capital Research.org:

In her last book, Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right, Mayer bewails the “100 biggest known donors in 2014,” who spent “nearly as much money on behalf of their candidates as the 4.75 million people who contributed $200 or less.” Who were those terrible donors? Mayer says, “A few of the biggest spenders were now Democrats.”

Check her source in the endnotes, and you find how many “a few” equals:

Donors who gave exclusively or primarily to Democratic candidates and groups held down 52 of the top 100 spots—including by far the biggest donor of disclosed 2014 cash: retired San Francisco hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer.

I chose Mayer’s “a few” as the worst lie in the book, but I had to write a long review to catalog all her other distortions and falsehoods. One book chapter had previously appeared as a New Yorker hit piece, and my earlier dissection of that partisan journalism drew this response from John Hinderaker of Powerline:

Walter’s article was perhaps the most devastating refutation of a magazine article I have ever read. In a calm, dispassionate manner, he laid waste to Mayer to a degree that in a more just world would end her career in journalism.

Hinderaker asked readers to leave comments at Mayer’s blog, begging her to respond, but of course she refused. Silence is golden when you’re a wealthy New Yorker from a famous banking family, writing for prestige media whose business model is to give an overpaid, underinformed audience only what it wants to hear.

New Cambridge Study Of Disinformation Is Full Of Disinformation

Posted on by

The latest effort of the academic-media complex to steer citizens in the direction that the powers-that-be prefer comes in the shape of “The Disinformation Age,” edited by Lance Bennett and Steven Livingston, Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Despite the prestigious publisher, a cursory glance is enough to tell me that this is the usual reverse-engineered history, by which I mean that the authors already know what their conclusions are going to be and are determined to rewrite history to fit them.

Just one small example. The book dwells on the influence of the Koch brothers on the establishment libertarian think-tanks like the Mercator Center and the Cato Institute, NEVER mentioning that that “beltway libertarianism” is only one form of right libertarianism, and not the most radical or convincing by any means. That brand of libertarianism is in fact constantly criticized by anarchist libertarians as well as by minarchists.

What’s more, the Cambridge book has the nerve to source the term “Kochtopus,” coined by the libertarians at Mises.org/Lew Rockwell, to the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, whose use of it came several years later and whose knowledge of the whole history of the Kochtopus is at second-hand, filtered through liberal-left tropes, and filled with suspicious gaps and elisions.

LRC: 2008 March 25 How Libertarian Is the Kochtopus

MindBodyPolitic.com:  2009, April 3,  The Libertarian Kochtopus

New Yorker: 2010:  The Koch Brothers’ Covert Ops

Mayer, a documentedly uninformed and lazy investigator got the whole Kochtopus network notion from bloggers who picked it up from the Ron Paul libertarians, which included me at the time, whom Matt Taibbi, a fellow left-lib journalist, was following, plagiarizing, and misrepresenting.

According to  this Cambridge disinfo guide, “Kochtopus” is the term Jane Mayer “likes to call the network”…. no mention of the piddling fact that dozens if not hundreds of people had analyzed the network and called it that long before she did, all of them with a world-view diametrically opposite hers.

The charge of plagiarism surfaced fairly soon, but the New Yorker did its own misleading pseudo- investigation and came to the unsurprising conclusion that there was no there there.

Not surprising, since Mayer is a prime product of the nepotistic and incestuous media culture.

InfluenceWatch tells us the following:

Mayer’s maternal grandfather was Allan Nevins, founder of American Heritage magazine and winner of two Pulitzer Prizes. Mayer’s great-great-grandfather was Emanuel Lehman, who founded the investment bank Lehman Brothers. [15]

That’s who decides what’s disinformation and what isn’t. Plagiarists and propagandists live in a bubble all their lives, sheltered from any necessity to defend their ideas honestly, and the result is false, empty history.

,

Controlled Opposition: Strawman Arguments Versus Reality

Posted on by

Matthew Ehret via LRC suggests that any attempt at questioning the kind of opposition figures that are thrown up is wrong, because if the opposition were always controlled, the globalists would have long ago achieved their goals and the situation is hopeless.

He may have qualified this opening remark on the rest of the show, which I didn’t watch, so possibly I have him wrong.

In any case, let me refute his argument for the strawman it is.

NO ONE is saying that EVERY opposition to the globalist project is run by the globalists themselves. That is so obviously a distortion of any reasonable understanding of the dialectic as to be a red herring.

Thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of people are wide awake and know what is going on. I draw that conclusion from looking at comment sections, usually pseudonymous, on the web. None of these people is controlled except to the degree they censor themselves, out of prudence or moderators and trolls distort and tar their comments.

HOWEVER, this opposition, while certainly visible at a lower level and indirectly influential, does not directly affect the power centers, whose operating assumptions have already factored in their discontent and channelled it into much more visible and directly influential TALKING HEADS, who are almost always vetted and in conformity to certain parameters, while allowed leeway to argue WITHIN those parameters.

What about patriotic and influential groups within the power network, such as, intelligence or military groups, who disclose or leak information to scuttle ongoing globalist plans?

OF COURSE these are real points of opposition. And the proof is that some globalist projects are at least temporarily scuttled.

Ehret argues that the globalists should already have accomplished their goals, if there was that much controlled opposition.

Here, I need to rub my eyes.

Where the devil does Matt Ehret live? When I read the papers, I see millions of people, even those with access to the net and the leisure to read, walking around with face masks, getting multiples injections, locking themselves up in their homes, announcing their pronouns, and displaying other signs of complete capitulation to the demands of the government. That looks like mission accomplished to me.

I see two sets of Orthodox Slavs busy inflicting tremendous damage to their motherland, to their churches, their people, their economies, and their future, while ENABLING and DISTRACTING from the globalist policies that have actually exported inflation and starvation around the world. I see NATO, which was irrelevant before, now thriving and expanding, and the military industrial awash with new money.

I see millions if not billions of small businesses shut down forever, ancient crafts destroyed for eternity and their owners expropriated and enslaved to debt,  over the last decade or so and hardly any articles in the media about this ongoing catastrophic destruction.

Instead, the leaders of resistance genuflect before the golden calf, beg forgiveness for trivial statements from idolators of the calf, and jail and silence its critics. And you tell me they are NOT leaders controlled by the system and I should SWALLOW their claims without any qualification?

If the globalists have postponed some of their plans, missed targeted outcomes here and there and do stand exposed for their machinations, this is NOT due to highly visible semi or fully controlled FIGURE HEADS, but due to tens of thousands of internet warriors, many long dead or disappeared who have spoken out truthfully over the decades  and indeed centuries [through republished samizdat texts revived by the web] to inform the world.  Whether they were at one time agents or compromised, whether they were bigots or racists, or jihadis, or Nazis, or Bolsheviks, Gentiles, Talmudists, snake charmers or wizards ultimately does not matter, if their material was truthful.

TRUTH percolates up from the ground. It grows like a mustard seed from the ground.

ASTRO TURF, NEEDING MONEY, BRANDING, NETWORKS, AND PARAMETERS, COMES FROM ABOVE.

 

 

 

 

 

With Friends Like NATO, Ukraine Doesn’t Need Russia As Enemy

Posted on by

Scott Ritter at Russia Today:

The former US intelligence officer explained that in the event of a breakdown, the Ukrainians would not be able to use the weapon. Ritter reported that the M777 towed 155mm howitzer had weaknesses. It is lighter than the previous version and is unstable when fired. This howitzer also wears out quickly in combat. Its effectiveness decreases already on the fourth day of use. The howitzer becomes completely useless within a week. To address this shortcoming, the US military stepped up maintenance on the ground. But it required highly qualified personnel and high-quality logistics. The Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have such capabilities and howitzers will very quickly become unrepairable.

Similar difficulties will be caused by the maintenance of German “Leopards” and American M133 armored vehicles. These weapons are outdated, worn out and will fail soon after the outbreak of hostilities.

Scott Ritter stated that with such friends as NATO, Ukraine does not need enemies.

Earlier, Scott Ritter said that Europe is over. In his opinion, if the current positions regarding Russia do not change, the continent will suffer irreparable damage, which has not been seen since the end of World War II.

Pro-Gvt Disinfo Expert Does Deep Dive Into Jan 6?

Posted on by

UPDATE: I cited Greenwald on the DHS hiring disinfo specialists to censor the web, under the guise of correcting disinformation.  On second thoughts, Greenwald is probably not the best person to cite, given his past with Snowden and other deep state actors, good or bad. So I’ve deleted the quote.

David Troy does a deep dive into what he considers the background of Jan 6.

Just a glance tells me Troy has an axe to grind….linking child porn to the gold standard is I suppose one way of looking at gold-bugs.

He mentions the following, whose deaths he spins to support his pro-government/deep state argument:

Mark Lombardi, about whom I blogged a DECADE ago.

Gary Webb, about whom I blogged more than a decade ago.

Danny Casolaro, about whom I also blogged a decade ago.

[the post was made private so I will repost it and link to that]

No time for more now.

EXCERPT:

The work of multiple researchers and historians has intersected to provide a fuller picture of the historical forces that led to the events of January 6th. The story centers on the Council for National Policy (CNP) and its members and affiliates who were the most active organizers and participants. But the deeper question is why this history unfolded the way it did.

Where did the CNP come from? What are its goals? Considering this larger historical frame apart from the day-to-day frustrations of party politics reveals a number of key themes. CNP was born from the same network of people who created both the John Birch Society and the World Anti-Communist League. In turn, those networks are also tightly associated with the birth of American libertarianism and also harbor a fervent and lingering passion for the gold standard.

Within this community, the fear and distrust of communism cannot be separated from the libertarian “non-aggression principle” and the preference for the gold standard. The fetish for gold is in fact directly tied into the non-aggression principle in that they see inflationary fiat currency as a kind of “molestation,” as articulated by Robert LeFevre, considered by many to be the progenitor of modern American libertarian thought.

US Disinfo Czar: Need New Laws Against Online Abuse Of Women

Posted on by

The Jewish Voice.com:

“Congress should reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and include provisions against online gender-based harassment,” Jankowicz wrote in a WIRED article highlighting the “abusive content” sent on social media to women in public life…..
Social media companies, she argued should “make the shift toward believing women” allowing them to identify and censor content. Jankowicz also called for tech companies to stop “a tacit pile-on instruction” from influential people with a lot of online followers.

Jankowicz said online mockery of women was a threat to democracy, warning that “gender disinformation” could prevent women from running for office.”

Donald Trump Failed To Break The Techno-Managerial Dictatorship

Posted on by

Scott Gibbons at The Millenial City:

“As I wrote in my book, Trumped by History: The Resurrection of the Great American Middle Class, then suddenly, out of left field came the perennial celebrity Donald Trump. He did not come from within any institution or discipline, and his ideas and platform coalesced rapidly through interaction with various populist personalities, frustration and thought waves. Trump most famously recognized and sanctioned the downtrodden great American middle class and drew those people out of long-term seclusion into increased and open expression of opinion. He resuscitated them and suddenly by just wearing MAGA caps their long suppressed opinions were clear to everyone.

As I wrote in Trumped by History, in bypassing the mainstream institutions and processes, Donald Trump starkly defined the conflict between the middle class and the techno-managerial elite, drawing his supporters fully into the open for the first time since they had lost their social dominance in the 1960s. At the same time, he elicited a virulent opposition to himself personally from establishment conservatives whose ideology was thought in principle to be nearly the same as that of his supporters – revealing both left and right to be the true techno-managerial elite enemy of the great American middle class.”

Gibbons suggests that the Trump presidency failed to dislodge the techno-managerial ruling class and only enriched its own self, thereby leaving its followers even more vulnerable than before.

This is a pessimistic and widely-held analysis that I don’t share, because I never subscribed to the belief that Trump came from no where. I was quite clear-eyed from the beginning about who Trump was. I realized he was a liberal from the heart of the establishment – he was, after all, sent out to sell the financial bail-out to the public. There was his family’s decades-long coziness with mob figures, his ties to the Clintons, and his family ties to the media and to the Jewish establishment. He would never have become that popular without that.

However, to me he represented an opening, a disruption that had the potential to shake things up and move them in an unexpected direction. That potential did not exist with Hillary Clinton.

Trump blew up the place verbally.

And that created a space for the middle class to express itself. Whatever else did not get accomplished by his presidency, that did.

And it can not be undone.