What a dangerous shill Chomsky is. I just spotted this comment from 2020, where he claims Trump is the worst criminal in human history. I guess when you’ve spent your life covering up for Mao, Pol Pot, and every other communist mass murderer, you might not have all that much competition left. But really, the worst criminal ever? Not even Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun?

One of the things of which I’m everlastingly proud is that I saw through this Judas goat fairly early on. In fact, my radar for Judas goats is just about 100 percent accurate. I can smell them across the Atlantic..or Pacific, in this case.

LA Progressive.com
Left Gatekeepers.

The third group to be disinvited is any New Left group that is anti-Zionist. US foreign policy is very dependent on having a friendly base in the Middle East and we can rest assured that any group that is pro-Palestinian such as the ANSWER coalition will be attacked as being anti-Semitic. There is good reason why the scholar Norman Finkelstein has never been able to receive a full-time teaching position because of his defense of the Palestinians. The entire New Left must get a permit paper from AIPAC, the most powerful lobby for Israel in Yankeedom.

Another group targeted by the Left Gatekeepers are organizations that actively support anti-imperialism. Any Pan-African movement leaders like Gaddafi in Libya will be condemned as “authoritarian dictators”, mouthing CIA positions. The African People’s Socialist Party in Yankeedom would also be dismissed.

Furthermore, on an international level, any organization or media outlet that show the slightest sympathy to nations deemed an enemy of the United States will be targeted. The Left Gatekeepers will have no problem with anarchists who condemn both US foreign policy and the authoritarian governments of Russia, China and Iran. But any news source that reports some sympathy for Russia, China, Iran, Cuba or Venezuela are deemed enemies. It is very important to the Left Gatekeepers (whether inside or outside the CIA) that the left in the US tow the party line about its perceived enemies.

So, for example, it is impossible to say that that yes, China has an authoritarian government and yes there is a deep class structure and yes, it is state capitalist. Nevertheless, the Chinese state has raised the standard of living for millions of people and internationally it is doing what Marx said what was best about capitalism: developing the productive forces through building the New Silk Road. China is also going off the dollar, as is Russia, and they are backing their economies in gold. We think that any nation-states or states that attempt to break the domination of the Yankee empire is worth critically supporting. But for the Gatekeepers and their new left pawns, this is too much.

News sources that defend countries that challenge Yankees’ foreign policy will be harassed. This is the case for New Eastern Outlook, Russian Times, The Greanville Post, TeleSUR, or Venezuelan Analysis.

Lastly any group that suggests the United States has been and is capable of assassinations and false-flag operations at home or abroad will be labelled “conspiracy nuts”. This is certainly what happened and is happening to the 911 Truth Movement.

Op India.com:

A story from the pristine Panchmarhi hills of Madhya Pradesh. Where the sun shines bright, where the sky is a wonderful blue, where the animals of the land lead their lives undisturbed in the virgin forest.

Then, one day in the early 1990s, this virgin forest has a visitor. A visitor who sees this lush green forest and falls in love with it. And decides that he must have it to himself. He must grab a piece of this virgin forest, solely for himself, get everyone else out of there and make it his vacation home.

Who is this visitor? Some Brahmanical colonizer from the RSS? Well, not exactly.

This visitor has made his fortune out of sensitising city dwellers and rich foreign audiences about the importance of the environment and protection of tribals. His films have made him wealthy and he purchases the land without difficulty. A few years later, he marries into his own intellectual caste, another firebrand author, writer, activist who stubbornly opposes the Brahmanical Indian state taking the forests away from the tribals of the heartland.

The happy couple who love their vacation home in the forest? Pradeep Kishen and Arundhati Roy.

Because nothing serves the purpose of India’s tribals more than making sure that Arundhati Roy has a vacation home built on their land where she can reflect on their deprived status. Where else will the powerful intellectual opposition to the Sardar Sarovar Dam come from? And wouldn’t Arundhati Roy need a vacation home in the area if she plans to oppose the “new development plan for the Pachmarhi area in which a hotel-building would be allowed at the cost of despoiling the beauty and sylvan backdrop of the colonial hill station”?

I don’t know if the word ‘colonial’ in the linked India Today article from 1999 was used by Arundhati Roy herself, but I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if she insisted on it.

Vacation home building for intellectuals? Yes!

Hotel building? No, no, a thousand times no!

Hotels have a way of attracting the middle class crowd that can’t afford to have private vacation homes. You let them build a hotel near their vacation home in the Panchmarhi hills and next thing you know the place becomes like every other city where the writers and activists have to use the same streets and breathe the same air as everyone else.

In fact, Pradeep Kishen even became a member of a government committee to hear objections against the building of the hotel. In the course of discharging his duties, he presented objections from the “people” against the evil capitalists. The objections against converting “Panchmarhi into the Las Vegas of Madhya Pradesh.”

Here, “people” obviously means Kishen’s wife, Ms. Arund***ti Roy. Did you think any other people matter?

And then it happens! In 1999, the noble activists of Panchmarhi end up receiving a notice about their own vacation home being built on illegally grabbed forest land. Thus begins a long battle in the bourgeois courts of India’s broken republic.

In the course of this battle, powerful arguments are presented by those in Arundhati Roy’s favor. One such argument published in India Today:

“The alleged violation of the law in Bariaam, even if technical, by the landowners pales into insignificance when compared with illegal developments on the other side of the Bariaam Lake. Many senior government officials have purchased land in areas falling within the Pachmarhi wildlife sanctuary.”

Hmmm… seems like Bhakts did not discover whataboutism after all.

Or this one:

“A house nearby is owned by the sister of Vikram Seth, another author, who wrote A Suitable Boy.”

See? Members of the same caste group live nearby. The sister of Vikram Seth. Not Vikram Seth himself, mind you, but his sister. It’s all about the bloodline. Mr. Pradeep Kishen and Ms. Arundhati Roy need to be near their own kind. . It’s a caste group after all. Not every chaiwala or pakodawala or beggar can get in.

The last I know of this long battle begun in 1999 is that the local court declared the bungalow illegal in 2010, upholding a decision of an earlier Revenue Court.

Jewish Trivia has this:

Brzezinski is the daughter of Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, whose own father Tadeusz was a Polish diplomat, stationed at various times in Germany, the Soviet Union, and Canada. The Brzezinski family were Catholics, but in 2005, a genealogist published an article claiming that Tadeusz Brzezinski’s mother was actually born Jewish. Her family, however, converted to Catholicism in reaction to pogroms in Poland in the early 20th century. When Mika Brzezinski was asked about this report, she replied, “I don’t believe it. I’m not Jewish. Not that there’s anything wrong with that,” referencing the famous line from the Seinfeld television show about being homosexual. After criticism from the Jewish community, Brzezinski apologized for trivializing the issue.

Russia Insider has a deep dive into Blackrock, which, with Goldman Sachs, contributes and controls a majority of Western political leaders:

What follows is a machine transcription of an audiofile available at the link above and being a machine transcription, there are several errors. The material is taken from The Right Stuff, I believe, which is an alt right site. I am not in agreement with every thing the alt right says, which is why I don’t link directly to them.  Also, my fear is that many of these sites are run by the US government  for reasons of entrapment.

NOTE In no way do I endorse or subscribe to anything neo-Nazi or racist toward Jewish people. My critique of Jewish control of the media, finance, and politics is only because I fear what supremacist control of the economy and the government must mean for the rest of us.

EXCERPT FROM TRANSCRIPT

“So going back to BlackRock and Goldman Sachs.

[00:16:22] Right. They’re not actually separate entities. BlackRock is the top investor in Goldman, along with Vanguard and strict State Street right after them. So together, Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street own 20 percent of Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs, in turn, is who did the startup for ICE and then installed SPRECHER is the NYSE CEO. So in effect, BlackRock controls Goldman and Goldman controls Hertz Stock Exchange. And it’s pretty, pretty hilarious. And when you look at BlackRock itself, founded in nineteen eighty eight by Larry Fink, who is still the CEO, Larry Fink is Jewish. In fact, I’m just going to read the names and I will tell you if they’re not Jewish. How about that. We’ll just do it that way.

[00:17:05] It’s easier to do it that way. So Larry Fink, Robert S. cappato, Susan Wagner, Barbara Novick, Ben Golub, Q Frater back, guys. A Gentile, Ralph Shlash Stein. You think that guy’s a gentile, James? I don’t know. That’s a tough one. Jesus and Keith Anderson also a gentle so out of the founders of BlackRock, six out of eight are Jewish. So who’s calling the shots now? Again, same rules apply. I’m just gonna read the names and I’ll tell you if they’re not Jewish. So Larry Fink, Robert Capital still around. Rob Al Goldstein, Ben Golub, still around. Gary Shevlin. Derek Stein. Marc Weidmann. Marc Wiseman. Those are basically the guys that sit on cardboard jazz.

[00:17:51] It didn’t hear you call it. Any exceptions to the rule there? Yes. It seems like all these guys are Jewish. The entire corporate board of BlackRock, Jeff.

[00:18:02] Wow. And so, yeah, of course. And Larry Fink, it’s just like, oh, my God, when you look at the look at this guy and think think told the firm’s 14000 employees that he is instituting potentially the most aggressive diversity program in corporate America and sharing that, quote, A bunch of white men will no longer be running the world’s largest money management firm. Yes. So like you guys, where it’s basically Stein, Golombek, Goldstein Capital think weideman Weizman. It’s like, oh, yeah, but not that, though. Like that’s going to remain intact. Yeah.

[00:18:36] Yeah. And do you think they’re only applying that rule internally or are they applying that to the many corporations they have controlling stakes in as we’ll get to.

[00:18:44] I wonder I wonder if if that theory trickles down. Yeah. And it’s I mean they’re going to be trying to mean the fact that they’re handing it off. Know, Jamie Diamond had some heart issues I think in the last couple of weeks.

[00:18:58] And there were some articles talking about who he had groomed as his predecessors or sorry as his successors. I meant to say and one of them is Joseph Pinto, who’s a subpart of Jew, and another one is a woman. So Pinto looks like, you know, your typical like beaner replacement. But no, that’s a subpart of Jew and then a woman who he’s trying to bring up, who’s like unmarried cat lady. Yes. She’s also Jewish. And I think her name is Catherine Lake. I can’t remember. But if you look her up, she’s she’s Jewish. And those are those are the successors for Jamie Diamond, J.P. Morgan’s Jamie Diamond. If he decides to retire. So, yeah, I like this idea that. Oh, we got it. We got to diversify. No, there’s nothing getting diversified. These are all still Jews in charge of all of it. So, you know, Fink has also said profits are an in no way consistent with purpose.

[00:19:49] In fact, profits and purpose are inextricably linked. What does he mean by that? What do you think he means? What do you think their purposes? Well, let’s talk about their purpose. So you had, I think, along with Tom Barach Blackstone, which is different from Black Rock Blackstone, that’s CEO Stephen Schwarzman and Goldman Sachs, Dina Powell were all invited to closed door sessions to discuss Jared Kushner’s Middle East peace plan.

[00:20:17] L-o-l at peace plan. And we remember how what the rollout of that was. But think guy in charge of BlackRock. You know, he he was in that room. Tom Barach Blackstone. Goldman said it’s funny that they’re all there. And of course, Schwartzman was also selected to lead Trump’s economic advisory team during the transition. But it’s not just BlackRock ,of the fifty two senior executives of the largest American asset management firms, private equity funds and. Hedge funds such as Vanguard, Blackstone Group, Elliott Management, Charles Schwab, Renaissance Technologies being White Mellon, Millennium Management Warburg Pincus, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, AQR Capital, Bain Capital, Apollo Global Management 36 or Jews or have Jewish spouses.

[00:21:03] So it’s that roughly 70 percent [are Jewish]

[00:21:05] So to do 70 I think is how that works out. Just fucking disgusting. And those are the ones that, you know, we can look up and figure out. And a lot of that has changed. I think as time has gone on. But these guys are all also members of a secret society before you cringe. This is a real thing. Kappa Beta Fi Enga, look it up. It’s publicly available, but it’s a secret society for finance capital. It’s been around actually since nineteen twenty nine prior to the stock market crash in twenty nine. And the Wall Street chapter apparently is the only chapter left in the membership is is publicly available. You have people like Michael Bloomberg, John Corer, Zine, Larry Fink, Richard Grasso, David Komansky, Sally Krawcheck, who I mentioned her before. Marc Lasry, Martin Lipton. Martin Lipton. Sounds since I could go right. Wrong. Wilbur Ross, Alan Schwarz, Robert Rubin, Mary SHAPIRO, Diana Taylor, who is the wife of Michael Bloomberg and the superintendent of New York State Banks. Warren Stephens. John C. Whitehead. Richard Fuld, who is the former chair and CEO of Lehman Brothers.

[00:22:19] You can look all these people up, but yeah, this is a this is a basically one of their little clubs. And I’m sure because this is publicly available and you can see some of the members they induct 20, 15 to 20 new members every year at a black tie dinner. I’m sure that. Do you really think that this is the only forum in which these people meet and this is a fun forum like this is where these people get together and and drink and socialize and connect with one another and network, actually. But the things that are said and the plans that are made are certainly not done in this manner. But I didn’t even know about captivated Fi. I certainly didn’t know about it. But it was formed in 1929 prior to the stock market crash. And their motto is Keeping alive the spirit of the good old days of 1928 in 1929. Well, that that kicked off a lot of the restructuring of the world economy. That’s what Spetz into World War 2.

[00:23:17] Yeah, I know the good old days where profits were coming hot and heavy and very little oversight.

[00:23:22] So, yeah, Larry Fink is in the mix on this. He got Bloomberg in there, got John Corazón. You got all these these people in. The only reason I mention captivated Fi is because of Larry Fink and a lot of these these people that are all intermingled in so many ways.

[00:23:38] Sure. But Fink, I wonder how many of those people show up showed up in Jeffrey Epstein’s black book, the AP, an interesting research project.

[00:23:45] Good question. I think is probably the most powerful man in the world. His company actually has 6.5 trillion dollars in assets. They are the single largest Shell shareholder in virtually any major corporation that you can think of. We’ll go through the list here in a second. And it controls the nine DACs companies in Germany as well. So it’s not just the United States, very deeply rooted in Germany and Austria. They’re all over the world. It’s they can influence the fate of entire cities and countries. BlackRock is they have 70 offices in 30 countries, clients in over 100 countries around the world. They are essentially the world’s largest shadow bank due to its size and scope. I mean, just the math, just to put this into perspective, so people understand BlackRock is larger than Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan combined. And they own those companies, too, like they own large controlling, not quite well, not controlling in the sense that you would think not 51 percent, but large enough where they can make things happen if they need to. They are the largest single shareholder also of BASF, Daimler, Lufthansa, Deutsche Bank and Allianz. And that’s just in Germany. They they also have this massive data center in Washington state.

[00:25:16] There’s a cluster of six thousand computers there that monitor the assets of over 170 pension funds, banks, foundations, insurance companies and others. These these computers watch interest rate changes, bank failures, look at natural disasters and, you know, look at every change in consequences, positive or negative. And of course, this system is called Aladdin and there are 17000 traders around the world that decide when to buy or sell assets. Based on what this data center spits out, it’s the heart of BlackRock and they single handedly managed most of the money that is in private equity and hedge funds combined worldwide. The only other big company out there that owns just almost as much as them, they’re dwarfed by half. But three trillion is is Vanguard. And so although almost all of their holdings are stocks, they are the largest shareholder in 50 percent of the world’s third largest corporations. So they not only hold stocks, but they hold bonds, commodities, hedge funds and real estate. And yeah, I mean, according to an anonymous European insurer who wishes to remain anonymous and possibly alive as well, he said if you’re looking to buy or sell something or invest, it’s very difficult to get around BlackRock.

[00:26:36] That I mean, they basically, like, run the show. And yeah, yeah, it’s huge.

[00:26:41] Yeah. And when you take a look at the toll, the type of companies they’re involved in, it’s very diversified, a lot of diverse assets here.

[00:26:48] They have 5 percent of Apple, 5 percent of Exxon Mobile, 6 percent of Google, 7 percent of Berkshire Hathaway. The list goes on and on, 7 percent of Petro China. So they’re involved in just about every field you can imagine.

[00:27:01] Yeah. Johnson and Johnson. G.E., Chevron. JP Morgan. Wells Fargo. Procter and Gamble. Royal Dutch Shell. Nestlé. Walmart. Novartis. Roget, Toyota. China. Mobile.

[00:27:11] Like I mean, they they don’t need like who needs sovereign nations and government. Like government is just like for these people, just something that’s getting in the way and this consolidation of power in the center of power in the United States and basically installing BlackRock as the new operating system on top of the Fed and the Treasury is exactly I mean, it just put it all together and you can figure out what’s going on.

[00:27:36] They own they own $58 billion worth of Microsoft, $54 billion worth of Apple. Forty five billion dollars worth of Amazon, $26 billion worth of Johnson and Johnson. Twenty four billion worth of Facebook. Twenty two billion worth of alphabet. Twenty two billion worth of Exon.

[00:27:54] Twenty two billion worth of JP Morgan. I mean, it’s of Bircher Hathaway. It just goes on down the line. Pfizer, Visa, Intel, Netflix, Wal-Mart, Starbucks. They own they are the third largest shareholder of Lockheed Martin, second largest shareholder of Boeing, the fifth largest shareholder of General Dynamics. You have Raytheon, Northrop, McKesson, Huntington, Ingles, L-3 Technologies. Like this is all part of the the military industrial complex media.

[00:28:25] They are the second largest shareholder of AT&T, which now includes Turner Broadcasting, HBO, CNN and Warner Brothers. It’s like this one company now might as well make it all simple. Walt Disney Company, which includes ABC, Fox News A and E, ESPN, Lucasfilm and Marvel. BlackRock is the second largest shareholder. Comcast Charter Communications, 21st Century Fox, which is now owned by Disney. Thompson, Reuters. CBS Dish Network. Viacom. Right. We’re talking about the Black Rock with with Vioxx. I mean, and we’ve talked about the CEO of Viacom and how this is all blending together. And if you’re wondering why BlackRock is the second largest shareholder for a lot of these positions, it’s because, as I said, the first is often Vanguard.

[00:29:14] Vanguard has 41 one holdings with a total value of three trillion with top holdings in this order. Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, JP Morgan, Facebook, Johnson. And it’s all the same companies they own between the two of these companies. They own a huge amount. Now, people would say, oh, yeah, it’s only 6 percent. It’s only a very small portion of the total value of of the company. It’s like. But if they pulled out of one of these companies or decided to do essentially BTX against an American corporation, that’s the end of that. So all of these companies have to be walking in lockstep with whatever give Larry Fink whatever the fuck he wants. So if you’re wondering why, you can have very quickly overnight a nationwide D platforming campaign where it’s almost as if every single company is on the same conference call to decide what action to take. And it’s not like they’re confused about what they need to do. Like in many cases, they just know what they’re supposed to do. But if you cut a lot of people by surprise in 2016, that it’s like, wow, all these companies are operating in such a coordinated fashion. Well, now you get why like now you understand why that happens.

Andrei Martyanov in his latest talking head answers some questions put to him by subscribers.

A quick summary: The West is going crazy because European purchases of oil are financing Russia’s war and there is nothing to be done about it; Poland will stop buying gas, but others will continue; the Russian economy is much larger than the West estimates and it is autarchic enough to withstand sanctions; the Eurasian market is colossal and dwarfs the European market and there is nothing the West can do about it; he is not going to say anything more about the Moskva until the MOD releases more facts; the US cannot defeat Russia with conventional weapons and will sustain losses larger than those of WW2 if it tries, so the chances are that such a face-off will make them go nuclear; the Jewish lobby has a tremendous influence on US policy but many neoconservatives are WASPS or of other nationalities, like the Polish anti-Russian  Brzezinski; the US still has some rights but the EU is completely totalitarian; it was Reagan who put the neocons in power.

On this last, I will post separately, because obviously Martyanov does not know the details of what happened, although someone like Paul Craig Roberts, who was a Reagan official, does. The neocons got in by stealth, infiltrating and blocking legitimate security vetting, one helping the other, in the SECOND half of the administration, when poor Reagan was already suffering cognitive decline. Nonetheless, Reagan too genuflected to the mafia, even making the birthday of  Menachem Mendel Schneerson [the Lubavitcher messiah] Education Day.

The influential Russian journalist and Putin-confidante-turned-scatological-critic, Nevzorov, is under investigation for cooking up the Mariupol hospital bombing fraud. He is also, and more curiously, linked to the dissemination of the Moskva true-cross story.

Now it turns out that he has been living in Israel this past month.

What are his connections to Israel and the West, if any, and could they add substance to the thesis that the Moskva sinking may have been planned far in advance as a propaganda coup, not by the Ukrainians, but by the British or even the Israelis.

Nevzorov has a Comanche father and claims that if he has any tribal affiliation it is to the Comanches, not to Russia. He has no affinity to Russian nationalism, he says, and especially not to the Orthodox vision of Russia, which he claims is Nazism.

Interestingly, Nevzorov, whose maternal grandfather was a KGB officer, was a staunch defender of the Soviet Empire when it was on its last legs. His widely popular TV show took a hard-line against secessionists in Lithuania during that time, encapsulated in a term he coined, Nashi [ours], for the pro-Soviet fighters. This term was later adopted by Putin and reused during the incorporation of Crimea by the Russians, thus, Krym Nash.

It is quite strange that a term like this, so close in sound to the word Nazi, should have been whole-heartedly taken up by the Russian government. It sets Russia up to be cast as “fascists,” especially when taken along with the use of the letter ‘Z’ for Russian forces.

Z, as I blogged earlier, was used in a Russian cartoon in the 1973, in which children dressed in Ukrainian colors descend in a bathyscape called Neptune and discover a sunken ship with the letter ‘Z’ on it which is connected to Nazism. When someone on Twitter referenced this movie, the movie was apparently blocked. Was this just because of embarrassment or was someone unhappy over the discovery of the cartoon? Why would the government adopt the letter ‘Z’ given those associations and who came up with the idea? Could it be the same person who coined the term ‘Nashi’? A person with an interest in tarring pro-Russian forces as fascist?

Could that person be affiliated with foreign, subversive elements?

Nevzorov has visited his father’s home in an Indian reservation in in Oklahoma where he found his father has been a drug dealer, killed in a battle with the police.

Is he a dual Russian and US citizen? It is certainly possible. In any case, he has other interesting connections to the West.

Nevzorov was a consultant to Russian Jewish oligarch Boris Berezovksy in the 1990s, during what has been called the looting of Russia. Berezovsky was the subject of a critical book by the Forbes editor Paul Klebnikov, who was later murdered, some say, as a consequence of his journalism.

Berezovsky himself started out supporting Putin, and then became a fierce critic, fleeing the country to avoid prosecution and vowing to unseat the Russian president by all means, from his perch in the UK.  The oligarch’s circle there included Alexander Litvinenko, a Russian agent who defected to the UK and was later killed by radioactive Polonium poisoning.  A British court found the murder to have been the work of agents of the Russian state, but there is as much evidence that it was a framing of Russia by a third party. Also part of the Berezovsky circle, was the American Jewish microbiologist, Alex Goldfarb, whom some think actually committed the murder. Goldfarb heads an American anti-Putin group.

Berezovsky reportedly committed suicide in 2013 in the UK.

Again, there are questions about his end.

Nevzorov’s decades-long connections to such subversive elements and Byzantine intrigue, with British, US, and Israeli ties, suggests that propaganda he disseminates might have a foreign origin and foreign backing.

If that is so, the gifting of the true cross relic to the Moskva in 2020 could be a clue that the ship was chosen as a target at least then, and most likely even earlier. Perhaps, it was at the time Crimea joined Russia, given that that area has been a locus of conflict between Britain and Russia for centuries.

Concord Monitor:

The Camp of the Saints, which has also been recommended by white nationalist congressman Steve King of Iowa, is a dystopian racist novel by Frenchman Jean Raspail that dehumanizes all non-whites, caricaturing them as savage, subhuman, eaters of feces who threaten the West.

Actually, during the time Raspail wrote his dyspeptic but powerful propaganda tract the only people who routinely ate feces were avant-garde European and American whites, notably the writers Jean Genet, Charles Bukowski, and William Boroughs who celebrated coprophilia, murder, cannibalism and other vicious practices.

In France, coprophagia among certain of the aristocracy was a thing as far back as the Revolution.

In fact, “eats s***” is an extremely common phrase in normal American conversation; also “full of s***,” “s***-faced,” “s***-posting,” “s***-eating,” “no s***,” “you’re s***ting me,” and many similar terms that go to prove which group of people is actually coprophilic and anally obsessed.

Not that we would ever waste our time and talents defacing human beings of whatever race, all without exception made in the image of God. Argue about immigration all you want. Stop it cold in its tracks. Uncover the Jewish supremacist networks by name.

But don’t try to cover up your abysmal cowardice and inability to fight the globalist elites who are destroying your country by scrawling obscenities fit for the bathroom wall onto the inspired text of the Bible itself.

The ‘camp of the saints’ in The Book of Revelation in the New Testament denotes those who love God and follow  truth, righteousness, and love. The forces of Gog and Magog who surround them are the dark Satanically-inspired kingdoms, who, along with the corrupt, homosexual infiltrated Jesuit-led Vatican, and the largely Jewish financial elites, sow division and chaos between nations and creeds to tighten their control over the lives and minds of ordinary men and women world over.

Yet, these groups, which ought to be mentioned by Raspail, are not to be found at all in the book.

Instead, it is Raspail’s visceral hatred of brown skin that comes through. Brown is a color which instantly makes him think of his own excretions, which he then connects to the filth of Asian streets. This revulsion is mixed up with a fear of the massive populations of the East and intense distaste for their customs.

Come to think of it, there is a strangely homosexual element to the novel. The revulsion from breeding, the obsession with  death, feces, and playing with feces, are all distinctly homosexual.

Added: I really think I have a point here. The book was written at a time when French intellectual and literary life was replete with perversion, from sado-masochism to pedophilia, necrophilia, and coprophagia. Could it be that this gifted writer, unable to fulfill his suppressed homosexual desires, because of his religion, sublimated them by projecting them onto a dark-skinned invader?

Consider this passage from one of the high priests of French literature, Alain Robbe-Grillet about 6, 7, and 8 year old girls:

They’d sucked vigorous men and perfumed young ladies. They’d  been caressed, embraced, licked. Their too-childish orifices had been stuffed with exciting creams, before being very softly masturbated. They’d admired an adolescent burning like a torch. They’d seen sperm and blood spilling, but also the tears of schoolgirls being tortured.”

Compare that to this passage in Camp of the Saints:

And everywhere, a mass of hands and mouths, of phalluses and rumps. White tunics billowing over fondling, exploring fingers. Young boys, passed from hand to hand. Young girls, barely ripe, lying together cheek to thigh, asleep in a languid maze of arms, and legs, and flowing hair, waking to the silent languid maze of arms, and legs, and flowing hair, waking to the silent play of eager lips. Male organs mouthed to the hilt, tongues pointing their way into scabbards of flesh, men shooting their sperm into women’s nimble hands. Everywhere, rivers of sperm. Streaming over bodies, oozing between breasts, and buttocks, and thighs, and lips, and fingers. Bodies together, not in twos, but in threes, in fours”

These are fantasies not fears. The language is of eroticism in revulsion and taboo, which is exactly what perversion is. This is not about poor people. It’s about group homosexual and pedophile orgies.

An odd obsession for a Catholic monarchist, you might think. But then again, when you consider the pedophilia and extreme homosexuality drowning the West, including the Catholic church, maybe not.

[Randy Engel, a traditionalist Catholic, has written exhaustively about the homosexual and pedophile networks in the American Catholic church and those who covered up for them and she has cited Francis, as Pope, making explicit and scandalous references to coprophilia and coprophagia in public speeches.]

Maybe, there lies one secret of the book’s vast popularity.

I read that Raspail’s mentor Marcel Jouhandeau was a homosexual who tried to seduce his pupils and ended by committing suicide. Was Raspail one of the students seduced?

Just as disturbing is the fact that Raspail’s name was among the members of the Association Robert Brasillach, a homosexual, who was condemned after his death for collaboration with the Nazis.

Still, by no means do I think the book should be censored. In fact, I urge everyone from South Asia to read it. Read it on the internet if you don’t want to put money into the man’s hands. He is dead, by the way.

Respect him for telling his truth and saying out loud what the vast majority of white Europeans and Americans will say inside, while going along with liberal pieties on the outside. Miserably poor Indians from Calcutta are an easy target. Raspail, the pious fraud, did not have the courage to write a book about the white-skinned people who actually ruined his culture.

The question is, was that deflection accidental, or not?

I think the latter: the book intentionally sought to reframe the  dynamics of such anti-colonial classics as Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth, published just 10 years earlier.

By deflecting the righteous anger of colonized people away from the elite colonizers and substituting the white populations of the colonial countries, as victims, the colonizers deftly  retained control of their domestic population and forestalled a possible human rapprochement between the two victim groups.

Indeed, it is telling that Raspail wrote nothing as powerful about his real overlords. And his fellow-travelers in the US have joined forces with their real oppressors, the financial elites, to manufacture a false narrative: it’s the wealthy Mellon Scaife family that paid for this book to be republished and distributed here in the US.