WHO’s Coming Pandemic Police State Will Not Need A Vote

I  blogged recently on the fact that the Gates Foundation-funded vaccine cartel GAVI had articles on its site mulling the current bioterrorism potential of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever [one of the diseases studied and tested in the US- run Ukrainian biolabs], as well as assessing the future pandemic potential of CCHF, along with nine other similarly lethal pathogens whose human-to-human transmissibility is currently regarded by scientists as low…..

At least, that is the public position of scientists. However, it is entirely possible that biowar researchers have already weaponized these pathogens into pandemic-capable organisms, in some secret lab somewhere.

GAVI’s musings are related to the currently unfolding plans for a supranational medical police state run by WHO, which fronts for GAVI, in concert with the globalist cabal of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum.

Some hardworking researchers have pulled up Schwab’s Nazi and Jewish roots and relationship to the myriad overlapping secret societies that work incessantly for global government.

From the Council of the European Union:

The Council adopted on 20 May 2021 a decision to support the launch of negotiations for an international agreement on the fight against pandemics within the framework of WHO.

The Council adopted on 3 March 2022, a decision to authorise the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response……

The intergovernmental negotiating body will hold its next meeting by 1 August 2022, to discuss progress on a working draft. It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.

Some ideas being discussed  include banning wildlife markets, offering incentives for detecting viruses, and imposing sanctions on countries that conceal pandemic information. This last suggestion comes from the former terrorist and long- time shill for the Clinton and Gates Foundations, WHO’s non-medical chief, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Until now, sanctions have always been a non-starter for the WHO.

The Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response [WGPR] spelled out some further tools being considered:

The document speaks to the following recommendations: surveillance systems that would link into each country’s national health system; the implementation of universal digital vaccination certificates and guidelines on how each member country would be paying fees to the World Health Organization, in addition to the annual membership fees each member country is already paying.

An honorary professor at the Russian Academy of Medical Science and a former WHO employee turned whistleblower Astrid Stuckelberger is concerned that very few groups have had any access to the closed-door deliberations unless they are NGO’s officially working with the WHO.

Members of WHO will also not have any say in deciding whether they want to adopt the new treaty or not.

This delegation [put together to draft the Pandemic Treaty] has been embedded in the Constitution of WHO, and is immediately approved by 194 member states, regardless of whether they adopt its principles. This delegation is legally binding according to the International Health Regulations,”

This would let the coming police state automatically override the national constitutions of the member nations.

This Pandemic police state will be a centralized, digitalized, and technocratic reset of the world order using human AND ANIMAL health and the environment as a pretext.

Consider who will represent these competing interests, how the balance between them will be determined, and who will come out the loser.

Succinctly, the pandemic police state can and will use the protection of wildlife of all kinds as an excuse to enforce regulations that will run against human welfare, especially against those human beings regarded as lesser in its worldview: the elderly; the seriously or chronically ill; the mentally handicapped; the disabled; preborn or newly born infants; the genetically defective, or even merely suboptimal.

Along with these will be grouped political foes and dissidents, domestic and foreign; tribes and ethnicities  that are not allies or considered regressive, primitive or inferior in any way; so-called terrorists and subversives engaged in wrong-think; businesses small and large that get in the way of the cartels favored by WHO; conservatives and traditionalists of many religious and non -religious backgrounds whose values clash with the counter-civilizational projects of the nascent world order.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *