Obama versus the Little Sisters of the Poor:

“The Little Sisters of the Poor are an order of Roman Catholic nuns who have taken vows of poverty, chastity and obedience. They operate nursing homes for those who cannot afford them and employ more than 50 persons. The sisters have objected to the requirement that they must pay for health insurance coverage that provides for birth control, as those payments directly violate Catholic teachings and beliefs.

In a pluralistic society, one would expect that the government would accommodate the sisters. In a free society in which everyone who works for the government takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, the feds have a legal obligation to accommodate them. In a political society in which many Catholics are Democrats who elected the Congress that gave us Obamacare, one would expect an accommodation. But we expect in vain, as the federal government has resisted the sisters mightily and asked the courts to turn down their pleas.”

The only point is this is true for everyone.

All those of us who oppose aggressive wars are forced to pay taxes to support the killing of strangers we have nothing against. Or we’re forced to support so-called NGO’s working hand in hand with an army of spies to destabilize and defraud the countries from which some of us emigrated.

Maybe the Little Sisters should take up some foreign policy activism, while some foreign diplomats can stand up for the Little Sisters.

Then we might really get some where….

DNA India.com describes the extent of institutionalized fraud in American Schools in India (i.e. tax fraud on India by US citizens OFFICIALLY ENCOURAGED)

“The sprawling school, located next to the US Embassy on American government-owned land, has about 1500 students on its rolls, nearly 500 of whom are from the US. The remaining students are from several other countries, including some locals.

Government sources said that they have information that several teachers of the school are working “illegally”, in violation of visas granted to them. Moreover, it is in violation of tax laws.

Government views these violations seriously and is likely to initiate action in this regard, the sources said.

India, in 1973, had granted to 16 teachers of the school the “tax exempted status”. However, as per information available with government, there were many more teachers who were working but not shown as such.

Meanwhile, a report in New York Times says that a handout for new teachers at the school has offered “some unusual guidance” to female teachers whose husbands will also be teaching at the school.

Instructing female spouses to list their occupation on visa applications as “housewife”, the handouts state that they should not mention that they would be working.

Indian officials regard this advice as illegal.

As per the news report, the handout notes that India has placed restrictions on the number of tax-free visas available to school employees. “So, if you are a teaching couple,” the handout says, “we usually have the male spouse apply for the ’employment’ visa and the female spouse be noted as ‘housewife’ on the visa application.”

The report said that Paul Chmelik , the school’s administrator had refused to comment on the visa issue.

The issues pertaining to the school are among those raised by the Ministry of External Affairs with the US government through a diplomatic note and figured in the discussions between US Deputy Secretary of State William J Burns and new Indian Ambassador to the US S Jaishankar in Washington two days ago.

“Deputy Secretary Burns conveyed that we take their concerns very seriously and will continue to address them via appropriate diplomatic channels,” the US State Department said in a statement later.

India initiated a slew of initiatives in retaliation to the arrest and strip-search of its senior diplomat Devyani Khobragade, a 39-year-old 1999-batch IFS officer, on December 12 in New York on charges of visa fraud.

When contacted, the Spokesperson in MEA said, “we are aware of these reports (handouts). These are very serious issues and we will very carefully examine them.” India has been demanding withdrawal of charges against Khobragade, who was indicted by a jury in New York hours before she left that country after getting full diplomatic immunity.

Apart from downgrading the privileges enjoyed by the US diplomats and their families, India also sought details about staff in American schools in the country for possible tax violations. It has also asked the Embassy to “discontinue” commercial activities undertaken by the American Community Support Association (ACSA) from its premises from today.

With India deciding to enforce strict reciprocity about the privileges enjoyed by American diplomats posted in the country, the government has already withdrawn extra privileges enjoyed by them such as airport passes which gave them special access at Indian airports.”

Will Grigg, writing about the police killing of an unarmed homeless man with mental problems says North Korean police are better:

“Two days ago, a jury in Orange County, acquitted the two police officers who led the fatal gang-beating of Thomas, an unarmed, mentally troubled homeless man. The jurors acted on the assumption that the lethal violence was justified because the victim tried to defend himself after the police began their assault.

“American police taught to treat any act of non-compliance as “resisting arrest,” a supposed offense that justifies the use of pain compliance and – in cases like that of Kelly Thomas – lethal force, if it is necessary to subdue the victim. In fact, most police who go “hands-on” with a victim will pre-emptively shout “Stop resisting!” even when no resistance is offered. Any incidental contact with the sanctified person of a police officer is treated as criminal battery or even aggravated assault.”

AND

“Often now when North Koreans are challenged for infringing a certain law, as long as the offense is not political, they won’t hesitate to protest if they believe the law to be irrational,” explains Jiro Isimaru, the Japanese journalist who organized the underground videographer network. This is in stark contrast with the common perception that North Koreans have been “brainwashed” into docile conformity and reflexive submission.

That isn’t true, apparently, of a growing segment of the population suffering under Communist rule in North Korea. It is emphatically true, tragically, of too many citizens of the purported Land of the Free.”

As I’ve felt for a while, no “activists” or “whistle-blowers” here are going to change anything.

There are only two things that will stop the increasing recklessness of US policy, whether in its quantitative easing policies or in its imperial overreach.

The first is economic reality.….which  can be postponed only so far.
The other is the Rest Of the World…..if it can get off its knees.

The Telegraph, Calcutta, reports:

“The vicarious pleasure that the foreign diplomatic community living in the United States of America has drawn from Washington being outwitted by a Third World country on its own terrain is a startling indication of how deeply foreign governments — even some close allies of the United States of America — resent American bullying. But very often they are helpless and unable to do anything about it. That India stood up to Uncle Sam is something many of these diplomats would like to emulate. Unfortunately, even as they daily face from the American bureaucracy the kind of treatment that the Indian deputy consul-general in New York faced — albeit in lesser and varying degrees — they are made to suffer in silence more by their own political bosses back at headquarters, who like to be more American than the Americans themselves.

Manmohan Singh is not the only head of a foreign government to have claimed in public, in the White House Oval Office, and to the eternal discomfiture of his aides (to which I was witness), that the people of India love George W. Bush. I was once at a Central European embassy in Washington, whose diplomats were being treated like dirt in that city even as the Americans were demanding and getting whatever they wanted from that country in return. That country’s prime minister was visiting the US and the occasion was its ambassador’s reception for him.”

UPDATE: So when the maid “Sangeeta Richard” was gifted an I-Phone by Dr. Devyani and got to use her computer, all she needed to do was to use the software to emit radio-waves that could sus out computers not even connected to the net. Her connection to Wayne May suggest where she could have acquired the software and suggest also why he was so hasty in spiriting her out of the country.

ORIGINAL POST

The National Security Agency has implanted software in nearly 100,000 computers around the world – but not in the United States – that allows the U.S. to conduct surveillance on those machines, The New York Times reported Tuesday.

The Times cited NSA documents, computer experts and U.S. officials in its report about the use of secret technology using radio waves to gain access to computers that other countries have tried to protect from spying or cyberattacks.

The agency has planted most of the software through getting access to computer networks, but has also used a secret technology that allows it entry even to computers not connected to the Internet, the Times said, citing U.S. officials, computer experts and documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

The software network could also create a digital highway for launching cyberattacks.

I must be doing something right….or maybe Mr. Stix isn’t as popular a writer as I thought, since he’s actually taking the trouble to respond.

First, I apologize. The article was not by Mr. Stix, he was simply citing it….apparently written by a blog-buddy called Federale.…who turns out to be ex of Homeland Security and a former Federal agent.…now blogging about immigrants.

In that case, the distortions are even more scary, but now much more understandable.

My bad. Will correct.  My excuse is I love puns and got carried away when I saw the name. It’s a hazard of trying to keep up and deconstruct propaganda, as it’s put out.

Still,  the correct attribution actually makes my claim about state propaganda that much more compelling in this case.

On other points made in his refutation by Stix:

1. I am a coward. Um, check out my blog.

2.  I am a “Glibertarian.” Um not quite. Check out my blog. Classical liberal.

3. I am a high-caste Hindu. Um no.  Middle-class in origin. Upper middle-class at present. Christian by birth and descent.

Not all Indians are primitive savages, that is the thesis that has got Mr. Stix upset

I actually do not wear a bone in my nose and have been seen frequently in churches – Orthodox, Catholic, Lutheran and CSI. I am a member in good standing of some. And have even sung and conducted choirs in Catholic churches.

However, churches in the US are often far too left-wing for my taste.

4.  Thomas Woods, Ilana Mercer, no problem.   I like them both, when they stay on track and don’t ignore the Israeli mafia blackmailing governments, here or elsewhere.

Woods even cited one of my pieces in one of his books, so I cannot be a “glibertarian.” I routinely criticize them and have got into trouble with them for criticizing Rothbard, Hoppe, Block and Kinsella…..

I dropped out of their fan club, because I am not an anarcho-capitalist.

Oh and I did write another book, with a libertarian, who has a conservative following. I notice, like some others I’ve mentioned, Stix dropped my name off that book, conveniently. So he really can’t complain if I didn’t attribute him, by accident, can he?

So these bizarre factless slurs and name-calling of which I seem to be the sole recipient, to what do I attribute them?

Christianity and high civilization?

Why is it other people’s much more sharply-worded blogs don’t get attacked in such scurrilous terms?

Why shouldn’t I draw the conclusion that there is in fact pervasive racism, suppressed, and maybe excerbated, by laws?

Still, I cannot get worked up about a random blogger who’s more a victim of propaganda than anything else.

So, a very good day to you too, Mr. Stix. Hope you feel better soon. You’re one of the imperial state’s many victims. A moral victim.

PS

I didn’t bother to refute anything else by Federale/Stix  because in a way their own writing discredits them.  If the masses don’t bother to study and just accept something said by someone because he’s one of them, then that’s the fault of the masses.

But just to give you an idea of how badly this guy distorts stuff:

1.  Stix tries to cover up Federale’s wrong analysis that Devyani was upper-caste and this was about caste Hindus upset about being “touched.” He did this by claiming, first, that she is a Sanskritized Shudra, not a Dalit.

This is an after- the-fact concoction, because the reservation system is in fact very specific and if she identifies publicly as Dalit, that’s what she is.

Dalit is the self-styling of the former “untouchable.”

2. Sanskritization has nothing to do with Devyani’s position, because her mobility has been caused by the reservation or quota system, instituted by a socialist government.

3.  A strip-search, involving inspection of the cavities, did occur and the US Marshals admitted it. The Marshals admitted they did a standard strip-search, which since 2012, by ruling of the Supreme Court, does indeed involve examination, but not penetration, of the cavities.

4. The  Indian government removed the barriers that were placed to PREVENT the free-flow of traffic near the American Embassy, which was a superogatory privilege, granted unilaterally, and with no reciprocity, to the US. The barriers were there so that the diplomats could walk across to the American school without a problem even in mid-day, which wouldn’t have been possible given traffic-congestion in Delhi.

They removed that, because it was a courtesy, and no government would continue to give courtesies unneeded to a country that just submitted a senior consular office to what is custodial rape, under Indian law at least.

The Indian govt in fact upped the security to the US embassy because they were probably aware that there could be a staged provocation to follow, in order to cast the Indian Gvt in a bad light.

As it is, the State Dept. attempted to elicit the maximum mileage by misreporting what happened.

However, with the net, people do get to read the papers and see what’s actually happened.

5. Hinduism is not simple polytheism. Hinduism is not even very clearly a defined religion, as the Abrahamic religions are. However, the core of Hinduism, which includes the Vedas and Upanishads, contains the philosophical content.

This is generally called Panentheistic, which is something quite different. Panentheism can be polytheist or monotheist.  Hindu panentheism contains both strands. However Brahma, Siva, Visnu operate very much like the Trinity of the Christian Church, as do the principles of Satva, Rajas, and Tamasa.

Polytheism certainly exists as a practice, but it is not a simple polytheism by any means. Icons in Hinduims operate like the icons of the Orthodox church.

Beyond that, there are also animistic belief and more polytheistic practices, followed by lower-castes and out-castes, which upper castes looked down on, in just the way Federale looked down up on those practices…..

But today, lower-caste practices have been elevated, by Cultural Marxists, just as alternative practices in the US, have been elevated by them.

So Federale/Stix are both confused on the subject, which, admittedly, is complex and not easy to understand or explain.

But hey, we’re not talking Mircea Eliade or Jaroslav Pelikan here….

Patrick Buchanan on the blank check for war given to Israel:

“Last weekend, the Obama National Security Council finally belled the cat with a blunt statement by spokesperson Bernadette Meehan:

“If certain members of Congress want the United States to take military action [against Iran], they should be up front with the American public and say so.”

Exactly. For whether or not all these senators understand what they are doing, this is where their bill points — to a scuttling of the Geneva talks and a return to the sanctions road, at the end of which lies a U.S. war with Iran.

A majority of Democratic senators have thus far bravely bucked AIPAC and declined to co-sponsor S.1881. However, all but two Republican senators have signed on.

If, after Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, the GOP has once again caught the war fever, the party should be quarantined from the White House for another four years.”

The post that got Ron Unz purged from the American Conservative on July 20, 2013

Ron Unz:

“For the last half-century, the overwhelming majority of immigrants, especially illegal ones, have been non-white, and the resulting racial fears have been a central motivating force driving many of the most zealous restrictionists, who fear being swamped by a tidal wave of “the Other.”  However, I believe that racial considerations, whether fully conscious or not, might also be found on the other side of the issue, helping to explain why our national leadership today so uniformly endorses very heavy foreign immigration.

America’s ruling financial, media, and political elites are largely concentrated in three major urban centers—New York City, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C.—and all three have contained large black populations, including a violent underclass.  During the early 1990s, many observers feared New York City was headed for urban collapse due to its enormously high crime rates, Los Angeles experienced the massive and deadly Rodney King Riots, and Washington often vied for the title of American homicide capital.  In each city, the violence and crime were overwhelmingly committed by black males, and although white elites were rarely the victims, their fears were quite palpable.

One obvious reaction to these concerns was strong political support for a massive national crackdown on crime, and the prison incarceration of black men increased by almost 500% during the two decades after 1980.  But even after such enormous rates of imprisonment, official FBI statistics indicate that blacks today are still over 600% as likely to commit homicide than non-blacks and their robbery rate is over 700% larger; these disparities seem just as high with respect to Hispanic or Asian immigrants as they are for whites.  Thus, replacing a city’s blacks with immigrants would tend to lower local crime rates by as much as 90%, and during the 1990s American elites may have become increasingly aware of this important fact, together with the obvious implications for their quality of urban life and housing values.

According to Census data, between 1990 and 2010 the number of Hispanics and Asians increased by one-third in Los Angeles, by nearly 50% in New York City, and by over 70% in Washington, D.C.  The inevitable result was to squeeze out much of the local black population, which declined, often substantially, in each location.  And all three cities experienced enormous drops in local crime, with homicide rates falling by 73%, 79%, and 72% respectively, perhaps partly as a result of these underlying demographic changes.  Meanwhile, the white population increasingly shifted toward the affluent, who were best able to afford the sharp rise in housing prices.  It is an undeniable fact that American elites, conservative and liberal alike, are today almost universally in favor of very high levels of immigration, and their possible recognition of the direct demographic impact upon their own urban circumstances may be an important but unspoken factor in shaping their views..”