Intelligence Manipulation On Disqus

A sharp poster notes what I’ve observed about the Devyani row and others like it. Comments favorable to Khobragade or the Government of India are thumbed down massively. Comments favorable to the US are thumbed up immediately.

The comments favoring the US never go to the facts in the case or address the points raised. They persist in talking about SC/ST/Dalit reservations and the Adarsh flat. It seems as though those are purposely being raised to inflame and that non-Dalits and Brahmin opinion is especially being inflamed. The commenters often have Indian names but their idioms seem un-Indian.

All this is even more evidence of an intelligence psyop intended to raise consciousness of “modern slavery,” add further injury to India, possibly disrupt her partnership with the US…

Fascinating to watch the day to day massaging of public opinion and the “fake” posts…

    It’s interesting how votes on specific comments can be manipulated on Disqus. When I first saw above comment, it had 12 votes. In matter of few seconds, the up votes moved from 12 to 59. You will see this specifically in case of articles published on Devyani. Interesting enough, you see up votes in huge numbers only for certain comments which are against Devyani.

  • 1 2
  • Reply

More Evidence That Devyani Was Set Up

New Indian Express finds more evidence of links between the US embassy and its diplomats, the Richard family and the arrest of Devyani Khobragade:

“A direct link seems to be emerging between the domestic assistant at the centre of the storm in diplomat Devyani Khobragade case and the US envoy who has been asked to be withdrawn by India, even as External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid said there was no question of restoring privileges for the US embassy here.

It is suspected that in-laws of maid Sangeeta Richard may have been employed with Wayne May, regional security officer at the US embassy, whose presence is no longer wanted by India.

Neither the Ministry of External Affairs nor the US State Department has officially identified the US diplomat who will be withdrawn, though they have said the official has a similar director-level rank as Devyani Khobragade.

Official sources had said the diplomat was “involved in processes related to the Khobragade case and subsequent unilateral action by the US”. The US diplomat has been given “little more than 48 hours”.

Incidentally, the original complaint against Khobragade, accusing her of visa fraud and making false statement, was investigated and filed by DSS special agent Mark Smith and her arrest was also managed by the diplomatic security service.

(Lila: It was Mark Smith who made the original error or false statement that the figure $4500 represented the amount to be made to Devyani. He too belongs to the Diplomatic Security Service in the US, the same body, to which Wayne May belongs.

It was May who told the Delhi police to ignore Devyani’s requests to proceed against the extortion and who helped spirit the Richards out of India, buying tax-exempt tickets, which was a violation of Indian law. If May hadn’t been expelled, he would have been charged with obstruction of justice and tax fraud).

“There also seemed to be another reason for the special attention given to Richard’s case — the elderly Richard couple had been inherited as driver and cook by various US diplomats who resided at the diplomatic residence in Aurangzeb Lane. One of the previous occupants of that address was Uzra Zaya, who is currently acting assistant secretary in the State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.

(Another direct connection the US Government)

Further, the air tickets for the family members — husband Philip Richard and children, Jennifer and Jatin Richard — were paid for by the US embassy’s travel agency, availing of the exemption from duty for diplomats.”

No Stix But Stones: US Propaganda On The Diplomat Story

UPDATE: More links to follow, bear with me.

UPDATE:Mr. Stix tells me that I wrongly used his name and not the name of the actual author, who is Federale.

I stand corrected and apologize for having used his name incorrectly.  My apologies. I have made the correction in the piece. But my criticism still stands and since Mr. Stix thoroughly endorses Federale’s views, no great harm.

These are the dangers of trying to counter propaganda as soon as it launches. What happened is very simple, I saw the piece on Mr. Stix’s site and then rushed to rebut the original off my computer copy and paste. In the copy, I’d cut out the original author and only preserved the original link.  I forgot to check. No nefarious motives at all.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Unbelievable what you can read on so-called major alternative blogs. The level of ignorance exhibited is frightening.

Read on for a supposedly daring expose of the diplomat story. It gets hardly one thing about the story correct.

At Vdare, one blogger, Federale, writes:

“There has been a major dispute in the news recently involving India and the United States. It is ostensibly about the treatment of diplomatic staff in both countries, but the truth is far more interesting.”

Lila: Actually, there was no dispute, as such. There was a flagrant breach of diplomatic protocol by the US Government which acted unlawfully, as it turned out, since the diplomat did in fact have immunity.

STIX

The true motive behind Indian outrage and the subsequent endangerment of the American diplomatic outpost in New Delhi is about anti-white racism, anti-Christian bigotry, and Hindu supremacism on the part of Indians,  officials and outraged public alike

Lila: Hindu supremacism? Where? Indians tend to fawn on whites and India is one of the few foreign countries where the US consistently enjoys high approval….why, I can’t think, given the fact that the US has descended into a form of political madness in recent years and has been acting in an unfriendly way for a long time.

STIX

The second part of the back story is the issue of diplomatic immunity. As a consular officer, and not a diplomatic officer, Khobragade holds immunity only for official acts, of which visa fraud is not one. Espionage is, but not visa fraud.

Lila

Actually, although it wasn’t known at the time, she had been granted full immunity because of accreditation to the UN, for which she’d applied and which she then forgot about.

Stix

Here is where the case gets interesting and Americans learn another lesson on the perils of aliens…..

“…stripping and cavity searches…” Any experienced Federal agent would laugh hysterically at that one. First, the U.S. Marshals Service does not perform strip searches on its customer base. The first part of the procedure in the holding area in a Federal courthouse, is a search of the person arrested, even if the person was searched, and the arrestee should have been, by the arresting agents.

Standard procedure is a close search of the person, the placing of the searching Deputy U.S Marshal or Detention Enforcement Officer’s hands on the arrestees clothed body and the crushing and twisting of the layer of clothing in a top to bottom pattern, but not a strip search. And note here, the arrestee comes in physical contact with the searching official.

Lila: Since 2012 , strip-searches with visual inspection of the cavities have indeed become standard. The fact that  this blogger doesn’t know about it is the problem. It’s also a problem that someone vents so pompously without having even tried to ascertain the facts. It’s finally a problem that he’s such a racist that he thinks the accused MUST be lying, because she’s an alien.

Here’s The Indian Express:

“While New Delhi is learnt to be particularly upset that Khobragade was allegedly forced to undergo a cavity search, sources said that a body cavity search in the US includes a visual or manual search of cavities such as nostrils, ears, mouth, navel, penis or vagina, and rectum.”

Since these are only “rapist vegetarians,” I don’t think that good Christians need to take them seriously. So let’s ask the good Christians at the State Dept and the US Marshals whether indeed they checked Dr. Devyani’s rectum for “lying to the government” on unproven allegations from a maid with a criminal complaint against her.

Here’s a report from other non-rapist non-vegetarians:

Asked whether Khobragade was strip-searched, the US Marshals Service(USMS) replied “yes,” adding that she “was subject to the same search procedures as other USMS arrestees held within the general prisoner population in the Southern District of New York.”

It confirmed that Khobragade was also held in a cell with other female detainees, amid claims she had been detained with drug addicts.

Here’s the 2012 decision on strip-searches on allegations:

Court records show Florence was subjected to an invasive strip and visual body-cavity search. He was then held for six days in the county lockup before being transferred to a Newark correctional facility, where, he claims, he was subjected to another more intrusive search before being placed in the general prison population.

STIX

Then the next lie from Khobragade, “repeated cavity searches.” Another laugh, as no cavity searches are performed on arrestees except in extraordinary circumstances, commonly with hardened criminals known to commit violence in custody or terrorism suspects.

Lila: Cavity inspections are  indeed performed.  I believe that Wayne May, the anti-terrorism unit chief who was behind the set-up of Khobragade, might also  be behind the Marshals’ insistence on stripping Khobragade.  Her father has already indicated that there was a simmering dispute between the Ministry of External Affairs and the US Embassy in New Delhi. What must now happen is journalists must find out if the Marshals photographed the procedure (which they surely did)  and with whom they have shared it. I suspect the recorded images have been kept for blackmail purposes, as that is also standard operating procedure with the intelligence services these days.

STIX

Of course, high caste Hindus are outraged apparently most of all by the arrest itself.

Lila: She is from the lowest caste – the Dalit and her position and her father’s position are seen by many as a triumph of the reservation (affirmative action) system in India, whatever you think about it. Thomas Sowell has written about it critically.

STIX

Khobragade was not the first Indian consular officer to be arrested for visa fraud relating to domestic servants.

Lila:  Yes, there is a history of visa fraud because the laws against trafficking which grant easy visas to people making such accusations have enabled the fraud. Of the previous two cases, one was amended with half the charges retracted. Both cases were suspect and the diplomats felt they were the victims of fraud and extortion.

Stix:

And there is the rub: the mere touching of a high caste Hindu by an untouchable. For the uninitiated, Hinduism is a very primitive religion, untouched, shall we say, by modern considerations of ethics or reason.

Lila: Stix must be a propagandist asked to put out such rubbish. She wasn’t merely touched, as Professor Juan Cole among many others has admitted. “Baring of the labia” is not touching clothes. She was a Dalit, not a Brahmin. And Hinduism is one of the oldest, most sophisticated and intellectual religions in the world, the mother of all religions, in the opinion of many great scholars.

STIX

It is a religion based on ritual purity and the avoidance of pollution. At the center of ritual purity and pollution is caste. Ritual purity is maintained primarily by avoiding physical proximity or touching of lower castes who are polluting to a higher caste, and in the case of the Untouchables, avoiding even their shadow. In the caste system, all persons not Hindus are Untouchables, especially foreigners.

Lila: Yes, there are social aberrations among Hindus, but many of these have been and continue to be corrected.  The blogger is embarrassing here in his ignorance. Foreigners are not untouchables in Hindu culture. The maid herself is a lower-caste convert but may well have been originally a higher caste than Devyani, for all we know. Syrian Christians are usually quite well off and not discriminated against.

STIX

The U.S. Marshals official who had the temerity to touch a high-caste Hindu  committed a grave offense in Hinduism and was insulting to all high caste Hindus, especially the Brahmins who dominate India’s politics and government. (By the way, in violation of the caste system, as political power is supposed to be exercised by the Kshatriya caste.)

Lila: Brahmins do not dominate India’s politics. India’s government is chock-full of minorities at the highest level, far more than the US’s.  She has a Sikh Prime Minister,  has had a Muslim President, and  has an Italian Catholic national leader. There are Dalit state ministers and women hold powerful positions. Many of India’s Brahmins have long emigrated to escape the universal affirmative action program.  Caste has been critiqued, ameliorated, fought, and debated for more than a century with great success, and some failures. It would be like saying that America had made no progress on slavery, even if you were to equate caste and race, which would be incorrect.

STIX

To those with a religious or philosophical system, such an incident would be viewed rationally, as Christians do. A rational person would clearly understand the close association of arrest and search. It is no controversy at all.

Lila: The utterly contemptible blogger thinks that there’s nothing barbaric about having your privates examined because of an arrest.

STIX

For Christians, truth and love are the primary philosophical aspects of their belief systems.

Lila: Yes, Christian truth and love are in full display in this abominable piece of propaganda against a religion and a country. Christian truth and love are behind the global spy state that loots and murders with a rapacity Genghis Khan would have envied. Yes, it’s all Christian.

STIX

The other is personal responsibility for one’s actions in life. No Christian can be affected by the mere presence or touch of another person. There is no ritual purity or pollution in Christ, there is only eventual judgement by God for one’s behavior. A shadow has no effect on one’s moral being, unlike the Brahim who becomes polluted by the proximity of an Untouchable.

Lila: There are no educated Indians who believe that someone’s shadow “pollutes.” You might find uneducated people in the villages who believe it. On the other hand, come to New York City, to the liberal elites, and you will find some thinking on those lines.

STIX

And the Hindus know the truth about the failure of their belief system, which is why Hindus reacted so strongly to the mere touch of an Untouchable on a high caste Hindu.

Lila: Hinduism is the most intellectually compelling of the great religions, despite the much greater organizational power of Christianity. It is Christianity which is slowly becoming Hinduized. The New Age with its “Laws of Attraction” and “You become what you think,” its energy medicine, its yoga, and its meditation, is popular Hinduism, adopted by Westerners without attribution, even while they disparage and undermine the culture from which it arises. Hinduism is the only major religion, beside Christianity, which accepts the divinity of Christ, as an avatar. Islam and Judaism do not, as, for them, it would be blasphemy to call a man a god.

STIX

Hindus became enraged to hide what they knew to be true, the farcical nature of Hinduism: its ritual obsessions and its moral vacuum devoid of any introspection, intellectual reflection, and its obviously ridiculous pantheon.

Lila: One might equally ridicule communion as a cannibal ritual, Mary as a pregnant teen, the Catholic church as a refuge of pedophiles, or bring up stories of angels dancing on pins and weeping statues.

STIX

No one considers the gods of the Greeks, Romans, or barbarians of Europe to be anything other than an inadequate attempt to deal with the vicissitudes of life and explain the natural world around them. One does not accept that Zeus, Hera and Athena existed. They were creations of unenlightened minds.

Lila: I see. Concepts like moira and hamartia and hubris were unenlightened. I suppose Stix is unaware of how much of Greek paganism and eastern thought/symbology actually ended  up being adopted by Christianity.

STIX

However, Hindu India is the only major society that retains such a primitive religion of hundreds of gods that need appeasing.

Lila: This is an embarrassment. He hasn’t even turned to Wiki to understand that Hinduism has never been simple polytheism.

STIX

And in its irrationality, Hindu India has gravely threatened U.S. diplomatic personnel by withdrawing security around the American Embassy in New Delhi.

Lila: Hinduism has the most highly developed and varied philosophical systems, next to which Western philosophies are actually very limited and unsatisfactory.  And security was never withdrawn from the embassy. Some additional traffic barriers were removed. Security was in fact stepped up.

STIX

Clearly such an over-reaction is based on an inferiority complex, and rightly so, as India is close to a failed state, where slavery is widely practiced and plagued by caste violence.

Lila: The reiteration of the term “slavery” is so striking that it must be connected to the NGO -instigated , Bill Gates-backed “modern slavery” meme, which is the basis of the new color revolution aimed at India.

Stix prattles on about “caste violence” while the state he lives in rampages around the globe, destroying economies, mass murdering whole populations, spying, surveilling and brutalizing its own population.

STIX

But these actions by the Indian government were, of course, an actual violation of diplomatic protocol and legal obligations that India has under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which requires the host government to protect diplomats from attack. Such is their religious hatred of Untouchables, India will violate solemn agreements it has signed.

Lila: Madness. India has done no such thing, but nice try at spinning public opinion. It will work with the reading public of VDare,which must be semi-literate to stomach such fare.

STIX

This is hardly a nation the United States should allow immigrants to this country from. Is there no reason in India? Apparently not. They do not even understand the notion of and limitations of consular immunity.

Lila: The good thing about the incident would be if the US corporate presence picked up and left. And could American universities stop begging Indians to sign up, because you can’t open a paper in India without their ads begging for Indian students. …who, unlike many others (hint), pay their way.

STIX

Of course, Sangeeta Richard may be a Christian, given her last name, or at least a descendant of mixed-race stock, which in India makes one an Untouchable as well.

So, I don’t see why Indians are so upset. Apparently a cheap domestic servant was more important that ritual pollution. But ritual pollution is more important that truth and justice, as well as not as fun as burning American untouchables in effigy. Not to mention that high-caste Hindus are outraged that a lower caste got to America before them.

Lila: I’ve already addressed these idiotic errors. Mind you, this is not a high-school student. He’s a widely read blogger, because he “dares” to tell the truth about the ongoing victimization of  whites. I kid you not.

That is insularity, folks. I won’t call it racism, because I think racism needs some level of awareness behind it. People like this are so ignorant and wrong, it’s almost funny.

An entire article on the popular VDare site, which is read by millions of conservative, white nationalists. But no such piece in the mainstream. You have to ask if people like hm are intentionally feeding propaganda, not just error, to inflame the most flammable part of the population.

STIX

The real question though remains, do we as Americans want immigrants like this, obsessed with ritual purity and pollution, bringing such behavior to the United States?

Is this misogyny, violence, and anti-Americanism something the United States needs?

Lila:

Apparently, if you don’t like your women being stripped and having their private parts inspected as  standard procedure, that makes you an anti-American and a misogynist.

Actually, America is consistently highly regarded in India, which, given all this, might not be a good thing. A bit of anti-Americanism might be just the thing for India to regain real independence in its policies.

Nanny-Gate Architect Believer In Global Al Qaeda Threat

The diplomat who was behind the Sangeeta Richard “slave-nanny” case has some highly relevant views:

Here are Mr. Wayne May’s own words

“For the immediate future, terrorism will remain a major transnational problem, driven by continued ethnic, religious, nationalist, separatist, political, and economic reasons.Terrorism based on extremism, especially that which is supported by designate terrorist states like Iran and organizations such as Al Qaeda, remains the primary threat to American interests around the world. and missile proliferation, especially with regard to chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons and missile delivery systems, will continue to be a major concern for the United States as well.

“In addition, growing humanitarian issues—which can drive extremism and conflict—will continue to concern the United States. My role as a DS Agent is to monitor and understand these trends so I can be proactive against the threats that we are facing today and ready for the threats of tomorrow.”

If this is not a smoking-gun statement, I don’t know what is.
Here are all the ingredients that go to make a good, red-blooded “liberventionist” of the type that produces a jolly old color revolution, in which entire continents get destabilized, economies destroyed, and tens of thousands of people displaced, injured or killed, so that bureaucrats can calmly move pins around on a map and fulfill quotas to expand their department empires.

1. He believes in an over-arching global terror threat posed by a singular outfit called Al Qaeda, ranging around the entire world, undetected by the NSA and its galaxy of spy programs.
2. He believes Iran is a terror state.

3.He has global humanitarian concerns.So has Soros and the entire CIA, see Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer Blog.

4. He wants to be proactive to stop terror. Would that be proactive as in Rumsfeld’s P2OG (Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group)?

Anti-Terrorism Boss Behind Fake Slave Case Expelled From India

Didn’t I spot this for a a set-up and an intelligence psyop as soon as it broke? Yes, I did.

(In comments here and here and here . See below post for actual comments made at EPJ on this).

Now, bingo, here’s our man – a meddlesome anti-terrorist (read, neocon) turns out to be chief hatcher of the slave-nanny psyop plot:

Regional security officer Wayne May, who has been asked to leave India, was the coordination officer of the India-US anti-terrorism assistance programme and a special agent of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the division of the US State Department that is also the complainant against Khobragade in the New York case.

New Delhi believes May and his wife, Alicia Muller May, who too is a diplomat and is posted at the US Embassy as a Community Liaison Officer, were central to the entire issue of evacuating domestic help Sangeeta Richard’s family and the action against Khobragade.

Wayne, who has put in over 27 years of service in the US government and managed the more than 420 security staff and investigative officers at the mission in New Delhi, was the main liaison to Indian police agencies for high profile visits from the US and was the coordinator from the American side to the anti-terrorism assistance programme.

The expulsion, sources said, was ordered as India had “reasons to believe the diplomat is closely involved in the processes relating to the case and the subsequent unilateral action by the US”.

– See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/us-diplomat-told-to-go-back-had-helped-nannys-family-leave/#sthash.v842KZb4.dpuf

The senior US diplomat expelled by India Friday allegedly played a central role in the case against IFS officer Devyani Khobragade in New York as well as the evacuation of her domestic help’s family to the US last month.

Regional security officer Wayne May, who has been asked to leave India, was the coordination officer of the India-US anti-terrorism assistance programme and a special agent of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the division of the US State Department that is also the complainant against Khobragade in the New York case.

New Delhi believes May and his wife, Alicia Muller May, who too is a diplomat and is posted at the US Embassy as a Community Liaison Officer, were central to the entire issue of evacuating domestic help Sangeeta Richard’s family and the action against Khobragade.

Wayne, who has put in over 27 years of service in the US government and managed the more than 420 security staff and investigative officers at the mission in New Delhi, was the main liaison to Indian police agencies for high profile visits from the US and was the coordinator from the American side to the anti-terrorism assistance programme.

The expulsion, sources said, was ordered as India had “reasons to believe the diplomat is closely involved in the processes relating to the case and the subsequent unilateral action by the US”.

As an officer of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Wayne was also allegedly coordinating with his counterparts in New York who had filed the official complaint of trafficking against Khobragade.

Sources said India had initially thought of taking action against Alicia, a diplomat of the first secretary rank, as she had allegedly used her privileges to buy tax-exempted air tickets for the husband and children of Richard who left on trafficking visas.

This, sources said, was illegal as only diplomats and their families are eligible for the tax exemption.

However, New Delhi subsequently decided that “reciprocal action” should be taken against a diplomat of the same rank as Khobragade, resulting in the notice to the US to withdraw Wayne, who is a consular level officer.

Wayne, who has served in the Diplomatic Security Bureau since 1988, has worked in Thailand, Colombia, Niger, Singapore and Greece before being posted to India in 2010. He was in charge of the entire security and investigation team in India that included a “deput

– See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/us-diplomat-told-to-go-back-had-helped-nannys-fa

mily-leave/#sthash.Ex9bTStw.dpuf

MY EARLIEST COMMENT THAT THIS WAS A PSYOP WAS AT ECONOMIC POLICY JOURNAL: ON DECEMBER 21, ALTHOUGH I SENSED IT RIGHT AT THE OUTSET.

  1. @Heath

    Actually, the diplomat is from the lowest rank – a Dalit, what used to be called Untouchable.
    That is precisely why she was chosen, since the banking cartel (Rothschild related) work WITH older families, higher castes, who have traditionally aligned themselves with foreign interests over Indian ones.

    For eg. the Tatas, now so respectable, made their money through the opium trade and the addiction and impoverishment of the Asian masses. The Tatas worked then and now with the Rothschilds, who also made money in the opium trade in India.

    Bharara, a Sikh (a community at odds with Indian interests over the years), has a Jewish wife, incidentally, and his brother’s business was bought out by Amazon for hundreds of millions of dollars. He’s also deeply embedded in the NY and NJ Democrat political machinery, through his work with Chuck Schumer

    Perhaps because of this, he has avoided going after any major wrong-doers on Wall Street (except for Cotzein), and has gone after patsies. Even with the non-patsy, SAC, he avoided going after major wrong-doing, and just slapped a fine on it for insider-trading, a marginal issue. He is seen as a grand-stander and politically ambitious, as well as rather unscrupulous (duh).

    The Devyani story seems to be an intelligence pysop, just like the Rajat Gupta affair. Gupta, was a patsy thrown to the wolves to save Blankfein’s skin at Goldman Sachs, because of his status as a director at McKinsey, the firm most responsible for outsourcing American jobs, which had nothing to do with the financial crisis, but made Gupta a good target in a time of job loss and xenophobia.

    More crucially, Gupta was a power player in the rise of the Indian lobby in DC and of South Asia in the financial world, which the banking cartel wanted to curb, thus again making him a ripe target.

    I believe Devyani’s targeting is similarly political. It is part of a pattern of targeting the Indian Foreign Service, the elite cadre of the civil service.

    This group is actually LESS corrupt than others. And the civil service itself is less corrupt (at least until the last few years) than the larger group of politicians.

    The targeting of the IFS would make India less effective in diplomatic circles.

    Why do I suspect an intel psyop?

    There has been a history of CIA infiltration into India, especially in recent years.
    The maid’s family worked for the US embassy. She was interested in getting a more permanent visa to the US than the one she got through her employment with the diplomat, who from the account of the maid’s own daughter, treated her well. The maid is a Christian convert from a highly unionized state (Kerala) with a strong communist and Christian (Zionist Christian) influence.

    The maid tried to extort and blackmail the diplomat, who filed a case against her in India,

    Instead of letting that case take its course, the USG along with a NY NGO interfered in the judiciary in India, by spiriting the maid out of the country, and giving her and her family different visas – very strange behavior in the circumstances.

    All this happened over the months leading up to the arrest of the diplomat and while the Indian gvt was keeping the US gvt informed, the US gvt appeared to be conspiring with the maid to arrest the diplomat, along with the human-trafficking NGO, Safe Horizon, whose Board of Advisers gives the game away – it’s all big bank (Rothschild-related -JP Morgan, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, UBS and so on).

    Safe Horizon is a prominent New York NGO, working closely with the NY government and therefore probably quite close to NY AG Preet Bharara, who was the lawyer in the Gupta case too.

    http://www.safehorizon.org/index/about-us-1/board-of-directors-88.html

‘Further comments at EPJ:

From ZeeNews:

8:15 pm: Was US govt aware of whereabouts of Khobragade’s maid?

Even though the US government feigned ignorance, it may have been aware about the whereabouts of Sangeeta Richard, the maid of Indian Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade who is at the centre of a diplomatic row.

Indicative of this is that Sangeeta’s father-in-law is believed to be working in the US Embassy here.

Sources said the mother-in-law of the maid was also known to the American government as she had worked with a senior diplomat of the US Embassy here.

Besides these, Sangeeta’s husband Philip, a driver with Mozambique Embassy here, was given visa to travel to the US easily and quickly.

Indian government wonders whether all the requirements for grant of visa to him were fulfilled, particularly those related to adequate salary and financial deposits in his bank account. – PTI

More:

7:10 pm: US committed visa fraud: India

India today said its Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade was trapped in a “conspiracy” and accused US of a fraud by granting a visa to the family of her absconding maid.

“She is innocent… It is not the illegality that she (Khobragade) is accused of, but the illegality she refused to oblige,” External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid told Parliament.

Khurshid further said Americans facilitated a visa fraud even after being told by India that there was a risk of illegal immigration by Sangeeta and her family.

6:15 pm: Maid’s family flew to NY on Dec 10

Devyani Khobragade’s absconding maid Sangeeta Richard’s family flew to New York on December 10, just two days before the diplomat’s arrest, government sources said.

Also, India was in touch with the US since June after the official passport of the maid was cancelled and subsequently told about the anti-injunction suit order by an Indian court, they added.

5:40 pm: India freezes diplomatic perks for US consulates

Reply

Opinion in India is completely against the USG’s action on this. Don’t be fooled by so-called Indian comments supporting the action on Indian sites. These are almost hundred percent spurious comments by fake persona, intelligence plants or brainwashed commie students. Most Indians are too poor to spend time blogging and commenting and the net is not always up.

India’s English language media is OWNED by the West and tries to steer public opinion on gay rights, female empowerment and such, by the twitterati. Here’s the ownership structure.

Who owns the media in India ?

There are several major publishing groups in India, the most prominent
among them being the Times of India Group, the Indian Express Group, the
Hindustan Times Group, The Hindu group, the Anandabazar Patrika Group, the Eenadu Group, the Malayalam Manorama Group, the Mathrubhumi group, the Sahara group, the Bhaskar group, and the Dainik Jagran group.

Let us see the ownership of different media agencies.

NDTV: A very popular TV news media is funded by Gospels of Charity in Spain that supports Communism. Recently it has developed a soft corner towards Pakistan because Pakistan President has allowed only this channel to be aired in Pakistan. Indian CEO Prannoy Roy is co-brother of Prakash Karat, General Secretary of Communist party of India.His wife and Brinda Karat are sisters.

India Today which used to be the only national weekly which supported BJP is now bought by NDTV!! Since then the tone has changed drastically and turned into Hindu bashing.

CNN-IBN: This is 100 percent funded by Southern Baptist Church with its
branches in all over the world with HQ in US. The Church annually allocates
$800 million for promotion of its channel. Its Indian head is Rajdeep
Sardesai and his wife Sagarika Ghosh.

Times group list: Times Of India, Mid-Day, Nav-Bharth Times, Stardust , Femina, Vijaya Times,Vijaya Karnataka, Times now (24- hour news channel) and many more. Times Group is owned by Bennet & Coleman. ‘World Christian Council’ does 80 percent of the Funding, and an Englishman and an Italian equally share balance 20 percent. The Italian Robertio Mindo is a close relative of Sonia Gandhi.

Star TV: It is run by an Australian, Robert Murdoch, who is supported by St. Peters Pontificial Church Melbourne.

Hindustan Times: Owned by Birla Group, but hands have changed since Shobana Bhartiya took over. Presently it is working in Collaboration with Times Group.

The Hindu: English daily, started over 125 years has been recently taken over by Joshua Society, Berne, Switzerland. N.Ram’s wife is a Swiss national.

Indian Express: Divided into two groups. The Indian Express and new Indian Express (southern edition) .ACTS Christian Ministries have major stake in the Indian Express and latter is still with the Indian counterpart.

Eeenadu: Still to date controlled by an Indian named Ramoji Rao. Ramoji Rao is connected with film industry and owns a huge studio in Andhra Pradesh.

Andhra Jyothi: The Muslim party of Hyderabad known as MIM along with a
Congress Minister has purchased this Telugu daily very recently.

The Statesman: It is controlled by Communist Party of India. Kairali TV: It
is controlled by Communist party of India (Marxist)

Mathrubhoomi: Leaders of Muslim League and Communist leaders have major investment.

Asian Age and Deccan Chronicle: Is owned by a Saudi Arabian Company with its chief Editor M.J. Akbar.

The ownership explains the control of media in India by foreigners. The
result is obvious.

  1. I am sure that if Laura Bush had had her rectum probed it would be a big problem and people would speak up, far more than if Jane Blow had hers. That’s normal, not hypocrisy.
    Plenty of Indians have spoken up about abusive treatment of ordinary people in India and elsewhere.
    But I guess racists like Tony wouldn’t know because they don’t read anything except what’s written by fellow whites in English, right?

    Firstpost World

    Time we returned the insult to US liberally by R Jagannathan Dec 18, 2013

    The despicable treatment of Devyani Khobragade, Indian Deputy Consul general in New York, should be another wake up call for India and talk-circuit liberals….

    We should not take such affronts lying down anymore. In a limited sense, the transgressions of US minimum wages law by Khobragade will draw the usual Indian liberal nonsense: if we are in contravention of their law, we are the guilty party….

    . Our general assumption that the US law enforcers are merely doing their duty is rubbish. If alleged violation of US visa laws by Infosys can be settled with a fine, why couldn’t the US have done so for Khobragade? Or is a woman diplomat fair game for US law enforcers?

    Indians are the most gullible goops in the world when it comes to discerning the difference between an honest effort to implement the law and using laws to project power and blackmail other countries. The American government is the most sophisticated legally illegal enterprise in the world when it comes to dealing with people from other countries…..//

    The truth is American agencies have sophisticated ways of using their laws against foreigners to defend their interests. Their laws may oppose torture, so they will use Guantanamo Bay to for torture and waterboarding against prisoners. President Obama vowed to shut it down, but Guantanamo is still around.

    Even if it is shut, they will ask allies in brutal Africa or Thailand to do their dirty work. Americans are forbidden by their own laws to indulge is assassinations abroad, but Obama has converted the CIA into a killing machine. Two years ago, they killed one of their own nationals – Anwar al-Awlaki, for example – because of his alleged terror links (not proven in a court of law). The Americans regularly use drones against civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan and South Yemen on the plea that one among them may be a terrorist.

    To have plausible deniability, they even use private surveillance and security agencies as surrogate CIA agents. (Read Mark Mazzetti’s eyeopening book, The Way of the Knife, to get a glimpse into this). Their freedom of religion laws will be used against the one country which actually allows everyone to practice and propagate his religion (India), but top allies like Saudi Arabia will get a free pass on this law. America will swear by free markets to lobby for Wal-mart, but will not recognise freedom for labour movement. Is free enterprise only about the movement of capital and not other factors of production?

    The Americans practice sophisticated racism. Thus they will use a Preet Bharara to target Khobragade (or Rajat Gupta or Raj Rajaratnam) so that it looks like Indian-Americans are implementing the law, and hence not racist, but the same laws will not be used to humiliate the Hispanics or Afro-Americans or the Saudis or American icons like the late Steve Jobs or to convict Richard Nixon or Bill Clinton.

    (Read the comments on a Washington Post story on Preet Bharara, where the commenter accuses Bharara of not following up on the alleged misdemeanours of some pillars of the American judicial establishment.)

    Reply

Corrupt Fat-Cat NGO Behind “Slave-Nanny” Fraud

The truth about the corrupt, crony-corporate NGO, backed by the US government, big corporations and banks that rakes in $56 million dollars a year, yet begs for money constantly and can’t find enough victims for its services:

“Safe Horizon’s financial statement for the year 2012 reveals that the NGO invested over $10,500,000 (Over `65 Crore) in bonds, mutual funds and shares. The NGO which claims to work in areas like domestic violence, criminal justice and human trafficking is funded by big corporates like AGT International, AVON, US government agencies, Philips Van Heusen Corporation and Capital One Bank.

Its expenditures are more intriguing including an average $161,000 or `1 Crore on lobbying every year. It pays its high flying CEO more than $339,000 or `2 crore per annum. A US based group Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (SAVE) claimed money paid by Safe Horizon is more than what a member of the US House of Representative receives as annual salary.

The federal government spends $1 billion a year for programmes to curb domestic violence. But these programmes lack accountability and transparency, giving rise to bloated salaries, mismanagement and outright theft,” SAVE claimed.

A political commentator Carry Roberts who exposed several frauds masterminded by US NGOs wrote in ‘Renewamerica’ that “victims of battering are in short supply these days. So when no victim is known to exist, the solution is obvious: fabricate one.”

“Like other abuse shelters, Safe Horizon makes a grand show of being perpetually hard-up for cash…..But how many would-be donors know Safe Horizon resembles Citicorp or Bank of America, far more than a grass-roots organisation dedicated to providing succour to persons down on their luck?” Roberts wrote, adding that Safe Horizon rakes in nearly $56 million every year and pays skyscraper salaries that would put many bail-out bank executives to shame.

US state attorney Preet Bharara was peeved that Indians were not talking about hapless and real victim Sangeeta, who is now at the mercy of the US Department of Justice and Safe Horizon. Perhaps Bharara is not aware of the conflict of interest between Safe Horizon and the US Justice department. In its financial statement, the NGO claimed it received money to the tune of $ 952,000 from the Justice Department which will announce the judgement on the plea of the NGO it fund.”

Nanny-gate: Fraudulent Charges By the US

A brilliant piece by Satybrata Pal in The Hindu about the flagrant US breach of protocol and law in the maid case:

“While the U.S. argues that anyone in New York paid less than the minimum U.S. wage is being ill-treated, what is in fact the case is that anyone who has to live only on that wage is — as the U.S. NGOs so vehemently argue — condemned to a life of poverty and hunger. Forbes pointed out in an article earlier this year that the unemployed who live on welfare get more in several States than those who work for minimum wages. In New York, Forbes calculated the annual take-home from welfare at $43,700 a year, or $21.01 an hour, almost three times the minimum wage.

It is important to remember this because a help employed by an Indian diplomat has none of the expenses that are assessed to compute either a minimum or a living wage. She stays in a room in the diplomat’s house, with her food, clothing, medical bills and transportation all paid for. Every dollar she earns is saved. If Sangeeta Richard was paid $500 a month, she was saving that a month. No one living on minimum wages in the U.S. has savings; most are up to their eyes in debt. Saving $500 a month for them is a pipe dream. The black and Hispanic women who work as domestic help and charwomen in the U.S., and form its underclass as the societal and lineal descendants of slave labour, would happily trade places with Sangeeta Richard.

Members of our civil society who argue that she was bonded labour, as defined in our Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, perhaps do not know the terms under which domestic help are employed by Indian diplomats. Neither that Act, nor any of the judgments of the Supreme Court which interpreted it, applies to them.

Convention and obligations

Those who claim that the Indian government has no interest in protecting domestic workers, and therefore is indifferent to Sangeeta Richard’s plight, ask why it has not ratified Convention 189 of the International Labour Organization (ILO) “Concerning Decent Work for Domestic Workers,” which came into force in September 2013. This is unfair because the government of India voted for the draft, and has since prepared a draft “Policy for Domestic Workers,” incorporating many of the provisions of the Unorganised Workers’ Social Security Act (UWSSA), 2008.

It is also not germane to this case because ILO Convention 189 would protect a domestic worker abroad only if the host government has ratified it. Like India, the U.S. government also voted for the Convention in 2011, but made a remarkably candid statement in explanation of vote: “In the case of the United States, a number of the provisions present complex issues with respect to our existing law in practice, including in regard to our federal system of government. Accordingly, we want to make clear that our vote to adopt this Convention entails no obligation by the United States to ratify it.”

Convention 189 offers all the protections that the U.S. claims Sangeeta Richard was denied. If these are already statutory requirements in the U.S., it is hard to understand why the convention presented it with “complex issues,” which had to be reconciled with its laws.

What is disturbing is that the U.S. “evacuated” the Richard family after issuing them “T-visas,” given to the next of kin of victims of human trafficking. This meant that, in its view, Sangeeta Richard was a victim of human trafficking as defined in the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, which supplements the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC).

The protocol defines “trafficking in persons” in detail. None of the conditions precedent applies to Sangeeta Richard, and a person travelling on an official passport of a democracy run by the rule of law by definition is not someone who is being trafficked. Moreover, when the Indian Embassy had asked the U.S. government to help trace her when she absconded, the T-visas in response make it clear that the U.S. considered the Indian government complicit in human trafficking.

It follows that the U.S. does not have the slightest intention of abiding by Article 8 of the Protocol, which sets out the terms under which a victim of trafficking is sent back to her country. In turn, this violates the assurance the U.S. gave when it ratified the protocol, to which it entered a reservation, but clarified that “this reservation does not affect in any respect the ability of the United States to provide international cooperation to other Parties as contemplated in the Protocol.”

Iran case

Instead, the U.S. claims that its laws were broken, and since a consular officer does not have the full immunity of an accredited diplomat, Ms. Khobragade was not immune from either arrest or subsequent prosecution. This, though, is not what the U.S. argued as the applicable international law when its diplomatic and consular staff were taken hostage in Iran in 1979, and the government in Tehran threatened to prosecute them for acts that were, in its view, crimes in Iranian law. The U.S. moved the International Court of Justice and in its submission, claimed inter alia that: “Pursuant to Articles 28, 31, 33, 34, 36 and 40 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the Government of lran is under an international legal obligation to the United States to ensure that … the consular personnel of the United States be treated with respect and protected from attack on their persons, freedom, and dignity; and that United States consular officers be free from arrest or detention. The Government of Iran has violated and is currently violating the foregoing obligations.”

The court ruled in favour of the U.S. on all points, by a large majority on most, but unanimously on the U.S. contention, examined at length in its judgment, that the Iranian threat to prosecute diplomatic and consular staff was a violation of the Vienna Conventions. The court held that: “no member of the United States diplomatic or consular staff may be kept in Iran to be subjected to any form of judicial proceedings or to participate in them as a witness.”

The U.S. therefore does not really have a case, on either moral or legal grounds. What is surprising is that it was prepared to offend a country that is now of some strategic and commercial interest to it, and so blatantly breach the Vienna Conventions that protect its diplomatic and consular agents as much as they do all others. Except, it seems, in Iran in 1979 and in the U.S. in 2013.

(Satyabrata Pal, a former High Commissioner to Pakistan, is a Member of the National Human Rights Commission.)

US diplomat involved in engineering row asked to leave India

I have been blogging repeatedly about this case, because I’ve felt instinctively that it was only the tip of the iceberg.

As I’ve shown at my blog, there has been a history of what looks, to an impartial observer, like unfriendly acts by the US toward India.

I am not sure this whole story wasn’t engineered in some way. Diplomatic rows often precede economic…and even military…rows.

It’s to be hoped it won’t go that far, but in a time of recession, it’s easy to whip people up against dark-skinned foreigners, with a culture and appearance you don’t like. Displaced anger is perfectly understandable in the population.

But from the media?

The so-called intelligentsia has been inflaming and exaggerating dozens of issues (from rape to trafficking to Indian labor to the financial crisis) in the most irresponsible way. What is their responsibility?

BBC:

“India has asked the US to withdraw an official from its embassy in Delhi in a row over the arrest of an Indian diplomat in New York……

The question now is whether this draws a line under the messy diplomatic spat between the two countries.

Of greater importance is the longer-term impact this may have on bilateral ties. India, a democracy and rising power in Asia, is seen in many quarters in Washington as a natural fit to become a special partner of the United States. The US has sought a closer strategic and military partnership with Delhi but to a large extent has been rebuffed.

India is cautious about advancing ties too quickly. It doesn’t want to antagonise Beijing and many Indians still see the US as having been far too close to Pakistan.

Ms Khobragade has always denied any wrongdoing.

Some local reports say Washington has been asked to withdraw a diplomat of a “similar rank” as Ms Khobragade from its Delhi mission.

Others quote an unnamed government official as saying the US official was involved in the case relating to Ms Khobragade – although this is yet to be confirmed.”

NDTV describes the US diplomat being expelled as someone who had instigated and assisted in spiriting Sangeeta Richard out of India in contravention of Indian laws.

Ernst Nolte & Robert Conquest On Auschwitz

Ernst Nolte: “The Gulag came before Auschwitz.”

Robert Conquest:

“For Russians – and it is surely right that this should become true for the world as a whole – Kolyma [one part of the Gulag] is a word of horror wholly comparable to Auschwitz … it did indeed kill some three million people, a figure well in the range of that of the victims of the Final Solution.”[9]

Excerpted from Ralph Raico: “The Taboo Against Truth,” LRC, June 8, 2010

Advice to The Powerful: ‘Fess Up Now, Not Later

Gary North:

“The time to tell all is when you’re in power. The second best time to tell all is just after you are fired for having told all. You go public. Better yet, do not volunteer in the first place.”

error: Content is protected !!