Philip Goldberg writes about the vile manner in which conversions to Christianity are effected these days by aggressive missionaries:

“Imagine you’re poor and living in a rural area. Your child gets sick. You manage to transport her to a hospital or clinic. To your relief, the condition is treatable. But the cost of treatment is not just beyond your means, it’s beyond your imagining. However, says the kindly health care worker, you can get the treatment free of charge. All you have to do is renounce the centuries-old traditions of your people and convert to a foreign religion.

Such offers are being made to desperate people in the villages and tribal areas of India.

I just returned from a month in that country, to mark the Indian publication of my book, American Veda. In the 18 cities I visited, the most frequently mentioned topic was the shady tactics of certain missionaries.

Not all of them, mind you. Not the intrepid souls who work selflessly to help the poor, the afflicted, and the illiterate, in the spirit of their savior’s exhortation to serve “the least of these.”

Such missionaries have been welcome in India for centuries, and the Hindus I spoke to are grateful for their good works. What is causing consternation and anger is a new breed of zealots, heavily financed by American fundamentalists, who seem driven to pile up numbers like door-to-door salesmen racking up commissions. Determined, fervent, and creative in pursuit of souls to save, they sound more like the snake-oil hucksters of legend than servants of Christ.

Targeting mainly the impoverished and uneducated, some of their tactics make the hospital bargain I described earlier look as reputable as ordering a book from Amazon. I was told of missionaries giving people temporary jobs in return for converting, and then threatening them with job loss — not to mention eternal damnation — if they reconvert to Hinduism. Families have apparently been torn apart because the converts are made to disassociate from the heathen.

I heard about missionaries who dress in orange robes to look like swamis. Gullible and desperate villagers are told that their traditional gods are actually corrupted versions of Christ; that the venerable saints and sages of India’s past were really Christians; that the three horizontal stripes traditionally drawn on the foreheads of Shiva devotees stand for the Holy Trinity; that the Upanishadic prayer that includes “Lead us from darkness to light” was meant as a cry for Jesus to save them.

A mother is sick? A father loses his source of income and can’t feed his family? The bus filled with youngsters suddenly “stalls” on a dangerous mountain road? Well, say the missionaries, try praying to your Hindu gods. Hmmm, imagine that: nothing changes. Well then, see what happens if you pray to Jesus. Wow! Lo and behold! The mother receives medicine. The father gets a one-day job that puts rice on the table. The bus engine starts again! If one prayer to Jesus produces miracles like those, imagine what converting will do!

I heard about people being told that their misfortune derives from their worship of Hindu deities, because the idols are really forms of the Devil; about village strongmen being paid to coerce conversions from other villagers; about women given a choice of walking a mile to haul water from their usual source or using the new well conveniently dug in front of a church. The price? Conversion, of course.

I don’t know if these egregious actions are commonplace or rarities. I do know that they are dishonorable. They’re about coercion, not spiritual conversion; extortion, not the exchange of ideas. And, if I may say so as a non-Christian, they are an affront to Jesus, whom every Hindu I’ve ever met regards as a holy man of the highest order if not an incarnation of God. I can’t help thinking that he would be as outraged by the deception being perpetrated in his name as he was about the moneylenders in the temple.

I told people in India that most American Christians would be appalled if they knew what was being done by their overly aggressive brethren. I was tempted to wait until after Christmas to test that thesis, but I decided that this season of goodwill might be the ideal time. So, what do you think, my Christian sisters and brothers? Is there some cosmic war for souls going on, in which anything goes? Or are there rules of engagement that civilized people should observe? What would Jesus say?”

It seems the Marshals arrested Ms. Khobragade and strip-searched because one of their own didn’t know how to read a visa application or a job contract correctly. So says Daniel Arshak, Devyani Khobragade’s lawyer:

“Arshack said the DS-160 form, which was prepared and submitted online, called for Khobragade’s salary, not that of the babysitter. Khobragade wrote $4,500 per month, whereas the babysitter made about $1,560 a month, the defense attorney said. The U.S. alleged the babysitter in fact made closer to $500 per month, below minimum wage, citing one of two contracts between the two women and the babysitter’s statements.

Arshack said the U.S. government also misconstrued the different payment terms in the two employment contracts.

In a contract prosecutors said Khobragade submitted as part of the visa application, the diplomat said she paid the babysitter $9.75 an hour — above minimum wage as required by law, State Department Special Agent Mark Smith said in the criminal complaint. In a second contract, the diplomat agreed to pay the babysitter 30,000 rupees a month, or approximately $573, the U.S. said, which came out to about $3.31 per hour. New York minimum wage is $7.25 per hour.

Arshak said the second contract spelled out payments that were to be deducted from the babysitter’s pay and sent to her husband in New Delhi.”

Saurabh Shukla thinks that the Manhattan District Attorney is not pursuing “justice” as he claims, but a more vulgar…and common…agenda: settling racial scores with Indians:

“Significantly, the US has given asylum to countless pro-Khalistanis. It may be mentioned that American courts have been admitting law suits filed by pro-Khalistani groups against Indian leaders.

“Summons were issued to leaders like Congress president Sonia Gandhi and Union Minister Kamal Nath and even the Congress party in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.

“How are the US courts concerned with a matter that did not occur within its territory?” a senior official wondered.

“The development surrounding Devyani brought back memories of Krittika Biswas, the daughter of an Indian diplomat posted at the Indian Consulate in New York, who was arrested in her school, handcuffed and forced to spend 28 hours in a detention cell for cyber-bullying in February 2011.
It was later found that another student was responsible for the crime.

“India and the US differ on the issue of immunity that should be granted to Devyani. Washington argues that she does not have immunity from arrest. But officials have pointed out a double standard, as witnessed in the case of Raymond Davis, who was arrested for the murder of two Pakistanis in Lahore in 2011. The US State Department had said Raymond cannot be arrested as he was working with the American Consulate.

“As it was later revealed, he was not even a consular employee but a contractor employed by the CIA! It is strange that Americans then argued that he had immunity while now asserting that the Indian Deputy Consul General does not have such immunity. Or, does the Vienna Convention have to interpreted in one way for Americans and in another way for Indians?” a former diplomat questioned.

Diplomats of several countries bring domestic servants from their respective countries and pay them more or less what Indian diplomats pay, but only Indians have been targeted, another official remarked.”

I wish the author had been brave enough to take the next step and fit this provocation into the larger pattern of  the Rothschild elites targeting India, its government, people, and culture.

But then that would have been anti-Semitic. And even the smallest anti-Semitic thought, as we impenitent wogs must learn, is so much worse than the worst anti-Indian action.

Instead, the Western powers and their presstitutes like to set one community against another, so long as the hidden hand stays hidden….or, at least, unmentioned.

Times of India reports that Devyani’s status as a UN advisor  at the time of the arrest means she does indeed have full immunity.

That could open several US officials to damage and liability claims for wrongful arrest.

I’d love to see what Swati Sharma and the rest of the transnational rights brigade are going to do now that their little commie psyop (I’ll elaborate with the details in another post) has fallen flat and the New York NGO (Safe Horizon) and the NY DA (Bharara)  are exposed.

I mean, spicy Vindaloo for Indian babu-neta  goose should be at least hot ketchup for Amriki babu-neta gander, no?

Time for the GOI to fund an American Aam Admi Party with its own Amriki Kejriwal to run New York’s government. Any takers?

Government sources said Khobragade was accredited advisor to the Indian mission to the UN on August 26, 2013 — to help the mission with work related to the General Assembly — and her accreditation was valid until December 31.

As sources here highlighted, the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations Article 4 Section 11A specifies “immunities from personal arrest or detention and from the seizure of their personal baggage” of all representatives of members to the United Nations.

Section 16 of the same Article specifies that the expression “Representative” shall be deemed to include all delegates, deputy delegates, advisors, technical experts and secretaries of delegations. She was accredited as advisor on August 26 and was transferred to the permanent mission after the arrest and is currently holding the position of counsellor.

Because she was attached to the permanent mission only temporarily (until December 31), the State Department was not required to issue its own identity card and it is possible that they may not have known about Khobragade’s status. Sources said this was all the more reason for the State Department to have informed India about the move to arrest Khobragade. As the diplomat was working as acting consul general, the US ought to have notified India about her arrest under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. The MEA joint secretary who handles the US, Vikram Doraiswamy, was in that country on the day Khobragade was arrested, but he wasn’t informed about it.

The alacrity with which the US “evacuated” Khobragade’s domestic help Sangeeta Richard’s family, days before the diplomat’s arrest, rattled New Delhi. Bharara later justified this in a statement saying the Justice Department was “compelled” to make sure that victim, witnesses and their families “are safe and secure while cases are pending”. As the case now unravels fast, several US officials, especially those who handled Khobragade’s arrest, may have opened themselves to claims for damages and liability.

The government has also discovered that the amount of $4,500 quoted by Bharara as salary promised to Sangeeta by Khobragade was actually just a mention of the employer’s salary on the help’s visa application form.

The State Department’s own guidelines on diplomatic and consular immunity emphasize that law enforcement officials need to be sensitive because short-term official visitors from other States to the United Nations or to international conferences convened by the UN may enjoy full diplomatic immunity equivalent to that afforded diplomatic agents. “Owing to the temporary nature of their visit, such officials will normally not have the usual official identity documents recognizable in the United States. Law enforcement officials (particularly in New York) should be sensitive to the existence of this situation and always coordinate with the US authorities indicated in the list of Useful Phone Numbers if confronted with an apparent offender appearing to fall into this category’,” it states.

A diplomat’s daughter, Krittika Biswas, had last year filed a lawsuit in a NYC court seeking $1.5 million as damages for her wrongful arrest.

Last year, in blogging about the Rajat Gupta trial and the weird rulings of Judge Rakoff, I researched and found evidence of corruption related to the judicial process in New York, involving prosecutors, judges and others at the blog of Ed Manfredonia. See this piece on how Robert Morgenthau, NY DA covered up the Madoff fraud.

There was also specific information about Rakoff.

Ed Manfredonia was one of the contributors to the Deep Capture website, whose blog was instrumental in starting cases against naked short-selling an other abuses on Wall Street.

Unfortunately, Preet Bharara has shown himself more interested in the low-hanging fruit than anything else.

Today, I find that  Manfredonia’s site was hacked (in October 2012, a few months after I first began linking to it at various sites) and many articles –  relevant to my posts –  “disappeared,” although the author insists he will put them back up.

My comment on a blog on the Gupta ruling in 2012

Lila Rajiva on June 22, 2012 at 7:23 pm said:

Indian Express :

“In a new twist, it has now emerged that senior Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade enjoyed full diplomatic immunity including from personal arrest and detention on December 12 when she was taken into custody by the US authorities in a visa fraud case.

39-year-old Khobragade, who was posted as Deputy Consul General in New York, was also accredited as an “Advisor to the Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations” by the UN w.e.f. 26th August 2013 and her status as an Advisor was valid until 31 December 2013. The accreditation was for the UN General Assembly 2013.

Under the “Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations”, Article 4 Section 11A specifies “Immunities from personal arrest or detention and from the seizure of their personal baggage” of all representatives of members to the UN and further the Article specifies that the expression “Representative” shall be deemed to include all Delegates, Deputy Delegates, Advisors, Technical Experts and Secretaries of delegations.

“Her arrest, therefore, on December 12th 2013 was contrary to her status on that date,” sources said. The sources also said India has taken up the matter with the US State Department.

The 1999-batch IFS officer was arrested on December 12 on charges of making false declarations in a visa application for her maid Sangeeta Richards. The diplomat was released on a USD 250,000 bond after being charged with visa fraud.

Subsequent revelations that she was strip searched and held with criminals triggered a row between the two sides with India downgrading privileges of certain category of US diplomats among other steps.

Alex Newman at the New American: (HT to LRC blog):

“What happened in Saddad is the most serious and biggest massacre of Christians in Syria in the past two years and a half,”reported Archbishop Selwanos Boutros Alnemeh, the Syriac Orthodox Metropolitan of Homs and Hama, saying 45 innocent civilians, including women and children, had been martyred. Many were thrown into mass graves or wells. “Other civilians were threatened and terrorized,” he said. “Thirty were wounded and ten are still missing.”

According to the church leader, whose statement has been widely quoted by Christian sources and alternative media outlets, some 1,500 Christian families were held hostage by rebel forces and used as human shields. All of the houses in the ancient Christian village of about 15,000 people were looted, he said. The churches were desecrated and robbed, with ancient texts being taken. Businesses, schools, the hospital, the post office, and other buildings were all destroyed as well.

Photographs of the destruction were posted online. Videos of the anti-Christian terror and its aftermath appeared on YouTube. So far, however, the establishment press — especially in the United States, where the Obama administration has emerged as one of the top backers of rebel forces — has remained almost entirely silent about the escalating atrocities against embattled Christian communities in Syria.

“The brutal rampage in Saddad featured what is being described as the worst known massacre of Christians in Syria in recent times; and the second worst in the Middle East after the savage 2010 attack against Iraq’s Church of Our Lady of Salvation, the Archbishop said. “We ask if the terrorists are gone permanently, or if there is the possibility of a return for a second massacre,” he added in a statement posted by the Orthodox Church, noting that thousands of Christians were held hostage, yet the world refused to listen.”

Comment:

Such is the result of  interventionist meddling in other countries – the massacre of innocents.  But perhaps that IS the point. Meddle and enrage, bring to power the most hard-line elements, which then turn on anyone they see as “foreign” or aligned via religion with foreigners.

The Bible on the New World Order:

Condemns the persecution of the innocent

“If you were Abraham’s children then you would do the things Abraham did. As it is you are determined to kill me….You belong to your father, the devil”

(John 8:39-44).

Condemns racial/religious supremacism

“Do not think you can say to yourselves `We have Abraham as our father’. I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham” (Matthew 3:9).

Praises righteous actions rather than religious dogma

“For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God’s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous.”
(Roman 2:13)

Looks for the quality of the heart, not religious professions

You are always on their lips but far from their hearts.
(Jeremiah 12: 2)

Condemns morally corrupt teachings (such as, approving blackmail, bribery, financial fraud, pornography, and sexual immorality)

Condemns tyranny AND political revolution (even faux techno-revolution approved by the EFF via Assange & Co. and proxies like Arvind Kejriwal)

Condemns propaganda AND false advertising

……rebellion and treachery against the LORD, turning our backs on our God, inciting revolt and oppression, uttering lies our hearts have conceived.
(Isaiah 59:13)

Condemns academic fraud, IP theft, plagiarism, falsification of history, mind-control operations

“Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free”

(John 8:32)

Update: More misunderstanding: The US Marshals deny that she was cavity-searched, by the standards of what THEY mean by cavity-searches, which is  digital probing of the body-cavities. That didn’t happen, it seems.

But, Devyani claims she WAS cavity-searched (she never specified digital penetration – that was assumed by many people, including me, erroneously), by which she apparently meant the VISUAL INSPECTION of body-cavities –  also a gross indignity and violation of privacy.

Visual inspection body cavities is part of all strip-searches and is violative enough to be an extreme measure, so for Bharara to claim that there were NO cavity-searches ,as such, is misleading and inflammatory. He knows perfectly well that she, as an Indian citizen, would not be aware of such distinctions.

So, while she didn’t suffer bodily probing, she did suffer visual inspection of the cavities, which is in itself quite outrageous, whoever the subject is and whatever the offense, as long as there was no suspicion of hidden contraband or weapons.

Update: Strip-searches are photographed. Presumably, cavity-searches are also photographed. Where are these photographs kept? Only on the security cameras or elsewhere? If they are archived elsewhere are they shared with the intelligence agencies?

Update: Bryan Fischer, a conservative Christian preacher, suggests that the arrest was “payback” for the Indian Supreme Court ruling criminalizing homosexuality. This would seem far-fetched, except for some things:

The resume of Dana Sussman, the attorney defending Khobragade, who is a gender feminist and abortion rights activist and is very active in the victims services industry.

The :”cavity-search” of Devyani, which seems intentionally provocative.

The close alignment of the maid with the US embassy, so much so that they violated court orders in India to spirit her out of the country, buying her air-tickets while making use of an exemption from taxes available only to diplomats.

Repeated erroneous statements from the US. Bharara insisted that Devyani wasn’t cavity-searched, when she was. Now, it turns out that the government agent misread the visa application and thought the figure in the column for Devyani’s salary (4500) was what she intended to pay the maid.

The general up-roar in the West and among various Western mouthpieces in India about the Supreme Court ruling on gays.

[The ruling doesn’t seem to me to deserve the uproar. One would have to search quite hard to find many gays in India, although they certainly do exist. The whole thing is mightily exaggerated.  I don’t know why the old colonial law which was struck down not too long ago should be considered such a threat to civilization, since I don’t recall anyone being prosecuted under it. But perhaps they were and I just wasn’t aware.

However, I don’t see why it’s OK to criminalize voluntary labor contracts  (minimum wage laws) but it’s terribly evil to criminalize voluntary sexual contacts. There are arguments to be made on both issues, on both sides. But it is very interesting that people who think nothing about interfering in reasonable labor contracts get so very upset about interfering in sexual conduct that has been strongly prohibited for, um, over 2000 years…

In any case, my quarrel is less with homosexuals, among whom I’ve had several good friends.  It is  with the homosexual lobby and its fellow travelers, who insist on demonizing the religious conscience of conservatives.]

Update: Daniel Arshak, the lawyer representing Khobragade, says a US official bungled when claiming that Khobgragade lied to the government. The official/agent mistook Khobragade’s statement of her salary ($4500) in some official forms for a claim that she was going to pay her maid that sum. I wonder how much attention the Rothschild media (world English language media) will give that.

Meanwhile, as one would expect, former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, Tamil chauvinist Karunanidhi took a swipe at the Indian government for its strong stand on the incident by comparing that to the governments silence on the killing of Indian fishermen by Sri Lanka and on the (alleged atrocities) committed by Sri Lanka against the LTTE.

I say it’s expected, because, as I’ve repeatedly blogged here, the south of India, especially Tamil Nadu, has been increasingly drawn into the Rothschild orbit.

All its English language media is owned by Christian or Communist entities beholden to the Rothschilds. These entities are closely tied to the funding and hyping of LTTE concerns that is the result of business alliances with the prominent media/political clan, the Maran family, to which Karunanidhi is related.

The globalists wish to break off Tamil Nadu and the south, Christianize it, and dominate the subcontinent through it, because of its rich biodiversity, cultural importance (the oldest extant culture) and strategic and economic significance.

As to corruption, nothing and no one could be more corrupt than Tamil politicians, most of whom have been assiduously courted and bribed by the West to play their appointed roles.   However, human rights Trojan Horse NGOs are never worried about that kind of corruption.  Corruption is only a pretext for intervention.

Update: See also the  2-part series on the espionage angle from GreatGameIndia:

“The entire family [Lila: the maid’s family, two members of which worked for the US embassy] could not have been spirited out of India, the manner in which it was done, without engineering some extremely sensational diplomatic incident, which carried both the stamp of morality and the object of provocation.

ORIGINAL POST

Kingshuk Nag advances a plausible theory that covers many bases of this strange case:

Devyani’s father, Uttam Khobargade, now suspects that the maid Sangeeta Richard was a CIA agent. Foreign office sources say that as deputy consul general in New York, Devyani was not privy to any strategic secrets. So if an agent was planted in her house it was only to cultivate her for the ‘long run’. After all in the long run, Devyani would only go in one direction in her career – upwards.

There is no gainsaying that intelligence agents are not planted in the house or office of every foreign service officer. That leads to the question: why was Devyani chosen? Indian intelligence analysts say that this was possible because US intelligence agencies perceived – rightly or wrongly – that  Devyani had many weaknesses. The first weakness was that she had married an Indian-American who at least till they got married had a US citizenship. Under the rules applicable to Indian foreign service officers, they cannot marry foreign citizens. In the present case, Devyani’s husband would have to give up his citizenship and take up Indian citizenship. I do not know whether Devyani’s hubby Aakash Singh Rathore has done this. For those who came in late, as reported in TOI, Aakash is a professor of philosophy who takes deep interests in wine matters. It is not clear whether Aakash has taken up Indian citizenship or taken up a PIO (Person of Indian Origin card). But what is strange is that in the whole matter concerning his wife he is nowhere to be heard or seen. He is obviously keeping a studied silence. Aakash did not migrate to the US recently; he was born in New York, so it was probably his father who moved to the US.
This leads to Devyani’s second weakness: likely inclination to continue in the US for long to be with her hubby. Devyani’s name has cropped up in the Adarsh scam. This is another weakness. Foreign agents love to cultivate officers who are vulnerable even if it is in their domestic country. Reports also indicate that she had used pressure to get her foreign language training in German at the cost of some of her batchmates who had a higher rank and that this was a subject matter of dispute in court. Subsequently, Devyani was posted in Berlin. She is believed to have met Aakash while undergoing German language training at the Goethe Institute in that country.

Foreign service officers who worked with Devyani assert that they strongly believe that she had political ambitions and would have certainly contested elections in the future (now the possibility increases with all the sympathy she is garnering). This would have made Devyani a rather attractive proposition for any spy agency. What better than have an upward mobile officer who could become a future lawmaker, in their pocket?

Devyani also committed a blunder by paying Sangeeta less than what she promised to pay her. This is precisely what officially the case is all about.

The most important issue is, why did Sangeeta Richard then give up her cover and focus attention on Devyani? There are no easy answers but it is conceivable that Devyani realized that she was being watched and put pressure on Sangeeta to sing pointing out that she was vulnerable because her family was still in India.

[Lila: A much more plausible hypothesis is that the maid – rather well-fed and well-clothed from her photos) was looking for a green-card and used the easy route of false abuse charges, snookering a self-styled gender feminist activist/pro-abortion liberal democrat partisan, Dana Sussman, part of the extremely well-funded and Rothchild connected victim industry in New York, which instead of going after real slavery often runs intel scams, knowingly or not.]

If this is the case, then kudos to Devyani for being smart enough to realize that she was being targeted. As pressure mounted on her Sangeeta first ran away and then put counterpressure on Devyani by filing a case. She possibly had help also from a US diplomat at whose whom she worked in New Delhi.

Devyani went to meet Sangeeta’s lawyer but what transpired is not known. Meanwhile, to protect Sangeeta, US agencies went an extra mile to evacuate Sangeeta’s husband and two kids before arresting Devyani. There is no gainsaying that Indo-American Preet Bharara (who as a neo-convert is trying to be more loyal than the king; he was born in Ferozepur) overdid his bit and the US agencies handcuffed and strip-searched Devyani. This has caused a furore in India and has gone against the Americans whether they admit it or not.

Domestic politics is making foreign minister Salman Khurshid overreact. The fear of Modi looms large: Khurshid expects Modi to shout from the rooftops that the Indian government can’t even protect its women diplomats from humiliation abroad. If the pitch is raised, the move has the potential to cost Congress valuable votes in the forthcoming elections. Modi has, however,  done nothing of the sort, but Khurshid can’t take him for granted (don’t forget Modi has been denied a US visa). In the process, Khurshid has done something that leaves Devyani vulnerable. She has been withdrawn from the New York consulate, where she had limited diplomatic immunity and posted to the UN, where she will get full diplomatic immunity. But this full immunity will be applicable to her from the date that the US government accepts her as a diplomat accredited to the UN. In the interim, she is left without any diplomatic cover.

So, in the ultimate analysis, is it a case of spying gone awfully wrong?

NOTE: I will be adding links as I find time.

I commented at EPJ on the Rothschild-backed NGO, SAFE HORIZON, which styles itself the largest “victims services agency in the US.” It is based in NY, so you can imagine how interwoven with the NY political machinery it is.  Thus it is closely intertwined also with Wall Street. Since it focuses on issues like cross-border human trafficking, it makes a perfect vehicle for intelligence operations.

Human rights NGOs are well-known to play such Trojan Horse roles.

Safe Horizon has been working closely with Preet Bharara (Rothschild-approved NY prosecutor), who threw Rajat Gupta to the wolves. I believe this was engineered  to diminish the power of the South Asian lobby in DC circles (Gupta was one of the founders of the main Indian lobby) and the clout of South Asian financiers on Wall Street (Gupta was at the pinnacle of management in US business).

The Rothschilds have had a history of working closely with elements in India (Parsis like the Tatas, or Sikhs etc.) who do not identify with India as such but have pursued independent and sometimes adversarial agendas (for eg. Khalistani separatists).  The Rothschild entities invariably operate through enforcers and mouthpieces who are usually Jewish themselves either wholly (Naomi Wolf, Noam Chomsky) or partly (Obama is part Jewish, as is Mrs Clinton) or married to Jews (Samantha Powers, Amartya Sen, Preet Bharar) or from a prominent family that is in business with them (Karan Thapar, for eg.). There are occasionally non-Jewish enforcers or mouthpieces, but even so, they are usually philo-semitic and/or anti-Christian/ militantly atheistic.

MY COMMENT AT EPJ:

@Heath

Actually, the diplomat is from the lowest rank – a Dalit, what used to be called Untouchable.

That is precisely why she was chosen, since the banking cartel (Rothschild-related) works WITH  older families, higher castes, who have traditionally aligned themselves with foreign interests over Indian ones.

For eg. the Tatas, now so respectable, made their money through the opium trade and the addiction and impoverishment of the Asian masses. The Tatas worked then and now with the Rothschilds, who also made money in the opium trade in India.

Bharara, a Sikh (a community at odds with Indian interests over the years),  has a Jewish wife,  incidentally, and his brother’s business was bought out by Amazon for hundreds of millions of dollars. He’s also deeply embedded in the NY and NJ Democrat political machinery, through his work with Chuck Schumer

Perhaps because of this, he has avoided going after any major wrong-doers on Wall Street (except for Cotzine), and has gone after patsies. Even with the non-patsy, SAC, he avoided going after major wrong-doing, and just slapped a fine on it for insider-trading, a marginal issue.

Bharara is seen as a grand-stander and politically ambitious, as well as rather unscrupulous (duh).

The Devyani story seems to be an intelligence pysop,  just like the Rajat Gupta affair.

Gupta, was a patsy thrown to the wolves to save Blankfein’s skin at Goldman Sachs, because of his status as a director at McKinsey, the firm most responsible for outsourcing American jobs, which had nothing to do with the financial crisis, but made Gupta a good target in a time of job loss and xenophobia.

More crucially, Gupta was a power-player in the rise of the Indian lobby in DC and of South Asia in the financial world, which the banking cartel wanted to curb, thus again making him a ripe target.

I believe Devyani’s targeting is similarly political. It is part of a pattern of targeting the Indian Foreign Service, the elite cadre of the civil service.

This group is actually LESS corrupt than others. And the civil service itself is less corrupt (at least until the last few years) than the larger group of politicians.

The targeting of the IFS would make India less effective in diplomatic circles.

Why do I suspect an intel psyop?

There has been a history of CIA infiltration into India, especially in recent years.
The maid’s family worked for the US embassy. She was interested in getting a more permanent visa to the US than the one she got through her employment with the diplomat, who from the account of the maid’s own daughter, treated her well.

The maid is a Christian convert from a highly unionized state (Kerala) with a strong communist and Christian (Zionist Christian) influence.

The maid tried to extort and blackmail the diplomat, who filed a case against her in India,

Instead of letting that case take its course, the USG along with a NY NGO interfered in the judiciary in India, by spiriting the maid out of the country, and giving her and her family different visas – very strange behavior in the circumstances.

All this happened over the months leading up to the arrest of the diplomat and while the Indian gvt was keeping the US gvt informed, the US gvt appeared to be conspiring with the maid to arrest the diplomat, along with the human-trafficking NGO, Safe Horizon, whose Board of Advisers gives the game away – it’s all big bank (Rothschild-related -JP Morgan, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, UBS and so on).

Safe Horizon is a prominent New York NGO, working closely with the NY government and therefore probably quite close to NY AG Preet Bharara, who was the lawyer in the Gupta case too.

http://www.safehorizon.org/index/about-us-1/board-of-directors-88.html