Author Archives: Lila

Women’s rights begin in the womb

Posted on by

http://www.priestsforlife.org/africanamerican/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/s-Righs-Begin-in-the-Womb.jpg

PriestsforLife points out how abortion providers target poor people and racial minorities, so that over 60 percent of the victims of abortion in the US are non-whites. This is the fulfillment of the eugenicist dreams of Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger. Combine this with the race-replacement goals of unrestricted subsidized immigration and you get a different picture of the leftist agenda.

It is telling that left-liberals cover up this real murderous racism, while nattering on about people’s unpleasant or offensive words:

“As an African American woman, the threat to my freedom is under siege with the threat of the HHS mandate looming over my vocation at PFL, and over the plight of my people whom abortion threatens to depopulate because of our skin color.

The CDC’s latest Abortion Surveillance report (Nov. 29, 2013) found that between 2007 and 2010, nearly 36 percent of all abortions in the U.S. were performed on black children, even though blacks make up only 12.8 percent of the population. Another 21 percent of abortions were performed on Hispanics, and an additional seven percent on other minority races. A total of 64 percent of all abortions were on minority groups.

A disproportionate number of Planned Parenthood abortion mills, 79 percent, are in black and other minority neighborhoods; further evidence of the targeting of minorities by the abortion industry.

Women like Tonya Reeves and Lakisha Wilson are dying in these abortion mills. Abortion has also robbed men like boxer Floyd Mayweather of fatherhood.

Dangerous carcinogens contraceptives are harmful to women and are negatively impacting our society. The effects of these contraceptives lead to increased risk of various cancers, infertility, depression, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, psychological problems, relational problems, and a host of other issues including death.

Abortion has also been linked to cancer and other female disorders.

Please connect the dots. Abortion and applied use of carcinogenic fertility blockers masquerading as “birth control” are acts that repeatedly result in the often painful deaths of a children in the womb and which can inflict lasting negative emotional, physical and psychological consequences on women is real torture. Yet some officials and experts – at home and abroad – continue to chose to ignore these facts, focusing instead to challenge the Prolife Community’s respect for the right to life and opposition to abortion.

The fight for religious freedom, the battle against the unjust HHS Mandate, the UN crusade against fertility, the decimating impact of abortion on the Black community; these are not isolated incidents. They are all part of a war on the rights of children, women, families and the global communities. God help us! This is war! Please pray with us and join us in the march towards victory.”

Marx, communism, and abortion

Posted on by

Lifenews.com describes the iron link between abortion and communism:

“In the Communist Manifesto, Marx several times wrote openly of the “abolition of the family” and of communism abolishing “eternal truths” and “all religion, and all morality.” “The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional relations,” Marx affirmed. “[I]ts development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas.” Marx knew how shockingly revolutionary this was. He wrote: “Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.”

Marx practiced what he preached. He was a terrible father who caused tremendous discord in his family. As the family nearly starved, and as Marx’s long-suffering wife neared the breaking point, Marx began an affair with the family’s young nursemaid, whom he impregnated. When the child was born, Marx refused to acknowledge its existence and his paternity.

Marx’s disciples, of course, happily followed in his footsteps.

The Bolsheviks, when they took over, immediately lifted the Russian Orthodox Church’s longstanding prohibition against divorce. They also expunged God from wedding ceremonies, establishing so-called “Red weddings” — that is, purely secular wedding ceremonies. In short order, divorce skyrocketed to proportions never before seen in Russia’s long history or anywhere in the world. Within just decades, Russians had divorce rates worse than the worst rates in recent American history. I recall the female character in John le Carré’s book, The Russia House, who remarked to her foreign love interest, “But everyone in Moscow is divorced!”

It was the perfect the communist plot, literally. They had sought to undo traditional notions of marriage and morality, and they succeeded wildly.

And it wasn’t just in Russia. This thinking was endemic to the communist movement worldwide. In America, Communist Party USA (CPUSA) members swapped wives and divorced easily and merrily. They lived very loosely in their sexual morality and marital relations, pursuing practices that would make even today’s culture blush. They boasted about it; it was a source of pride. Anyone who has studied American communism or been involved in the communist movement knows this.

To be sure, a 1930s CPUSA member wasn’t thinking about gay marriage, and the Russians certainly weren’t. Nonetheless, all of them consistently, consciously undermined the traditional understanding of marriage. It was one of their targets.

That brings me to abortion. The Bolsheviks advocated abortion. It was one of the first things they legalized. By the early 1920s, Bolshevik Russia had the most liberal abortion policies in the world. And what happened? Just like divorce, abortion exploded. In fact, the proliferation in abortions was so bad that it shocked even Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger during a trip to Russia in 1934. By the 1970s, when America was just getting around to legalizing abortion, the Soviet Union was averaging over 7 million abortions per year — dwarfing the very worst rates in America post-Roe v. Wade. The direct effect of this on the Russian population has been staggering.

For the record, Russia’s horrific abortion rates are common in communist countries, which to this day lead the world in abortions.”

Hans-Hermann Hoppe: Waited too long to fight thought-police

Posted on by

http://wallawallateapartypatriots.blogspot.com/2012/10/saturday-cartoons.html

Hans-Hermann Hoppe describes his torment at the hands of the thought-police and wishes he had fought it earlier:

“I have long regarded the political correctness movement as a threat to all independent thought, and I am deeply concerned about the level of self-censorship in academia. To counteract this tendency, I have left no political taboo untouched in my teaching. I believed that America was still free enough for this to be possible, and I assumed that my relative prominence offered me some extra protection.

When I became a victim of the thought police, I was genuinely surprised, and now I am afraid that my case has had a chilling effect on less established academics. Still, it is my hope that my fight and ultimate victory, even if they can not make a timid man brave, do encourage those with a fighting spirit to take up the cudgels.

If I made one mistake, it was that I was too cooperative and waited too long to go on the offensive.”

Ravi Zacharias settles the question of abortion rights

Posted on by

UPDATE: Zacharias has since been implicated in a sex-scandal, whose details I don’t fully know. The whole thing seems like a set-up to me, but there are multiple allegations that he received massages for a painful back that involved a sexual component. I don’t know if he was framed or not, but so far his own organizations have distanced themselves from him.

Well-known evangelical Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias points out the gross hypocrisy of the abortion rights advocates:

“I said, “Can I ask you a question? On every university campus I visit, somebody stands up and says that God is an evil God to allow all this evil into our world. This person typically says, ‘A plane crashes: Thirty people die, and twenty people live. What kind of a God would arbitrarily choose some to live and some to die?’” I continued, “but when we play God and determine whether a child within a mother’s womb should live, we argue for that as a moral right. So when human beings are given the privilege of playing God, it’s called a moral right. When God plays God, we call it an immoral act. Can you justify this for me?” That was the end of the conversation.”

Malum in se: Do not comply with “secular sharia”

Posted on by

Anthony Esolen writing on the degree to which a Christian must submit to the law or the state.

He calls the law secular sharia.

But really sharia would be much better, because, in sharia law I would at least find a governing authority whose thinking I respected.

Islam is not my religion, but I understand and respect its demands. The pornocracy I hold in utter contempt.

“For Thomas, as opposed to Augustine, the state is not simply a necessary evil, something we have to endure because we are sinners who would otherwise pitch ourselves into bloodshed and riot.  When man uses right reason to order his affairs on earth, he is actually participating in God’s providential governing of the world.  Now that, I think, is a fruitful position to take.  It does render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, granting to the secular powers a legitimate sphere of action, while subordinating that action to the common good.  And, since the common good is a human good, it cannot be conceived apart from what makes man good in himself; so the ultimate object of the lawgiver, says Thomas, is to make his subjects good.  That does not mean blessed; he cannot take one tiny step towards accomplishing that.  But he can encourage them, by law and example and custom, to become more temperate, braver, wiser, and more just.  It is a noble calling, which the lawgiver cannot fulfill unless he acknowledges the limits of his rights.  That is, Caesar receives what is Caesar’s due, when Caesar acknowledges that God must receive God’s due…..

…Them’s fighting words now — or I wish they were.  But what do you do when the state does not know what it is and what it is for, and flattens the legitimate societies beneath it, including the family?  Well, Thomas gives us two ways in which laws may be unjust.  The first way is divided, as is typical of the medieval summa, into three subordinate ways: the law may be unjust because the wrong authority has enacted it (which may be the case in California, though I have heard arguments defending the judge’s interpretation of the foolish law), because it was enacted with no thought for the common good (for instance, as when a tyrant or a tyrannical faction uses public means for private ends), or because it distributes rewards and burdens inequitably (as when the publican takes half of the middle class contractor’s next dollar). 

The second way a law may be unjust is if it commands what is malum in se, evil in itself. For instance, a law that overrides the natural right of parents to educate their children is demanding, of its enforcers, actions that are evil in themselves.  Or a law that would require all citizens to expose their children to pornography — say, the popular bit of pornoganda, Angels in America, now returning to public schools in Illinois; that too would be evil in itself.  Such laws, says Thomas, are not laws at all; they do not have the character of lex — meaning that which justly binds the conscience.  They are violences, he says.”

In the US, every man is his own commissar

Posted on by

Race realist Jared Taylor,writing at American Thinker, says what I’ve often said here and at EPJ:

“There are powerful organizations, such as the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, that do their best to silence me. If I am on a television or radio program, they call the producer to explain that despite my reasonable tone I am a ‘hate-monger’ who must not be allowed on the air again. If they learn that I have been invited to give a talk, they call the organization that invited me and try to persuade it to cancel the talk.

“At first, I was astonished by this kind of thuggery. Americans claim to be devoted to free speech, but they are not. It is disgraceful that organizations whose purpose is not to refute their opponents but simply to squash and silence them have any credibility at all. And yet the media routinely cite these groups as if they were so blissfully wise that they can read my mind and tell you what I really think.

“People who immigrated from the Soviet Union were amazed to find that Americans are more afraid of the ‘diversity’ regime than Russians were of the Communists. And at least under the Soviets there was a clear enemy: the censors and the secret police. In America — the land of the free — every man is his own commissar.”

When they are not abruptly cancelled, Taylor’s appearances on campus have been disrupted.  When the organization tried to place ads in more than a dozen college newspapers saying simply “Is diversity a strength? We think not. For an alternate view: AmRen.com,” no paper would run the ad.  New Century Foundation holds an annual conference in April.  This year’s is the 25th through 27th, outside Nashville.  In 2010 and 2011 it was scrubbed at the last minute because of threats to the hotels hosting the events.  The website was taken down by hackers just last Sunday.

Though his first two books had received glowing reviews from the likes of the Wall Street Journal and sold well, two agents were unable to find a publisher for White Identity.  NCF published the book.  Taylor is not in bad company:  the foundation is the publisher of what is easily the best book on Affirmative Action in college, law and medical school admissions, The Affirmative Action Hoax by former Professor of Classics at University of Witwatersrand in South Africa, Steven Farron.  But Taylor’s book has not received the attention it would have if it had been released by a commercial press.

Even those who question the viability of White nationalism or disagree with it in principle, and who would argue that creed is more important than color and that they would rather spend an evening with Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, Clarence Thomas, etc. than with any White liberal, have to be troubled by the machinations of the P.C. regime.

The First Amendment was the first Amendment for a reason.  It will not be defended in federal courts until a Republican President is willing to appoint judges who respect the Constitution.  I’m told there are a few out there.

In the meantime, those who value free speech ought to think about doing what they can to retire the word “racist.”  A member of La Raza is not a racist; a European-American who questions preferential treatment for minorities is. The word is a slur, with all the sophistication and precision of “commie” or “Nazi.”  Today it says more about the intelligence of the accuser than the sins of the accused.”

On Auschwitz Anniversary, Black Mass To Be Held At Harvard

Posted on by

TO BE CONTINUED – LINKS, NOTES, AND ADDITIONAL RESEARCH TO BE ADDED

Update 6: At Alabama.com, there is a report that, although the Black Mass at Harvard was canceled, members of the Satanic Temple of New York, the sponsors, did meet at 10 PM at the Hong Kong Restaurant, near the campus, dressed mostly in black.

Update 5: Just this morning I found an email with an adl.org address, which argued that Devyani Khobragade’s lawyer Daniel Arshack had mishandled her case deliberately because he was Jewish.

Of course, since I followed the case closely, I know this isn’t true.

Arshack made the best of a case the DOJ was intent on pursuing and cleverly outwitted Bharara.  Bharara always had the option to reindict, whatever Arshak did or didn’t do.  It could be a genuine email and perhaps I am mistaken about Arshack.

But I think he did what it took.

So why the email? Probably to hint to  me that the post below might be construed as anti-Semitic. Well, I take such warnings seriously and I revised my writing to see if I had jumped to any unwarranted conclusions. I don’t think I did. So the piece stands….. and the email goes.

Update 4

A site devoted to ritual abuse documents Doug Mesner’s long-time involvement in harassing and defaming people involved in ritual abuse research and therapy, which has even led to actions for defamation.

Update 3 The Harvard club was not able to find another location and the Mass has been canceled.

Update 2

The Satanic Temple of New York claims to be a group that is not supernaturally oriented and uses Satan as a literary metaphor of rebellion against superstition and authority and not a genuine Satanic group, like that of Anton LaVey.

In the interview linked above, Doug Mesner  (aka Lucien Greaves, Douglas Misicko) the founder, explains that the purpose of his group is satirical, not religious.

He founded it to expose hysterical claims in the early 1990s that large numbers of children were being subjected to ritual sex-abuse by Satanists in the public-school system and to debunk the advocates of repressed memory syndrome who testified on their behalf in court.

In “Mobs, Messiahs and Markets,” (2007), following the lead of Counterpunch editor and noted propaganda analyst, Alexander Cockburn, I adopted the same position on the subject, only to find out later that, while it was true that there was mass panic in the 1980s and 1990s, much of it had been fomented to muddy the cases of real ritual child-abuse perpetrated by the intelligence agencies as part of covert mind-control related operations.

Alex Constantine, who researches mind-control and sex-abuse trauma, writes of Cockburn:

“Alex Cockburn’s skepticism toward ritual abuse was summed up in an editorial appearing in the February 8, 1990 Wall Street Journal, “The McMartin Case: Indict the Children, Jail the Parents.” The son of a British spy, and a loquacious defender of the Warren Commission, Cockburn has such strong feelings about the McMartin case that he once publicly maligned an editor of the L.A. Weekly for refusing to print a recommendation that “the tots bearing false witness in the McMartin preschool case be jailed for perjury.”

His primary source on the subject of child abuse, Debbie Nathan, is herself something of a false witness.

In ‘What McMartin Started: The Ritual Abuse Hoax” (Village Voice, June 12, 1990), Ms. Nathan moaned that “children at McMartin told of being molested in tunnels under the school. None were ever found, but until recently parents were still digging.” In fact, 30 days before Nathan’s article appeared, the tunnels were discovered beneath the preschool by scientists hired by the parents, confirming the testimony of the children. The project employed a team of archeologists from local universities, two geologists, a professional excavator, a carbon-dating specialist and a professional photographer to document the dig’s progress and findings. The longest tunnel was six feet beneath the preschool, running eastward 45 feet from the southwest wall, and ten feet along the north wall. The tunnel walls were held in place by support beams and a roof of plywood and tarpaper. A branch of the tunnel led to a nine-foot chamber (the “secret room” described by the children?). Another extended from the preschool to the triplex next door, surfacing beneath a roll-away bathtub. Forensic tests on thousands of objects found at the site – including two hundred animal bones – were conducted.”

In 2007, a senior libertarian activist informed me that Cockburn was himself affiliated with the left-wing of the CIA. I’d by then come to suspect some such thing, given the gate-keeping of Counterpunch on 9/11 research. I stopped writing for them around that time. Later, delving into “conspiracy research,” I came to the conclusion that ritual mind-control sex abuse was real, even if all the evidence for it swirling on the web was densely muddied with disinformation. [Just for balance, here is the conventional skeptical view, promoted by Chip Berlet and SPLC, of so-called satanic ritual abuse.]

In a similar way, the “Temple of Satan” and its staged school-yard affronts might provide cover for genuinely occult ritual practitioners. More later on this.

Update 1: The Black Mass has been moved off campus, under pressure from Catholic groups.

ORIGINAL POST ( incomplete, being written in real time):

Note: I am going to publish this piece as I write it so it is on the net, before the time of the Mass. That means, links and addictions, corrections and revisions, mistakes and rethinks, will all appear in real time. Bear with me and check back for the changes.

Harvard Extension School Cultural Studies Club is planning on holding a Black Satanic Mass, in parody of the Catholic church, this evening in conjunction with the New York-based Satanic Temple.

This is the website of the Satanic Temple.

It was embroiled only earlier this year in another controversy, when it applied for a permit to build a statue of Satan next to the Oklahoma State Capitol, where a monument to the Ten Commandments had been built in 2012..

The parody of communion is a favorite practice of Satanists in the tradition of Aleister Crowley, the notorious English occultist.

Crowley, like so many Western “occultists” simply studied yoga and Tantric Saivism from traditional practitioners in South India, (specifically in the Madurai Meenakshi temple, close to where my grandmother lived), then misused and perverted the texts to boost his own ego and suit his own ends. The general belief is that Crowley exaggerated his practices. This version of the story can be found at wiki:

Following a mountaintop sex magic ritual, Crowley also performed an invocation to the demon Choronzon involving blood sacrifice, considering the results to be a watershed in his magical career.[91] Returning to London in January 1910, Crowley found that Mathers was suing him for publishing Golden Dawn secrets in The Equinox; the court found in favour of Crowley. The case was widely reported on in the press, with Crowley gaining wider fame.[92] Crowley enjoyed this, and played up to the sensationalist stereotype of being a Satanist and advocate of human sacrifice, despite being neither.[93]

But I’m inclined to believe that this just a sanitizing of his history for public consumption. Whatever the truth, Crowley’s writings on magic dwelt a great deal on the need for blood sacrifice in Magic/

From Magic in Theory and Practice (Chapter 12):

“It is necessary for us to consider carefully the problems connected with the bloody sacrifice, for this question is indeed traditionally important in Magick. Nigh all ancient Magick revolves around this matter. In particular all the Osirian religions — the rites of the Dying God — refer to this. The slaying of Osiris and Adonis; the mutilation of Attis; the cults of Mexico and Peru; the story of Hercules or Melcarth; the legends of Dionysus and of Mithra, are all connected with this one idea. In the Hebrew religion we find the same thing inculcated. The first ethical lesson in the Bible is that the only sacrifice pleasing to the Lord is the sacrifice of blood; Abel, who made this, finding favour with the Lord, while Cain, who offered cabbages, was rather naturally considered a cheap sport. The idea recurs again and again. We have the sacrifice of the Passover, following on the story of Abraham’s being commanded to sacrifice his firstborn son, with the idea of the substitution of animal for human life. The annual ceremony of the two goats carries out this in perpetuity. And we see again the domination of this idea in the romance of Esther, where Haman and Mordecai are the two goats or gods; and ultimately in the presentation of the rite of Purim in Palestine, where Jesus and Barabbas happened to be the Goats in that particular year of which we hear so much, without agreement on the date.”

Another significant connection, for my purpose, is that between Crowley and pedophile practitioner and advocate, dean of the sexual revolution in America, Alfred Kinsey.

In “Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences,” Judith Reisman  has extensively documented Kinsey’s crimes, showing a link between pederasty (and pedophilia) and infanticide, as well as the consumption (cannibalism) of children.

This link is apparent to anyone who has studied the history of serial-killers. A disproportionate number of them were homosexuals who not only assaulted their victims, but ate their body parts.

I want to make it very clear that the statistical study of these ties is inadequate. Correlation is not causation, and many would even dispute correlation, given that the numbers of serial killers is not large enough to adequately study the proportion of homosexuals among them.

Nonetheless, the findings are significant:

“One hundred and three news stories involved the rape and/or murder of children: 90 involved the molestation and murder of a child or children, 11 stories involved only the abduction and rape of children, and two the rape and mutilation, but not the murder, of the children involved. Of the 90 news stories where the child was raped and murdered (0.47% of the unique child molestation stories), 40% involved homosexual molestation.”

What is ever more fascinating is that, other research shows that lack of children and abandonment by family members are significant enough to figure as predictors of serial-killing. Military service is also a factor in prediction for serial killers in the US. (This is in contrast to such widely-accepted predictors as childhood abuse, which turn out to be irrelevant).

 

Here is Reisman talking to the Catholic magazine, The Wanderer:

“Kinsey, Reisman further explained, was an adoring disciple of Britain’s “great beast,” Alastair Crowley, considered the “prophet of pedophilia” and a known satanist.

The Wanderer asked her if there was a link between satanism and pederasty, and she responded:

“Yes, certainly….

“There is a direct link between Kinsey and Crowley, as I showed in my book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences.

“Kinsey visited Crowley’s lair or ‘abbey’ in Sicily, as a pilgrim who goes to a religious place of holy worship. Crowley, we know was involved in ritualistic sacrifices of various kinds, including the ritualistic sexual abuse, and deaths, of children. Kinsey went to Crowley’s lair to adore Crowley’s images of people in copulatory positions.

“Kinsey’s promotion of children as sexual objects for adults to consume is of a piece with Crowley and the whole concept of satanic human sacrifice. Clearly, we sacrifice our children when we engage in sex with them. Those who do it, know it.

“Pedophilia, or more commonly, pederasty, is a form of human sacrifice. Anyone who assaults a child sexually knows they are not only killing that child’s soul, but some would say, from a psychotherapeutic perspective, they are turning that child into a dysfunctional, self-destructive individual, and they know the child-victim will also act out on other children, perhaps hundreds, the rest of his life, and so the human destruction is perpetuated.”

In this respect, recall that the self-styled Duke Porn star, Belle Knox (who, in my opinion, is a mind-control victim), said that she was being “consumed” by porn watchers who then hypocritically condemned her.  This was taken as an astute comment on the commodification of sex as a consumer item. But it was a double-entendre. She was hinting at and approving her consumption as a near-underage girl by a pedophilic culture

In case you think this is a wild reading of her words, consider that Mike Kulich, who made the porn contract offer to the Duke student, Thomas Bagley, runs a porn distribution company called Monarchy Distribution.

Monarch is the name given to an alleged mind-control program spun out of the better-known and better documented CIA program called MK Ultra.

So-called “conspiracy sites” claim that Satanism or some version thereof, is the religion practiced surreptitiously by the elites of what is called the New World Order, but I believe there is an alternative case to be made that events like the spurious Black Mass performance are orchestrated provocations directed at conservative Christians. They are intended to polarize debate in the country, demonize and misrepresent non-Christian traditions  (and make them the victims of the inevitable backlash), as well as distract from important foreign policy issues. They might also be intended to provoke anti-Semitism and religious conflict.

Be that as it may, the debate is inadequate without noticing the date of the controversy.

Today is May 12, which is the day in 1942 when the first train-load of Jews, some 1500 of them, arrived at Auschwitz, the worst of the Nazi camps where Jews (and many others) were exterminated during World War II.

Auschwitz, for the ruling elites, was the Holocaust (sacrifice) that enabled the Jews to acquire the Promised Land.

The number of Jews who died – still controversial  in some circles- is reckoned as 6 million, which has a sacred significance in Talmudic lore.

It was the number mentioned as the number of those “lost,” apparently long before the actual Nazi extermination.

The reason given by students of number symbolism is that the number six in the Talmudic prophecies pertains to Man (since man was created on the sixth day in the Book of Genesis), while the number ten represent the Kingdom of God realized on earth (Malkuth in the Sephiroth).

The 600,000 number multiplied by 10 became 6 million, according to this number symbolism.

Thus, one of the keys to contemporary secular eschatology, wherein the Jews and Israel become the salvation of the world,  lies in number symbolism and ancient Hebrew prophecy of the necessity of “losing six” (six million Jews) if the Jews are to return to Israel.

[I will research this angle some more, to make sure I have not been mislead by anti-Semitic propaganda or government-created disinformation.]

I believe that the Harvard Black Mass, as well as some other events in the last few days, are connected to this May 12 anniversary of Auschwitz.

First, very relevant to the Black Mass story is the abortion video published by abortion activist Emily Letts on Youtube last week, which I called out as a snuff movie as soon as I saw it.

The video was was replete with black-magic symbolism.

Let me point out some of it:

First. Moral inversion (Vampirism is good).

The perverse equation here is between giving birth to a child and murdering it. This is a typical moral inversion of the kind used in Satanism.

Notice that Ms. Letts was not equating birth and death, as religious texts often do when they teach that death to the physical world is birth in the spiritual world.

That  belief gives value to asceticism and self-restraint.

Instead,  Letts equated murder (the taking of another person’s life) with the increase of her own life, which is a form of vampirism.

Her words marked the abortion as ritual infanticide, intended to appease spirits or demonic powers.

Infanticide of this kind was typical of the worship of Molech or Baal in the Old Testament and it was forbidden to the Israelites.

Vampirism is exactly the opposite of the communion bread that Jesus offered to his disciples to give them eternal life.

Jesus’s sacrifice of his life – the definition of perfect love for others in Christianity  – is inverted into the Satanic ritual of taking life to increase one’s own.

The vampirism is especially evil because it is the perversion of the relationship between mother and child, the strongest of  human loves and one intended to reflect God’s love for each soul.

Second. Arrogation to herself of divinity. Letts portrays herself as a goddess.

The Letts video shows her humming and singing while contemplating her own ability to dispose of life and create it:

The non-graphic video focuses on her face and shows her breathing and humming through the procedure.”

(“Why I Filmed My Abortion,” Cosmopolitan, May 5, 2014)

Again, this is typical of Satanism. The capacity to give life is with God, not with Letts, who is only the vehicle.  In the Bible, Satan’s primary fault is wanting to usurp the position of God. Letts might well consider herself a goddess, but the reality is she is only a human being, pretending to be more, which is quite a different thing.

That this arrogation of the role of divinity was intentional is shown by the indifference displayed by the actress, which, if her purpose was to make her decision sympathetic, defeated her purpose. It back-fired by displaying the callousness and moral vacuity of the radical abortion position.

Now, if the sole intention of the video had been to remove the stigma of abortion, the video would surely have shown a more sympathetic figure, perhaps a woman who was sick, or had been raped.

Thus, I believe the motivation for the video was not what the sponsors of the video competition claimed.

I suggest that the idea all along was to promote a view of abortion as intentional, calculated killing, for the mother’s convenience. The objective was to efface the mother’s “sentimental” attachment to the child. That thesis is substantiated in an article in Salon, written earlier in the year by another abortion zealot.

Now, many people, including me, have felt something amiss in the whole narrative of the video. Some have suggested it was a hoax and Letts was not pregnant. I think the truth might be worse. I suggest that Letts deliberately got herself pregnant in order to kill the child to create the video.

I will explain why I think that in another post so as not to distract from the analysis of the symbolism here.

Third.  Preserving souvenirs of a killing.

Explaining why she made the video, Letts wrote a long piece at Cosmopolitan (Why I Filmed My Abortion), claiming that she was just as attached to her sonogram, as most people are to a child.  She made a rather bizarre claim that if her house were on fire, the first thing she would grab would be the sonogram. When I read this, I was immediately struck by the awkwardness of the story. It felt as if she had deliberately inserted this paragraph to follow some script. The “house on fire” symbolism is familiar to me from Buddhist texts, where the lusts of the body are said to feel like fire. Buddha asks us to flee the body, as a house on fire.  I first thought this was some kind of perverse reference to that. Perhaps it is.

But there is a more ready explanation. . In the worship of Molech, the children were thrown into the mouth of the idol so that they fell into the furnace below. The burnt bodies were the only souvenirs of what happened.

Could the “burning house” of the Cosmopolitan piece be a veiled reference to the charnel house of  Molech? And the sonogram, with its hieroglyphs, a veiled reference to the skeletal remains of the children.

 

Fourth. The invocation of sacrifice.

This interpretation gains weight when you notice another bizarre part of the Cosmopolitan piece – Letts’ insistence that women who kill their children, in spite of all the negative stories they hear about the ill-effects on their health or future fertility, as “sacrificing” these things, for the sake of killing the child:

“Yet women come into the clinic all the time terrified that they are going to be cut open, convinced that they won’t be able to have kids after the abortion. The misinformation is amazing, but think about it: They are still willing to sacrifice these things because they know that they can’t carry the child at this moment.”

Who talks about “sacrificing” when they are killing something, if not the practitioners of ritual sacrifice?

Of burnt offering? Burnt offering is exactly what the burning of children (House on fire) was in the worship of Moloch/Baal.

But “burnt offering” is exactly what the Holocaust means (It was at first called  Shoah (Catastrophe) by the Jews).

The genocide of 6 million Jews was the burned offering that enabled the Jews as a people to regain the land of Israel.

Proving the existence of Lord Krishna

Posted on by

Indians are taught that Krishna was a myth and did not exist. This is the inevitable byproduct of an educational system and mentality put in place by the British empire. But things are changing. In response to the question of whether Krishna existed amateur historians are coming up with new evidence of the authentic nature of the Hindu scriptures:

“Most certainly, says Dr Manish Pandit, a nuclear medicine physician who teaches in the United Kingdom, proffering astronomical, archaeological, linguistic and oral evidences to make his case.

“I used to think of Krishna is a part of Hindu myth and mythology. Imagine my surprise when I came across Dr Narhari Achar (a professor of physics at the University of Memphis, Tennessee, in the US) and his research in 2004 and 2005. He had done the dating of the Mahabharata war using astronomy. I immediately tried to corroborate all his research using the regular Planetarium software and I came to the same conclusions [as him],” Pandit says.

Which meant, he says, that what is taught in schools about Indian history is not correct?

The Great War between the Pandavas and the Kauravas took place in 3067 BC, the Pune-born Pandit, who did his MBBS from BJ Medical College there, says in his first documentary, Krishna: History or Myth?.

Pandit’s calculations say Krishna was born in 3112 BC, so must have been 54-55 years old at the time of the battle of Kurukshetra.

Pandit is also a distinguished astrologer, having written several books on the subject, and claims to have predicted that Sonia Gandhi would reject prime ministership, the exact time at which Shankaracharya Jayendra Saraswati would be released on bail and also the Kargil war.

Pandit, as the sutradhar of the documentary Krishna: History or Myth?, uses four pillars — archaeology, linguistics, what he calls the living tradition of India and astronomy to arrive at the circumstantial verdict that Krishna was indeed a living being, because Mahabharata and the battle of Kurukshetra indeed happened, and since Krishna was the pivot of the Armageddon, it is all true.

You are a specialist in nuclear medicine. What persuaded you to do a film on the history/myth of Krishna? You think there are too many who doubt? Is this a politico-religious message or a purely religious one?

We are always taught that Krishna is a part of Hindu myth and mythology. And this is exactly what I thought as well. But imagine my surprise when I came across Dr Narhari Achar (of the Department of Physics at the University of Memphis, Tennessee, in the US) and his research somewhere in 2004 and 2005. He had done the dating of the Mahabharata war using astronomy.

I immediately tried to corroborate all his research using the regular Planetarium software and I came to the same conclusions. This meant that what we are taught in schools about Indian history is not correct.

I also started wondering about why this should be so. I think that a mixture of the post-colonial need to conform to western ideas of Indian civilisation and an inability to stand up firmly to bizarre western ideas are to blame. Also, any attempt at a more impartial look at Indian history is given a saffron hue.

I decided that I could take this nonsense no more, and decided to make films to show educated Indians what their true heritage was. The pen is mightier than the sword is an old phrase but I thought of new one: Film is the new pen.

Any ideas I have will receive wide dissemination through this medium.

I wanted to present a true idea of Indian history unfettered by perception, which was truly scientific, not just somebody’s hypothesis coloured by their perceptions and prejudices.

Why not a documentary on Rama, who is more controversial in India today? Proof of his existence would certainly be more than welcome today…

A documentary on Rama is forthcoming in the future. But the immediate reason I deferred that project is the immense cost it would entail. Whereas research on Krishna and Mahabharata was present and ready to go.

Further more, Rama according to Indian thought, existed in the long hoary ancient past of Treta Yuga, where science finds it difficult to go.

There is a controversial point in your documentary where someone Isckon monk alludes to Krishna as being the father of Jesus. How can you say that since there is an age gap of roughly 3000 years between the two spiritual giants?

Is Krishna the spiritual father of Jesus? That is what the person who was training to be a Roman Catholic priest, and who now worships Krishna, asks. The answer comes within the field of comparative religion and theology.

The Biblical scriptures qualify Jesus as the son of God. Most Indians have no problems accepting this as Hindus are a naturally secular people. However, then the question that arises is, if Jesus is the son, then who is the Father or God Himself?

[Lila: The word secular in India means not-communal or not provoking religious animosities.]

Now, Biblical scriptures do not really give the answer except to say that the Father is all-powerful and omnipresent. Now, of course, we know that Jesus does not say that he is omnipresent or omnipotent.

[Lila: Jesus both says that he and his father are “one,” implying omniscience and also says at other times, “No man knoweth except the father,” implying limitation.]

Now, no scripture can live as an island, all by itself, and the Srimad Bhagavatam and other scriptures such as the Bramha Samhita all call Krishna as an all powerful, omnipresent being.

So, if we use these words of Bhagavatam, there can be no other truth, which means that Krishna is the father of all living creation.

But it does not mean that Jesus is not divine. Jesus is indeed divine. What I liked about the monks in my documentary is that they do not denigrate Jesus although they worship Krishna as God. They keep Jesus in their hearts, while worshipping Krishna. What could be more secular or more Christian?”

Abortion as Population Control: The Missing 2 Billion

Posted on by

From Life-News, a perspective on a depopulation project more successful than war and equal to any genocide:

At 40 million abortions a year, it would only take 25 years to eliminate one billion babies. Since the abortion business really took off around 1960 or so, we have probably eliminated nearly twice that number, or two billion unborn human beings.

Think about it. Over the past half-century, quietly and without fanfare, in ordinary towns and cities, in dozens of countries around the world, perhaps two billion children have been killed. They have died unknown, often unmourned, and acknowledged only from time to time.

The 20th century was violent by any measure. Thirty-seven million people were killed in World War I. Over 60 million perished in World War II. Six million Jews and another six million Catholics died in Hitler’s death camps. Twenty million died at the hands of the Soviet authorities. Sixty-five million Chinese were killed by the Communist Party, while forty-two million more starved to death during Mao’s Great Leap Forward. And so on.

But these numbers are dwarfed by the sheer volume of children who have been killed this past half-century.”

So those were the tiny, unimportant little lives that were snuffed out so that human beings could become sex-addicts and proud of it..

Something about a voice in Rama…

Father knew best: “The Silent Holocaust” (1981)

Posted on by

The author of “Abortion: The Silent Holocaust” (1981) was a man, and a celibate Catholic priest at that, yet his understanding of the moral import of abortion far exceeds that of feminist pro-abortion women who deny the nature of what they are doing, or, worse yet, understand it fully, but nonetheless elevate their own convenience above it at all times (Salon):

“I would put the life of a mother over the life of a fetus every single time — even if I still need to acknowledge my conviction that the fetus is indeed a life. A life worth sacrificing.”

(Lila: my emphasis)

The author of these chilling lines, which could have come out of the mouth of some KGB chief or Nazi commandant, does get one thing right: Motherhood, devoid of elementary moral development, does not in itself confer humanitarian feeling or ethics. One can be childless and/or a male and have a far truer ethical compass than many of the malign mothers of modernity or the industry experts who brainwashed them.

For instance, contrast Father Powell, who quit his career for a year to write “Abortion: The Silent Holocaust,” with Dr. Nathanson, the godfather of the abortion industry who admitted that the pro-abort movement manufactured statistics to brainwash the population to accept the new laws.

Nathanson stated unequivocally that abortion was kept in place not by the needs of “women’s emancipation” – as feminism’s dupes believed and still believe – but by the self-interest of the abortion providers and the state.

National Right To Life News reviews Father Powell’s important book:

“(Father) Powell rhetorically asks himself why a heavily trained academic [Powell says he had so many degrees he felt like “Father Fahrenheit”] would be so burdened by Roe. He concludes it was because of two formative experiences that had left Powell with an “acute sensitivity to the value of every human life.”

One came about as a result of his short stint as a hospital chaplain in Akron, Ohio. He quickly realized that “scenes of suffering and raw grief had been quarantined out of my academic experience.” It dawns on him that he had never even seen someone die or be born.

[Lila: What changed me from pro-choice to pro-life was not a change in understanding of the nature of the act. I always understood abortion to be the taking of human life, but I was mesmerized by the propaganda that the child was somehow “more” the moral responsibility of the woman’s because of its residence in her womb.

This, of course, denies the man’s genetic contribution as well as the genetic contributions of the grand-parents of the child on both sides.

Previously, I’d also not seen pictures of the fetus or the evidence from new technology of  its complete humanity very early on in development.  As soon as I saw that evidence, thanks to the activism of Lila Rose (yes, I realize she’s Opus Dei but that’s another blog post), I changed my mind.]

“…..each of us has an absolutely essential part to play, that none of us are accidents, that God could have created the world without a place for us but didn’t want to.

“No one else can speak my message,” Powell writes, “or sing my song, or bestow my act of love. These have been entrusted only to me.”

The other formative experience for Powell, also before Roe, came when he went to Europe for further studies. While there, Powell visited the remains of the Nazi death camp at Dachau.

There he learned firsthand of the utilitarian ethic of the Nazi regime, its utter disregard for those who were frail or “unproductive,” and the silence of many Germans to the unspeakable monstrosities that were taking place.

He notes that the words “Never again” are printed on the gate in five languages. It’s a memory that haunts Powell when the U.S. Supreme Court unleashed the abortion holocaust.

Both experiences left him numb. One was too beautiful, too sacred. The other too violent, too shattering.

Yet troubled as he was by these experiences, it was something else that persuaded Powell to take a year’s sabbatical to serve as a pro-life speaker: his counseling experience with three young women.

The first had aborted and was deeply sorry. The life had seemed to have gone out of her eyes and as she left her visage seemed to say, “How can I ever forget?”

The second–a bubble gum-smacking teenager–represented the polar opposite extreme. She was as casual about her impending abortion as the first woman was devastated by the abortion she now bitterly regretted. But it was the third woman whose attitude nearly struck him dumb.

Laboratory tests had confirmed her pregnancy. In response, she told Powell that she had even stopped smoking and drinking; those “can affect the baby,” she remarked. Then in the next breath, she offhandedly remarks, “But I have an appointment to kill this baby next Thursday morning.”

While rocked back on his heels, Powell didn’t blame her for her wildly inconsistent statements. This new ethic of “utility and convenience” was in the very air she breathed, air remarkably like that which permeated Nazi-era Germany.”

Powell also grasps the fact that abortion is intimately connected with neglect of the weak and elderly. He describes what the last 24 hours of his mother’s life meant, absent any measure of “productivity”:

“During those many hours of conversation, characterized by “complete openness,” Powell was “introduced to parts of myself that I didn’t know existed.” He adds, “If I had to pick out the most humanizing, maturing, and life-transforming days of my life,” they would include his mother’s last 24 hours.

“What a terrible and personal loss I would have suffered,” he writes, “if she had been ‘put out of her misery’ because the supposedly meaningful and productive days of her life were over.”