Category Archives: mind-control

Putin: ISIS Funded By G20 Per Russian Intel

Posted on by

From Global Research:

We’ve been very patient. For the last 12 hours we’ve been constantly refreshing Google News for just one — one — western article about Putin’s bombshell comments at the G20 summit in Antalya. You would think that the Russian President stating publicly that ISIS is receiving money from 40 different countries, including G20 members, would be “newsworthy”. Right? 

But the western media has defied even our worst expectations: Not a single mainstream western outlet reported on Putin’s comments. Typically, at least the Daily Beast has the common courtesy to distort or misrepresent the most recent Putin press conference. But in this instance, there is literally no written western record of Putin saying anything about who finances ISIS during the G20 summit in Turkey. This is insane.”

Only cricket chirps from the west

“Muslim Rape Crisis” In Sweden Debunked

Posted on by

UPDATE:

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-19592372

ORIGINAL POST

I found this interesting post that debunks the “Muslim rape crisis in Sweden” narrative and points out how high rape and crime rates are in almost entirely white European countries like Estonia and Latvia that no one includes in discussion about Islam and rape in Europe [minor edits added for readability and grammar]:

New UPDATE (06/06/2013):Sweden’s latest murder statistics have come out for the year of 2012, and this is really bad news for atheists/racists.Remember the murder statistic is a very objective crime statistic, since it doesn’t rely much upon the rate of reporting or a a country’s laws, and is difficult to falsely report. So, the homicide rate and count is very objective when compared to many other crime statistics.Since atheists as a whole are universally stupid people, they would never ever read the official crime statistics published or encourage anyone to do so, but instead just use speculation, rumors, or other such nonsense as sources.

Here are the official crime statistics: http://bra.se/bra/brott–statistik/mord-och-drap.htmlThe murder count in Sweden in 2012 was 68, which comes to a murder rate of 0.71 per 100,000 for 2012, which is lower than all 50 US states, almost every country on the entire planet, and one of the very lowest murder rates in Swedish history!

So Sweden has now achieved an unthinkable astronomically low murder rate of 0.71!

What a disappointment for the Nazis/atheists that Sweden’s murder rate in 2012 (with more Muslim immigration) is even lower than it was in 2011, and is one of the very very lowest murder rates in all of Swedish history.

It’s really almost unthinkable that any country could have a murder rate this low.

To put things into perspective, let’s look at the number of murders in the US states with population sizes closest to Sweden’s 9.6 million population (Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina),  since the murder rate is in proportion to the population size:
– Georgia had more than 550 murders in 2011
– Michigan had more than 600 murders in 2011
– North Carolina had more than 500 murders in 2011

Source: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-4

So, this means that the US state with the lowest murder count and population size closest to Sweden (North Carolina) had nearly 100 more murders in 1 year than Sweden did in 5 years.

Sweden’s murder count in 5 years (2008-2012) would be 414, whereas North Carolina’s murder count is above 500 in just 1 year.

The murder count in Sweden in 2012 was 68. You’d have to go all the way back to maybe the 1960s or 1970s to find Sweden murder rates this low.

If crime is up and there’s much more violence, wouldn’t the murder count and murder rate go up dramatically and be higher than at least a few US states?

So where’s all the ‘crime’ that the fools (atheists) are referring to?

Not only is the murder rate lower, the murder count is lower than ever as well.

Apparently there’s more ‘crime’ and violence in Sweden, but Sweden is safer than all 50 US states.  The US state with the lowest murder rate in 2011 had a murder rate of 1.2 per 100,000.

Well I guess I can’t blame atheists for being misled, they are gullible people who never read official crime statistics published, just garbage on blog sites.

I’m still waiting for the fools (atheists) to justify their lies about there being so much more crime in Sweden now, with more Muslim immigration, I guess they can’t. All they have are lies from their low-life atheist mouths.

What will the fools (atheists) come up with next since the official crime statistics published debunks their lies?

BTW: I’m not a Muslim and never have been at any time in my life (and never will be), I’m not from the Middle-East, Asia, Africa, or Europe. Initially I was on the same anti-Islam bandwagon that many are on right now (and said lots of anti-Islamic things) up until around 2011 when I realized it was just a waste of time and energy.

What’s the point in focusing lots of time and energy on ending just Muslim-related crime (non-violent rapes with no injuries), helping rebuild Muslim countries, trying to make life better for Muslims alone, and helping out Muslim countries alone?

I don’t get it.

Since 9/11 there were more than 120,000 non-Muslim killings in the US (from 2002-2012), so what would happen if we focused our time and energy on helping out non-Muslims instead?

The very worst thing that can happen to the Nazi White Nationalist movement in Sweden is a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants. This would ruin everything for them wouldn’t it?

They should deport/ban Muslim immigrants and prevent all that ‘crime’ in Sweden, then bring in lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants. If this time, with non-Muslim immigrants there really is more actual crime, what will Nazi Swedes do?

There’s “more crime”, but the murder rate in 2012 (latest data) is one of the lowest in Sweden history, lower than all 50 US States (meaning that there’s not even 1 US state that has a lower murder rate), and lower than almost every single country in all of the entire world.

All that the liars/atheists can do is discourage people from reading the official crime statistics published and avoid mentioning the murder rate at all costs.

UPDATE: After much discussion I’ve determined the actual cause of the reported rape rate in Sweden being high.

Here’s my hypothesis as to why Sweden’s reported rape rate is so high:
– Sweden’s new modified rape laws in 2005 made it so that the way rapes are counted is intentionally inflated
– The rate of reporting rapes in Sweden is very high
– Many reported rapes in Sweden are false reports caused by the extreme racism there

The evidence to support this hypothesis:
– An excerpt from this BBC News article demonstrates how laughable Sweden’s new rape laws are:

“In Sweden there has been this ambition explicitly to record every case of sexual violence separately, to make it visible in the statistics,” she says.

“So, for instance, when a woman comes to the police and she says my husband or my fiance raped me almost every day during the last year, the police have to record each of these events, which might be more than 300 events. In many other countries it would just be one record – one victim, one type of crime, one record.” – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19592372

So this means that 1 report from 1 woman in Sweden could count as 300 or more “rapes” in their rape statistics, depending on how many times the victim claims they were “raped”.

In 2009 according to the Sweden Democrats there were only 253 rape cases (the number of rape cases would tell us the number of rapes if Sweden would’ve had regular rape counting laws), meaning that Sweden’s reported rape rate would only be around 2.7 per 100,000 if they had normal rape counting laws (which is more than 94% lower than the current rate that appears in their rape statistics).

– All of the objective crime statistics in Sweden that are difficult to falsely report like the murder rate and car thefts have decreased or remained constant

– Sweden’s murder rate in 2011 with more Muslim immigration has decreased to 0.86. It’s the lowest murder rate in decades for Sweden and one of the lowest in all of Sweden history, so Sweden’s murder rate is lower than all 50 US states in 2011 and almost every country in the entire world.

The murder rate in Sweden was much higher in the 1990s when there was much less Muslim immigration. From the murder rate we know that the type of “rapes” and “crime” in Sweden must not be lethal (Source: http://www.bra.se/bra/brott–statistik/mord-och-drap.html)

–  The reported number of homicides for Sweden in 2009 was 232, but the actual number was 92! So this means the actual homicide rate was more than 60% lower than the reported homicide rate.

Over 100 of the reported homicides in Sweden in 2009 weren’t even about homicides. (Source: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-006/EN/KS-SF-12-006-EN.PDF)

If people are willing to falsely report murders obviously they would be willing to falsely report a rape.

For a car theft how are you going to falsely report it? Are you going to make a up a non-existent license plate or hide your car? It’s difficult to falsely report a car theft.

For a homicide how are you going to falsely report it? Claim someone got killed even if they’re alive? It’s difficult to falsely report a homicide. Although you can falsely convict someone of murder.

But for a rape, it’s easy; even if there’s no DNA evidence or injuries in the case you can still win. Anyone can just make up a story about how they were raped; it’s arguably the very very easiest crime to falsely report.

– The main sign of a false rape report is no injuries and no DNA evidence.

No injuries tells us that very little to no force was used and no DNA evidence tells us that there was no actual intercourse. So in cases like these you would just have to rely upon whom you believe, the accused or the accuser.

If there was more violence in Sweden we would expect the murder rate to increase, not decrease, so the murder rate is a real big blow to the Nazi movement in Sweden.

– Falsely reporting a rape is extremely easy, falsely reporting a homicide is extremely difficult, and the reported rape rate is the only crime statistic that’s radically changed in Sweden

– We know from history that in extremely racist societies falsely reporting rapes was common. Here’s an example of one in Sweden:

“The [Swedish] woman later recanted her story about the alleged rape when she learned that a surveillance camera mounted in the taxi had recorded the couple leaving the vehicle without paying” – http://www.thelocal.se/14626/20080929/

– The murder rate isn’t calculated by the number of reports like how the reported rape rate is, it’s calculated by objective deaths, so the murder rate is a very objective statistic that’s difficult to distort and skew

– There were over 5,940 reported rapes in Sweden in 2009, but the Swedish Democrats talked about 114 out of 253 cases, 253 cases is more than 95% lower than the total number of reported rapes in Sweden, I’m guessing the number of cases is much lower because the “reported number” counts each alleged event (Source: http://www.thelocal.se/28580/20100825/#.UMR9MFVkyAg)

– According to Swedish journalist Ingrid Carlqvist “Most [Sweden] rape complaints are false. I base my conclusions on the hundreds of preliminary investigations and verdicts I’ve reviewed in my 30 years as a journalist” (Source: http://rixstep.com/2/1/20110701,00.shtml)

– Since the reported rape rate relies upon a country’s rape laws, the rate of reporting rapes, and since it’s extremely easy to falsely report a rape the reported rape rate is the very least objective of all crime statistics and gives us no objective data as to what’s occurring

Conclusion:
– The murder rate is really embarrassing, so the Nazi Swedes avoid mentioning it at all costs
– Not being able to falsely report a murder like a rape must really pain the Nazi movement in Sweden

– There’s no way Swedish racists are going to encourage people to look at the official statistics and reports published, they’re only going to encourage people to look at  propaganda Nazi articles and YouTube videos
– The basic argument of the Nazi Swedes and anyone who supports them is that “crime is up in Sweden except in every objective crime statistic that’s difficult to falsely report and distort”
– All that’s changed in Sweden is Sweden’s rape laws and the rate of reporting rape, this is why the murder rate has remained constant (and is actually lower now) in Sweden

If Swedes really believe that Muslim immigration is their problem (with a murder rate lower than all US states) then here’s what I suggest they do:
– Deport/ban all Muslim immigrants
– After all the Muslims are gone, bring in lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants
– If there’s more actual crime in Sweden (you know in objective crime statistics) with  white non-Muslim immigrants, without a target as easy as the Muslims, what will Nazi Swedes do?

I would encourage Sweden to deport all existing Muslim immigrants and ban all Muslim immigration.  I would suggest that any Muslim immigrant living in Sweden voluntarily leave Sweden. I would also suggest that white non-Muslims go live in Sweden.

It would be a great experiment to see what would happen in Sweden with a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants. My guess is that then it wouldn’t matter if the murder rate was 10 times or 20 times higher in Sweden. It wouldn’t be international news, because non-Muslim immigrants are much harder targets.

Some other things to note:
– The worst rapist in Sweden was a White Swede, Thomas Quick, who allegedly raped and murdered 30 men
– New Zealand doesn’t have Sweden’s unique rape laws, so NZ’s reported rape rate is probably more real than Sweden’s, yet in NZ they have rape-murderers, like Jason Frandi, a White New Zealander who raped and murdered a tourist

– The European countries with the highest murder rates, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia have the least non-white immigration, the lowest percentage of Muslims in Europe, and the purest European stock. I’ve asked the people who complain about the supposed “Problem of Islam” in Europe as to why they don’t make websites or YouTube videos to help out Lithuanians, Latvians, and Estonians, but none of them have ever answered the question.

– Multiple studies and experiments have shown that White males are reported less often for all crime in general.

– Since White males are reported less often for rape, if White males were reported as often as others at least 80% of the reported rapists in Sweden should be White males, this would be more consistent with the murder rate in Sweden
– If you report a White male for rape and there’s no injuries, you don’t have video camera evidence, 20 witnesses, or anything like that, and it’s not a child rape or drug rape, then the jury will most likely just say “it’s no big deal, charges dropped”, you’ll just have to wait for the White male to go on to kill or seriously injure someone to get a conviction

What a shame it is for the Nazi movement in Sweden that you can’t falsely report a murder, as you can a rape.”

Levels Of Brain-washing

Posted on by

First Level Brain-washing: General Public:

Reaction:

“The Paris attacks were committed unprovoked by Islamicists (ISIS) who hate us (France/America/substitute country name) for our freedoms.”

RESULT: Anger directed against Islamic countries, Muslims, all brown people.

Helps NWO-instigated ongoing psyop called “war on terror.”

Second Level Brain-washing: Informed Public/Activists:

Reaction:

“The Paris attacks were blow-back by radicalized young men who join ISIS, who hate us  (France, America/substitute country name) for attacking them before.”

RESULT: Anger directed against French, American and allied Muslim governments.

Helps NWO-instigated ongoing psyop to dismantle all governments.

Deprogrammed public & activists:

Reaction:

“The Paris attacks were committed by Western intelligence operatives, working with their golem, ISIS and with hired operatives of Western-allied Muslim outfits to instigate public support for more funding for the “war on terror.”

RESULT: Anger directed against Western intelligence outfits and the Western elites who run them.

Obstructs NWO’s continuing psyop on the world, called the “war on terror,” which might better be called the “war OF terror.”

Hint:

Open defecation is a social problem in India and Indonesia, not in Syria. Middle-class Syrian Muslims are not likely to be involved in anything like that.

Conclusion: the “migrants” are operatives.

Note that the CIA has, for several years, been using feces and menstrual blood in its intelligence operations abroad: for example, these “Egyptian feminist” activists, who front for Western intelligence.

[I deleted the link because of the images. You can find them by googling for Egyptian feminists sh** and bleed, or looking up the archives of Reason magazine.]

The secondary benefit Western intelligence agencies derives from the usage of feces and menstrual blood is that the public begins to be habituated to such images in the news, which helps promote genres of porn involving feces and menstruation.

The intelligence agencies are ultimately run by financiers/elites that depend on the global porn trade, so the use of these images can be seen as government-funded advertising to increase big porn’s market-share.

The images also make homosexuality more acceptable, for reasons I needn’t flog.

A further benefit to the agencies is that by running public campaigns against open defecation in Asia, on the one hand, while simultaneously running intelligence operations involving open defecation, on the other, the Western public is conditioned to associate militant brown (“like feces”) Isis operatives with, first, Islam and Muslims in general, and, secondly, with all brown-skinned people, especially South Asians and Indians.This conflation helps transform rational debate over immigration into something visceral and racial that solidifies resentment and anger toward all foreigners and thus supports imperial aggressions.

Lack of hygiene ( a social and economic problem) becomes conflated with “brown people” (color and race) and these in turn become conflated with attacks against the West leading to the notion of an anti-white foreign invasion generated by the third-world.

Syria, of course, is not a “third-world” country.

The propaganda classic, “Camp of the Saints,” made exactly the same move, conflating impoverished people in Calcutta with a migrant invasion of Europe, and in the process exacerbating white working-class anxieties.

The author, Jean Raspail, is a royalist, but, like all too many who fawn on blood-elites, he himself is  working-class.

The Calcuttan slum-dwellers who, in the book, land up in Paris, in the real world, cannot even afford to leave their slum, let alone, Bengal or India.

In the book, the slum-dwellers from Calcutta are uniformly depicted in the most loathsome terms, as perpetually copulating, disease-ridden sub-human monstrosities, swamping the shores of the “beloved city” of France.

The “beloved city” is a phrase from Revelations that actually refers to Jerusalem, so that in Raspail’s white-nationalist supremacist vision, the Christian end-times becomes fused with British Israelism and white Europeans become the “true Israel,” surrounded in the last times by the demonic forces of Gog and Magog, now equated with the third-world.

This is simply sleight-of-hand, intended to distract from the groups actually orchestrating the “clash of civilizations.”

Cross-Dressing Linked To Recidivism, Suicide, Mental Illness

Posted on by

In “Forensic and Medico-Legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices,” (CRC Press, December 2008), Dr. Anil Aggarwal of Maulana Azad University, New Delhi, demonstrates that the paraphilia of male cross-dressing is not, as activists like to claim, completely harmless.

Instead, it is characteristically accompanied by other sexual fetishes, such as, bondage, masochism, and auto-erotic asphyxiation.

C-D is often seen with homosexual inclination, increased sexual interest, and increased masturbation and is associated with increased use of pornography, as well as with forms of mental illness (mania, depression, suicidal ideation).

Aggarwal finds cross-dressing linked to childhood separation from parents.

Other researchers, even within Western governments, come to similar conclusions:

In “Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Recidivism,” (1998), R. Karl Hanson and Andrew Harris (Corrections Research, Dept. of the Solicitor General, Canada) write:

A recent meta-analytic review of
follow-up studies identified numerous individual factors that were reliably related to sexual offense recidivism (Hanson & Bussière, 1996, 1998). Almost all of these identified factors were static (e.g., offense history, victim type, age) and the remainder were highly stable (e.g.,antisocial  personality disorder, deviant sexual preferences).” (p. 6)

The authors also make the following observation:

The recidivists had committed a new sexual offense while on some form of community supervision (probation, parole, mandatory supervision).

The non-recidivists were matched to the recidivists on victim type, criminal history, geographical region and jurisdiction.

The study examined approximately equal numbers of rapists, boy-victim child molesters and girl-victim child molesters.
Despite efforts to match the recidivistic and non-recidivistic groups, some differences remained in static, historical variables.
In comparison to the non-recidivists, the recidivists had a greater history of sexual deviance, such as diverse types of victims, stranger victims, juvenile offenses and paraphilias (e.g.,
exhibitionism, cross-dressing).
As well, the recidivists showed more signs of an antisocial lifestyle than did the non-recidivists. The recidivists were more likely to
meet criteria for antisocial personality, psychopathy (PCL-R), and had higher
scores on objective risk scales (SIR and VRAG).”  (p. 3).

In  “Managing High Risk Sex Offenders in the Community: A Psychological Approach,” (2004) Jackie Craissati writes:

“As might be expected, the sexual homicide group exhibited much greater levels of paraphilia – non-contact behaviors such as exhibitionism, cross-dressing, and voyeurism – and this has been observed in other studies.”

and the following (p. 63):

Common features found in sexual sadists which differentiate them from non-sadistic sexual offender include a significant history of physical abuse, known cross-dressing, obscene telephone calls, and indecent exposure.”

 

 

Fringe Sites Also Controlled, Say Members

Posted on by

That the so-called “lunatic truth fringe” of the alternative media spectrum is also controlled is truly mind-boggling.

If you search Godlike Productions, you can see unsourced claims that Merkel is the spawn of Hitler and plenty of other rants of that sort.

But my rather decorous and fully sourced account of her actual ethnic background vanishes in a few hours.

As I’ve said before, lunacy, racism, and incitement are things the powers-that-be love.

It’s reasonable discourse about unmentionables, from people who don’t have their stamp of approval, which is censored.

All roads must lead to Rome, or they’ll put up road-blocks.

Below is a comment from a GLP (God-Like Productions) member who’s run into the same problem.

Note: I am not a member of any of these sites and consider most of them to be disinformation venues, with good facts mixed up with fog, either official or unofficial, but even I was taken aback at the swiftness with which just a link and a comment that was completely factual got erased.

I take that to mean that the powers-that-be do keep an eye on everyone on the net – not just major media voices.

Doomsday Prophecies:

Try to post the words Tavistock and/or Jason Lucas on GLP. Just those words and nothing else.

Then when you are autobanned by a php script go do some research on the subject.

Now when seeking an alternative to GLP some of you will arrive at LOP (LunaticOutPost) They allow you to post anti-GLP rants in one section of their forum.

Be careful of LOP as some research on the web will show that it too is a Tavistock psyop.

They are practicing mind control with their sites and sucking people in like a new Dyson.

What amazes me is how desperate people are to stay unbanned and go about kissing Trinity’s pimpled a**.

By the way he is not one. Trinity is more than one person all of which are scum. It is a controlled experiment where the mess with your minds.

One day Trinity preaches Ron Paul values and the next says Obama is not that bad of a guy.

Some days GLP casts banning nets where they allow all kinds of trash talk. It will go one for a few hours and then they see who submits ‘abusive posts’ to earn karma while the mods go on a banning spree. It is like clockwork and is obvious to anyone with a brain.”

Link To Godlike Productions, Reddit Deleted

Posted on by

Yesterday, Godlike Productions, another conspiracy site, had two pages with links to the Merkel piece. This morning, one has vanished, the other has been deleted:

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3000315/pg1

Sorry, that message is no longer in the database.

There was a link to a couple of pages on Reddit, yesterday.

This morning, a search for Reddit shows nothing, even though both Godlike Productions and Reddit show up on my dashboard as links leading to the blog.

More proof that every forum, whether mainstream, alternative, conspiracy, fringe, nationalist, or racist/racialist is controlled by the powers-that-be?

Another thing – the hits on the one article posted at Rense now stand at over 7000, yet the overall position on my blog on Google has not budged. I may misunderstand how these things work, but it sure looks strange to me.

 

Jeff Rense Link

Posted on by

Jeff Rense, the conspiracy site (which also retails “aliens” and other sci-fi stuff) has linked my piece on Merkel’s Ashkenazy and communist affiliations. I thank him heartily, but warily, since when one gets attention from bigger sites, it often ends up in the services of other agendas, some hostile.

Is November slated for some big-time shake-up (ala the Million Mask March in London) that the powers-that-be have planned and every little dissident voice must be roped in….or not?

No idea. But I see the same link showing up on some fairly racialist/racist sites, below which Indian immigrants are characterized as “shit-skins,” among other epithets.

I suppose it’s all the anti-migrant feeling being fanned by the NWO-orchestrated migrant/refugee incursion into Europe.

To be expected.

Meanwhile, I’m watching that one piece get more hits in one morning than my whole blog sometimes gets in a couple of weeks.month.

Religions Being Played Off Against Each Other

Posted on by

From Washington’s Blog (which sometimes runs disinformation), this excellent piece:

Fundamentalist Muslims, Christians and Jews all think they are in a “holy war” against the other guy.

They assume that Christianity, Judaism and Islam are mortal enemies.   As such, they assume that Saudi Arabia (the seat of most fundamentalist school of Islam) fights for Islam, Israel for Judaism and the U.S. (which has the most Christians of any country in the world) for Christianity … or religious tolerance.

They’re being played.

Specifically, while it’s true that Saudi Arabia has long backed Islamic terrorists … so has Israel (and see this and this).

Radical Islamic Syrian “rebels” have allegedly offered to “trade” the Golan Heights to Israel … in exchange for military aid.

The Saudis – along with the Israelis – say that Arabs are not ready for democracy.

Israel has also repeatedly been caught impersonating Muslim extremists. For example, Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

NBC News reports that Israel backed a Muslim fundamentalist terror group against Iran.

Former CBS News producer Barry Lando claims that Saudi Arabia helps directly fund Israeli’s Mossad in its campaign to assassinate Iranian scientists.  And see this.

The Sunday Times reported that Saudi Arabia has tested the ability to stand down its air defenses to allow an Israeli strike on Iran to pass through its airspace. After the Arab Spring, Israel views the Saudi government as “guarantor of stability”, according to the New York Times. In 2011, Israel approved a German sale of 200 Leopard tanks to Saudi Arabia. The approval came from Uzi Arad, the national security advisor to Benjamin Netanyahu.

And the U.S. has long backed Saudi Arabia … and the Madrassa schools within Saudi Arabia which teach radical, violent Wahabi beliefs.

The Washington Post reported in 2002:

The United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings ….

The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school system’s core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books ….

The Council on Foreign Relations notes:

The 9/11 Commission report (PDF) released in 2004 said some of Pakistan’s religious schools or madrassas served as “incubators for violent extremism.” Since then, there has been much debate over madrassas and their connection to militancy.

***

New madrassas sprouted, funded and supported by Saudi Arabia and U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, where students were encouraged to join the Afghan resistance.

And see this.

The U.S. also directly arms, funds and otherwise supports the most violent fundamentalist Muslim terrorists – including Al Qaeda – against the more moderate Muslims and secular Arabs. Indeed, the U.S. backs Islamic terrorists who are persecuting Christians and Jews.

Yet the U.S. not only strongly supports Israel, but many of the most fundamentalist American Christians support the most fundamentalist, hard-line, radical Israeli Jews. And the Israeli government supports the Christian fundamentalists.

These 3 countries – centers of 3 different religions – are also all fighting on the same side in various wars. For example, the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Israel are all fighting against the Syrian government, and backing Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. (Indeed, the New York Times reported that virtually all of the rebel fighters are Al Qaeda terrorists.)

In reality, corrupt government officials – many of whom are atheists – are using the most extreme forms of religion to divide and conquer us … while they are working together with “enemies” from the “opposing” team.”

Malhotra Trounces American Professor

Posted on by

Hindu activist Rajiv Malhotra’s brilliant rebuttal of plagiarism charges by an American professor, Andrew Nicholson.

Nicholson, having borrowed liberally – without any acknowledgment whatsoever– from traditional Indian pandits, had called Malhotra a “plagiarist,” even though Malhotra cites him over thirty times in his book:

Dear Andrew Nicholson,

I am glad you have entered the battlefield so we can get into some substantial matters. Since this is an extended article, I want to go about it systematically, starting with the following clarifications: I used your work with explicit references 30 times in Indra’s Net, hence there was no ill-intention. But I am not blindly obeying you, contrary to your experience with servile Indians; hence your angst that I am ‘distorting’ your ideas is unfounded. My writing relating to your work can be seen as twofold:

  • Where I cite your work.
  • Where it is my own perspectives.

You are entitled to attribution for ‘A’ but not for ‘B’.

Regarding ‘A’, I am prepared to clarify these attributions further where necessary. But, as we shall see below, I am going to actually remove many of the references to your work simply because you have borrowed Indian sources and called it your own original ideas. I am better off going to my tradition’s sources rather than via a westerner whose ego claims to have become the primary source. This Western hijacking of adhikara is what the elaborate Western defined, and controlled system of peer-reviews and academic gatekeepers is meant to achieve, i.e. turning knowledge into the control of western ‘experts’ and their Indian sepoys.

Regarding ‘B’, let me illustrate by using the very same example you cite as my ‘distortion’ of ‘your’ work. You wrote in your book that Vijnanabhikshu unified multiple paths into harmony. This is correct. That comes under ‘A’. But I add to this my own statement that Vivekananda does the same thing also. This is important to my thesis that Vivekananda built on top a long Indian tradition, and not by copying ideas from the West as claimed by the neo-Hinduism camp. This is ‘B’ – my idea. Your complaint is that by asserting this about Vivekananda, I am distorting you. You fail to distinguish between ‘A’ and ‘B’ because you assume that you are the new adhikari on the subject and anything in addition to or instead of your views amounts to a distortion. I see this as a blatant sign of colonialism.

You are carrying the white man’s burden to educate the Indians even about our own culture. Please note that Vijnanabhikshu is an important person in our heritage and there are numerous commentaries on his work. Yours is not any original account of him. You got this material from secondary sources. But by complying by the mechanical rules of ‘scholarship’ you got it into western peer-reviewed publications, and hence you claim to be the new adhikari. Furthermore, nor was Vijnanabhikshu the first to unify Hinduism. I have sources of the unification of various Hindu systems that go back much further in time and you do not seem to be aware of these. My point is that Vivekananda stands on the shoulders of many prior giants within our own tradition. I cited you to the extent it worked for me but did not stop there; I took it further than you have.

Sir Williams Jones started this claim to be the ‘new pandit’ in the late 1700s when he was a top official for the East India Company. Today that enterprise is dead in one sense, but has revived and reincarnated into new forms. You do not seem conscious that your position is not only arrogant but also puts in the parampara of Sir William Jones.

I re-examined your book lately and find too many ideas taken from Indian texts and experts that are cleverly reworded in fancy English. Let’s take a look at bhedabheda Vedanta. My teacher of this system has been Dr Satya Narayan Das, head of the Jiva Institute in Vrindavan, who spent considerable time with me while I was writing Being Different where I first explained my understanding. He is considered one of the foremost adhikaris today in this system, and adhikar in our tradition is not a matter of producing publications (with lots of quotation marks and obedience to other rules), but mainly requires actual experience of what is being said. Without the inner experience of the states of consciousness being discussed, it is at best secondary knowledge.

This experience is not a simple matter for western Indologists who spend hours going through other western interpretations and Sanskrit dictionaries. By complying with the procedural requirements of citations, etc. they suddenly claim to have become the new original and primary source. This system needs to be questioned, and I have written extensively about the syndrome I call the peer-review cartel. (You can read my debate on this a decade back on Rediff.com)

Therefore, I intend to delete most of the references to your book for bhedabheda, because it is clear that you lack the adhikara as per our system. I do wish to credit you in some respects but nowhere close to what you demand. It amazes me that there is nothing original in your explanation of bhedabheda, as your knowledge is obtained from reading Indian texts, western interpretations and sitting at the feet of Indian pandits to learn. Unfortunately, western Indology does not recognize what the pandit teaches you as his work, because it is oral and not written in a peer-reviewed (hence western supervised) publication. So the whole protocol of claiming something to belong to you as the author is a sort of technology of thievery. Fortunately, Indians have started claiming back their bio-heritage such as Ayurveda from such thievery that is being done by westerners claiming that Indians never filed patents as per western rules. It is time to also claim our intellectual heritage back.

Indian pandits know their materials by heart and it is orally transmitted, and they do not have the ego to claim authorship. They are very humble and hence get taken for a ride. They are duped by any ‘good cop’ from the west who comes in Indian dress to talk to them nicely and bamboozle them into believing that he is a friend of the tradition. Westerners can pick their brains freely, without which you would not be able to learn; but then you go back to the West and have the arrogance to call it yours. As per your Western protocol, you thank the pandit in some preface once, and feel that it suffices. But if you want that my 30 references to your work fall short then by the same token, please note that you, too, ought to be acknowledging your pandits and Indian textual sources in every single paragraph, if not every sentence.

Only that portion of your work which you feel gives truly original thoughts can become yours and make you its adhikari. If you would be kind enough to send us a list of what you consider original thoughts in your book, and that I have used these because they are not found anywhere else except in your work, then I would gladly bow to you and thank you profusely. But whatever portions (which is almost the entire book) are merely your rehashing the Indian materials in fancy English, over those I do not grant you the status of ‘ownership’.

….. What frightens your colleagues is that my book will educate our traditional pandits about your methods of exploitation. Let me frighten you even further: All my books are in the process of being translated into Sanskrit, specifically for the purpose of education of young pandits about the issues I raise. So my target reader is not folks like you, but our own pandits and others who claim this as their heritage and practice. I am especially interested in those who did not sell out to western sponsorship, foreign tours, etc. These will comprise my home team. I am only doing a humble service to inform them about the issues and remedies.

This is why more and more Indologists will be asked to come out of the woodwork and defend the old fortress. In the process they will also expose themselves. But that fortress is crumbling and my work merely accelerates the process of India once again becoming the center of Indology and not a subservient satellite of it.

Indian authorities should demand the return back to India of the 500,000 Sanskrit manuscripts that are lying outside India in various Western universities, archives, museums and private collections. These are our heritage just like old statues and should be returned since they were mostly taken by theft during colonial rule. I consider these more precious than the Kohinoor diamond. Right now, it is western Indologists like you get to define ‘critical editions’ of our texts and become the primary source and adhikari. This must end and I have been fighting this for 25 years. Now we finally some serious traction, thanks in part to people like you who attack and give me a chance to make my case more openly. Please note that what happens to me personally is irrelevant, and I am glad if attacks like this awaken more people.

My response to you is nothing personal, but serves to educate my own people. You are a glaring example of what I have called a ‘good cop’, i.e., one who goes about showing love/romance for the tradition. But at some time his true colors come out when he does what I have called a U-Turn. You would make an interesting case study of the U-Turn syndrome, for which we ought to examine where you got your materials from, and to what extent you failed to acknowledge Indian sources, both written and oral, with the same weight with which you expect me to do so.

To suit their agendas, westerners have pronounced theories like ‘nobody owns culture’ and ‘the author is dead’. Our naïve pandits are too innocent to know any of this, but I wish to inform them. The claim that nobody owns a culture makes it freely available to whosoever wants to do whatever they choose to do with it. Hence, Indian cultural capital is being digested right and left. The contradiction is that the west is ultra-protective about its ‘intellectual property’ and your obsession to squeeze more references/citations out of me illustrates this.

By declaring that the ‘author is dead’, the West says the contexts and intentions of the rishis are irrelevant. They are dead and nobody knows what they meant. So ‘we’ (the Western Indologists) must interpret Indian texts by bringing our own theories and lenses. This has been the basis for the Freudian psychoanalysis of Hinduism, and all other Western theories being applied. If the original author is dead, the material does not belong to anyone. It is public domain. So whoever has more funding and powerful machinery will determine how it is interpreted. However, the same ‘nobody owns culture’ principle does not apply to what you consider as your ‘property’. Indians need to wake up to this game.

[This same foul game is played by anti-IP libertarians who operate from the same assumptions of the colonialists, old and new.]

They need to stop funding Western Indology and develop Indian Indology. The ‘make in India’ ideal should also be applied here. Expecting Indologists to change because you dole out money is like feeding a crocodile expecting him to become your friend. For the first 10 years of my work in this area, I gave away a substantial portion of my life savings in an unsuccessful attempt to fund and change the Indologists’ hearts. But they play the good/bad cop game with skill. I learned a great deal because I was acknowledged as the largest funder of western Indology at one time. Then I stopped and became their harshest critic. I have on file a lot of grant correspondence with Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, to name just a few. Naturally, they worry that I am exposing their secrets. One day I will get someone to organize all that material into a publication.”