US Trans-Formation: Money, Control, Depopulation

Gender dysphoria is a psychological condition like anorexia.

Like anorexia, gender dysphoria is most likely a result of injured family dynamics or social pressures.

But while anorexics are not given liposuction to appease their anxieties, people with gender identity confusion are given sexual reassignment surgery (SRS).

As one tortured “trans-gender,” who quickly came to regret his transformation, realized, the medical community is making big money from this quack “treatment”:

The recently published WPATH Version VII has simply allowed the medical community to open the “floodgates” for this very tragedy to unfold. To get on cross gender hormones and then have surgery has become almost as simple as going to the convenience store for a pack of gum. If the client [Lila: the word client, instead of patient, is instructive] wants it, give it to them. “Real Life Test”? Maybe, maybe not, depending on your circumstances, occupation, etc. It is a billion dollar industry that thrives on your illness.

Get help. Don’t mutilate your body. The psychiatrist, psychologists, and surgeons will enjoy a wonderful life. You, however, could end up with a tortured life, ending up penniless, possibly unemployed, without family or friends and maybe even homeless. And that’s if you haven’t tried or committed suicide by then! All so you can become the girl you “think” you are inside and wanted to be! People, God or whatever you believe in made you in the correct gender. It is encoded in your very DNA. If you think differently, get real help; but, DON”T CHANGE IT.”

There are several incentives at work here for the ‘trans agenda’:

  1. MONEY: These lucrative surgical and hormonal therapies are a bonanza for the unethical professionals who offer them. Drug companies make big money from them. Meanwhile, the expensive treatments become another burden that tax-payers are forced to pick up, making them more impoverished. The fetishitic and pornographic aspects of trans life-style are also cash cows for the sex industries (pornography, sex-toys, fetish costumes etc).
  2. CONTROL: The advantage of creating another protected class is that it becomes dependent on the government and antagonistic to the general population. Trans activists can thus be successfully used as proxy rulers, snitches, and controllers, to demonize and further destroy heterosexual families. The “trans” agenda helps the government interpose itself intimately into childrens’ lives and makes them destroy family and society from within. The increasing numbers of confused teens drawn into this community become a reliable vote-bank for pro-government policies.
  3. DEPOPULATION: The end-game is to reduce the number of “breeders.”  This is the real goal of encouraging people with psychological issues to turn themselves into guinea-pigs for treatments that have no chance of changing their chromosome-determined sex,  but have a 100% chance of destroying their ability to have children.

 

Tamil Nadu Gets First Transgender Officer

BBC reports on the appointment of Tamil Nadu state’s first transgender police officer:

India’s supreme court recognised transgender people as a third gender last April, five years after the electoral commission added the category to ballot forms.

The ruling meant the government had to provide transgender people with quotas in jobs and education in line with other minorities, as well as key amenities.

There are an estimated two million transgender people in India.

While the Times of India reports that Tamil Nadu police already have three transgender constables on their books, reports in other Indian media said Prithika will become the first officer in the country.

Prithika was born Pradeep Kumar and left her parents’ home before completing a computer studies course and undergoing surgery.

She had wanted to be a police officer since being a child, Indian media said.

The court also ruled that the result of a police physical test, which Prithika failed after being a second late in a 100-metre dash, was not valid.”

 

Manic Depressive Cross-Dressing Professor’s Tale

More about the real roots of fetishistic cross-dressing  from someone who healed himself of the behavior:

In my own case the sexual adventures, which I have recounted in vivid detail in my book, “Bipolar Bare”, were associated both with both mania and depression. A depressed rage would come over me, where I sought out high risk behavior in bathhouses. I wished to kill myself through contracting AIDS. I would go into periods where I thought my life worthless, and vile. The more I sought out sex in gay bathhouses the worse I felt about myself, but I hid this behind a façade of normality. I acted and dressed like a professional during the day, and at night during those times of extreme depression I would go out looking for sex. I didn’t do this when I was not depressed. I acted like a heterosexual male dating women and loving their company. But I could never get into a meaningful relationship because I had this secret life which occurred during my depressions. I was addicted to marijuana at this time. Stoned it was easy to overcome my inhibitions about homosexuality so that as my cyclical depressions arose I could operate on my hidden fantasies. Gay sex was the behavior I loved and hated at the same time.Later after I had given up marijuana and became a Buddhist meditator, I abandoned this secret life for eight years. I still had depressions and manic episodes, but they were not as severe and I could handle them. I stopped hating life and frequenting bathhouses. I got married and embarked on a productive professional career as an architect, but this period of tranquility did not last. After a few years the stresses in my life especially the problems of keeping an architectural practice flourishing lead me back into severe manic-depression and addiction. The drug I became addicted to was far more powerful than marijuana. I found crack cocaine and immediately began to abuse it. Crack is rocket fuel to mania. I loved this high, which at first and actually for a fairly long time diminished my depression. I was self-medicating. The drug however released all my inhibitions, and I found what I most wanted to do was cross-dress and seek out sex in clubs and bars. I did this secretly for a long time. I had a studio separate from my home, where I would go ostensibly to work on my art, which I did some of the time, but much of the time I spent getting dressed up as my alter-ego Carlotta. She would prowl the streets of downtown Los Angeles with the other transvestites looking for johns. She also carried in her purse and eight inch ice pick for protection -she said- but in reality she hoped to come across some poor smuck who would challenge her and she could skewer. Luckily this never happened. It was all about risk and dichotomy.

The risk of this behavior was more than merely exciting, I was euphoric. Once I had a rough homeless man hanging onto my open car door as I tried to speed away from a drug deal gone bad. I was trying to push him off the door at the same time negotiating the steering wheel. He eventually let go and tumbled into the street. I should have been terrified by this event. I wasn’t. I was trilled. It was everything I wanted: the adrenalin rush, the exhibitionist behavior – I was dressed in full drag, and the act on the cusp of illegality. I could not get enough of this activity. I like Dr. Jekyll could not and did not want to stop becoming Mrs. Hyde.

The dichotomy was a full expression of my manic self. There was Carl, the professional architect doing his job each day looking normal -at least normal at first, the more my addiction grew the less balance and reliable I became. People in my office later remarked to me that they did not know what Carl would show up on any given day. One day I would be cute and loving, the next I could be cutting and hateful. Then there was Carlotta, black dressed bitch with orange red hair, who raced around town from transvestite bar to gay bar or walked the streets of skid row. These two selves were diametrically opposed to one another. One was the daytime loving husband and father; the other, the queen of the night.

I have recovered from my addiction and my cross-dressing with the help of therapy and medication. I have come to see my desire to become a woman as a manifestation of my illness that had its roots in childhood. When I was five or six before my young life was torn apart by the nasty divorce of my mother and father. My happiest days were dressing up in an attic closet with my older sister in our grandmother’s old clothes and shoes. We would put on slips- they dragged far behind us, high heels that were twice as big as our little feet, and wrap our necks with feather boas. These days with my sister that ended in our separation after the divorce stayed with me and influenced my future relationship to my sex. Sex is deeply ingrained, be it be sexual identity or sexual proclivity. I believe it comes out in mental illness in some form or the other, perhaps influenced by personal history or just plain biology. Perversion of sex can be seen in many of the bipolar disordered.”

 

 

Cross-Dressing Linked To Recidivism, Suicide, Mental Illness

In “Forensic and Medico-Legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices,” (CRC Press, December 2008), Dr. Anil Aggarwal of Maulana Azad University, New Delhi, demonstrates that the paraphilia of male cross-dressing is not, as activists like to claim, completely harmless.

Instead, it is characteristically accompanied by other sexual fetishes, such as, bondage, masochism, and auto-erotic asphyxiation.

C-D is often seen with homosexual inclination, increased sexual interest, and increased masturbation and is associated with increased use of pornography, as well as with forms of mental illness (mania, depression, suicidal ideation).

Aggarwal finds cross-dressing linked to childhood separation from parents.

Other researchers, even within Western governments, come to similar conclusions:

In “Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Recidivism,” (1998), R. Karl Hanson and Andrew Harris (Corrections Research, Dept. of the Solicitor General, Canada) write:

A recent meta-analytic review of
follow-up studies identified numerous individual factors that were reliably related to sexual offense recidivism (Hanson & Bussière, 1996, 1998). Almost all of these identified factors were static (e.g., offense history, victim type, age) and the remainder were highly stable (e.g.,antisocial  personality disorder, deviant sexual preferences).” (p. 6)

The authors also make the following observation:

The recidivists had committed a new sexual offense while on some form of community supervision (probation, parole, mandatory supervision).

The non-recidivists were matched to the recidivists on victim type, criminal history, geographical region and jurisdiction.

The study examined approximately equal numbers of rapists, boy-victim child molesters and girl-victim child molesters.
Despite efforts to match the recidivistic and non-recidivistic groups, some differences remained in static, historical variables.
In comparison to the non-recidivists, the recidivists had a greater history of sexual deviance, such as diverse types of victims, stranger victims, juvenile offenses and paraphilias (e.g.,
exhibitionism, cross-dressing).
As well, the recidivists showed more signs of an antisocial lifestyle than did the non-recidivists. The recidivists were more likely to
meet criteria for antisocial personality, psychopathy (PCL-R), and had higher
scores on objective risk scales (SIR and VRAG).”  (p. 3).

In  “Managing High Risk Sex Offenders in the Community: A Psychological Approach,” (2004) Jackie Craissati writes:

“As might be expected, the sexual homicide group exhibited much greater levels of paraphilia – non-contact behaviors such as exhibitionism, cross-dressing, and voyeurism – and this has been observed in other studies.”

and the following (p. 63):

Common features found in sexual sadists which differentiate them from non-sadistic sexual offender include a significant history of physical abuse, known cross-dressing, obscene telephone calls, and indecent exposure.”

 

 

Autogynephilia: The Truth Behind “Transgender”

 

Lady in red: Kerry says that many men enjoy female masking but that it's a taboo even among the cross-dressing community“Transgender” as an identity equivalent to a biological male or female is the latest intellectual legerdemain intended to hoodwink the American population.

Some radical feminist bloggers have spotted “transgenderism” accurately as an attempt to erase the notion of biological women in favor of  male autoerotic sexual obsession – autogynephilia –  a condition that is associated, apparently at alarming rates, with sexual offenses ranging from public exhibitionism to rape and murder.

[Note: transgender activists adamantly deny the centrality of autogynephilia to transgenderism and consider it quack science.

As for me, I find it plausible, but not as a medical condition so much as a moral condition.

In my lay opinion, there are no such fixed identities as homosexuals, autogynephiles etc. These are reifications of acts chosen by human beings, under more or less erotic compulsion.

As a Christian, I consider such acts disordered or immoral on the basis of their non-conformity to the injunction to regard our bodies as the temple of God, who appears to favor the missionary posture and reproductive sex over everything else.]

Despite the language of “feminine essence” employed by political activists, it is not female “brain sex” but male fetishism – autogynephilia – that is behind the large majority of transgender cases that develop in adulthood.

Perhaps to disguise this fact, transgender activism has lately become centered on feeding puberty-delaying/suppressing hormones to children who display even the most innocuous divergence from the expected behavior of boys or girls.

In a two-step regime, this blocking is followed with hormone therapy to induce the secondary sex characteristics of the desired sex.

The hormone blockers are the first stage of the treatment, but there’s a second stage that’s possible. Once children have postponed puberty for three or four years, at around age 16 they can choose to begin maturing sexually into the opposite gender, the gender they want to become. To do this, they begin taking the hormones of the opposite sex. For males, taking estrogen at this point will bring on breast and hip growth — and all the attributes physical and emotional of females. The reverse will happen for girls who take testosterone. Spack says this treatment can help make an adult transgender male almost indistinguishable from a biological male in terms of physical appearance.”

But there’s a catch in this gender wonderland:

Taking testosterone or estrogen immediately after blocking puberty will make a teenage patient sterile.”

To repeat  –   transgender therapy following puberty-blocking therapy results in sterile adults who cannot, and will never, reproduce.

How different is this really from Nazi human experimentation?

And who gives either the medical profession or the parents the right to make such monstrous changes in the sexuality of their children?

What irony that people who are so quick to denounce Muslims for female genital mutilation, even of a relatively circumscribed nature, have no problem with destroying forever the fertility of their children.

Fertility, moreover is not adventitious but central to sexuality.

Regardless, the rush is on to swap organs and hormones at will.

One can see why.

With government funding and elite backing, transgenderism and its attendant therapies, surgeries, drug-regimes, social-conditioning, judicial monitoring, legislative framing, and media promotion, make for a huge financial bonanza for the professions, NGO’s, and government agencies involved.

In the UK, the Tavistock and Portman Trust has taken the lead in transgender therapy, which has seen a 75% increase there from 2002 to 2015.

The Tavistock and Portman Trust is a specialist mental health branch of the National Health Service (NHS) of the UK under private control. Note, private control.

It is an off-shoot of the Tavistock Clinic, founded in 1920 to treat shell-shocked soldiers returning from World War I.

The Portman clinic was founded in 1933 to study and treat delinquency.

The Tavistock Clinic and the Portman joined forces in 1994 and then became a foundation trust of the NHS in 2006.

The work of the Tavistock Clinic was expanded by the Tavistock Institute, founded in 1946 with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.

It planned to study/assist organizations with an amorphous mandate best described by its own web-site:

(They) integrate different approaches from the social sciences to give our clients a deep understanding of their issues and potential ways forward. (They) bring assumptions to the surface and work with the unpredictable, including what is hidden, and sometimes, unconscious.” [2]

So-called conspiracy researchers are almost unanimous in concluding from this vague jargon that the Tavistock Institute’s real goal is far more subversive and anti-social than its stated one.

Tavistock has become synonymous with mind-control of the masses.

Another of the elite backers of transgender therapy, this time in the United States, is influential billionaire and former US army lieutenant-colonel James (now Jennifer) Pritzker.

Pritzker has publicly admitted that he is an autogynephile, that is, a man who is aroused at the thought of himself as a woman.

Pritzker has also come out publicly as a transsexual, a man who makes himself into a woman through surgery.

Pritzker’s family, one of the richest in the America, owns and operates the Hilton chain of hotels and his own personal net worth is around $1.5 billion.

His extended family’s fortune is over ten times that.

Sadly for its public image, aging male fetishists like James Pritzker are the primary fans of the trans-gender movement.

It has therefore cleverly fastened onto transgenderism in children as a way to diffuse that awkward fact.

But the transgender children end up being paraded by their adult care-takers in a pornified spectacle catering to the same fetishistic males:

The “Transgender Chicken Circuit”, for the uninformed, is a patchwork of media appearances, news and feature articles, talk shows, documentaries, convention and seminar appearances that savvy parents can weave together into a modest cottage industry of transgender child celebrity. Think of it as a Munchausen-marinated transgender version of “Toddlers and Tiaras” whose fans are aging cross-dressing male autogynephiles in possession of both a wistful longing for an unexperienced girlhood, and a generous disposable income. These men are the funders of the agencies and lobbying groups promoting the medicalization of childhood gender nonconformity. The best known example is billionaire financier and lifelong closeted crossdresser (and father of three) James “Jennifer Natalya” Pritzker whose Tawani Foundation single-handedly funds the experimental pediatric transgender drug clinic at Children’s Hospital of Chicago.”

To sum up, transgender activism in the UK (Tavistock) and in the US (Tawani) caters to the sensibilities of adult male fetishists and is both driven and funded by the private foundations (Tavistock and Tawani) of the super-rich ruling elite.

To be more specific:

The Pritzkers, a rich, powerful, and influential family of Ashkenazy Jews, are behind the transgender therapy movement in the US.

The king-pin Ashkenazy Rothschild family and the Sephardic converso Rockefeller family, which merged financial interests in 2012, are behind the same thing in the UK.

The Rockefellers fund a wide-range of political and social programs whose overarching themes are those of what is called the New World Order – feminism, environmentalism, one-world government, sexual license, sterility, abortion.

Those who think that the crypto appellation for the ostensibly Protestant Rockefellers is an anti-Semitic canard should read “The Grandees: America’s Sephardic Elite,” by Stephen Birmingham.

The author cites a book meant only for Jewish eyes that lists older established Sephardic Jewish families in the U.S in order to distinguish them from the post-1848 parvenus, among whom are many of the Ashkenazy banking elites.

Who would expect to find, for example, the Rockefellers in The Book? They are there, along with such old-family members of American society as the De Lanceys, the Livingstones, the Goodwins, the Stephensons, the Ingersolls, the Lodges, the Ten Eycks, the Tiffanys, the Van Rensselaers, the Hopkins, and the Baltimore McBlairs.”

Now a little more about the Pritzker family: Penny Pritzker, the current Secretary of State is Obama’s top fundraiser.

The Pritzker family co-owned the Superior Bank with the New York developer Alvin Dworman (also Jewish) at the time of its spectacular crash from gross mismanagement, a collapse that was the largest of its kind in a decade.

The Pritzkers pretended not to have known anything about the management, even though they collected exorbitant dividends, let the federal thrift insurance fund take a hit of $440 million dollars for the bank’s covered losses, and coming out relatively unscathed themselves.

In short, your typical crony-capitalist hustlers.

Guy Russo’s book, “Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers,” (2006) describes how Pritzker’s grand-father and great-grandfather became wealthy as tax lawyers for the Chicago mob, the Outfit.

But the Pritzker’s association with crime does not stop there.

It extends to banking with the criminal BCCI bank; CIA ties through the off-shore racket, looting of thrifts; labor racketeering; and sweet-heart deals with the government.

The Pritzkers are allied with another Ashkenazy crime family – the Crowns, according to Christopher Bollyn, citing Sherman Skolnik (h/t to Abel Danger) who says that the Crowns are affiliated with Israeli intelligence and have repeatedly exerted pressure on Obama to attack Iran and to attack researchers on 9/11.

With that bit of background, let’s return to what the Pritzker money has wrought in the realm of transgenderism.

First:

It has funded studies at the Palm Center of  San Francisco State University that urge the military to open its doors to transgendered individuals, despite their elevated risk for suicide and psychiatric illness.

The Palm Center also wants the military (the tax-payer) to subsidize the drug-therapy and surgeries that transgenders might require.

Second:

The Pritzker money funds the Center for Gender, Sexuality, and HIV Prevention at the Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago.

There, younger and younger children are being given hormones that block puberty or bring on opposite sex characteristics that cause irreversible changes, including loss of fertility.

Many of these patients are 14 and younger at the time they give their “consent.”

Ironically, many of these gender non-conforming children would, if allowed to develop, simply choose to act homosexually.

In other words, the transgender activists are demanding that childrens’ bodies conform to their moral/sexual choices about sexuality.

It is not wonder that many homosexuals, lesbians, and radical feminists have found the transgender agenda alarming, although they have erroneously identified the problem as conservative heterosexual conformism.

Even more dishearteningly, the Lurie children’s program is run by an HIV-positive homosexual who admits that he has no idea what the long-term result of hormonal interventions will be, but nonetheless has few qualms about using confused children and their anxious parents as guinea-pigs in his quest for glory.

It is hard to understand in what way this odious project is different from the human experimentation of Nazi scientists, who also induced sterility in their victims.

Moreover, adult transgenderism is not associated by medical researchers with opposite sex identification (or same sex interest) in children, although some activists have created a narrative that argues as much.

Adult transgenderism is linked most obviously to autogynephilia, a behavioral addiction that, unchecked, can lead to obsessive cross-dressing at one end of the scale, and sexual reassignment surgery at the other.

Less remarked is the large number of autogynephiles who commit assaults, rapes, and murders.

Colonel Russ Williams, the commander of a Canadian air-force base,  broke into women’s bedrooms to steal their underwear for years before he raped and murdered two subordinates.

A cross-dressing fetishist, he routinely masturbated in his victims’ undergarments after his crimes and meticulously recorded everything for his future gratification.

Serial killer Ed Gein, the inspiration for the horror films, “Psycho” and “Silence of the Lambs,” was obsessed with creating articles of clothing from the sexual organs of his victim.

In the minds of these injured males, wearing women’s clothes is equated with wearing women’s skins and sexual organs….a male erotic fantasy that they enjoy as males, not females.

Far from being a case of “women hiding in men’s bodies,” as the media presents it, autogynephilia is a case of men hiding in  men’s bodies, and in the case of a related erotic fetish – female masking –  men hiding in women’s bodies.

Autogynephiles remain men intent on mimicking the appearance of women to enhance their sexual experience as men.

They “wear” their victim/target’s appearance/clothes in order to erase the women outside them – real biological women – in favor of their own narcissistic and erotic mimicry.

In that sense, the autogynephile is not becoming a woman, as he would like us to believe.

He is consuming or assimilating woman-hood to complete his self-contained and injured masculinity.

By definition, autoeroticism – like porn – is fundamentally at odds with other-directed, reproductive, biological sex, although it can parody it grotesquely.

That is to say, transgenderism is sterile in theory as well as in practice.

And this sterility coincides with the stated objective of the New World Order to eliminate or reduce reproduction, which is why it is being promoted vigorously by the establishment media.

But to observe as much in this increasingly deranged society is to be counted as paranoid and bigoted.

All aberrations must be tolerated by the tolerant society except the aberration of  calling things aberrant.