Transgender Activism: Porn Behind The Mask

I guess when you live in an affluent country, with dirt-cheap food, housing bargains galore, paid work if you are willing to do it, one of the cushiest social safety-nets around, well-stocked free libraries on every corner, and technological marvels at your disposal that a Roman emperor would envy, you tend to obsess over imaginary grievances.

Today’s imaginary grievance is that if you don’t feel quite in sync with your biological sex – a psychiatric condition called gender dysphoria that has some neuro-chemical basis – you shouldn’t just work on changing your mental disposition. Ah no, that would be too bourgeois and torturous.

Instead, you should chop off the offending body part, ala Origen, pump yourself up with hormones, and then force society to accept you at your face – er- genital value.

Yes. It’s bottoms up in the USSA.

That’s the substance of a recent ruling from America’s diseased judiciary on transgender rights.

The ruling forces an Illinois school district to give full access to the girls’ locker-room in a high school, in addition to the girls’ bathroom stalls, to a pre-op biological boy with his boy-parts and baritone fully intact, who rather fancies himself in girls’ dresses.

The biological girls at the receiving end of this  gross outrage staged a walk-out. The school offered to let the “victim” use a private bathroom.

But no, Mr. Guess-Who must undress before the girls and outrage their modesty, or his human dignity will be at stake.

In another age, the wanna-be Barbie would have earned a swift kick in the pants and exile to boot-camp or wilderness-training to learn some testicular fortitude.

This being the USSA, the American Civil Liberties Union whipped out the accordion and violins, Barbie was assuaged to the tune of 75 grand, and some shriveled men-in-black ruled from somewhere near Mount Olympus that undressed teen-aged girls in Illinois must watch a young man display his genitalia to them and allow him to watch them in turn or …..fascism!

This can only be construed as a victory for voyeurs and pedophiles, for who else would celebrate violating the sexual privacy of thirteen and fourteen-year old girls?


Apparently, large numbers of brain-washed liberals, for whom the issue has already been framed as one of “rights” and “discrimination,” rather than as it really is – a whole-sale, frontal assault on the young and the innocent by the pornocracy.

Fangs bared and bloodied, the porn culture howls in frustration at the one last obstacle – public opinion- that separates it from the freshest “meat” on the sex-market.




St. Peter Damian On Public Reproof

I was worrying whether I ought to have criticized Pope Francis.

What right have I to judge his faithfulness to Catholic doctrine, when I am not a Catholic and not a regular church-going Christian either and certainly hold a few heterodox beliefs.

But then I came across this letter by St. Peter Damian, who got a lot of criticism for his forthright denunciation of homosexual clerics in his day (1007-1072 AD).

Unlike Pope Francis who famously said, “who am I to judge,” in reference to homosexuals, St. Peter Damian says, “Who am I not to judge…”.

[Christians are not supposed to “judge” (that is, condemn or consign to damnation), but they are explicitly instructed to “judge” in the sense of reprove, when their reproof might be the only means to save someone from more self-destructive actions.]

… I would surely prefer to be thrown into the well like Joseph who informed his father of his brothers’ foul crime, than to suffer the penalty of God’s fury, like Eli, who saw the wickedness of his sons and remained silent. (Sam 2:4) … Who am I, when I see this pestilential practice flourishing in the priesthood to become the murderer of another’s soul by daring to repress my criticism in expectation of the reckoning of God’s judgement? … How, indeed, am I to love my neighbor as myself if I negligently allow the wound, of which I am sure he will brutally die, to fester in his heart?[48] “So let no man condemn me as I argue against this deadly vice, for I seek not to dishonor, but rather to promote the advantage of my brother’s well-being. “Take care not to appear partial to the delinquent while you persecute him who sets him straight. If I may be pardoned in using Moses’ words, ‘Whoever is for the Lord, let him stand with me.’ (Ezek 32:26)” [49]



Female Privilege: The Facts


Yet the notion of the American woman as a powerless “victim” is one of the most absurd notions ever foisted upon anyone. American women live, on average, seven years longer than men. They control 86 % of all personal wealth [PARADE Magazine, May 27, 1990], and make up 55% of current college graduates. Women cast 54% of the votes in Presidential elections, so they can hardly claim to be left out of the political decision-making process! They win almost automatically in child custody disputes. Women suffer only 6% of the work-related fatalities (the other 94% are suffered by men). Women are the victim of only about 35% of violent crimes, and only about 25% of all murders, yet because of our society’s exaggerated concern and respect for them, special legislation has been passed to punish “violence against women” as if it were a more heinous crime than “violence against men”. (Feminists claim to want “equality”, and this is an example of what “equality” means to them, i.e., preferential treatment to address their concerns). Two out of every three dollars spent on health care is spent on women, and even if you don’t count pregnancy-related care, women still receive more medical care than men – yet feminists still holler that womens health is being “neglected”, and far too many of us credulously believe them. Of the 25 worst jobs, as ranked by the Jobs Related Almanac based on a combination of salary, stress, security, and physical demands, 24 of them are predominantly, if not almost entirely, male, which might explain why men commit over 80% of all suicides. (Most of these statistics come from The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrell.)

Now, if it were really the case, as feminists claim, that men have selfishly arranged everything to be wonderful for themselves, absolutely ignoring womens’ legitimate concerns and needs, would the above be true? Of course not. It is much more realistic to suggest that women have cleverly seized the upper hand by pretending to be helplessly trapped below! Looking at the full picture, and not the tiny, distorted one that feminists and those they have duped present, we see a very different picture: The American woman emerges as perhaps the most privileged large group in history, enjoying a never-before- seen level of affluence, power, leisure, and health, supported by the work, discipline, and self-effacing, life-destroying exertions of a group they have bamboozled – their men – into believing their cries of “victimization”. The links below will help you to start finding your way out of the familiar maze of feminist lies.

Click here to read my article, Feminism, The Noble Lie

Take Back the Campus: refuting the Ten Most Common Feminist Myths (which are more accurately termed “lies,” because feminists just keep on promoting them with reckless disregard for truth, no matter how many times the falsehood of these claims is pointed out to them.).

Read my article Bill Clinton and the Gender Gap, in the August, 1996 issue of The Backlash Magazine.

Read Steven Goldberg’sarticle, Feminism Against Science

Lebanese Minister: 2-3% Of Refugees Are ISIS

A Lebanese minister that ISIS fighters constitute 2-3% of the numbers at refugee camps in Lebanon, as well as of those entering Europe:

The Mirror:

At least 20,000 bloodthirsty jihadis have infiltrated Syrian refugee camps and are plotting to enter Europe, a senior official warned tonight.

Lebanese Education Minister Elias Bou Saab said he fears Islamic State radicals make up at least 2% of the 1.1million Syrians living in camps across his country.

And he warned of a covert jihadi “operation” to get across the Med and into Europe. His warning came as David Cameron made a whistle-stop tour of refugee camps in Lebanon and Jordan yesterday to try to win back public support on the Syria crisis.

“My gut feeling is they (IS) are facilitating such an operation. To go to Europe and other places… From Turkey to Greece,” Mr Bou Saab said.

“You may have, let’s say, 2% that could be radicals. That is more than enough. We have had that also with our camps here – you find 2-3% of them.”

What makes this claim plausible is the number of accounts of  rapes being reported among  the migrants, for instance, in Germany. These rapes are not only migrant-on-migrant, but are migrant-on-native.

Some people are even calling it a rape epidemic. I haven’t looked into it enough to know if that claim is hype, propaganda, or cold fact.

Whatever it is, it is added evidence that the migrants are not solely refugees.

Is ISIS behind the rape? Or are there Muslim gangs infiltrating the refugees? Are they mercenaries? Is this Operation Gladio all over?