That’s not how anyone with any social or literary intelligence would interpret his remarks [Trump bold, Lila italics]:
“And then I saw the disinfectant
He doesn’t specify which, but the MSM immediately inserted various brands, forcing brand manufacturers to distance themselves from the purported remarks.
where it knocks it out in one minute and is there a way we could do something like that by injection inside
“A way,” and “something like that” are clearly NOT recommendations to directly inject. They are speculations about whether government/researchers [“we”] can come up with a way of getting the same [“like that”] efficacy through an unknown- to-the- President [“is there..?”] technology [“a way”]
or almost a cleaning.
“Almost” shows he was aiming for a similar effect but not necessarily specifying the same kind of cleaning technology used externally.
In other words, the President pointed out that disinfectants get rid of the virus on external surfaces and wondered aloud whether something could be done to make them work internally, via injection or something similar. This is an interesting suggestion and it could work if the disinfectant were delivered directly to the virus without harming tissue. There are ways to do this. Nanotechnology is one. Already, household bleach, a disinfectant, is used in very diluted form to clean deep ulcers.
Just fyi, I am posting a portion of the drafts of my post on the genocidal response to Covid-19. I wrote the post on April 21, emphasizing that it was a crime against life, property, and liberty, but suggesting that the most important thing was to find out how the virus started.
The next day I put together links that bolstered this argument, including one from Thomas Szasz, decrying any non-consensual medical intervention as assault:
? Return to editor Compare any two revisions Revision by Lila 2 days ago (22 Apr @ 09:07)
Title
Deleted: How did Covid19 start?
Added: Genocide by medical intervention: Starving millions as health care policy
Content
Unchanged: <!– wp:paragraph –>
Unchanged: <!– wp:paragraph –>
Unchanged: <p></p>
Unchanged: <p></p>
Unchanged: <!– /wp:paragraph –>
Unchanged: <!– /wp:paragraph –>
Unchanged: <!– wp:paragraph –>
Unchanged: <!– wp:paragraph –>
Unchanged: <p><strong>”Non-consensual ‘treatment’ is assault, even if it cures the patient of his disease,”</strong> <a href=”https://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_05_4_szasz.pdf” class=”aioseop-link”><em>The Therapeutic State: The Tyranny of Pharmacracy</em>, Thomas Szasz, The Independent Review, v. 5, n. 4, Spring 2001, pp. 485-521.</a></p>
I made some 17 revisions to the post altogether and in the time I made them, I got the answer to the question I was looking for. Whodunnit?
Not “China,” the “USA,” or “Israel.”
These are national entities. NWO criminal activity is usually transnational and done by black ops groups in the intelligence or related communities, directly accountable only to entities beyond the purview of national accountability.
My research suggests that the intel agencies of several countries, in concert with WHO and GAVI, among others, helped to roll-out the pandemic project. This was done with the express purpose of enforcing the agenda of the climate alarmists, whose Swedish poster-child (literally), Greta Thunberg, demanded last year an immediate end to business as usual (DONE), the cessation of air travel (DONE), drastic reduction in pollution levels (DONE), and a decrease in human activity and encroachment on natural habitats (DONE).
The rank-and-file environmentalists and probably poor Greta herself are true believers used as tools by the Kabbalist/Talmudic utopians whose ideology synchs perfectly with that of the Gaia-gone-wild crowd.
Thunberg and her following are the Baptists. The boot-leggers are fintech, greentech, the spy agencies, and the banksters, all of whom are heavily invested in the climate-control agenda and stand to make a killing if it goes through.
The argument that medical facilities will get overwhelmed is spurious.
More than 60% of cases are asymptomatic and those that are symptomatic are not severe. Of those that are severe, only a small fraction are fatal, usually involving people over 80 with co-morbidities.
Intravenous mega-dose Vitamin C, D, Zinc, and other nutraceuticals have proven to be very effective for the disease, although they are given little play in the fear-mongering media. None of these are[sic] expensive.
It is in fact because of Covid 19’s rather obvious lack of real lethality, the global elites have had to resort to apocalyptic “what if” scenarios to scare us into their prison-camp model of governance. Let’s stand up to the propaganda, for once.
We cannot equate real-world real-time economic injuries with “computer model-cum-war-game-cum-wonk-hypothetical” infection/mortality rates that are continuously revised downward by the “experts,” even while the talking heads tom-tom them relentlessly.
Furthermore, a number of physicians have stated publicly that ventilators are the wrong remedy for Covid 19, and the injuries to the lungs seen in some patients are a result of the force of the ventilators, not the infection from the virus.
Minus ventilators, it is hard to see why Covid 19 should impose a great a burden on any healthcare system.
Meanwhile, Tamil Nadu is rushing into mass testing of even “cold” spots using Chinese-made (!!) test-kits that give results in a few minutes, as opposed to the ones made in India, which take a few hours. However, the Indian kits rely on swabs from the throat and nose, whereas the Chinese kits take blood samples.
Is anyone not the least afraid of using test kits from China, where this virus apparently originated? Even apart from the fact that Chinese test-kits have been rejected for being faulty by several countries, is no one in India afraid of accidental contamination?
[Lila: As of April 22, the Chinese kits have in fact proved to be defective and are being returned.]
So, we are to stand a meter apart from neighbors who do not have the disease and we are to give up our jobs and social life to “stay safe”…but then we are to hand over our blood to the government, using kits made in the very country where this pandemic began. And this country is our regional and global rival. It is a totalitarian communist state. It is on the forefront of surveillance technologies like 5G, social-credit monitoring, and DNA monitoring. It has clamped down on academic research into the origins of the virus.
Apart from the loss of privacy involved, is there no fear of biological warfare?
— Comment at Sabhlok City (Pro-free market economist Sanjeev Sabhlok’s blog) in response to the following post:
I am glad to see you take on such sweeping denunciations of Indians and such servile apologetics, not for the best of Western culture or for Christian ethics – with which I could agree, but for the British empire as a whole.
Deficiency in rationality is not the problem with Indians, at least, not the ones in my neck of the woods – Tamil Nadu. Indians – if one can generalize so sweepingly – are supremely rational in pursuit of their self-interest and that of their families. What is lacking in us – but not all of us – is a sense of community and civic responsibility. That is, our self-interest is essentially individualistic. But that is a criticism that could be leveled even more accurately at the “pseudo” libertarian ideologues who employ Bhandari.
This extreme individualism has cultural roots in India in Brahminism, not Hinduism. Hinduism is a made-up imperial concept that Bhandari seems to have bought into.
Indeed the self (and only self) interested “rationality” of the Brahmin-Bania nexus has much in common with that of the Jews and it was the Jewish banking elites – long intermarried with the ruling classes of Europe – who were the driving force behind the British empire for which Bhandari pines.
Two. Indians did indeed fight the British, to the extent possible given so great a disparity in power.
But it is a waste of breath to refute this rant, which is the kind of thing that is lapped up in the financial circles in which Bhandari moves.
Kindly ask Mr. Bhandari to direct all his self-confessed 82 points of IQ against the banking elites, the Federal Reserve, Sabbataean Frankism, Kabbalistic irrationalism, Israeli/Mossad false flags/ psyops, and Orthodox rabbinical racism. In them he will have all he needs to understand the current state of the entire world – not merely India.
But, given his employment history, I am not holding my breath.
Comment at Print.in on R. Jagannathan, “Modi Must Not Extend Lockdown,” Print.in, April 8, 2020
Lila Rajiva
Not only should the lock-down be lifted, so should social distancing orders, which are pointless, as the virus can survive elsewhere, not just in saliva or breath. India has a relatively YOUNG population and low levels of infection. Covid19 is fatal mostly to older people with co-morbidities. There is no crisis here, except the one we are manufacturing with our reckless and dangerous remedies. If the true rate of infection, rather than just confirmed cases, were known .and if the death figures were not being manipulated and were accurate, we would probably find a mortality rate closer to the seasonal flu than to something like Ebola. As it stands, a recent study out of Germany puts the mortality rate at 0.3 or thereabouts, which is only slightly worse than the seasonal flu. The flu, by the way, has killed many more tens of thousands of people so far, without equivalent catastrophizing. Government never lets a good crisis to to waste. It uses it to grab more money and power from people. Which bureaucrat or politician would turn down boat-loads of central government money and the opportunity for grandstanding and political patronage? Bah humbug to the self-styled experts too. W.H.O is funded preponderantly [sic] [Lila: I should have written that WHO’s funding by private entities is dominated by Gates] by Bill Gates, whose philanthropy is adulterated with poisonous self-interest and whose polio vaccine campaigns in India and elsewhere have left huge numbers of children dead from a mysterious ailment resembling nothing more than polio. Mandatory shots laced with sterility drugs is the agenda of the vaccine mafia. Gates has spoken approvingly of reducing the population and is affiliated with Planned Parenthood, with its racist and eugenicist history. Let us be wise and follow Sweden, which is allowing its citizens to develop herd immunity by carrying on with life as usual, with some precautions for the elderly and immune-compromised. A robust economy gives robust livelihoods that allow people to get the nutrition, exercise, and sleep necessary for developing strong immune systems. Vitamins A, C, and D consumed as supplements as well as in the diet; plenty of water, sleep, social support (not isolation);,megadoses of intravenous Vitamin C, Zinc, and hydroxychloroquine (or a nutraceutical equivalent) for those who fall sick; and careful hand-washing, cleaning, and general hygiene:- these are the answers to Covid-19, not economic self-immolation. A penniless man cannot eat except as the recipient of charity…and who will give the charity if everyone becomes penniless? Remember, government can milk the private sector only so long as that cow is alive and healthy. Ask yourself – who would profit from the economic destruction of India and the replacement of millions of small businesses and casual workers with online firms and robots? The answer is – fintech, social media, big data, the spy agencies, all of which are controlled by the global banking elites and their allies in every country. Indians – do not be fooled. Go back to work and turn of the mainstream media.
“The number of people facing acute food insecurity could nearly double this year to 265 million due to the economic fallout of COVID-19, the United Nations’ World Food Programme (WFP) said on Tuesday.
The impact of lost tourism revenues, falling remittances and travel and other restrictions linked to the coronavirus pandemic are expected to leave some 130 million people acutely hungry this year, adding to around 135 million already in that category.”
Extinction Rebellion, a climate alarmist group, has quickly distanced itself from a post purportedly expressing satisfaction at the human catastrophe entailed by the Covid-19 restrictions:
“Corona is the cure. Humans are the disease.”
But while XR’s timing and phrasing might have been off, the substance of the post does not misrepresent the general tenor of environmentalist arguments:
“The sad truth is, once the humans get out of the picture, the outlook starts to get a lot better,” says John Orrock, of the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California.
“To say that the world has cancer, and that the cancer cell is man, has neither experimental proof, nor the validation of predictive accuracy; but I see no reason that instantly forbids such a speculation. Cancerous growths demand food; but, as far as I know, they have never been cured by getting it,”
Someone has been hacking my private mail since 2007. It was the company monitoring me. I saw emails deleted. They even sent me a Trojan. This was not just work mail, but personal.
Later, it escalated into sending people my way to snoop or set me up. Job replies would be deleted or never reach. Book proposals, inquiries, all waylaid.
I would shut down my email and start another…and I would be safe for a few months and then it would start all over. Personal letters, phone calls, messages and always the listening.
I pulled out the land lines after things I discussed showed up in different articles all in the same incestuous web of newsletters. Who was feeding that stuff to them? Was it intelligence? Or was it some contractor? Was the boss involved, and which boss?
Every quiet moment alone, only I wasn’t alone. Every family joke, that my enemies now knew.
But why? And why this latest sabotage of my domain?
Who else was in on it with them? Someone at the hosting company. Yes, probably.
American censorship, free market style. The market has spoken. Only not the market, but criminals.
White-collar criminals. The ones who never make the headlines with those Mexican rapists conjured by the crook-in-chief. The Mossad stooge.
Should I connect the dots from spammers to hackers to domain squatters and domain sabotage? I think so.
And why? Well, first, why not? If you can inflict damage with impunity on an enemy…and apparently I am an enemy for having been a victim/ target…why not.
But something else is ticking inside those malevolent heads.
Apologies for the site having been down so long. First, there was a long spell of bot attacks that I could never tackle in time.
Then, there were a bunch of technical glitches. I’m up now, but for how long I can’t say. I’ll take it as it comes.
My latest preoccupation is the growing menace of biometric identification, the worst specimen of which is India’s monstrous Aadhaar card.
Aadhaar, as duly noted on this blog, has the same meaning as Al Qaeda, that is, ‘the base’..which is another word for a ‘the foundation’. But it is also a pun on a more obviously ominous word – ‘data-base.’
A data-base of human beings, that is.
These sorts of cogitations will be dismissed in the major media as conspiracy theory.
But it is nothing of the sort, to anyone who follows the day-to-day encroachment of the state on the remaining rags of privacy.
Aadhaar is exceptional in that it includes a person’s name, his/her parents’ names, a photograph, all ten finger-prints, iris scans, and a signature, all in one easily duplicated piece of paper.
Already, despite Supreme Court pronouncements to the contrary, the Indian government has demanded it for public welfare schemes, for government scholarships, for new bank accounts, for government pensions, for gas subsidies, for cell phone accounts, and now, perhaps, for income-tax filings.
Already, millions of people with Aadhaar have had all their personal and financial details leaked, for weeks and months at a time, on multiple government websites.
The implications are horrendous, by any measure. The helpless citizen is now trapped between the surveillance state and the criminal mafias, pinned down like prey, cowering between the gimlet-eyed eagle of global government overhead and the insidious snake of international crime underfoot.
If Donald Trump turns out to be power-hungry, corrupt, and stupid, if he becomes an icon of an arrogant emperor, it would simply be the first time in recent decades that we the people widely recognized those characteristics in a president. This – what we are watching today – is how an all-consuming, and all involving state behaves, in its natural environment.
The upset and sadness regarding the new administration by a whole sector of Americans (and their mainstream media translators) is the result of their own ignorance of how the government of the size and scope of the US government actually works. Fascism seems to be the word of the day – but our government is a long established crony capitalist state, one able, willing and eager to take by hook, by crook and by force, whatever it wants from any citizen of non-citizen alike. This is old news.
Those who love the glory of the state, adore its power and enjoy its parental aura, have built and supported the state we have. Donald Trump is the perfect man to lead it.
I certainly hope that he might also be the perfect president to destroy it.
Either way, I see nothing worth complaining about. Our energies should be spent on living freely, prospering and helping others to do so. We should pay attention to the teeth-gnashing of the ruling, chattering and echo-chamber classes only so far as it informs us on potential vulnerabilities of the state that we may use practically, and as teachable moments.”
As usual, the mainstream media around the globe are hysterically misrepresenting the facts about the Trump restrictions on immigration. This is no blanket ban on Muslims, as a careful reading of the text shows.
David French does a good job of separating the facts from the hysteria. For the hysteria, French cites the usual suspects: Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, the Huffington Post, etc.
For the facts, and for perspective, French begins with this:
[T]he order temporarily halts refugee admissions for 120 days to improve the vetting process, then caps refugee admissions at 50,000 per year. Outrageous, right? Not so fast.
Before 2016, when Obama dramatically ramped up refugee admissions, Trump’s 50,000 stands roughly in between a typical year of refugee admissions in George W. Bush’s two terms and a typical year in Obama’s two terms. . . .In 2002, the United States admitted only 27,131 refugees. It admitted fewer than 50,000 in 2003, 2006, and 2007. As for President Obama, he was slightly more generous than President Bush, but his refugee cap from 2013 to 2015 was a mere 70,000, and in 2011 and 2012 he admitted barely more than 50,000 refugees himself.
The bottom line is that Trump is improving security screening and intends to admit refugees at close to the average rate of the 15 years before Obama’s dramatic expansion in 2016. Obama’s expansion was a departure from recent norms, not Trump’s contraction.
About the 90-day ban on people entering the U.S. from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, French has this to say:
[T]hese are countries either torn apart by jihadist violence or under the control of hostile, jihadist governments. The ban is in place while the Department of Homeland Security determines the information needed from any country to adjudicate any visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual seeking the benefit is who the individual claims to be and is not a security or public-safety threat. It could, however, be extended or expanded depending on whether countries are capable of providing the requested information.
The ban, however, contains an important exception: Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may, on a case-by-case basis, and when in the national interest, issue visas or other immigration benefits to nationals of countries for which visas and benefits are otherwise blocked. In other words, the secretaries can make exceptions — a provision that would, one hopes, fully allow interpreters and other proven allies to enter the U.S. during the 90-day period.
To the extent this ban applies to new immigrant and non-immigrant entry, this temporary halt (with exceptions) is wise. We know that terrorists are trying to infiltrate the ranks of refugees and other visitors. We know that immigrants from Somalia, for example, have launched jihadist attacks here at home and have sought to leave the U.S. to join ISIS.
Indeed, given the. . .recent track record of completed and attempted terror attacks by Muslim immigrants, it’s clear that our current approach is inadequate to control the threat. Unless we want to simply accept Muslim immigrant terror as a fact of American life, a short-term ban on entry from problematic countries combined with a systematic review of our security procedures is both reasonable and prudent.
French opposes application of the ban to green-card holders because they have already gone through round after round of vetting. He notes, however, that Trump’s order, by its terms, doesn’t apply to them. Thus, the administration should intervene to stop the misapplication of its order to green-card holders. If it doesn’t, “it should indeed be condemned,” French says.
What about the indefinite hold on admitting Syrian refugees? French finds this to be fairly inconsequential — a return, largely, to the Obama administration’s practices from 2011 to 2014:
For all the Democrats’ wailing and gnashing of teeth, until 2016 the Obama administration had already largely slammed the door on Syrian-refugee admissions. The Syrian Civil War touched off in 2011. Here are the Syrian-refugee admissions to the U.S. until Obama decided to admit more than 13,000 in 2016:Fiscal Year 2011: 29Fiscal Year 2012: 31Fiscal Year 2013: 36Fiscal Year 2014: 105Fiscal Year 2015: 1,682.
To recap: While the Syrian Civil War was raging, ISIS was rising, and refugees were swamping Syria’s neighbors and surging into Europe, the Obama administration let in less than a trickle of refugees. Only in the closing days of his administration did President Obama reverse course — in numbers insufficient to make a dent in the overall crisis, by the way — and now the Democrats have the audacity to tweet out pictures of bleeding Syrian children?
It’s particularly gross to see this display when the Obama administration’s deliberate decision to leave a yawning power vacuum — in part through its Iraq withdrawal and in part through its dithering throughout the Syrian Civil War — exacerbated the refugee crisis in the first place. There was a genocide on Obama’s watch, and his tiny trickle of Syrian refugees hardly makes up for the grotesque negligence of abandoning Iraq and his years-long mishandling of the emerging Syrian crisis.
When we know our enemy is seeking to strike America and its allies through the refugee population, when we know they’ve succeeded in Europe, and when the administration has doubts about our ability to adequately vet the refugees we admit into this nation, a pause is again not just prudent but arguably necessary.
What about Trump’s directive to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality? French puts this directive in perspective by noting the extent to which persecuted non-Muslims almost never seemed to benefit from Obama’s refugee policy:
[When] Obama dramatically expanded Syrian refugee admissions in 2016, few Christians made the cut:The Obama administration has resettled 13,210 Syrian refugees into the United States since the beginning of 2016 — an increase of 675 percent over the same 10-month period in 2015.Of those, 13,100 (99.1 percent) are Muslims — 12,966 Sunnis, 24 Shi’a, and 110 other Muslims — and 77 (0.5 percent) are Christians. Another 24 (0.18 percent) are Yazidis.
As a point of reference, in 2015 Christians represented roughly 10 percent of Syria’s population. Perhaps there’s an innocent explanation for the disparity. Perhaps not.
In any event, federal asylum and refugee law already has a built-in religious test. The term refugee means “(A) any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality . . . and who is unable or unwilling to return to . . . that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of . . . religion [among other things] . . .” Thus, as French says:
Religious considerations are by law part of refugee policy. And it is entirely reasonable to give preference (though not exclusivity) to members of minority religions.
Finally, French emphasizes that “you can read the entire executive order from start to finish, reread it, then read it again, and you will not find a Muslim ban.” He concludes:
Now is the time to take a fresh look at our border-control and immigration policies. Trump’s order isn’t a betrayal of American values. Applied correctly and competently, it can represent a promising fresh start and a prelude to new policies that protect our nation while still maintaining American compassion and preserving American friendships.”
Nothing has been proved yet, and what with all the false rape charges, I would like to find out what really happened before going there.
Still, on the face of it, I find it credible.
Is this a contradiction of my previous blog post about false rape charges?
No. Arguing that feminist laws are exacerbating false-rape charges in India in no way makes me unable to see real rape when (and if) it occurs.
There is NO rape culture in the US if you are talking about the average bloke and the average family.
On the contrary, there is a culture of misandry.
But in certain specialized settings, there is a rape culture.
One setting is the military – an outgrowth of the state.
The second is also an outgrowth of the state – the billion-dollar sports industry, with its endless stroking of athletic narcissism, its addiction to steroids, and its entitlement culture off the field.
The third locus of genuine rape culture is in certain venues in colleges, in bars and voluntary associations, where political correctness comes to an end and atavistic urges fueled by drugs, alcohol, and often violent porn, take over as a back-lash.
Here too, the state can be blamed. It is only the existence of enormous subsidies from the state that make this kind of permissive partying life-style possible.
The other two sites of genuine rape-culture are the prisons (also an outgrowth of the state) and criminal gangs on the street (fed by prison culture).
None of that has anything to do with traditional patriarchy.
Rather, the causes lie with intoxicants, the break-down of community standards, and the inculcation of the military ideal of a “killing machine” into even civilians, via a mindless sports culture, through criminal gangs, and through a prison-culture that is widely imitated by young people.
The state is central to the culture that promotes rape. The traditional patriarchal family is not.
“Polio Everyone usually gets very concerned about polio and use it as a main reason why vaccinations are so important. People always say to me, “Well, what about polio?”
The polio truth was one of the hardest ones for me to wrap my head around. The truth about polio (or what we have all been told is polio) is that during the 1950s many similar diseases were misdiagnosed as polio, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, hand foot, and mouth disease, transverse myelitis, undiagnosed congenital syphilis, ECHO, and Arsenic and DDT poisoning. The polio virus is a gut virus that has been around for centuries and had only began to show paralyzing effects on people in the 19 the century. Why? Because polio was really a reaction to the pesticides DDT and arsenic that were sprayed on literally everything at that time, including food. There was also a huge disruption to the immune system by the introduction of toxic and processed foods. These two factors together disrupted the gut and immune system balance which turned a once benign gut virus into a terrible disease. When DDT use was stopped, polio mysteriously dropped as well, proving that once again this vaccine did not save us. You can see the graph here. The CDC also reclassified the definition of polio multiple times, essentially reclassifying it out of existence.
The polio we see now in 3rd world countries is vaccine induced polio virus. Yes, you heard me right, vaccine induced polio. In the US the oral polio vaccine was dropped because it was causing polio, however it is still used in developing countries. How criminal is that?
This vaccination issue is a huge problem in India and Africa where the vaccine trials are causing enormous numbers of children to become paralyzed from the vaccine. In India over 53,000 cases of vaccine induced paralysis have occurred! The CDC even says that cases of polio are extremely rare in the US. However, between 1980-1994 there were 124 cases of vaccine-induced polio. Of course the government and CDC has been brilliant about covering all this up, but if you read the history of polio the picture becomes clear: vaccines did not save us from polio and in fact, caused massive harm.
Rotavirus What is rotavirus anyway? Most people I speak with have no idea what this disease even is.
Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe diarrhea among children worldwide. There are many different strains of rotavirus that can infect humans or animals, including monkeys, cows and sheep. There are five main strains that cause more than 90 percent of human rotavirus infections in developed countries, such as the US, but rotavirus strains are more diverse in developing countries. By the time a child is 5 years old they have been suspected to have been infected with rotavirus at least once. Each time a child gets infected his or her immunity is boosted and subsequent infections are less severe.
Problems with rotavirus occur when there is severe dehydration. Again this is more serious in developing nations where people may not have access to clean, safe water, or proper care. According to the CDC, Rotavirus infections rarely cause other complications and for a well managed child the prognosis is excellent. So if a child’s infection is well managed and the prognosis is excellent then why the heck do we need a vaccine when this vaccine is literally killing children throughout the world? Two babies died and 29 were hospitalized after receiving the Rotavirus vaccine in Mexico. Isn’t the death of one baby, one death too many? Why is this vaccine still on the childhood immunization schedule in the US? Where is the justice for these children?
This vaccine just happens to be co-created by Dr. Paul Offit who is the head of the Vaccine Information Center and has direct financial ties to the sale of this product. He is quoted as saying that a child would be safe receiving 10,000 vaccines at once! Sorry Mr. Offit, but I don’t believe you, and I will take my chances with the diarrhea. Maybe you should offer your own child as a guinea pig for this experiment you propose.”
Revision by Lila 2 days ago (22 Apr @ 09:07)