Author Archives: Lila

Autogynephilia: The Truth Behind “Transgender”

Posted on by

 

Lady in red: Kerry says that many men enjoy female masking but that it's a taboo even among the cross-dressing community“Transgender” as an identity equivalent to a biological male or female is the latest intellectual legerdemain intended to hoodwink the American population.

Some radical feminist bloggers have spotted “transgenderism” accurately as an attempt to erase the notion of biological women in favor of  male autoerotic sexual obsession – autogynephilia –  a condition that is associated, apparently at alarming rates, with sexual offenses ranging from public exhibitionism to rape and murder.

[Note: transgender activists adamantly deny the centrality of autogynephilia to transgenderism and consider it quack science.

As for me, I find it plausible, but not as a medical condition so much as a moral condition.

In my lay opinion, there are no such fixed identities as homosexuals, autogynephiles etc. These are reifications of acts chosen by human beings, under more or less erotic compulsion.

As a Christian, I consider such acts disordered or immoral on the basis of their non-conformity to the injunction to regard our bodies as the temple of God, who appears to favor the missionary posture and reproductive sex over everything else.]

Despite the language of “feminine essence” employed by political activists, it is not female “brain sex” but male fetishism – autogynephilia – that is behind the large majority of transgender cases that develop in adulthood.

Perhaps to disguise this fact, transgender activism has lately become centered on feeding puberty-delaying/suppressing hormones to children who display even the most innocuous divergence from the expected behavior of boys or girls.

In a two-step regime, this blocking is followed with hormone therapy to induce the secondary sex characteristics of the desired sex.

The hormone blockers are the first stage of the treatment, but there’s a second stage that’s possible. Once children have postponed puberty for three or four years, at around age 16 they can choose to begin maturing sexually into the opposite gender, the gender they want to become. To do this, they begin taking the hormones of the opposite sex. For males, taking estrogen at this point will bring on breast and hip growth — and all the attributes physical and emotional of females. The reverse will happen for girls who take testosterone. Spack says this treatment can help make an adult transgender male almost indistinguishable from a biological male in terms of physical appearance.”

But there’s a catch in this gender wonderland:

Taking testosterone or estrogen immediately after blocking puberty will make a teenage patient sterile.”

To repeat  –   transgender therapy following puberty-blocking therapy results in sterile adults who cannot, and will never, reproduce.

How different is this really from Nazi human experimentation?

And who gives either the medical profession or the parents the right to make such monstrous changes in the sexuality of their children?

What irony that people who are so quick to denounce Muslims for female genital mutilation, even of a relatively circumscribed nature, have no problem with destroying forever the fertility of their children.

Fertility, moreover is not adventitious but central to sexuality.

Regardless, the rush is on to swap organs and hormones at will.

One can see why.

With government funding and elite backing, transgenderism and its attendant therapies, surgeries, drug-regimes, social-conditioning, judicial monitoring, legislative framing, and media promotion, make for a huge financial bonanza for the professions, NGO’s, and government agencies involved.

In the UK, the Tavistock and Portman Trust has taken the lead in transgender therapy, which has seen a 75% increase there from 2002 to 2015.

The Tavistock and Portman Trust is a specialist mental health branch of the National Health Service (NHS) of the UK under private control. Note, private control.

It is an off-shoot of the Tavistock Clinic, founded in 1920 to treat shell-shocked soldiers returning from World War I.

The Portman clinic was founded in 1933 to study and treat delinquency.

The Tavistock Clinic and the Portman joined forces in 1994 and then became a foundation trust of the NHS in 2006.

The work of the Tavistock Clinic was expanded by the Tavistock Institute, founded in 1946 with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.

It planned to study/assist organizations with an amorphous mandate best described by its own web-site:

(They) integrate different approaches from the social sciences to give our clients a deep understanding of their issues and potential ways forward. (They) bring assumptions to the surface and work with the unpredictable, including what is hidden, and sometimes, unconscious.” [2]

So-called conspiracy researchers are almost unanimous in concluding from this vague jargon that the Tavistock Institute’s real goal is far more subversive and anti-social than its stated one.

Tavistock has become synonymous with mind-control of the masses.

Another of the elite backers of transgender therapy, this time in the United States, is influential billionaire and former US army lieutenant-colonel James (now Jennifer) Pritzker.

Pritzker has publicly admitted that he is an autogynephile, that is, a man who is aroused at the thought of himself as a woman.

Pritzker has also come out publicly as a transsexual, a man who makes himself into a woman through surgery.

Pritzker’s family, one of the richest in the America, owns and operates the Hilton chain of hotels and his own personal net worth is around $1.5 billion.

His extended family’s fortune is over ten times that.

Sadly for its public image, aging male fetishists like James Pritzker are the primary fans of the trans-gender movement.

It has therefore cleverly fastened onto transgenderism in children as a way to diffuse that awkward fact.

But the transgender children end up being paraded by their adult care-takers in a pornified spectacle catering to the same fetishistic males:

The “Transgender Chicken Circuit”, for the uninformed, is a patchwork of media appearances, news and feature articles, talk shows, documentaries, convention and seminar appearances that savvy parents can weave together into a modest cottage industry of transgender child celebrity. Think of it as a Munchausen-marinated transgender version of “Toddlers and Tiaras” whose fans are aging cross-dressing male autogynephiles in possession of both a wistful longing for an unexperienced girlhood, and a generous disposable income. These men are the funders of the agencies and lobbying groups promoting the medicalization of childhood gender nonconformity. The best known example is billionaire financier and lifelong closeted crossdresser (and father of three) James “Jennifer Natalya” Pritzker whose Tawani Foundation single-handedly funds the experimental pediatric transgender drug clinic at Children’s Hospital of Chicago.”

To sum up, transgender activism in the UK (Tavistock) and in the US (Tawani) caters to the sensibilities of adult male fetishists and is both driven and funded by the private foundations (Tavistock and Tawani) of the super-rich ruling elite.

To be more specific:

The Pritzkers, a rich, powerful, and influential family of Ashkenazy Jews, are behind the transgender therapy movement in the US.

The king-pin Ashkenazy Rothschild family and the Sephardic converso Rockefeller family, which merged financial interests in 2012, are behind the same thing in the UK.

The Rockefellers fund a wide-range of political and social programs whose overarching themes are those of what is called the New World Order – feminism, environmentalism, one-world government, sexual license, sterility, abortion.

Those who think that the crypto appellation for the ostensibly Protestant Rockefellers is an anti-Semitic canard should read “The Grandees: America’s Sephardic Elite,” by Stephen Birmingham.

The author cites a book meant only for Jewish eyes that lists older established Sephardic Jewish families in the U.S in order to distinguish them from the post-1848 parvenus, among whom are many of the Ashkenazy banking elites.

Who would expect to find, for example, the Rockefellers in The Book? They are there, along with such old-family members of American society as the De Lanceys, the Livingstones, the Goodwins, the Stephensons, the Ingersolls, the Lodges, the Ten Eycks, the Tiffanys, the Van Rensselaers, the Hopkins, and the Baltimore McBlairs.”

Now a little more about the Pritzker family: Penny Pritzker, the current Secretary of State is Obama’s top fundraiser.

The Pritzker family co-owned the Superior Bank with the New York developer Alvin Dworman (also Jewish) at the time of its spectacular crash from gross mismanagement, a collapse that was the largest of its kind in a decade.

The Pritzkers pretended not to have known anything about the management, even though they collected exorbitant dividends, let the federal thrift insurance fund take a hit of $440 million dollars for the bank’s covered losses, and coming out relatively unscathed themselves.

In short, your typical crony-capitalist hustlers.

Guy Russo’s book, “Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers,” (2006) describes how Pritzker’s grand-father and great-grandfather became wealthy as tax lawyers for the Chicago mob, the Outfit.

But the Pritzker’s association with crime does not stop there.

It extends to banking with the criminal BCCI bank; CIA ties through the off-shore racket, looting of thrifts; labor racketeering; and sweet-heart deals with the government.

The Pritzkers are allied with another Ashkenazy crime family – the Crowns, according to Christopher Bollyn, citing Sherman Skolnik (h/t to Abel Danger) who says that the Crowns are affiliated with Israeli intelligence and have repeatedly exerted pressure on Obama to attack Iran and to attack researchers on 9/11.

With that bit of background, let’s return to what the Pritzker money has wrought in the realm of transgenderism.

First:

It has funded studies at the Palm Center of  San Francisco State University that urge the military to open its doors to transgendered individuals, despite their elevated risk for suicide and psychiatric illness.

The Palm Center also wants the military (the tax-payer) to subsidize the drug-therapy and surgeries that transgenders might require.

Second:

The Pritzker money funds the Center for Gender, Sexuality, and HIV Prevention at the Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago.

There, younger and younger children are being given hormones that block puberty or bring on opposite sex characteristics that cause irreversible changes, including loss of fertility.

Many of these patients are 14 and younger at the time they give their “consent.”

Ironically, many of these gender non-conforming children would, if allowed to develop, simply choose to act homosexually.

In other words, the transgender activists are demanding that childrens’ bodies conform to their moral/sexual choices about sexuality.

It is not wonder that many homosexuals, lesbians, and radical feminists have found the transgender agenda alarming, although they have erroneously identified the problem as conservative heterosexual conformism.

Even more dishearteningly, the Lurie children’s program is run by an HIV-positive homosexual who admits that he has no idea what the long-term result of hormonal interventions will be, but nonetheless has few qualms about using confused children and their anxious parents as guinea-pigs in his quest for glory.

It is hard to understand in what way this odious project is different from the human experimentation of Nazi scientists, who also induced sterility in their victims.

Moreover, adult transgenderism is not associated by medical researchers with opposite sex identification (or same sex interest) in children, although some activists have created a narrative that argues as much.

Adult transgenderism is linked most obviously to autogynephilia, a behavioral addiction that, unchecked, can lead to obsessive cross-dressing at one end of the scale, and sexual reassignment surgery at the other.

Less remarked is the large number of autogynephiles who commit assaults, rapes, and murders.

Colonel Russ Williams, the commander of a Canadian air-force base,  broke into women’s bedrooms to steal their underwear for years before he raped and murdered two subordinates.

A cross-dressing fetishist, he routinely masturbated in his victims’ undergarments after his crimes and meticulously recorded everything for his future gratification.

Serial killer Ed Gein, the inspiration for the horror films, “Psycho” and “Silence of the Lambs,” was obsessed with creating articles of clothing from the sexual organs of his victim.

In the minds of these injured males, wearing women’s clothes is equated with wearing women’s skins and sexual organs….a male erotic fantasy that they enjoy as males, not females.

Far from being a case of “women hiding in men’s bodies,” as the media presents it, autogynephilia is a case of men hiding in  men’s bodies, and in the case of a related erotic fetish – female masking –  men hiding in women’s bodies.

Autogynephiles remain men intent on mimicking the appearance of women to enhance their sexual experience as men.

They “wear” their victim/target’s appearance/clothes in order to erase the women outside them – real biological women – in favor of their own narcissistic and erotic mimicry.

In that sense, the autogynephile is not becoming a woman, as he would like us to believe.

He is consuming or assimilating woman-hood to complete his self-contained and injured masculinity.

By definition, autoeroticism – like porn – is fundamentally at odds with other-directed, reproductive, biological sex, although it can parody it grotesquely.

That is to say, transgenderism is sterile in theory as well as in practice.

And this sterility coincides with the stated objective of the New World Order to eliminate or reduce reproduction, which is why it is being promoted vigorously by the establishment media.

But to observe as much in this increasingly deranged society is to be counted as paranoid and bigoted.

All aberrations must be tolerated by the tolerant society except the aberration of  calling things aberrant.

 

Religions Being Played Off Against Each Other

Posted on by

From Washington’s Blog (which sometimes runs disinformation), this excellent piece:

Fundamentalist Muslims, Christians and Jews all think they are in a “holy war” against the other guy.

They assume that Christianity, Judaism and Islam are mortal enemies.   As such, they assume that Saudi Arabia (the seat of most fundamentalist school of Islam) fights for Islam, Israel for Judaism and the U.S. (which has the most Christians of any country in the world) for Christianity … or religious tolerance.

They’re being played.

Specifically, while it’s true that Saudi Arabia has long backed Islamic terrorists … so has Israel (and see this and this).

Radical Islamic Syrian “rebels” have allegedly offered to “trade” the Golan Heights to Israel … in exchange for military aid.

The Saudis – along with the Israelis – say that Arabs are not ready for democracy.

Israel has also repeatedly been caught impersonating Muslim extremists. For example, Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

NBC News reports that Israel backed a Muslim fundamentalist terror group against Iran.

Former CBS News producer Barry Lando claims that Saudi Arabia helps directly fund Israeli’s Mossad in its campaign to assassinate Iranian scientists.  And see this.

The Sunday Times reported that Saudi Arabia has tested the ability to stand down its air defenses to allow an Israeli strike on Iran to pass through its airspace. After the Arab Spring, Israel views the Saudi government as “guarantor of stability”, according to the New York Times. In 2011, Israel approved a German sale of 200 Leopard tanks to Saudi Arabia. The approval came from Uzi Arad, the national security advisor to Benjamin Netanyahu.

And the U.S. has long backed Saudi Arabia … and the Madrassa schools within Saudi Arabia which teach radical, violent Wahabi beliefs.

The Washington Post reported in 2002:

The United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings ….

The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school system’s core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books ….

The Council on Foreign Relations notes:

The 9/11 Commission report (PDF) released in 2004 said some of Pakistan’s religious schools or madrassas served as “incubators for violent extremism.” Since then, there has been much debate over madrassas and their connection to militancy.

***

New madrassas sprouted, funded and supported by Saudi Arabia and U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, where students were encouraged to join the Afghan resistance.

And see this.

The U.S. also directly arms, funds and otherwise supports the most violent fundamentalist Muslim terrorists – including Al Qaeda – against the more moderate Muslims and secular Arabs. Indeed, the U.S. backs Islamic terrorists who are persecuting Christians and Jews.

Yet the U.S. not only strongly supports Israel, but many of the most fundamentalist American Christians support the most fundamentalist, hard-line, radical Israeli Jews. And the Israeli government supports the Christian fundamentalists.

These 3 countries – centers of 3 different religions – are also all fighting on the same side in various wars. For example, the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Israel are all fighting against the Syrian government, and backing Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. (Indeed, the New York Times reported that virtually all of the rebel fighters are Al Qaeda terrorists.)

In reality, corrupt government officials – many of whom are atheists – are using the most extreme forms of religion to divide and conquer us … while they are working together with “enemies” from the “opposing” team.”

Transgender Activism: Porn Behind The Mask

Posted on by

I guess when you live in an affluent country, with dirt-cheap food, housing bargains galore, paid work if you are willing to do it, one of the cushiest social safety-nets around, well-stocked free libraries on every corner, and technological marvels at your disposal that a Roman emperor would envy, you tend to obsess over imaginary grievances.

Today’s imaginary grievance is that if you don’t feel quite in sync with your biological sex – a psychiatric condition called gender dysphoria that has some neuro-chemical basis – you shouldn’t just work on changing your mental disposition. Ah no, that would be too bourgeois and torturous.

Instead, you should chop off the offending body part, ala Origen, pump yourself up with hormones, and then force society to accept you at your face – er- genital value.

Yes. It’s bottoms up in the USSA.

That’s the substance of a recent ruling from America’s diseased judiciary on transgender rights.

The ruling forces an Illinois school district to give full access to the girls’ locker-room in a high school, in addition to the girls’ bathroom stalls, to a pre-op biological boy with his boy-parts and baritone fully intact, who rather fancies himself in girls’ dresses.

The biological girls at the receiving end of this  gross outrage staged a walk-out. The school offered to let the “victim” use a private bathroom.

But no, Mr. Guess-Who must undress before the girls and outrage their modesty, or his human dignity will be at stake.

In another age, the wanna-be Barbie would have earned a swift kick in the pants and exile to boot-camp or wilderness-training to learn some testicular fortitude.

This being the USSA, the American Civil Liberties Union whipped out the accordion and violins, Barbie was assuaged to the tune of 75 grand, and some shriveled men-in-black ruled from somewhere near Mount Olympus that undressed teen-aged girls in Illinois must watch a young man display his genitalia to them and allow him to watch them in turn or …..fascism!

This can only be construed as a victory for voyeurs and pedophiles, for who else would celebrate violating the sexual privacy of thirteen and fourteen-year old girls?

Who?

Apparently, large numbers of brain-washed liberals, for whom the issue has already been framed as one of “rights” and “discrimination,” rather than as it really is – a whole-sale, frontal assault on the young and the innocent by the pornocracy.

Fangs bared and bloodied, the porn culture howls in frustration at the one last obstacle – public opinion- that separates it from the freshest “meat” on the sex-market.

 

 

 

Captured Israeli Colonel Fighting With ISIS

Posted on by

 

israel isis mossad cia

Image: h/t Politicalvelcraft.org

More evidence surfaces that supports the widely-held theory that ISIS is simply a creation of the CIA and Mossad:

An Iraqi security source said that an Israeli army colonel “Yusi Oulen Shahak” related to “Golani” battalion has been captured in one of the operational fronts in Iraq’s Salahuddin, Al-Alam News Network reports.

According to Al-Alam News Network, Iraqi security sources confirmed that the Israeli army colonel is named “Yusi Oulen Shahak” who is a member of the “Golani” battalion.

According to this reports, a number of extremist elements of the terrorist group ISIS/ISIL along [with] the Israeli army colonel have been arrested in one of the operational fronts in Salahuddin in Iraq.

According to this reports, Iraqi security forces are interrogating him about his relationship with the ISIS militants.”

 

 

Malhotra Trounces American Professor

Posted on by

Hindu activist Rajiv Malhotra’s brilliant rebuttal of plagiarism charges by an American professor, Andrew Nicholson.

Nicholson, having borrowed liberally – without any acknowledgment whatsoever– from traditional Indian pandits, had called Malhotra a “plagiarist,” even though Malhotra cites him over thirty times in his book:

Dear Andrew Nicholson,

I am glad you have entered the battlefield so we can get into some substantial matters. Since this is an extended article, I want to go about it systematically, starting with the following clarifications: I used your work with explicit references 30 times in Indra’s Net, hence there was no ill-intention. But I am not blindly obeying you, contrary to your experience with servile Indians; hence your angst that I am ‘distorting’ your ideas is unfounded. My writing relating to your work can be seen as twofold:

  • Where I cite your work.
  • Where it is my own perspectives.

You are entitled to attribution for ‘A’ but not for ‘B’.

Regarding ‘A’, I am prepared to clarify these attributions further where necessary. But, as we shall see below, I am going to actually remove many of the references to your work simply because you have borrowed Indian sources and called it your own original ideas. I am better off going to my tradition’s sources rather than via a westerner whose ego claims to have become the primary source. This Western hijacking of adhikara is what the elaborate Western defined, and controlled system of peer-reviews and academic gatekeepers is meant to achieve, i.e. turning knowledge into the control of western ‘experts’ and their Indian sepoys.

Regarding ‘B’, let me illustrate by using the very same example you cite as my ‘distortion’ of ‘your’ work. You wrote in your book that Vijnanabhikshu unified multiple paths into harmony. This is correct. That comes under ‘A’. But I add to this my own statement that Vivekananda does the same thing also. This is important to my thesis that Vivekananda built on top a long Indian tradition, and not by copying ideas from the West as claimed by the neo-Hinduism camp. This is ‘B’ – my idea. Your complaint is that by asserting this about Vivekananda, I am distorting you. You fail to distinguish between ‘A’ and ‘B’ because you assume that you are the new adhikari on the subject and anything in addition to or instead of your views amounts to a distortion. I see this as a blatant sign of colonialism.

You are carrying the white man’s burden to educate the Indians even about our own culture. Please note that Vijnanabhikshu is an important person in our heritage and there are numerous commentaries on his work. Yours is not any original account of him. You got this material from secondary sources. But by complying by the mechanical rules of ‘scholarship’ you got it into western peer-reviewed publications, and hence you claim to be the new adhikari. Furthermore, nor was Vijnanabhikshu the first to unify Hinduism. I have sources of the unification of various Hindu systems that go back much further in time and you do not seem to be aware of these. My point is that Vivekananda stands on the shoulders of many prior giants within our own tradition. I cited you to the extent it worked for me but did not stop there; I took it further than you have.

Sir Williams Jones started this claim to be the ‘new pandit’ in the late 1700s when he was a top official for the East India Company. Today that enterprise is dead in one sense, but has revived and reincarnated into new forms. You do not seem conscious that your position is not only arrogant but also puts in the parampara of Sir William Jones.

I re-examined your book lately and find too many ideas taken from Indian texts and experts that are cleverly reworded in fancy English. Let’s take a look at bhedabheda Vedanta. My teacher of this system has been Dr Satya Narayan Das, head of the Jiva Institute in Vrindavan, who spent considerable time with me while I was writing Being Different where I first explained my understanding. He is considered one of the foremost adhikaris today in this system, and adhikar in our tradition is not a matter of producing publications (with lots of quotation marks and obedience to other rules), but mainly requires actual experience of what is being said. Without the inner experience of the states of consciousness being discussed, it is at best secondary knowledge.

This experience is not a simple matter for western Indologists who spend hours going through other western interpretations and Sanskrit dictionaries. By complying with the procedural requirements of citations, etc. they suddenly claim to have become the new original and primary source. This system needs to be questioned, and I have written extensively about the syndrome I call the peer-review cartel. (You can read my debate on this a decade back on Rediff.com)

Therefore, I intend to delete most of the references to your book for bhedabheda, because it is clear that you lack the adhikara as per our system. I do wish to credit you in some respects but nowhere close to what you demand. It amazes me that there is nothing original in your explanation of bhedabheda, as your knowledge is obtained from reading Indian texts, western interpretations and sitting at the feet of Indian pandits to learn. Unfortunately, western Indology does not recognize what the pandit teaches you as his work, because it is oral and not written in a peer-reviewed (hence western supervised) publication. So the whole protocol of claiming something to belong to you as the author is a sort of technology of thievery. Fortunately, Indians have started claiming back their bio-heritage such as Ayurveda from such thievery that is being done by westerners claiming that Indians never filed patents as per western rules. It is time to also claim our intellectual heritage back.

Indian pandits know their materials by heart and it is orally transmitted, and they do not have the ego to claim authorship. They are very humble and hence get taken for a ride. They are duped by any ‘good cop’ from the west who comes in Indian dress to talk to them nicely and bamboozle them into believing that he is a friend of the tradition. Westerners can pick their brains freely, without which you would not be able to learn; but then you go back to the West and have the arrogance to call it yours. As per your Western protocol, you thank the pandit in some preface once, and feel that it suffices. But if you want that my 30 references to your work fall short then by the same token, please note that you, too, ought to be acknowledging your pandits and Indian textual sources in every single paragraph, if not every sentence.

Only that portion of your work which you feel gives truly original thoughts can become yours and make you its adhikari. If you would be kind enough to send us a list of what you consider original thoughts in your book, and that I have used these because they are not found anywhere else except in your work, then I would gladly bow to you and thank you profusely. But whatever portions (which is almost the entire book) are merely your rehashing the Indian materials in fancy English, over those I do not grant you the status of ‘ownership’.

….. What frightens your colleagues is that my book will educate our traditional pandits about your methods of exploitation. Let me frighten you even further: All my books are in the process of being translated into Sanskrit, specifically for the purpose of education of young pandits about the issues I raise. So my target reader is not folks like you, but our own pandits and others who claim this as their heritage and practice. I am especially interested in those who did not sell out to western sponsorship, foreign tours, etc. These will comprise my home team. I am only doing a humble service to inform them about the issues and remedies.

This is why more and more Indologists will be asked to come out of the woodwork and defend the old fortress. In the process they will also expose themselves. But that fortress is crumbling and my work merely accelerates the process of India once again becoming the center of Indology and not a subservient satellite of it.

Indian authorities should demand the return back to India of the 500,000 Sanskrit manuscripts that are lying outside India in various Western universities, archives, museums and private collections. These are our heritage just like old statues and should be returned since they were mostly taken by theft during colonial rule. I consider these more precious than the Kohinoor diamond. Right now, it is western Indologists like you get to define ‘critical editions’ of our texts and become the primary source and adhikari. This must end and I have been fighting this for 25 years. Now we finally some serious traction, thanks in part to people like you who attack and give me a chance to make my case more openly. Please note that what happens to me personally is irrelevant, and I am glad if attacks like this awaken more people.

My response to you is nothing personal, but serves to educate my own people. You are a glaring example of what I have called a ‘good cop’, i.e., one who goes about showing love/romance for the tradition. But at some time his true colors come out when he does what I have called a U-Turn. You would make an interesting case study of the U-Turn syndrome, for which we ought to examine where you got your materials from, and to what extent you failed to acknowledge Indian sources, both written and oral, with the same weight with which you expect me to do so.

To suit their agendas, westerners have pronounced theories like ‘nobody owns culture’ and ‘the author is dead’. Our naïve pandits are too innocent to know any of this, but I wish to inform them. The claim that nobody owns a culture makes it freely available to whosoever wants to do whatever they choose to do with it. Hence, Indian cultural capital is being digested right and left. The contradiction is that the west is ultra-protective about its ‘intellectual property’ and your obsession to squeeze more references/citations out of me illustrates this.

By declaring that the ‘author is dead’, the West says the contexts and intentions of the rishis are irrelevant. They are dead and nobody knows what they meant. So ‘we’ (the Western Indologists) must interpret Indian texts by bringing our own theories and lenses. This has been the basis for the Freudian psychoanalysis of Hinduism, and all other Western theories being applied. If the original author is dead, the material does not belong to anyone. It is public domain. So whoever has more funding and powerful machinery will determine how it is interpreted. However, the same ‘nobody owns culture’ principle does not apply to what you consider as your ‘property’. Indians need to wake up to this game.

[This same foul game is played by anti-IP libertarians who operate from the same assumptions of the colonialists, old and new.]

They need to stop funding Western Indology and develop Indian Indology. The ‘make in India’ ideal should also be applied here. Expecting Indologists to change because you dole out money is like feeding a crocodile expecting him to become your friend. For the first 10 years of my work in this area, I gave away a substantial portion of my life savings in an unsuccessful attempt to fund and change the Indologists’ hearts. But they play the good/bad cop game with skill. I learned a great deal because I was acknowledged as the largest funder of western Indology at one time. Then I stopped and became their harshest critic. I have on file a lot of grant correspondence with Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, to name just a few. Naturally, they worry that I am exposing their secrets. One day I will get someone to organize all that material into a publication.”

 

Why Christians Must Defend Their Traditions

Posted on by

The argument is made that Christians best imitate Jesus by not taking offense at insults and attacks on their traditions and icons.

There are many reasons why this is false.

There is the obvious one that Jesus himself did not tolerate the desecration of the Temple.

He actively threw the money-changers out of its precincts, over-turned their tables, chased away their animals, and put them out of business.

Then, there is the invective Jesus used  – “serpents,” “devils,” “liars,” “hypocrites.”

Is this Jesus meek and mild?

No.

There never was a Jesus meek and mild.

That is a concoction of well-bred, middle-class Sunday School misses.

They cannot be blamed for knowing nothing about real men, but we can.

Jesus slept out in the open, with only stones for his pillow.

He went for days without food or sleep.

He preached and healed in sun and rain on the hills and on the lake-shore, in front of sweaty, restless crowds of thousands of peasants.

He worked and lived with illiterate fishermen and carpenters, who drank and swore.

He routinely castigated the lawyers and scribes and the powerful members of the Sanhedrin.

Indeed, the entire Gospel story is the story of the relentless persecution of Jesus by the religious “mafia” that had an iron grip on the spiritual life of the Judeans.

That was the iron grip that Jesus broke on the cross.

So, using Jesus as an excuse for our cowardice doesn’t work.

But there are other reasons.

As the symbols of a tradition are denigrated with impunity, they lose their power over the minds of the young.

Young people don’t yet have the experience or discernment to filter out the abuse and distortion.

The young go by what they are told, not so much in words as in deeds, by their elders and their peers.

When the adults around do not respond to the tidal wave of filth and abuse directed at the Christian tradition, the young do not take Christianity seriously.

They see it only as the butt of jokes. The punch-line of comedy routines.

Faith flourishes with physical persecution. The shedding of blood creates martyrs.

But faith is hard-pressed to survive Saturday Night Live and a moral martyrdom of unending, undefended humiliation.

Jesus Christ will survive it. So will his saints.

But the rabble who perpetrate this barbarism and the cowards who countenance it will not survive with their  humanity intact.

I Feel Dread

Posted on by

I feel dread when I read the news.

The patterns by now are so familiar to me.

The same lies. The same liars. The same events, washing up like dirty spume from relentless waves.

They are waves from far out.

They are shadows cast ahead by something dark and terrible.

I know how it must have felt in the years before the world wars.

One must have smelled in the salty air what the future held.

It is terrible to look back and see how in less than twenty-five years, half of one immigrant’s adult life, a nation could have changed so utterly as this country did.

Even the surface of things doesn’t look the same. Smiles are harder, eyes are emptier, words more shapeless and soiled with overuse.

I can hardly bear to read through opinion in the regular press. I have to have it sifted through congenial websites.

We were free as late as 1984 – that fabled year. We were celebrating the victory of freedom in the world only five years later.

And now, thirty years later, we…the whole world…has wandered in broad daylight into  prison and the gates have been shut.

Judaic Anti-Christian Bigotry

Posted on by

I am using the term Judaic instead of Jew to represent the ethnicity that is otherwise called Jewish. I’m not satisfied with the word, but it will have to do for now.

Consider that the US has sent millions – if not billions – of dollars of tax-payer money to Israel, in addition to the oceans of donations from naive Zionist Christians who think of  anti-Christian Israel as the Biblical Holy Land.

I have included examples of anti-Christian bigotry from America and Israel, because liberal Judaics mock Jesus just as much as religious extremists.

It is a cultural item bound up in Judaic identity.

It is a hatred they have been fed from their religious texts and the warped and “lachrymose” narrative by which they’ve been isolated from humanity and conditioned by the Zionists.

1. An American Judaic climbed up onto a cross, took off his clothes, defecated, and spread his feces on it to express his hatred of Christians. This took place in 2009, but was recirculated on the internet in 2013, after the official announcement of the NWO at the London Olympics.

2. The same year, 2009,  American Judaic Larry David, in an episode of the HBO TV show, “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” urinated on a picture of Jesus. It was treated as a joke by the largely Judaic-dominated media in the US, which said nothing about the religiously-mandated bigotry behind such humor.

[The link is to the web-site of a revisionist scholar who has written extensively on the Talmud. I don’t subscribe to his views of the Holocaust, but neither do I believe that questioning the facts of the Nazi killing of European Jews should be a legal crime or render someone beyond the moral pale.

I also don’t subscribe to Hoffman’s views on usury, the interest-rate, Vladimir Putin, or what is entailed by Christian belief.

I’ve always suspected that “Holocaust denial” is promoted by the Zionists themselves, as a wedge issue and also to keep tabs on dissidents.

That is to say, it is quite possible that Hoffman, besides being a dissident, is also a disinformation agent of the state.

If he is not, I apologize to him in advance.

Anyway, reader beware.]

3. Comedian Sarah Silverman, a notorious  American Judaic, who has depicted herself having sex with “Jesus,” said that she hoped the Jews had killed Christ and that she would do it again herself in an “effin'” instant.

4. South Park, a Judaic comedy show, depicted Jesus defecating on George Bush, while censoring itself from depicting even an image of Muhammed. The video of the show has been removed from Youtube and elsewhere.

5. In June 2015, the Church of the Loaves and Fishes on the shores of the Sea of Galilee, an important Christian site, was damaged by an arson attack by extremist Talmudists, who left the message – “all idols will be smashed.”

6. In 2014, there were waves of attacks by “price tag” Talmudic extremists against Muslims and Christians. Christian churches were sprayed with graffiti with the message – “Jesus is garbage.” The attacks get their name from the argument by the extremists that vandalism and arson are the “price-tag” of trying to restrain the West Bank settlers from moving into Palestinian areas.

7. In an Israeli show, “Toffee and the Gorilla,” a girl in a bikini tells viewers how the goyim (Christians) are dangerous for Judaics because they try to convert them, refers to Jesus as Yeshu (a Hebrew acronym for a curse), and nails her companion, a toy gorilla, to the cross in a mock crucifixion.

8. Yeshiva students routinely spit on Greek, Armenian, and Syrian Christian priests and damage crosses.

9. A mob of 100 ultra-orthodox Talmudists attacked a group of 50 pro-Israel tourists, wearing t-shirts with Jesus’ words, “Love thy neighbor as thyself” that identified them to the mob as Christians. That was their sole provocation. Three people were injured and the police were needed to end the attack.

10. Lubavitchers and Hasidics show routine hostility toward ordinary British and American people they encounter, explicable only as religious hatred.

The Global Supra-National Climate Czar

Posted on by

From Catholicsm.org:

We close with a quote from Schellnhuber from his own study, published in the year 1998, and entitled “Geocybernetics: Controlling a Complex Dynamical System Under Uncertainty”; and which confirms Wippermann’s grave reservations and critical observations: “While the borders of nation states have become almost irrelevant to global economic players (for instance) after the end of the Cold War, human and natural rights are still confined and dominated by thousands of frontiers. This situation can only be overcome by giving up a good deal of national sovereignty and establishing a true regime of global governance. As a prerequisite, the rather symbolic parts and pieces of the UN system must be transformed into powerful supra-national institutions: allons corriger le futur!”