Navarro Report Volume III Final
Released, January 13, 2021
Category Archives: Technology
Pulitzer: Proof of Major Foreign Interference
On January 5, 2021, Jovan Pulitzer uploaded a 36 page account of documented foreign interference and fraud in the 2020 elections at Scribd.[h/t to Centipede Nation]
Was Pakistan’s Power Grid Hacked?
UPI reports that on January 9, 2021, there was a massive power outage that left 200 million people in Pakistan without power.
“The widespread blackout happened just before midnight, plunging the major cities of Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad and Peshawar into darkness, Energy Minister Omar Ayub said. He added that mobile and Internet services also were affected.”
Considering that Pakistan was one of the countries to which election data was routed, it would not be far-fetched to wonder if the US had sent a swift reprisal to the Pakistanis by hacking the country’s power grid.
ITALYGATE: Proof That Scytl Lied, Has Frankfurt Servers
In addition to the other list of sources corroborating the Scytl server raid and ItalyGate, the great folks over at Headline 360 News dug up a document were Scytl said in 2019 they had an “emergency back-up server in Frankfurt” to preserve the election data for European Parliament.
The document reads on page 3:
To guarantee the success of this project, Scytl’s team began preparing nine months in advance. Over this time, we conducted 3 separate trial runs, 5 user acceptance tests, and we set up the data collection center in Barcelona, as well as an emergency back-up center in Frankfurt. Our election experts were also able to upload past European Parliament Election results, dating back to the 1970s, to the official results website, making it the first time such results were made available in a single online location.
So, in essence, Scytl likely lied to the US in claiming they have no Frankfurt servers. Considering they blatantly told Europe the servers existed. This fact helps corroborate the loosely-corroborated account of the U.S. Military recovering servers in Frankfurt that have the original data of the elections in addition to the hacked data.
This is corroborated by CD Media, who has a source that pinged the Scytl server in Frankfurt and found it had crashed before coming back online from a server in Arlington. Va. during the night and following morning in question. Additionally, they found a working server in Frankfurt which saw a 30% increase in traffic on election night. If verified, this is proof the server was, in fact, located in Frankfurt, Germany.
Until this point, the closest proof was the affidavit signed by Arturo D’Elia’s attorney who claims he heard it all.”
WARNING: Disable Updates On Cell Phones
Lin Wood posted this recently:
LLinWood
8 hours agoBE PREPARED FOR AN IMMINENT BLACKOUT.
President Trump will be using be using emergency broadcast system.
We have a man of courage & faith at the helm.
He will be at the helm for 4 more years per the RULE OF LAW.
Pray for President, our country & ALL.
Steady.
As I blogged in the previous post, there seems to be a hint in Potus’ last tweet that he would be reaching supporters on emergency alerts on the Giant mass messaging system. There is a rumor going around that an automatic update to cell phones will disable the emergency messaging function.
So go into settings on your flip or smart phone and make sure to DISABLE AUTOMATIC UPDATES. You don’t want to lose that functionality.
However, just because we know how much disinformation is out there and because the deep state is always listening in to trap us with what we think we know but really don’t, it would be wise to make sure to check ALL update notices and see what they are about before unwarily installing something. The disabling mechanism might also come through a trojan or virus or even through some new app or software patch. No one can be sure.
Just be aware that there might be some kind of disruption in cell phone connectivity. Notice what happened after the Nashville bombing? Cell phone and internet services were disrupted in multiple states in the south for hours after.
Some people are warning about war being “imminent.” I have to laugh at that. Imminent? We are already at war and have been for some time. Cyber attacks, psyops, black ops, market crashes, disinformation, targeted assassinations and disappearances, weather modification, information black-outs: these are the weapons of the latest model of war.
MAGA’S Giant Voice
Trump’s last Twitter message, before he was banned from the platform, went:
“The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!”
This has been interpreted by many supporters, especially those who follow QAnon [I do not, though I frequently end up with the same conclusions], as a reference to a military communication system that they hope he will use to defeat his enemies:
https://www.fedsig.com/outdoor-sirens-and-speakers
There is a specific military communications system called Giant Voice Mass Notification Systems
That could have been the reference and the reason major social media platforms decided to banish him.
There could be a more sinister explanation for the reference, though.
POTUS could be playing the role of controlled opposition, using ambiguous phrases and words he knows some supporters will construe a certain way to trap them, while covering himself, either because he wants to purge radical elements from MAGA or because he is a part of the deep state.
I personally don’t think either of those two explanations is the case, but I’m sure some of his base is wondering about it. But I’m not a blind follower of anyone or any ideology, so it has occurred to me, as it did in 2016.
Why not now? Because having seen what he went through for four years and having seen what he did in that time, more than any president in my adult life, I really don’t believe he was intentionally deceiving us.
Retracted HCQ Study Muddled Ventilator & HCQ Use
Apart from the unverifiability of the data used, Dr. Steven Quay has pointed out a high-school-level error in the HCQ study co-authored by Dr. Sapan Desai (India’s answer to Neil Ferguson). The lead author is Mandeep Mehra, a Harvard professor.
The Mehra study has two variable inputs in it: Hydroxychloroquine and intubation with a ventilator.
The fact is buried in the paper and was likely missed by most readers.
What this means is that the increase in patient deaths could have been caused just as well by ventilator use. Actually, that has been the clinical experience of many physicians, given the nature of the hypoxia in Covid19, which seems to be a result of clotting in the lung. Ventilators are counter-productive.
Controlling for that mistake, HCQ, even in this unreliable study, is somewhat helpful.
Here, I should add something of which Dr. Quay is apparently not aware: HCQ is a zinc ionophore and should be used with zinc to get the excellent results that have been reported from all over the world.
No zinc was given in the Lancet study.
Lancet, NEJM Retract Covid-19 Papers Over Data Source Concerns
Update (June 5, 2020, 12.45 PM IST):
The Lancet editor-in-chief Richard Horton won the 2015 Friendship award given by the Chinese Government
and here’s more about him from the Lancet website:
“He now works to develop the idea of planetary health – the health of human civilizations and the ecosystems on which they depend.”
The Spectator points out that Horton has been an unrelenting critic of the British government, blaming it for not doing enough, but has attacked any criticism of the Chinese government.
ORIGINAL POST:
This house of cards is tumbling down fast:
From Statnews.com:
“The Lancet, one of the world’s top medical journals, on Thursday retracted an influential study that raised alarms about the safety of the experimental Covid-19 treatments chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine amid scrutiny of the data underlying the paper.
Just over an hour later, the New England Journal of Medicine retracted a separate study, focused on blood pressure medications in Covid-19, that relied on data from the same company.
The retractions came at the request of the authors of the studies, published last month, who were not directly involved with the data collection and sources, the journals said.
“We can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources,” Mandeep Mehra of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Frank Ruschitzka of University Hospital Zurich, and Amit Patel of University of Utah said in a statement issued by the Lancet. “Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted.”
A company called Surgisphere was responsible for the primary data on which the papers were based:
“As scrutiny grew, the authors on the paper not affiliated with Surgisphere called for an independent audit. In their Lancet statement Thursday, they said that Surgisphere was not cooperating with the independent reviewers and would not provide the data.
“As such, our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review and therefore notified us of their withdrawal from the peer-review process,” the researchers wrote.”
Who is Surgisphere?
The Guardian on June 3 had this report:
“Data it [Surgisphere] claims to have legitimately obtained from more than a thousand hospitals worldwide formed the basis of scientific articles that have led to changes in Covid-19 treatment policies in Latin American countries. It was also behind a decision by the WHO and research institutes around the world to halt trials of the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine. On Wednesday, the WHO announced those trials would now resume.
Two of the world’s leading medical journals – the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine – published studies based on Surgisphere data. The studies were co-authored by the firm’s chief executive, Sapan Desai……
…A search of publicly available material suggests several of Surgisphere’s employees have little or no data or scientific background. An employee listed as a science editor appears to be a science fiction author and fantasy artist whose professional profile suggests writing is her fulltime job. Another employee listed as a marketing executive is an adult model and events hostess, who also acts in videos for organisations…..Until Monday, the “get in touch” link on Surgisphere’s homepage redirected to a WordPress template for a cryptocurrency website, raising questions about how hospitals could easily contact the company to join its database….
..Desai has been named in three medical malpractice suits, unrelated to the Surgisphere database. In an interview with the Scientist, Desai previously described the allegations as “unfounded”..
…In 2008, Desai launched a crowdfunding campaign on the website Indiegogo promoting a wearable “next generation human augmentation device that can help you achieve what you never thought was possible”. The device never came to fruition…
…Desai’s Wikipedia page has been deleted following questions about Surgisphere and his history, first raised in 2010…..
…The Guardian has since contacted five hospitals in Melbourne and two in Sydney, whose cooperation would have been essential for the Australian patient numbers in the database to be reached. All denied any role in such a database, and said they had never heard of Surgisphere. Desai did not respond to requests to comment on their statements.
…Another study using the Surgisphere database, again co-authored by Desai, found the anti-parasite drug ivermectin reduced death rates in severely ill Covid-19 patients. It was published online in the Social Science Research Network e-library, before peer-review or publication in a medical journal, and prompted the Peruvian government to add ivermectin to its national Covid-19 therapeutic strategy…
…The New England Journal of Medicine also published a peer-reviewed Desai study based on Surgisphere data, which included data from Covid-19 patients from 169 hospitals in 11 countries in Asia, Europe and North America. It found common heart medications known as angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers were not associated with a higher risk of harm in Covid-19 patients.”
The Guardian report picked up the analysis from James Todaro at Medicine Uncensored.
Todaro shows that Surgisphere does not appear anywhere in Internet Archive records, and its portfolio of past cases is thin to non-existent, made up mostly testimonials and PR releases.
Errors in Surgisphere’s database that Todaro points out include:
Reporting 73 deaths from in Australia, when Australia had only a total of 67 deaths by April 21.
Claiming to have detailed patient records for 63,315 patients in the USA, when the total number of Covd-19 patients in the USA was 66,000.
Providing specific African data that would mean that over 40% of all patient deaths in Africa took place in Surgisphere-related hospitals with the sophisticated cardiac monitoring technology needed to collect such data.
What is amazing is not how this Desai shyster conned the world, but how these supposedly top-notch science journals and brilliant research scientists never bothered to check their sources for research that would have such a monumental impact.
We had the fraud Neil Ferguson. Now this.
On second thoughts, Desai almost deserves a medal for showing up how flimsy and pretentious the whole academic publishing industry is.
Added (June 5, 12.36 PM):
I have added an excerpt from Surgisphere’s response below:
“Our studies, including that published in The Lancet, use a registry, with data obtained from electronic health records (EHR). In our hydroxychloroquine analysis, we studied a very specific group of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and have clearly stated that the results of our analyses should not be over-interpreted to those that have yet to develop such disease or those that have not been hospitalized. We also clearly outlined the limitations of an observational study that cannot fully control for unobservable confounding measures, and we concluded that off-label use of the drug regimens outside of the context of a clinical trial should not be recommended.
In so doing, we join agencies including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, as well as several other observational studies reported in the NEJM, JAMA and the BMJ, each of which have pointed to either no benefit of the drug regimens using hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine or even a signal of potential harm (also see this paper). The Brazilian CloroCovid-19 Study on chloroquine diphosphate was recently stopped in Brazil due to the noted safety hazards associated with this drug.
Our COVID-19 research was not funded by any drug company, private or public donor, or political organization. Our research collaborators on the piece for The Lancet devoted their time through personal funds and resources because they saw the urgent humanitarian need and opportunity to inform rapidly-evolving pandemic responses.”
Wuhan Denialism
From Tablet:
“Media sources that claim to refute the lab source hypothesis often refer to the public comments of zoologist Peter Daszak, the flawed correspondence of Andersen et al., or the emotional Lancet letter in which some scientists basically expressed their support and compassion with their Chinese peers. While there are some virus hunters like Peter Daszak who assert zoonotic transfer and discount the possibility of a lab leak, there are also leading microbiologists like professor Richard Ebright who assert that a lab or lab-related accident is a possible cause of the outbreak.
Notably, virus ecologists like Peter Daszak and Jonna Mazet have an inherent conflict of interest as they are involved in similar bat and wildlife sampling activity—and, in Daszak and Mazet’s case, in research with the Wuhan labs. As an example of such activity, Daszak and collaborators sampled 12,333 bats for viruses in a big wildlife surveillance project. A lab-related accident in China involving similar research would likely affect the funding for their work as it would demonstrate the risks involved. As it happens, the NIH recently cut the funding to Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance after realizing the risks involved in that research.
Daszak’s relentless and heavily amplified public assertions that the outbreak must have originated due to a zoonotic jump, and his denial of the possibility of a lab accident involving a natural virus, even long before the SARS-CoV-2 genome was published, would appear to be motivated by the apparent conflict of interest that he has denied. Daszak’s denial of his conflict of interest raised concerns of many scientists and experts, with many explicitly describing that denial as a bold lie. Daszak has presented no direct evidence that the outbreak started as a result of a zoonotic jump outside of a laboratory. In case the outbreak is a result of a natural zoonotic jump, that would underscore the importance of Daszak’s risky wildlife sampling and “early outbreak warning” work and increase their research funding. It is important to consider conflicts of interest when assessing anyone’s claims.”
Genetic-Manipulation Origin For SARS-CoV-2?
Is considering a genetic-manipulation origin for SARS-CoV-2 a conspiracy theory that must be censored?
Here is a new research paper that considers the lab-origin of the virus the most likely explanation and suggests that it is being censored by scientific journals. The paper includes this telling paragraph on funding:
“In recent years, the field of corona-virology had been focused on pan-coronavirus therapies and vaccines, as evident from research conducted in the past five years,as well as from media reports. Synthetically generating diverse panels of potential pre-emergent coronaviruses was declared as a goal of active grants for EcoHealth Alliance which funded some of such research at WIV.”
Unfortunately, various intelligence/ex-intelligence operatives, some of them China hawks, have ignored the multiple ties the WIV has to Western public health bodies, private foundations, and agencies, and have tried to shift the blame solely to the Chinese government/lab.
Thus, the ex-chief of MI6 Sir Richard Dearlove has raised the possibility of demanding reparations from China. But Dearlove’s support for the invasion of Iraq and his involvement in the Steele dossier (in the Russiagate hoax) diminish his credibility.
Very likely, some of these public statements are either limited hang-outs or red herrings.
The truth is Zhengli Shi the “Bat Woman” at WIV was not working in isolation. She was a French-trained scientist with research experience in the US; she was at the center of a web of scientific partnerships and networks extending to leading labs in France and the USA. Her research has ties to the entire scientific community and its funders, and to the climate-change-public-health nexus that drives projects like OneHealth and the EcoHealth Alliance.
If this network was not fully implicated in what happened, we would not be seeing the kind of coverage…and coverup…from the global media. This level of media subterfuge suggests a transnational crime, originating from the highest levels of money and power. At that level, it is not China, or America, or Russia.
It is the transnational power-elite, driven by the dangerously utopian environmental ideology with which they mask their lust for power.