How walkable is your neigborhood? You can check it out here at Walkscore.com
Via Bob Sharpe´s blog, ¨Toward A Simple Life.”
How walkable is your neigborhood? You can check it out here at Walkscore.com
Via Bob Sharpe´s blog, ¨Toward A Simple Life.”
I told myself I’d ignore politics for a while and comment – if and when I could – only on things that might help people figure out what to do financially.
But two recent stories call for comment.
The first was yesterday’s story about mob violence between Uighur Muslims and Han Chinese in China. The violence was said to have been triggered by the influx of Han into the oil-rich Uighur lands, which has led to resentment from the Uighurs. They see themselves as less well-off… and also as exploited by the Han. The Han regard these feelings as a sign of the Uighurs’ backwardness and stupidity.
Apparently, photos were circulated on the net of Han gloating over dead Uighur. That seems have led to violent confrontations between Han, Uighur and police. Chinese authorities also blame a nonresident Uighur activist for instigating violence over the photos. “Activists,” demands for disclosure of photos, and the web, all came in for blame.
The second story is in today’s news. Apparently, US Treasury and other web sites were subjected to Denial of Service Attacks that had them down for a long time. The same thing happened to some South Korean banking sites. The attacks are said to have been very sophisticated and to have originated with North Korea, which has been firing missiles defiantly over the past couple of weeks.
My first worry is – is this all posturing or is something bigger afoot?
My second worry is – is this going to be used to clamp down on the net and on net activists? After all, yours truly has written several articles since 2005 demanding that the US government disclose photos of torture of Iraqi women – those articles could also be seen as inflammatory. Am I inciting jihadists with articles like that? I have no idea. My thinking is that people brainwashed into jihad probably don’t need much of a motive beyond the history of US policy to get them going.
But I’m willing to admit that it probably adds a bit of gasoline to some fires.
What to do? Should one NOT demand disclosure and assume the state has its reasons that reason knows nothing of?
But what if the state is circulating its own fiery propaganda with lethal results? Don’t you sometimes fight fire with fire?
Fight fire with fire and the whole world turns to coal, says Mahatma moralist.
George Herbert said something better though. He said the whole world turns to coal anyway.
Only a “sweet and virtuous soul still chiefly lives.”
The question is how does a virtuous soul act in such times and in such complexities?
I have no answer.
It rained the whole of yesterday. I walked out a bit at 10 AM to see if I could see a few things, but the wind here is strong and drives the temperature, from around 8-10 degrees to zero. It’s too humid to freeze or snow, though. Small mercies.
The first week I was down here – the last week of June – the weather was chilly and damp – the kind of damp that makes your knees and knuckles ache.
At first, I shrugged it off. Nothing’s perfect, I told myself.
Then a particularly cold blast from the ocean sent me scuttling to the provinces in search of warmer weather. But after a couple of days, I realized that with only English, a small town can pose problems, and I came back, sheepishly.
You can’t have beautiful old colonial houses, pristine air and water, safe streets… and complain because the weather is a bit chilly for a few months in the year. What kind of a pioneering attitude is that, I told myself.
Then again, I don’t fool myself I’m pioneer material. At heart, I’m a traditionalist. Even a bit of stick-in-the-mud. It’s an accident that I end up in the vanguard of things.
And the reason for that…the problem.. is rationality. I tend to argue things to their logical conclusions and then follow those conclusions – even when they don’t necessarily come easily. I call this a problem, because I’m not convinced that rationality is the best way to arrive at decisions. Instinct – gut – is better in most cases. And in some, just doing what the other fellow’s doing seems to work just fine. But I’ve always had a tendency to fall for beautiful symmetries – even when they’re misleading. Especially when they’re misleading.
And the beautiful, symmetrical argument is that the safest bet for most people is land.
They aren’t making cheap farmland in the US. There was still some in places like Alabama and Mississippi and Tennessee, until recently. But now it’s all been bought up. And what’s left is probably the dregs, as far as fertility goes.
Holing up in the Ozarks with a cache of ammunition probably works for some Americans. But somehow, I think a foreign born citizen taking to moonshine country might not work. It would be a shame to survive the Feds – and then succumb to the locals.
No offense meant.
In times of difficulty, people tend to stick to race and faith. I think it’s to be expected. I’ve begun to grow suspicious of everything foreign too – although personally, I’m nothing but a patchwork of foreign and borrowed.
It also sits much better with many people – morally – to hold a piece of dirt than to cling to ingots ….or scraps…of precious metal. Maybe childhood stories about golden calves…about Midas turning his little girl into gold…bother us at a certain level.
And gold mining is one of the worst businesses when it comes to water usage and damage to the environment.
Even if no one wants your piece of dirt…even if it crumbles with every other asset class into nothingness…..you can always scrape in the dust for turnips and roots. There’s something reassuring about that. Something solid.
You can’t eat wind – which is what we have an oversupply of now.
So – it’s land for many people.
And that’s what I’m seeing. Americans and Canadians are moving down here in something stronger than a trickle. Some of them, on a temporary basis. But the temporary seems to change into longer term for many.
My interest is both personal and professional. I came down to see for myself how the economic crisis is playing out in this part of the globe. And why Soros…among many other investors…is down here….
I’m on an assignment, it goes without saying. But one I’ve set myself.
I hope to leverage the information. How, I don’t know..
So, what does it feel like to breathe free air again?
Invigorating…
By the way, an apology…
I just noticed that some more radio interviews seem to have disappeared from the web. This one was on the Gary Null show a few years ago. I just saw that it had been removed. It joins a growing list: a Money Dots interview in 2008, another small interview on Dollar Daze in 2009.
What on earth could I have said that was so upsetting?
I have no idea. But I apologize because these shows were listed on my credits on this blog and their disappearance from the web makes me look like a liar….
A few random observations:
The concept of customer service is overdeveloped in the US…. and underdeveloped most other places.
A barbecue on coal is for wimps. Real men barbecue on wood fires.
Avoid changing money outside a bank and always check your money.
Always get a receipt.
32 hectares can mean 32 square meters of road frontage.
Try to avoid driving a car directly through a rice field.
There are a lot of Americans buying homes abroad. A lot.
Don´t say too much to the person in the expat group who brings up the Zionist lobby. Tell them you love it… or better yet, say nothing. He/she could be an informant.
My new piece, “Going Over the Mountain,” http://www.lewrockwell.com/rajiva/rajiva21.html, is posted at Lew Rockwell. So many of you had written asking where to go that I thought I’d write a piece answering some of your questions – and stoutly refusing to answer some of them.
Which questions DIDN’T I answer? Questions like is Panama better for you than Mexico. How would I know? It all depends on what you want to do and who you are.
Meanwhile, I am going to be AWOL at this blog for a few days. So bear with me if you don’t find your mail answered or posted here. I value everyone of my readers and contributors and hope to help you out much better after I’ve finished making a few arrangements for myself.
When I’ve done that – it should take a few months more – I will be in much better shape to answer more of your questions…
Meanwhile, the blog isn’t broken or discontinued. I’m just unable to write for a few days.
So adios for the moment.
“Corporation: An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility.”
— Ambrose Bierce
Greg at Holy Cause has actually lived through the infamous Zimbabwean Zaire’s hyperinflationary crisis in the 1990s, so his words carry their weight in…er..gold (dollar-holders, I know that stings).
“Most Americans have not lived in hyper-inflationary environments. I have, and assure you that your primary protection is to not hold cash. Treat it like a hot potato, let it rot in somebody else’s hands. This is repeated as Rule #1 below, but it bears saying several times. Never forget it, when you get cash, flee to something else as quickly as possible…..
Just don’t hold an inflating currency – pass it on to the next guy like a hot potato, let it rot in his hands rather than yours.
Rule #2 – Have some type of business, even a “black market” one. Businesses which survived the inflationary hurricane in Zaire included those which were involved in the supply chain of basic consumer goods….money changing was also a profitable business…..
Rule #3 – Own a house and enough land to farm to feed your family. Houses (a primary residence), well bought and paid in full, served as a good hard asset, and provided a roof over one’s head as well. Having a little land to garden or for raising small animals helped keep a family from starving….
Read the rest of this great post at Holy Cause.
“For a man of Western culture, it is of course difficult to believe and the accept the idea that an ignorant fakir, a naive monk, or a yogi who has retired from life may be on the way to evolution, while an educated European, armed with “exact knowledge” and all the latest methods of investigation, has no chance whatever and is moving in a circle from there is no escape…..
What do you expect? People are machines. Machines have to be blind and unconscious, they cannot be otherwise, and all their actions have to correspond to their nature. Everything happens. No one does anything.
“Progress” and “civilization” in the real meaning of those words, can appear only as the result of conscious efforts. They cannot appear as the result of unconscious efforts. And what conscious efforts can there be in machines? And if one machine is unconscious, then a hundred machines are unconscious, and so are a thousand machines, or a hundred thousand, or a million. And the unconscious activity of a million machines must necessarily result in destruction and extermination. You do not yet understand and cannot imagine all the results of this evil. But the time will come when you will understand.”
— G. Gurdjieff, quoted in “In Search of the Miraculous,” P. D. Ouspensky
My Comment
I’ve been fascinated with the influence of Gurdjieff on western artists in the early part of the twentieth century – pianists, painters, and writers (Katherine Mansfield and Aldous Huxley among them), including a large number belonging to the Harlem Renaissance.
Scholars generally dismiss Gurdjieff as a charlatan, or at best, obscurantist. Quotes like the one above don’t help. What can Western science (which wasn’t solely Western, of course, but that’s another story) possibly have to learn from “fakirs, monks, and yogis” ?
More later.
I wrote a long post at midnight two nights ago describing how someone was posting on my site deceptively. I described the hacking and threats/warnings [from whom I’m not sure, but the evidence points in a certain direction].
Anyone who thinks that a single individual can easily stand up to a corporation in court is dreaming. Unfortunately, some associations trail behind you like a ball and chain, dragging you down, no matter how hard you close your eyes and run away. The one thing that’s verboten in a masquerade is for someone to see through it.
Musing on how prone life is to imitating cheap fiction, I bought myself a small item of self-defense.
Writing is not a profession but a vocation of unhappiness
– George Simenon
Update
The individual who owned the blogs was upset by my post. Actually, I posted no personal information, only the IP address, country and profession of the pseudonymous mail, not the letter with the real name. And I took the material down quickly on my own. A blog post in the middle of the night is a low-profile way to send a message.
What message? Something like, don’t post repeatedly under different names on a blog that’s just been attacked and where the blogger suspects stalking. The targeted blogger will justifiably assume you’re the culprit. Sorry….that’s the way it is.
Lynndie England is unrepentant for what she did, says this piece:
“We move on to another hideous image, in which the same group of prisoners – one of whom Graner had punched full in the face – were lined up and ordered to masturbate.
How long had this sick charade continued? ‘You are going to find this ridiculous,’ says England, half suppressing a snigger. ‘One guy did 45 minutes! Freddie [Graner’s fellow prison guard, Ivan Frederick] just wanted to see if they would do it – and all seven of them lined up doing this.
‘Well, six stopped after a few minutes, but the seventh carried on.’
Hearing this account for the first time, even Roy T. Hardy, her lawyer, who had thought himself beyond shock after representing England for five years, is clearly taken aback…..
‘Sorry? For what I did?’ she interjects, incredulous. ‘All I did was stand in the pictures. Saying sorry is admitting I was guilty and I’m not. I was just doing my duty’
……it is impossible to empathise with her, for she is such an unsympathetic character……”
More of the same at Drudge on England’s interview with the German news magazine, Stern.
My Comment
I read this report with interest for two reasons.
1. It substantiates, as many other reports have done since then, my early (July 2004) insight that there were pictures of women being abused that were being deliberately held back and that the key to understanding Abu Ghraib was that it was a deliberate policy.
2. It also vindicates the argument of an essay I contributed to “One of the Guys” (Seal, 2006), a piece called “The Military Made Me Do It,” that England got the benefit of double-standards that treated the women torturers as somehow victims themselves.
I was sympathetic to England, as far as she – and others low down in the pecking order – were made scapegoats for the military and government elites who actually developed the policy. I was also sympathetic about the class bias shown toward them (shown in phrases like “trailer trash” that are used in this report as well).
But I thought England could still have behaved better than she did. I compared her to Joseph Darby, the whistle-blower, who did his duty despite all the dangers of being seen as a “snitch” by his colleagues. Both were about the same age. I thought England benefited from a double-standard exonerating the young women torturers.
I suggested in the essay that England’s sex was really as much an advantage as it was a disadvantage in the prison where she was a guard (female-deprived).
Another point of vindication: many journalists treat the story of Abu Ghraib as primarily a story about America. I find this somewhat narcissistic. The story is about the victims. To my mind, putting England and her colleagues at the center of Abu Ghraib adds a second injury to the victims. And, as this report illustrates, the perps are rarely worthy of it, even as psychological case studies. Most evil is done by depressingly ordinary people.
A final point. I recall that some journalists made the culturally obtuse decision to interview the raped women, completely forgetting the consequences to the victims of such media exposure. Sure enough, some of the interviewed women ended up dead.
I have to wonder at journalists with so little imagination and compunction for the subjects of their stories…
‘Subjects’ are also subjects in the other sense – they have their own voices.
All this adds to my belief that the mediacrats can be as big a problem as the kleptocrats.