Tag Archives: sec

Steve Cohen To Leave Trading, Says Vanity Fair

Posted on by

Well, well, well. It looks like Patrick Byrne, Judd Bagley, Mark Mitchell and the rest of the estimable team at Deep Capture are having more than some effect.

Not only have the Germans and Austrians banned naked short- selling, Vanity Fair, our least favorite low-class, high-gloss magazine of the DC twitterati, tells us that Steve Cohen is closing up shop as a trader. Sith Lord Cohen doesn’t like the spotlight, it seems.  Maybe he remembers all too well what he was up to in the 1980s……even if Reuters wants to keep it buried.

Vanity Fair:

In the July issue of Vanity Fair, legendary hedge-fund billionaire Steve Cohen tells special correspondent Bryan Burrough that he might be ready to walk away from active trading. How big would that be? Well, says Burrough, it’s “a little like saying that God is ready to walk away from Earth.” In this video, Burrough takes the measure of Cohen’s controversial careeer—and offers his theory on why the reclusive banker granted the second in-depth interview of his 30-year career to Vanity Fair.

9-11 Related Stock Fraudster Elgindy Tipped Off By SEC Officers

Posted on by

Dow Jones

“Two U.S. Securities and Exchange enforcement officers released nonpublic SEC information to a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a short seller who were convicted of securities fraud and conspiracy in 2005, an SEC watchdog’s report said Tuesday. One SEC officer on several occasions talked with the FBI special agent about the progress of agency probes of companies, Inspector General David Kotz said in his semi Continue reading →

SEC’s Goldman Action: Democrat Political Theater?

Posted on by

Politico raises the ‘timing’ question about the SEC’s Goldman suit:

“The Commission approved the Goldman suit in a vote that spit along party lines – a rare occurrence for approvals of enforcement litigation.

—Before the Commission had released its announcement, the New York Times published on its website a story describing the suit.

–Less than half an hour after the Times story’s publication, Organizing for America, the successor organization to Obama for America and now a project of the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”), sent millions of supporters an e-mail message from President Obama urging support for “Wall Street Reform.”

–Within hours, the Democratic National Committee had purchased AdWords advertising from Google, Inc. The DNC’s Google campaign fundraising advertisement, headed “Fight Wall Street Greed,” appeared whenever a user ran a Google search for the phrase “Goldman Sachs SEC.” It read, “Help Pres. Obama Reform Wall Street and Create Jobs. Families First!” and included a link to www.BarackObama.com, the website of Organizing for America.

–Democrats in Congress and the Administration have heralded the Commission’s suit against Goldman as a welcome boost to their case for the legislation.

–Members of the media have already begun to question the timing of the Commission’s suit and the actions of the Democratic National Committee.

As supported by the Commission’s canons of ethics, and as frequently reiterated by you and other Commissioners, the unqualified independence of financial regulators is crucial to the health of the financial system and the U.S. economy. For this reason, doubts about whether the Commission has scrupulously guarded its independence from the Administration’s partisan political agenda and concerted efforts to manipulate Congressional action are very serious, and should be addressed with full transparency.”

John Paulson: Market Fraud, Not Market God

Posted on by

John Paulson – more crooked than clever, says The Big Money:

“What emerges from the SEC’s charges against Goldman Sachs (which, it should be noted, the investment bank is strenuously denying) isn’t a story of Paulson seeing a crisis coming when others are still happily buying up housing derivatives. No, it’s a story of reluctant buyers manipulated into buying more collateralized debt obligations when it was already clear that the market was falling apart.”

SEC Brings Action Against Goldman Sachs

Posted on by

Update 1(April 17)

Glad to see that Simon Johnson is making the same point I make here, that charges should also be brought against John Paulson, or the system is broken beyond repair.

Market Watch:

“SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — The Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday charged Goldman Sachs & Co. and one of its vice presidents for defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product related to subprime mortgages.

The SEC alleged in a lawsuit that Goldman /quotes/comstock/13*!gs/quotes/nls/gs (GS 158.38, -25.89, -14.05%) structured and marketed a collateralized debt obligation that hinged on the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities. However, it failed to disclose the role that a major hedge fund, Paulson & Co., played in the portfolio selection process as well as the fact that the hedge fund had taken a short position against the CDO.”

This hit the FTSE, which fell 100 points, and the DJIA, 120 points and caused a tumble in GS’s share value, down by about (GS 165.40) 18% this morning. Investment banks and brokerages are down 7.6%.

This is likely to start a sell-off in the financial sector as a whole (down 3.1%) and possibly the much waited next leg down of the great correction that began in 2007-08.

Michael Roston points out the obvious. The amount in question in the Abacus deal is $15 million bucks, which is chump change.

Point two. No one’s saying anything about John Paulson, who made $1 billion out of it.

[Or, to take another instance, what about the Greek government, which is also getting bailed out….by tax-payers of another country? No culpability for the governments who get into these kinds of deals?]

You’ll also notice, as I blogged earlier, that George Soros, another speculator, has also called for the IB’s to be broken up (using the same argument, “too big to fail means too big to exist” – something also pushed by David Einhorn and the left-liberals). Now, I can see the sense in the “too big to fail, too big to exist” mantra, especially, if it had been used against the banks before they helped themselves to tax-payer money. But I wonder why it’s being repeated now, after the fact….and not then..

I didn’t hear these same critics of size pipe up at that crucial time.

Why?

Lazard-Freres Insider Trading Bust

Posted on by

I missed these arrests from back in mid-December:

“U.S. prosecutors filed criminal charges against a former Lazard Freres banker on Wednesday for alleged insider trading that earned him and others $500,000 in illegal profits.

The trading involved some of the highest profile deals during the leveraged buyout boom of 2005 to 2007, including the buyout of TXU Corp, as it was formerly known, for $44 billion, including debt.

The charges were brought against Adnan Zaman, a former vice president at Lazard Freres, in federal court in San Francisco.

Financial regulators also filed civil charges against him and Vinayak Gowrish, a former associate at private equity firm TPG Capital, saying the one-time fraternity brothers stole confidential stock tips and then passed them on to friends. In return, the men received cash kickbacks.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission settled the civil case with Zaman, who agreed to return $78,456 in ill-gotten gains and to be permanently barred from associating with any financial broker or dealer.

The SEC said that Gowrish and Zaman, friends since high school, tipped two friends, Pascal Vaghar and Sameer Khoury. Vaghar and Khoury also settled with the SEC.”

More at Reuters.

My Comments

Is it just me, or does there seem to be an awfully high number of desis (Hindi for home-boy).

What´s with these guys?

As a fellow desi, I have to hang my head. World-class education, world-class jobs, better than world-class salaries…and a world-class racket.

SEC’s Own Accounting Is Deficient

Posted on by

Apparently, the SEC, top regulator of financial fraud, isn’t up to snuff keeping its own financial books…
We don’t say it’s cooking its books, but it sure looks like if someone wanted, they could cook them quite easily, according to this report at law.com:

“The GAO found that the SEC “did not have effective internal control over its financial reporting as of Sept. 30, 2009.”
As part of its mission, the SEC is charged with enforcing strict financial disclosure rules for public companies. Apparently, it is less adept at policing itself.
For example, the GAO reported that SEC’s general ledger system allows unauthorized personnel to view, manipulate or destroy data, and that “serious unauthorized activity” may remain undetected.
Until the SEC fixes these problems, the GAO found, the SEC can’t be sure “1) its financial statements, taken as a whole, are fairly stated; 2) the information the SEC relies on to make decisions on a daily basis is accurate, complete, and timely; and 3) sensitive data and financial information are appropriately safeguarded.”
Nor could the SEC “provide evidence that it monitored controls over its payroll exception reports to ensure payroll transactions were recorded accurately and timely.”
While the GAO did credit the SEC with producing statements that were “fairly stated in all material respects,” it flagged “six significant deficiencies” for FY 2008 and 2009.

The six areas are:

• information security;
• financial reporting process;
• fund balance with Treasury;
• registrant deposits;
• budgetary resources;

My Comment:

Translated, those six problem areas amount to this:
No one can really be sure if or when

1. Someone steals information from the SEC
2. Something is wrong in the SEC’s accounts
3. How much money the SEC has with the Treasury
4. How much money the SEC takes in
5. How the SEC is doing on an ongoing basis

Chew on that…

SEC To Look At High-Frequency Trading and Naked Access

Posted on by

From Reuters, a report shows sharp rise in “naked access” to markets after 2005:

“NEW YORK (Reuters) – A report says that 38 percent of all U.S. stock trading is now done by firms that have “naked sponsored access” to markets, the controversial trading practice said to imperil the marketplace, and which faces a regulatory crackdown.

Naked access gives trading firms, using brokers’ licenses, unfetted access to stock markets. The firms, usually high-frequency traders, are then able to shave microseconds from the time it takes to trade.

Aite Group, a Boston consultancy, found that naked access accounted for just 9 percent in 2005.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is set to make changes to naked access and less risky forms of so-called sponsored access, when it releases a document expected next month.

The document is also expected to look more generally at high-frequency trading — where proprietary trading firms, brokers, and others use algorithms to make markets and profit from narrow market inefficiency.”

SEC Shuckin’ and Jivin’ on Madoff Report…

Posted on by

Pam Martens at Counterpunch:

“U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff smelled something fishy in the August 3rd deal the SEC cooked up with Bank of America…….

That was the same view held by the Congressional questioners in the Madoff matter at the February 4, 2009 dust up with top SEC officials. After many rounds of pointed questions produced unresponsive answers, round tripper Andrew Vollmer, then Acting General Counsel of the SEC, explained why. He and his fellow SEC panelists were claiming executive privilege. This position elicited the following outburst from Congressman Ackerman: “Your value to us is useless…Our economy is in crisis, Mr. Vollmer. We thought the enemy was Mr. Madoff. I think it’s you…you were the shield…You come here and fumble through make believe answers that you concoct and attribute it to executive privilege….”

On April 2, 2009, another of Wall Street’s favorite law firms, WilmerHale, announced that Andrew Vollmer would be returning to the firm as a partner. According to the press release, before joining the SEC, Vollmer was a vice-chair of WilmerHale’s Securities Department…….

…And just what does the Madoff fraud have to do with the big firms on Wall Street? The multi billion dollar proceeds of the fraud were wired in and out of JPMorgan Chase where Madoff maintained his firm’s account. Also, Madoff partnered with Citigroup’s Smith Barney, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs to compete head on with the New York Stock Exchange in a venture called Primex Trading as reported here at CounterPunch on January 15, 2009.