Category Archives: Finance

Mid-East, Europe, Africa Securitizations Will Deteriorate More, Says Moody’s

Posted on by

From the Global Arab Network:

“The performance of many asset classes in the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) securitisation sector will continue to deteriorate throughout the rest of the year and into 2011, says Moody’s Investors Service in a new Special Report. The report examines the prospects of recovery for international securitisation in several asset classes and geographies: EMEA Auto ABS, UK Credit Card ABS, UK Non-Conforming RMBS, Spanish ABS and RMBS, Asia Pacific ABS and Global Derivatives. The rating agency expects performance volatility and uncertainty to decline in the coming months, although it cautions that a drop is predicated on achieving some level of economic moderation if not slight improvement, combined with the seasoning of securitised loan portfolios.

Moody’s says that although GDP growth is expected to turn positive in many countries in EMEA later this year or in early 2010, employment and home prices will continue to deteriorate well into 2010, which will lead to securitised loan losses remaining at elevated levels throughout 2011 and 2012.”

Ron Paul: Fractional Banking Finances War…

Posted on by

John Rubino on Ron Paul:

*”Paul makes it clear that the Fed isn’t the whole problem. It’s just one part of a system that first went wrong with the introduction of fractional reserve banking centuries ago (banks used to be warehouses, storing depositors’ money for a fee), followed by the spread of European central banks (really just scams to allow a few elite bankers and politicians to expand their own power at the expense of everyone else) and then, finally, the introduction of fiat currency, which freed governments to expand spending and borrowing without regard to, well, anything. The problem, in short, is the whole of modern banking and finance.

*The middle part of the book features transcripts of Congressman Paul grilling Fed chairmen Greenspan and Bernanke. Some of these transcripts date back to the early Reagan era, which means that for going on three decades Paul has been fighting this fight, and slamming into the same brick wall. The Chairmen feel no need to explain themselves to a lowly congressman, and respond with a mixture of lies and obfuscation that apparently fooled most of Washington. The generally-respectful Paul even refers to Greenspan as “pathetic” after one especially dishonest piece of testimony. Less charitable readers will, by the end of this section, want to take a congressional microphone and beat Greenspan and Bernanke senseless.

*Fractional reserve banking and fiat currency make war easier. Back when a ruler needed actual gold to field an army, invading a neighbor required some serious forethought. But once a dictator (or the world’s policeman) could just print a few billion pieces of paper and order some new tanks, “defending the national interest” got a whole lot easier. Hence the bloodbath of the 20th century, and perhaps the mess of the coming decade.

*Paul knows all the major sound money/Austrian economics classics, and he cites them liberally. The “recommended reading” list contains a year’s worth of serious research.

*Though he continues to fight, he’s not optimistic about averting the coming train wreck, which he refers to as the “BIG ONE”.

Gulf Arabs to Move Out of Petro-Dollar (Updated)

Posted on by

Update:

I’m adding my comment at the top here after watching this puzzling day. Gold shot up to new highs over $1040 (and not just in the US but elsewhere). Is this the bull break-out the bugs have been waiting for? Maybe. Central bankers and officials from the Gulf states came out to pooh-pooh the story, but it couldn’t be put back in the box.

My puzzlement is this: If gold is soaring because of this “revelation” of the dollar’s death – then why did the dollar itself sink only modestly (at least, as I write).

I note also that the stock market recovered some of its ground. That might have something to do with the Australian Reserve Bank announcing a tighter policy, quite unexpectedly, and in apparent belief that the recovery is real, never mind Joseph Stiglitz, George Soros, Marc Faber, Jim Rogers, and other no-longer-strange bedfellows who think the opposite.

V-shaped, U-shaped, Square-root shaped, or corkscrewed, the recovery isn’t your grandfather’s recovery, that’s for sure. And someone is trying to make a silk purse out of this sow’s ear. That skepticism leads me to wonder whether this very convenient rumor, which coincides with the IMF meeting in Istanbul, might be a certain kind of saber rattling in anticipation of negotiations – except that these very public meetings are never where anything substantial takes place any way. (So says Simon Johnson in a recent blog post). But the IMF is selling gold, we know, and we know also that it wants to make sure it doesn’t hit the markets too hard when it does. Could this little upswing be helpful toward that end? Probably. Could this rumor – widely denounced as insubstantial – have something to do with that? Perhaps.

 

In the news, the Independent’s Robert Fisk reports on the coming fall of the petro-dollar:

“In a graphic illustration of the new world order, Arab states have launched secret moves with China, Russia and France to stop using the US currency for oil trading

In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning – along with China, Russia, Japan and France – to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.

Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.

The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in gold prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar markets within nine years.”

What A Billionaire Can Buy

Posted on by

For those who think that nationalism is the threat, rather than transnationalism, consider this:

“Bill Gates, America’s richest man with a net worth of $50 billion, has a personal balance sheet larger than the gross domestic product (GDP) of 140 countries, including Costa Rica, El Salvador, Bolivia and Uruguay. The Microsoft ( MSFT – news – people ) visionary’s nest egg is just short of the GDP of Tanzania and Burma.”

More here at Forbes.

Prechter – Debt Is the Problem, Not Paper Printing

Posted on by

Goldseek radio has an interview with Robert Prechter here.

Prechter’s 2002 book, “Conquer the Crash,” predicted the current economic collapse and this is an interesting and wide-ranging interview. Prechter is a renowned Elliot Wave theorist and a long-time prophet of depression.

Summing up his most important points:

*We have been in a developing deflation since 2002

*Debt is the problem, not paper-printing.

*Gold will hold value and do well, but it won’t go to the moon

*Cash is a good place to be

*The market will go down for a replay of 2008, in spades

Faber: Indian Central Bank One of the Best in the World

Posted on by

Marc Faber on CNBC:

“Where does India fit in your preferred or not preferred list right now of markets?

A: I think the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has one of the best monetary policies in the world because they supervise the financial sector very closely. They have maintained relatively tight monetary policies and also they pay attention not only to core inflation which is not representative of the cost of living increase and is not representative of inflation in the system but the RBI also pays attention to rising and falling asset prices. So I have to give them credit for being one of the best Central Banks in the world.

My Comment:

Faber goes on to argue for a pull-back in markets everywhere (maybe immediately, maybe after a further 10% rise), for a snap-back of the dollar in the near term (by around 10%), and for substantial further decline in the market, and over the next 2-3 years, in the dollar.

I like the point he makes in the quote that inflation isn’t just “core” inflation – the rise in prices in the stuff on the grocery shelves – but should also include asset price inflation. Because then you’d have a better judgment of what was going on in the markets.

My own take is that the media is misjudging some of the numbers coming from the emerging markets. The Chinese figures are likely to be highly over-optimistic and inflated, maybe by as much as 50% or more. The Indian market is also not that transparent….

Golden Goose Down – IMF Gold Swaps

Posted on by

GATA (The Gold Anti Trust Action Committee, the leading gold activist group that charges gold market manipulation) has just forced an admission from the Federal Reserve that it engaged in gold swaps.
In that context, I wanted to repost this old article of mine from three years ago, where I highlighted a news item that the media in the US had not bothered to cover:

Golden Goose Down: Was the IMF Involved in Gold Price Manipulation (Dissident Voice, June 8, 2006)

“The latest evidence is an IMF report that shows how IMF rules wink — if they do not actually blow kisses — at central banks which double count gold reserves they have actually lent out for sale in the open market.

Apparently, being a central bank means never having to say you’re short.

Aha, says GATA, which has charged all along that the IMF along with the US Federal Reserve and other government banks have done a financial two-step that has kept down gold prices until recently. The shady rules suggest that when they lent gold out for cash, the banks actually got to double their reserves by counting the leased gold as an asset too. Which means they got to lend, or sell, more gold than showed up on their books. That was pretty sweet both for the lenders — the central banks, who got a small return for their gold — and for the borrowers, the bullion banks that got to sell and reinvest the proceeds for a higher return in what’s called a carry trade.

Of course, it’s dollar holders who’ve done the real carry trade — carrying water for the lucky sods at both ends of the deal by clutching the ever diminishing paper that allows the lucrative game to go on at their expense. Sort of as if you or I or the rest of the peons who supply the tax funds for this financial musical chairs were to blow our money at Las Vegas and then write our losses down as collateral when we asked for a loan at the local credit union. Sounds good, huh?

Or as the IMF report admits delicately, IMF rules have encouraged overstating reserve assets because both the funds received from the gold swap and the gold are included in reserve assets.”

Gold Action Vindicates Caution

Posted on by

All the bugs who were rah-rahing and telling people to buy gold over $1000, instead of cautioning them to take profits and watch out must be feeling subdued. Despite the thrust upward to yearly highs, the gold action this year never struck me as spectacular at all. Considering everything that’s gone on, it’s been rather staid.

The most common explanation for that from the gold bug community is manipulation.  GATA has recently got confirmation of Federal Reserve gold swap arrangements that would certainly fall under the category of market intervention.

A second reason is that we still haven’t come out of the deflationary movement of the economy. We had the first wave of contraction last year, followed by an artificial bounce provoked by stimulus money and a lot of happy talk from the pundits. Now the second contraction has begun. Gold might do well in a deflation relative to other commodities, but so far it’s tended to sink when the market sells off, and that’s precisely what happened yesterday. No surprise there for me at all.

But it seems to have been a surprise to some traders out there. Rick Ackerman at Rick’s Picks expresses his puzzlement over the rush to dollars – it’s a rush to the Titanic, he argues.

Well – that’s why fundamental analysis is something you need to put on the back-burner when trading. I don’t care how bad fundamentals are. Nothing moves in a straight line down or up. Besides that, Ackerman, like many American commentators, assumes that his view of the dollar is the world’s view. That simply isn’t so. The dollar has terrible problems, but at least for now, there aren’t that many currencies that are free of problems – some of them worse than the dollar’s. And since the dollar is the currency used in a majority of transactions, moving out of them (which would be the case if you felt the economy was contracting) would entail buying dollars. It’s simple logic.

Finally – never pile onto a trade that has too many people on one side. That’s logic too.

Gold rose, but only wishful thinking would call it as powerful an upthrust as the gold experts have claimed it was. If you watch gold prices regularly, you’ll know it’s nothing for gold to move $40-50 in a day. It’s volatile. That’s its nature.

Add to its inherent volatility, the other things going on – the G20 meeting, much talk about altering the SDR’s backing, Bernanke’s comments about the recession ending, international tensions over Iran, the fact that September is usually a strong month for gold, Chinese comments about walking away from derivative contracts, China’s instructions to its population to buy gold — put all of that together and it’s not surprising that gold should have moved up by about $70.

If you bought earlier, you should have taken profits and you should be watching to see how things play out. I didn’t buy earlier, so I’m just watching.

I still firmly believe we are due for a correction – and a relatively big one. I’ll buy then (with reluctance – since I think it’s a terrible industry in many ways).  But what if we don’t correct, and gold shoots up?

Well, what if? Then I’ll be out. So what? if it goes up, it’s likely to go to $1200 or so. That’s a 20% upside. It could also go down to $800. Equal downside.

That’s not a good ratio of reward to risk. There are any number of stocks which will give you that kind of movement if you like gambling. But if you’re investing – and not gambling – then you should act like an investor and ask if you really want to buy at prices that high at the end of a long upthrust.

It doesn’t make investing sense.  So wait and buy on dips.

That said, I’m prepared to eat my words…

PS: Seems like Ackerman is in the deflationist camp (along with Shedlock, Prechter and others) – as opposed to the hyperinflationists like Schiff. [Correction: I accidentally had this in reverse, with Shedlock as inflationist. I’ve posted on why both Schiff and Shedlock are correct – and why that sort of face-off is misguided. Deflation in some areas and over a certain time frame can certainly take place with inflation over other areas. But if you consider inflation to be only the kind that shows up in CPI and on the grocery shelves then obviously, we haven’t see the kind of hyperinflation that gold bugs are waiting for. One thing I fail to see from a lot of people is an awareness that what’s anticipated from the Fed might already be priced into the dollar.]

Rick Ackerman’s Response:

RE: gold and the titanic?
From: Rick Ackerman
Sent: Fri 9/25/09 10:00 PM

Hey, Lila!

I’m using a $1074 target for Comex December Gold and have told my subscribers, many of whom are hard-money guys, that I can’t promise them any higher than that, at least not based on the evidence of GCZ’s daily and weekly charts. My gut feeling is that this is not the rally cycle that will take gold into the Promised Land, assuming it gets there at all. I’m still a hard-core deflationist who believes hyperinflation must ultimately play out, but not in time to save 80 million underwater U.S. homeowners from going through the ringer.

No matter what happens, the Baby Boomers’ retirement plans have already been deflated away to nothing. And concerning the dollar, I’ve moved beyond the idea that the currency is fundamentally worthless, accepting the reality that it trades, simply, as a share in USA, Inc.

With kind regards,

Rick

That’s a pretty good take on things from one of the more astute traders around.

The Carbon Credit Scam – Another Public-Private Boondoggle

Posted on by

“Dr Alison Doig, senior climate-change advisor at Christian Aid, says, ‘Live’s investigation highlights exactly what’s wrong with this flawed system, which is focused only on exchanging carbon credit globally, with no accounting for other environmental or social damage. All carbon credits are doing is making some companies rich, while doing nothing to prevent global pollution. It needs either abolition or total reform.’”

That’s a quote from a piece on how the much-touted carbon-credit trading scheme actually works on the ground in combating pollution. The idea of the scheme is to give industries a cap below which they have to operate. To exceed the cap, they have to purchase carbon credits from manufacturers in the developing world, who receive them in exchange for every cut in emissions they make.

The credits trade in private and international exchanges like any security, one ton of CO2 emission being equivalent to one Certified Emission Reduction (CER).

Carbon trading was one of the fastest growing sectors in 2006 and 2007, doubling in value, but like everything else, when the market took a hit, it took one too. With manufacturing output falling, emissions also fell, and with them carbon, making it more profitable for companies to pollute and buy the credits rather than cut back on emissions from fossil fuels.

And how does the scheme work on the ground? As Carbon Trade Watch documents in this revealing account by Nadene Ghouri, a company can actually be receiving tax-payer funded “green reward points” from the UN, and using the money for operations that are highly polluting – which is  what GFL (Gujarat Fluorochemicals) was doing.

China’s Gold Rush..

Posted on by

From Adrian Ash at Bullion Vault, via goldseek:

“The International Monetary Fund confirmed on Friday that it will sell 403 tonnes from its hoard to finance development projects in poorer countries, offering gold to central banks before considering steady, pre-announced open-market sales.
“China has no need at all to Buy Gold from the international markets,” counters Lila Lu, chief precious metals trader at Minsheng Bank Corp. in Beijing, speaking to Reuters.
“Because China is a large gold producer, it can source gold directly from its domestic makers, most of which are state-run enterprises.”
Off-market purchases direct from domestic Gold Mining firms enabled South Africa – then the world’s No.1 producer – to double its gold reserves during the late 1960s.
“Why should we use US Dollars to Buy Gold?” Lu added today. “We can use Yuan instead to purchase gold from domestic producers.”
Early Tuesday the state-owned China Investment Corp. announced taking a 15% stake in Singapore-listed commodities trading house Noble Group at a cost of $850 million.
Physical gold demand from private Chinese households rose 9% in the first half of this year, trade marketing-group the World Gold Council said today, announcing an “unprecedented” sales push across rural China.”

My Comment

There are several terribly important things going on in the capital markets and in international politics.

I’ll start with what most investors are probably watching anxiously – the teetering of the dollar at the lower end of the long term band of support (76-80), below which it plunged only a year ago. After showing some strength yesterday, the dollar is down again and gold is back up strongly over 1010. The reason seems to be the whispering in the markets that China will be buying IMF gold to supplement what are said to be meager reserves.

Rumors like these could be seen as a threat by the Chinese, for they expose China’s weakness in relation to other countries, especially those that possess better gold reserves. I suspect the comments by Lu are intended to diffuse that threat.

Another reason for dollar weakness is that the relative strengths of currencies are on the table at the G20 meeting, which is scheduled to take place in Thursday in Pittburgh, Pennsylvania and trade deficits are going to be considered – which is likely to be dollar negative.

The IMF sales are pretty interesting, although it’s hard to tell exactly what’s involved. It seems the gold will be sold to central banks (which ones?) and the proceeds will go to supplement and improve the financing now available to low-income countries (how?).

Question: Why should these professed good intentions be taken at face value, given all we know about the IMF?

At present, the IMF also allocates SDRs (or Special Drawing Rights) to each member country based on its contribution to the IMF (this is supposed to be a way to improve members’ liquidity in the international markets).

The SDR’s are based on a basket of currencies – currently, the US dollar, the euro, the sterling, and the yen – that can be traded for other currencies or used directly.

The IMF will use the gold sale proceeds to invest in other things. The interest from those investments will then benefit low-income countries. At least, that’s what I took away from my reading.

It all sounds suspiciously convoluted and opaque. My fear is that this is all an elaborate charade to leave some countries/institutions holding the “paper” bag, while real value is siphoned off by other countries/institutions.

I’ll leave you to decide who the winners and the losers will be….

Meanwhile, this is only my suspicion. I’ll need to go and do some more digging. But I’m putting my suspicions out here to fuel some leg work in the blogosphere.

Here’s a link to some relevant information on gold market manipulation at the website of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA), the leading activist group on gold price manipulation.

Especially read through the events surrounding the sale of Britain’s gold by then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown. Unlike other countries, UK gold sales are under the authority of the politicians. Brown sold British gold at a price lower than the market price at the time. The timing was extremely suspicious and followed on Robert Rubin’s unsuccessful attempts to get the IMF to sell its gold. The ostensible reason was to “help poor countries” – the same reason being given now. But the actual reason was a simpler one and one I’ve discussed a number of times. It was to keep the gold price low to support the dollar, disguise the rate of monetary debasement, and pump up the stock market. That in turn helped the derivative market, which Rubin and Greenspan had also helped to keep out of regulation. This was in the late 1990s….

Now, a decade later, the IMF hasn’t been weakened by the revelations of its sins. Instead, it’s been strengthened. And now, again, the IMF is selling gold – and again, the excuse is “helping the poor.”