Update [3.41 pm, Jan 27 IST]:
I added another tidbit to my comments at DC on Jo Becker’s forthcoming hit piece on Byrne and Powell for exposing Dominion Voting Systems’ fraud:
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/new-york-times-begs-court-to-dismiss-project-veritas-defamation-lawsuit/
The link goes to an article demonstrating the abysmal incompetence and bad faith of major reporters today. The NYT was hit by a defamation lawsuit after it claimed that its video was unsourced, when there were multiple witnesses that the Times just couldn’t be bothered to track down. Then, the Times admitted that its own take on Project Veritas was based on what it read on Wikipedia….
ORIGINAL POST
Over at Deep Capture, Patrick Byrne, former Overstock CEO and crusader against Wall Street and election fraud, has published an email from Jo Becker, a NY Times reporter asking for Byrne’s comment on a piece she is writing about his funding of Sidney Powell to the tune of $500,000 to research Dominion Voting Systems for fraud during the 2020 presidential election, a story she has heard from some unnamed source, she says:
“I have been told and am preparing to report that you gave the lawyer Sidney Powell $500,000 to investigate Dominion and the role it’s voting machines may have played, allowing her to continue to pursue this line of inquiry.”
As I blogged earlier, one of the most important things that digital warriors can do is to provide the background of the pressitutes and hacks that pass for the 4th estate these days.
Jo Becker, with three Pulitzer Prizes under her belt, is clearly a mouth-piece for elite narrative-shaping, because, these days prestigious prizes are awarded mainly to those inclined to play that role.
My comments at Deep Capture summarize what a little research into her history found:
Patrick,
She couldn’t be bothered to research this story so she went with an obviously incorrect tip, if there really was a tip. She couldn’t be bothered to check her grammar, so she added an apostrophe incorrectly to a possessive pronoun.
Any NYT reporter who uses anonymous sources [“have been told”] to prepare media reports to help Dominion in its retaliatory lawsuit against Powell and Guiliani for over a billion dollars, is likely an asset of some kind and not playing fair.
That’s just an educated guess for now, but I would urge the digital warriors on this blog to check into it.
People have been asking what they can do. Well, here it is.
Delve into Jo Becker’s past reporting, any connections to the financial cabal, or even to Coomer himself, proof of Mockingbird status, ties to Dem financiers or hacks, affairs with Coomer’s lawyers, business irregularities, court filings, and the rest of her history. Give these propaganda outlets a taste of the medicine they dish out to others.
Particularly look for her stories covering Trump, RussiaCollusion, and any BFF status with Obama and Hillary associates.
This will extract a price from reporters…and the people behind them… for intimidating anyone who exposes cabal corruption.”
OK guys, got some background.
Becker is a 3x Pulitzer winning reporter, who left the WashPo for NYT.
WashPo is even more of a Mockingbird outlet than any other paper.
So that is strike one.
Strike two. She has an extensive background in negative reporting on Trump, including pushing Russian collusion stuff.
Strike three. Her husband Serge Kovaleski, also of WashPo, now at NYT, is the son of Fred K. who was a CIA spy. Kovaleski goes back decades in interaction with Trump. He is the guy with the disability who was allegedly mocked by Trump. I would say what I dug up in just one minute is already looking bad for her objectivity in writing about Dominion.
[I know I did not put hyphens in some places, but that is because my keyboard isn’t working right not because I cannot be bothered.]
More on ”reporter” Jo Becker and her direct ties to HILARY ROSEN AND KEN MEHLMAN, whose interests evidently guide her reporting.
Becker’s Pulitzer Prize was not given because her gay marriage book was great: it’s been trashed even by the Guardian, from the left, as a kind of rewrite of the history of marriage equality to give credit only to “rich, white” guys….
What the Guardian should have said is that CREDIT WAS ONLY GIVEN TO DEMOCRAT ACTIVISTS.
In other words, those kinds of prizes go to those who promote the CABAL NARRATIVE.
Becker’s book promoted Chad Griffen, who ended up heading HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN, a very important part of the Democrat power base.
Becker’s promotion of Griffen and Human Rights Campaign ties directly to HRC’s HILARY ROSEN, one of the most powerful women in politics, Democrat political strategist, lobbyist, CNN analyst, Trump hater, and handler of Hillary, Feinstein, and other swamp critters on the left.
ON HILARY ROSEN’S TDS
https://dldnews.com/two-elephants-in-the-room/
“Hilary Rosen thinks that media will bitterly regret the day they have started treating Trump as a “normal politician.”
ON BECKER’S BOOK
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisgeidner/the-new-book-about-the-marriage-equality-movement
“But Becker’s reliance on the AFER (and, later, HRC) team — primarily lawyers Olson and Boies, staffers Griffin and Adam Umhoefer, and consultants [HILARY] ROSEN and KEN MEHLMAN]— is ultimately the book’s downfall. Almost any contextualizing of the case is done by people with a vested and open interest in advancing the narrative that Griffin, with Olson’s help, rescued a cause that Becker claims “had largely languished in obscurity.”
Correction:
Correction:
I lumped Ken Mehlman in with Rosen as a DEM operative, but in fact he is a gay Republican…one time chair of the RNC, whose position at HRC misled me. A RINO most likely, as he seems to be very active in Green investments. He is chief of Environmental Social governance at KKR, one of the largest private equity firms in the world. We know that private equity is heavily invested in Dominion Voting systems…and I would guess Mehlman has a hand in investments at KKR…and they are likely invested in Dominion as well. Must find a concrete link for that.