Donald Trump Failed To Break The Techno-Managerial Dictatorship

Scott Gibbons at The Millenial City:

“As I wrote in my book, Trumped by History: The Resurrection of the Great American Middle Class, then suddenly, out of left field came the perennial celebrity Donald Trump. He did not come from within any institution or discipline, and his ideas and platform coalesced rapidly through interaction with various populist personalities, frustration and thought waves. Trump most famously recognized and sanctioned the downtrodden great American middle class and drew those people out of long-term seclusion into increased and open expression of opinion. He resuscitated them and suddenly by just wearing MAGA caps their long suppressed opinions were clear to everyone.

As I wrote in Trumped by History, in bypassing the mainstream institutions and processes, Donald Trump starkly defined the conflict between the middle class and the techno-managerial elite, drawing his supporters fully into the open for the first time since they had lost their social dominance in the 1960s. At the same time, he elicited a virulent opposition to himself personally from establishment conservatives whose ideology was thought in principle to be nearly the same as that of his supporters – revealing both left and right to be the true techno-managerial elite enemy of the great American middle class.”

Gibbons suggests that the Trump presidency failed to dislodge the techno-managerial ruling class and only enriched its own self, thereby leaving its followers even more vulnerable than before.

This is a pessimistic and widely-held analysis that I don’t share, because I never subscribed to the belief that Trump came from no where. I was quite clear-eyed from the beginning about who Trump was. I realized he was a liberal from the heart of the establishment – he was, after all, sent out to sell the financial bail-out to the public. There was his family’s decades-long coziness with mob figures, his ties to the Clintons, and his family ties to the media and to the Jewish establishment. He would never have become that popular without that.

However, to me he represented an opening, a disruption that had the potential to shake things up and move them in an unexpected direction. That potential did not exist with Hillary Clinton.

Trump blew up the place verbally.

And that created a space for the middle class to express itself. Whatever else did not get accomplished by his presidency, that did.

And it can not be undone.

 

 

“Fake News” Becomes Fake News

Oh what a tangled web we weave

When first we practice to deceive….

Who could have thought that when you turn the information space into a battleground and weaponize it to deceive not just an enemy in a limited war, but the entire global public that the thing would rebound on you?

Who would have thought, right?

Full -spectrum dominance has become full-spectrum bedlam.

Fake news sites can no longer be tagged with the fake news label, complains a poor Canadian journalist, because that label is now being tagged by the victims as “fake news.”

 

Western Opinion Matters Less and Less To Most Of The World

Andrew Korybko draws some useful conclusions from watching the information war being conducted by the West against Russia:

“The average Westerner is practically incapable of ever recovering from the incessant narrative-psychological operations that they’re exposed to by their governments and their media allies, yet the non-West is much more open-minded and neutral.”

and

“The Global South is therefore the real cognitive battleground so to speak of the New Cold War, not the West or Russia. That’s because most of the governments representing this majority of humanity mostly practice a policy of principled neutrality towards the Ukrainian Conflict.”

I am not as sanguine as he is about the Global South, only because the West is already here poisoning the information space with its fact-checking websites.

These self-appointed fact-checkers have a fixed set of priorities: agree with climate catastrophe and you are pro-science and fact-based; demand mass vaccinations and you are pro-science and humane; disagree and you are unreliable, anti-science, a conspiracist and most-likely also a holocaust denier, only waiting to trot out the sieg heil, the Nazi cry permissible only to Ukrainians willing to be cannon-fodder for NATO].

 

Putin More Christian Than the Pope

In President Putin’s well-considered and judicious remarks to the UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres on April 26, I note two statements that shed an interesting light on his larger goals in pursuing the war in Ukraine and more generally on the position Russia has taken up as the head of the resistance to the universal hegemony of the West:

We are also surprised to hear statements by our colleagues that imply that some in the world have exceptional status or can claim exclusive rights because the Charter of the United Nations reads that all participants in international communication are equal regardless of their strength, size or geographical location. I think this is similar to what the Bible reads about all people being equal. I am sure we will find the same idea in both the Quran and the Torah. All people are equal before God. So, the idea that someone can claim a kind of exceptional status is very strange to us.

Since every word from Putin’s mouth is considered, I take the manner in which he has articulated his concerns about certain UN members to be highly significant.

First, it should be noted that he is attacking exceptionalism of any kind, which would imply both American exceptionalism and any other exceptionalism.

Now, exceptionalism is much the same thing as supremacism.

President Putin of course has positioned himself  very publicly  against Nazism, specifically the Nazism exhibited by some parts of the Ukrainian government. That is well known. However, he has for some time been hinting at something more.

And here he is clarifying what that is. It is the more general category to which Nazism belongs, supremacism.

The political point Putin is making to the Secretary-General is that actions of member-states that are similar should be treated similarly by the UN. If Kosovo could declare itself independent and this was recognized by the International Court, then the independence of the Donbass should be treated equally. Equality before the law cannot co-exist with an exceptionalist treatment of one country, permitting it a leeway  in action none other has. American exceptionalism is clearly the target here.

Then, significantly, President Putin, derives the equality of member- states in the UN from  the notion of equality among human beings given to us in religious scripture. And here he does something very illuminating.  He lists the religious texts that support the notion of equality: the Bible, the Koran, and the Torah.

Notice that he omits the Talmud and he omits any Hindu scripture, such as the Vedas or Upanishads, but since Hinduism is not represented in Russia in any substantial way, so that is not a surprise. What is a surprise is his omission of the Talmud, which is the scripture that most regulates Jewish practice, since Judaism, especially Chabad, is well-represented in Russia.  In fact, Chabad is the most powerful Jewish community in the country. Now, there is no question that there is in Chabad a supremacist vein, found in such texts as Ha Tanya, as well as, more generally, in the Talmud. Thus, when President Putin omits any reference to the Talmud and instead directly mentions the Torah, it is significant, since the Torah is most important among true Torah following Jews, who are anti-Zionist and constitute a very small group, and among the equally small group of Karaite Jews.

Besides that omission, the order of the list is also significant. President Putin mentions the Bible first, giving pride of place to Christianity among the traditional Russian faiths. He then mentions the Koran, giving Islam the second place, and with the Torah, gives Judaism its due. This particular ordering might be linked to the size of the demographic each religion represents in the Russian federation, with the state aligning itself first with the Orthodox faith and presenting itself as the defender of that faith.

From the political context, it is clear that President Putin is opposing his defense of equality to the supremacism practiced by two exceptionalist groups, the one in Ukraine which has a pagan and occult basis, and the one embodied in NATO and the West, that also draws on the pagan and the occult. I will leave it open whether one should extrapolate from Mr. Putin’s words an implicit indictment of Talmudic supremacism or not.

Now, contrast this with the words of the head of the Catholic church, Pope Francis, in a speech to Congress on September 24, 2015, in which he called for inclusion and fraternity. The Pope managed to mention both Moses and Mohammed but omitted the name of Jesus Christ. Clearly, in that at least President Putin is a more forthright defender of the Christian faith in the public sphere.

The War That “Must Be Genocidal And Total”

The eschatological war:

Dr. Yitzhak Attia, the director of French-language seminars
at the International School for Holocaust Studies of Yad Vashem in Tel Aviv, used very explicit language here, writing with a clarity unusual among Jewish intellectuals:

“Even though our reason shouts out with all its might the absurdity of this confrontation between a small people as insignificant as the people of Israel and the rest of humanity,… as absurd, as incoherent, as monstrous as it may
seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations, and it can only be genocidal and total, because it is a question of our respective identities.”

Chomsky: Trump Is the Worst Criminal In Human History

What a dangerous shill Chomsky is. I just spotted this comment from 2020, where he claims Trump is the worst criminal in human history. I guess when you’ve spent your life covering up for Mao, Pol Pot, and every other communist mass murderer, you might not have all that much competition left. But really, the worst criminal ever? Not even Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun?

One of the things of which I’m everlastingly proud is that I saw through this Judas goat fairly early on. In fact, my radar for Judas goats is just about 100 percent accurate. I can smell them across the Atlantic..or Pacific, in this case.

Left Gate-Keepers: Who Gets Disinvited

LA Progressive.com
Left Gatekeepers.

The third group to be disinvited is any New Left group that is anti-Zionist. US foreign policy is very dependent on having a friendly base in the Middle East and we can rest assured that any group that is pro-Palestinian such as the ANSWER coalition will be attacked as being anti-Semitic. There is good reason why the scholar Norman Finkelstein has never been able to receive a full-time teaching position because of his defense of the Palestinians. The entire New Left must get a permit paper from AIPAC, the most powerful lobby for Israel in Yankeedom.

Another group targeted by the Left Gatekeepers are organizations that actively support anti-imperialism. Any Pan-African movement leaders like Gaddafi in Libya will be condemned as “authoritarian dictators”, mouthing CIA positions. The African People’s Socialist Party in Yankeedom would also be dismissed.

Furthermore, on an international level, any organization or media outlet that show the slightest sympathy to nations deemed an enemy of the United States will be targeted. The Left Gatekeepers will have no problem with anarchists who condemn both US foreign policy and the authoritarian governments of Russia, China and Iran. But any news source that reports some sympathy for Russia, China, Iran, Cuba or Venezuela are deemed enemies. It is very important to the Left Gatekeepers (whether inside or outside the CIA) that the left in the US tow the party line about its perceived enemies.

So, for example, it is impossible to say that that yes, China has an authoritarian government and yes there is a deep class structure and yes, it is state capitalist. Nevertheless, the Chinese state has raised the standard of living for millions of people and internationally it is doing what Marx said what was best about capitalism: developing the productive forces through building the New Silk Road. China is also going off the dollar, as is Russia, and they are backing their economies in gold. We think that any nation-states or states that attempt to break the domination of the Yankee empire is worth critically supporting. But for the Gatekeepers and their new left pawns, this is too much.

News sources that defend countries that challenge Yankees’ foreign policy will be harassed. This is the case for New Eastern Outlook, Russian Times, The Greanville Post, TeleSUR, or Venezuelan Analysis.

Lastly any group that suggests the United States has been and is capable of assassinations and false-flag operations at home or abroad will be labelled “conspiracy nuts”. This is certainly what happened and is happening to the 911 Truth Movement.

The God Of Vacation Homes: Arundhati’s Resistance To Capitalism

Op India.com:

A story from the pristine Panchmarhi hills of Madhya Pradesh. Where the sun shines bright, where the sky is a wonderful blue, where the animals of the land lead their lives undisturbed in the virgin forest.

Then, one day in the early 1990s, this virgin forest has a visitor. A visitor who sees this lush green forest and falls in love with it. And decides that he must have it to himself. He must grab a piece of this virgin forest, solely for himself, get everyone else out of there and make it his vacation home.

Who is this visitor? Some Brahmanical colonizer from the RSS? Well, not exactly.

This visitor has made his fortune out of sensitising city dwellers and rich foreign audiences about the importance of the environment and protection of tribals. His films have made him wealthy and he purchases the land without difficulty. A few years later, he marries into his own intellectual caste, another firebrand author, writer, activist who stubbornly opposes the Brahmanical Indian state taking the forests away from the tribals of the heartland.

The happy couple who love their vacation home in the forest? Pradeep Kishen and Arundhati Roy.

Because nothing serves the purpose of India’s tribals more than making sure that Arundhati Roy has a vacation home built on their land where she can reflect on their deprived status. Where else will the powerful intellectual opposition to the Sardar Sarovar Dam come from? And wouldn’t Arundhati Roy need a vacation home in the area if she plans to oppose the “new development plan for the Pachmarhi area in which a hotel-building would be allowed at the cost of despoiling the beauty and sylvan backdrop of the colonial hill station”?

I don’t know if the word ‘colonial’ in the linked India Today article from 1999 was used by Arundhati Roy herself, but I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if she insisted on it.

Vacation home building for intellectuals? Yes!

Hotel building? No, no, a thousand times no!

Hotels have a way of attracting the middle class crowd that can’t afford to have private vacation homes. You let them build a hotel near their vacation home in the Panchmarhi hills and next thing you know the place becomes like every other city where the writers and activists have to use the same streets and breathe the same air as everyone else.

In fact, Pradeep Kishen even became a member of a government committee to hear objections against the building of the hotel. In the course of discharging his duties, he presented objections from the “people” against the evil capitalists. The objections against converting “Panchmarhi into the Las Vegas of Madhya Pradesh.”

Here, “people” obviously means Kishen’s wife, Ms. Arund***ti Roy. Did you think any other people matter?

And then it happens! In 1999, the noble activists of Panchmarhi end up receiving a notice about their own vacation home being built on illegally grabbed forest land. Thus begins a long battle in the bourgeois courts of India’s broken republic.

In the course of this battle, powerful arguments are presented by those in Arundhati Roy’s favor. One such argument published in India Today:

“The alleged violation of the law in Bariaam, even if technical, by the landowners pales into insignificance when compared with illegal developments on the other side of the Bariaam Lake. Many senior government officials have purchased land in areas falling within the Pachmarhi wildlife sanctuary.”

Hmmm… seems like Bhakts did not discover whataboutism after all.

Or this one:

“A house nearby is owned by the sister of Vikram Seth, another author, who wrote A Suitable Boy.”

See? Members of the same caste group live nearby. The sister of Vikram Seth. Not Vikram Seth himself, mind you, but his sister. It’s all about the bloodline. Mr. Pradeep Kishen and Ms. Arundhati Roy need to be near their own kind. . It’s a caste group after all. Not every chaiwala or pakodawala or beggar can get in.

The last I know of this long battle begun in 1999 is that the local court declared the bungalow illegal in 2010, upholding a decision of an earlier Revenue Court.

Was Zbigniew Brzezinski’s Grandmother Jewish?

Jewish Trivia has this:

Brzezinski is the daughter of Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, whose own father Tadeusz was a Polish diplomat, stationed at various times in Germany, the Soviet Union, and Canada. The Brzezinski family were Catholics, but in 2005, a genealogist published an article claiming that Tadeusz Brzezinski’s mother was actually born Jewish. Her family, however, converted to Catholicism in reaction to pogroms in Poland in the early 20th century. When Mika Brzezinski was asked about this report, she replied, “I don’t believe it. I’m not Jewish. Not that there’s anything wrong with that,” referencing the famous line from the Seinfeld television show about being homosexual. After criticism from the Jewish community, Brzezinski apologized for trivializing the issue.

Blackrock/Goldman Sachs Control Nations & Politics

Russia Insider has a deep dive into Blackrock, which, with Goldman Sachs, contributes and controls a majority of Western political leaders:

What follows is a machine transcription of an audiofile available at the link above and being a machine transcription, there are several errors. The material is taken from The Right Stuff, I believe, which is an alt right site. I am not in agreement with every thing the alt right says, which is why I don’t link directly to them.  Also, my fear is that many of these sites are run by the US government  for reasons of entrapment.

NOTE In no way do I endorse or subscribe to anything neo-Nazi or racist toward Jewish people. My critique of Jewish control of the media, finance, and politics is only because I fear what supremacist control of the economy and the government must mean for the rest of us.

EXCERPT FROM TRANSCRIPT

“So going back to BlackRock and Goldman Sachs.

[00:16:22] Right. They’re not actually separate entities. BlackRock is the top investor in Goldman, along with Vanguard and strict State Street right after them. So together, Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street own 20 percent of Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs, in turn, is who did the startup for ICE and then installed SPRECHER is the NYSE CEO. So in effect, BlackRock controls Goldman and Goldman controls Hertz Stock Exchange. And it’s pretty, pretty hilarious. And when you look at BlackRock itself, founded in nineteen eighty eight by Larry Fink, who is still the CEO, Larry Fink is Jewish. In fact, I’m just going to read the names and I will tell you if they’re not Jewish. How about that. We’ll just do it that way.

[00:17:05] It’s easier to do it that way. So Larry Fink, Robert S. cappato, Susan Wagner, Barbara Novick, Ben Golub, Q Frater back, guys. A Gentile, Ralph Shlash Stein. You think that guy’s a gentile, James? I don’t know. That’s a tough one. Jesus and Keith Anderson also a gentle so out of the founders of BlackRock, six out of eight are Jewish. So who’s calling the shots now? Again, same rules apply. I’m just gonna read the names and I’ll tell you if they’re not Jewish. So Larry Fink, Robert Capital still around. Rob Al Goldstein, Ben Golub, still around. Gary Shevlin. Derek Stein. Marc Weidmann. Marc Wiseman. Those are basically the guys that sit on cardboard jazz.

[00:17:51] It didn’t hear you call it. Any exceptions to the rule there? Yes. It seems like all these guys are Jewish. The entire corporate board of BlackRock, Jeff.

[00:18:02] Wow. And so, yeah, of course. And Larry Fink, it’s just like, oh, my God, when you look at the look at this guy and think think told the firm’s 14000 employees that he is instituting potentially the most aggressive diversity program in corporate America and sharing that, quote, A bunch of white men will no longer be running the world’s largest money management firm. Yes. So like you guys, where it’s basically Stein, Golombek, Goldstein Capital think weideman Weizman. It’s like, oh, yeah, but not that, though. Like that’s going to remain intact. Yeah.

[00:18:36] Yeah. And do you think they’re only applying that rule internally or are they applying that to the many corporations they have controlling stakes in as we’ll get to.

[00:18:44] I wonder I wonder if if that theory trickles down. Yeah. And it’s I mean they’re going to be trying to mean the fact that they’re handing it off. Know, Jamie Diamond had some heart issues I think in the last couple of weeks.

[00:18:58] And there were some articles talking about who he had groomed as his predecessors or sorry as his successors. I meant to say and one of them is Joseph Pinto, who’s a subpart of Jew, and another one is a woman. So Pinto looks like, you know, your typical like beaner replacement. But no, that’s a subpart of Jew and then a woman who he’s trying to bring up, who’s like unmarried cat lady. Yes. She’s also Jewish. And I think her name is Catherine Lake. I can’t remember. But if you look her up, she’s she’s Jewish. And those are those are the successors for Jamie Diamond, J.P. Morgan’s Jamie Diamond. If he decides to retire. So, yeah, I like this idea that. Oh, we got it. We got to diversify. No, there’s nothing getting diversified. These are all still Jews in charge of all of it. So, you know, Fink has also said profits are an in no way consistent with purpose.

[00:19:49] In fact, profits and purpose are inextricably linked. What does he mean by that? What do you think he means? What do you think their purposes? Well, let’s talk about their purpose. So you had, I think, along with Tom Barach Blackstone, which is different from Black Rock Blackstone, that’s CEO Stephen Schwarzman and Goldman Sachs, Dina Powell were all invited to closed door sessions to discuss Jared Kushner’s Middle East peace plan.

[00:20:17] L-o-l at peace plan. And we remember how what the rollout of that was. But think guy in charge of BlackRock. You know, he he was in that room. Tom Barach Blackstone. Goldman said it’s funny that they’re all there. And of course, Schwartzman was also selected to lead Trump’s economic advisory team during the transition. But it’s not just BlackRock ,of the fifty two senior executives of the largest American asset management firms, private equity funds and. Hedge funds such as Vanguard, Blackstone Group, Elliott Management, Charles Schwab, Renaissance Technologies being White Mellon, Millennium Management Warburg Pincus, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, AQR Capital, Bain Capital, Apollo Global Management 36 or Jews or have Jewish spouses.

[00:21:03] So it’s that roughly 70 percent [are Jewish]

[00:21:05] So to do 70 I think is how that works out. Just fucking disgusting. And those are the ones that, you know, we can look up and figure out. And a lot of that has changed. I think as time has gone on. But these guys are all also members of a secret society before you cringe. This is a real thing. Kappa Beta Fi Enga, look it up. It’s publicly available, but it’s a secret society for finance capital. It’s been around actually since nineteen twenty nine prior to the stock market crash in twenty nine. And the Wall Street chapter apparently is the only chapter left in the membership is is publicly available. You have people like Michael Bloomberg, John Corer, Zine, Larry Fink, Richard Grasso, David Komansky, Sally Krawcheck, who I mentioned her before. Marc Lasry, Martin Lipton. Martin Lipton. Sounds since I could go right. Wrong. Wilbur Ross, Alan Schwarz, Robert Rubin, Mary SHAPIRO, Diana Taylor, who is the wife of Michael Bloomberg and the superintendent of New York State Banks. Warren Stephens. John C. Whitehead. Richard Fuld, who is the former chair and CEO of Lehman Brothers.

[00:22:19] You can look all these people up, but yeah, this is a this is a basically one of their little clubs. And I’m sure because this is publicly available and you can see some of the members they induct 20, 15 to 20 new members every year at a black tie dinner. I’m sure that. Do you really think that this is the only forum in which these people meet and this is a fun forum like this is where these people get together and and drink and socialize and connect with one another and network, actually. But the things that are said and the plans that are made are certainly not done in this manner. But I didn’t even know about captivated Fi. I certainly didn’t know about it. But it was formed in 1929 prior to the stock market crash. And their motto is Keeping alive the spirit of the good old days of 1928 in 1929. Well, that that kicked off a lot of the restructuring of the world economy. That’s what Spetz into World War 2.

[00:23:17] Yeah, I know the good old days where profits were coming hot and heavy and very little oversight.

[00:23:22] So, yeah, Larry Fink is in the mix on this. He got Bloomberg in there, got John Corazón. You got all these these people in. The only reason I mention captivated Fi is because of Larry Fink and a lot of these these people that are all intermingled in so many ways.

[00:23:38] Sure. But Fink, I wonder how many of those people show up showed up in Jeffrey Epstein’s black book, the AP, an interesting research project.

[00:23:45] Good question. I think is probably the most powerful man in the world. His company actually has 6.5 trillion dollars in assets. They are the single largest Shell shareholder in virtually any major corporation that you can think of. We’ll go through the list here in a second. And it controls the nine DACs companies in Germany as well. So it’s not just the United States, very deeply rooted in Germany and Austria. They’re all over the world. It’s they can influence the fate of entire cities and countries. BlackRock is they have 70 offices in 30 countries, clients in over 100 countries around the world. They are essentially the world’s largest shadow bank due to its size and scope. I mean, just the math, just to put this into perspective, so people understand BlackRock is larger than Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan combined. And they own those companies, too, like they own large controlling, not quite well, not controlling in the sense that you would think not 51 percent, but large enough where they can make things happen if they need to. They are the largest single shareholder also of BASF, Daimler, Lufthansa, Deutsche Bank and Allianz. And that’s just in Germany. They they also have this massive data center in Washington state.

[00:25:16] There’s a cluster of six thousand computers there that monitor the assets of over 170 pension funds, banks, foundations, insurance companies and others. These these computers watch interest rate changes, bank failures, look at natural disasters and, you know, look at every change in consequences, positive or negative. And of course, this system is called Aladdin and there are 17000 traders around the world that decide when to buy or sell assets. Based on what this data center spits out, it’s the heart of BlackRock and they single handedly managed most of the money that is in private equity and hedge funds combined worldwide. The only other big company out there that owns just almost as much as them, they’re dwarfed by half. But three trillion is is Vanguard. And so although almost all of their holdings are stocks, they are the largest shareholder in 50 percent of the world’s third largest corporations. So they not only hold stocks, but they hold bonds, commodities, hedge funds and real estate. And yeah, I mean, according to an anonymous European insurer who wishes to remain anonymous and possibly alive as well, he said if you’re looking to buy or sell something or invest, it’s very difficult to get around BlackRock.

[00:26:36] That I mean, they basically, like, run the show. And yeah, yeah, it’s huge.

[00:26:41] Yeah. And when you take a look at the toll, the type of companies they’re involved in, it’s very diversified, a lot of diverse assets here.

[00:26:48] They have 5 percent of Apple, 5 percent of Exxon Mobile, 6 percent of Google, 7 percent of Berkshire Hathaway. The list goes on and on, 7 percent of Petro China. So they’re involved in just about every field you can imagine.

[00:27:01] Yeah. Johnson and Johnson. G.E., Chevron. JP Morgan. Wells Fargo. Procter and Gamble. Royal Dutch Shell. Nestlé. Walmart. Novartis. Roget, Toyota. China. Mobile.

[00:27:11] Like I mean, they they don’t need like who needs sovereign nations and government. Like government is just like for these people, just something that’s getting in the way and this consolidation of power in the center of power in the United States and basically installing BlackRock as the new operating system on top of the Fed and the Treasury is exactly I mean, it just put it all together and you can figure out what’s going on.

[00:27:36] They own they own $58 billion worth of Microsoft, $54 billion worth of Apple. Forty five billion dollars worth of Amazon, $26 billion worth of Johnson and Johnson. Twenty four billion worth of Facebook. Twenty two billion worth of alphabet. Twenty two billion worth of Exon.

[00:27:54] Twenty two billion worth of JP Morgan. I mean, it’s of Bircher Hathaway. It just goes on down the line. Pfizer, Visa, Intel, Netflix, Wal-Mart, Starbucks. They own they are the third largest shareholder of Lockheed Martin, second largest shareholder of Boeing, the fifth largest shareholder of General Dynamics. You have Raytheon, Northrop, McKesson, Huntington, Ingles, L-3 Technologies. Like this is all part of the the military industrial complex media.

[00:28:25] They are the second largest shareholder of AT&T, which now includes Turner Broadcasting, HBO, CNN and Warner Brothers. It’s like this one company now might as well make it all simple. Walt Disney Company, which includes ABC, Fox News A and E, ESPN, Lucasfilm and Marvel. BlackRock is the second largest shareholder. Comcast Charter Communications, 21st Century Fox, which is now owned by Disney. Thompson, Reuters. CBS Dish Network. Viacom. Right. We’re talking about the Black Rock with with Vioxx. I mean, and we’ve talked about the CEO of Viacom and how this is all blending together. And if you’re wondering why BlackRock is the second largest shareholder for a lot of these positions, it’s because, as I said, the first is often Vanguard.

[00:29:14] Vanguard has 41 one holdings with a total value of three trillion with top holdings in this order. Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, JP Morgan, Facebook, Johnson. And it’s all the same companies they own between the two of these companies. They own a huge amount. Now, people would say, oh, yeah, it’s only 6 percent. It’s only a very small portion of the total value of of the company. It’s like. But if they pulled out of one of these companies or decided to do essentially BTX against an American corporation, that’s the end of that. So all of these companies have to be walking in lockstep with whatever give Larry Fink whatever the fuck he wants. So if you’re wondering why, you can have very quickly overnight a nationwide D platforming campaign where it’s almost as if every single company is on the same conference call to decide what action to take. And it’s not like they’re confused about what they need to do. Like in many cases, they just know what they’re supposed to do. But if you cut a lot of people by surprise in 2016, that it’s like, wow, all these companies are operating in such a coordinated fashion. Well, now you get why like now you understand why that happens.