Isis Only Continues What US/UK Did To Iraq

Isis is only continuing what the US and UK did during  Gulf War II when hell was let loose in Iraq and its ancient monuments were plucked, gutted, and burned.

Simon Jenkins at the Spectator.co.uk:

When I protested the dropping of high-explosive bombs near ancient Serbian churches during the Kosovo war of 1999, I was told it was unreasonable to expect the RAF to be pinpoint accurate in its targeting. The heirs of Bomber Harris are not squeamish about the far end of a bomb site, be it a human being or a historic building. There will always be ‘collateral damage’. On this 70th anniversary of the Dresden firestorm at least we say sorry. We did not do so at the time. We saw eliminating an enemy’s heritage and culture as justifiable revenge — as Harris’s apologists still do. That is roughly the Isis approach.

There is no point in the United Nations secretary-general, Ban Ki-Moon, declaring the destruction of Nimrud ‘a war crime’, or Unesco declaring it ‘a direct attack against the history of Islamic Arab cities’. There is in place a clear 1954 Hague convention protecting ‘cultural property in the event of armed conflict’. It remains unratified by two states, America and Britain, ‘for reasons of national security’. That is two states, plus the Taleban and Isis. As Robert Bevan has written in The Destruction of Memory (2006), the razing of history has long been the most hypocritical weapon of war.”

“King” Donald & “Cracker” Jesus

 

Donald = Great chief, world ruler.

From the Gaelic or Old Celtic Domhnall.

“Dumno= World +Val = Rule

The name Donald has been borne by a number of early Scottish kings”

Donald Trump says that he is a believing Presbyterian.

But if you look at his public statements about his faith and compare them with his outspoken devotion to Israel, his beliefs seem very non-descript:

In comments about his “Christian” [Presbyterian] faith, this is how Trump postured about his belief in God in front of [Zionist] Christian evangelicals:

Trump, who told CNN earlier that he is both anti-abortion and anti-same-sex marriage, said people are surprised to learn about his Christian faith.

Trump’s new-found dislike for Planned Parenthood is actually rather ambiguous.

Notice that he also quickly retracted his decision to defund the outfit.

In the past, moreover, he’s been a big supporter of  Planned Parenthood.

This record suggests that Trump is just dissembling to gain the following of ordinary Americans.

Now read what Trumps says after that:

“People are so shocked when they find … out I am Protestant. I am Presbyterian. And I go to church and I love God and I love my church,” he said.

Moderator Frank Luntz asked Trump whether he has ever asked God for forgiveness for his actions.

“I am not sure I have. I just go on and try to do a better job from there. I don’t think so,” he said. “I think if I do something wrong, I think, I just try and make it right. I don’t bring God into that picture. I don’t.”

How are such beliefs Presbyterian?

They’re actually closer to a kind of popular deism.

Christianity has a foundational belief that the “natural man” is innately prone to sin and that sin requires confession, repentance and atonement/forgiveness.

While the Old Testament doesn’t have the same belief in original sin, it does require atonement for sins.

Trump said that while he hasn’t asked God for forgiveness, he does participate in Holy Communion.”

To take part in communion while being in unrepented sin is not Christian, whether one is Catholic, Presbyterian, or anything else. It is a gesture of utmost disrespect to Jesus.

Communion is either symbolically or literally the body of Jesus and is taken only when the believer has set his heart right with Jesus.

So that statement tell you that Trump is not Christian in any remotely orthodox sense.

But then again, he is also not an orthodox Jew.

A Torah-following Jew cannot approach God without atonement for sin.

That is why the Jewish high priest had to sacrifice two goats – the sacrificial goat on the altar, as atonement for sin, and the scape-goat in the wilderness, as an emblem of the destruction of the sin itself.

So Trump is making a clear signal of disrespect to Christian belief, and also to Orthodox Jewish belief.

Next, Trump says something quite bizarre:

“When I drink my little wine — which is about the only wine I drink — and have my little cracker, I guess that is a form of asking for forgiveness, and I do that as often as possible because I feel cleansed,” he said. “I think in terms of ‘let’s go on and let’s make it right.'”

It’s wrong to belittle anyone’s honest faith, no matter what their political positions.

But is Trump making a sincere profession here?

If you look at the other signals being sent out in this short passage, it seems not.

Social drinking is very much a part of non-Jewish Christian culture in the West.

Jesus drank wine in his day-to-day life.

But Jews today (and Muslims) do not drink wine at all.

In telling the public that he doesn’t drink at all, Trump is signalling his cultural distance from ordinary Americans and Europeans.

This seems quite peculiar to me, since his whole media performance centers around  identification with the common man in America.

And no, it’s not just a slip. A man who’s been in the lime-light all his life doesn’t make such slips.

The reference to Megyn Kelly’s blood was demonstrably crass innuendo about her period, to which the existence of a globalist “menstruation agenda” is only added proof.

This reference too is intentional.

Of course,  Megyn Kelly, who openly discusses her husband’s private parts with the likes of Howard Stern, is not in in need of our chivalry.

Very likely the entire bogus “incident” was cooked up at some level to drive ratings up.

The worst part of what Trump said was the reference to the communion wafer (or bread) as a “cracker.”

The wafer is the body of Jesus, in literal or symbolic terms.

“Cracker,” as any producer of reality TV like Trump knows, is a vulgar term for a poor white.

It is another way of saying “white trash.”

It is the equivalent of the word “nigger.”

In effect, Trump, the Sanhedrin’s shill, got on national TV and equated the crucified body of Jesus and his audience with a “cracker” (white trash).

And, irony, the “crackers” can’t have enough of him.

The equation of Jesus with trash has been made down the ages by certain Rabbis in dark passages in the Talmud.

It is the Sanhedrin’s fatal obsession.

Blinded by pride, they kick at the pricks to this day.

So when American Christians applaud Trump’s tomfoolery, they do it unaware that they are the punch-line.

But it gets better.

Donald Trump is not only a Judeophile, he has ethnic Jewish ancestry.

Please note that any ethnicity, in and of itself, is not a problem.

I draw attention to it only to show that it is no conspiracy at all to claim that the mouthpieces of the NWO cartel are nearly always either Jewish themselves or culturally emasculated tools.

Why that is so is a subject of some complexity and I cannot get into it here. I’m interested only in showing you what is really going on.

The Trump white Christian nationalist circus is not a dog-and-pony show. It’s a drag-show.

Trump’s daughter Ivanka is married to the Jewish publisher of The New York Observer and wealthy real-estate developer, Jared Kushner.

Ivanka (whose Czech mother is ex-wife Ivana) has converted to Judaism.

Trump’s son Eric is married to the Jewish producer of Inside Edition.

Trump’s sister is married to documentary producer, Jimmy Grau a former employee of the Trump organization.

Grau is identified as a Sephardic Jewish name.

Trump is not just the epitome of the crasser elements of the NY-Miami vice circuit.

He is half-Jewish, as are so many other Western leaders, from Angela Merket to Barack Obama.

Ancestry of Donald Trump

http://genealogy.about.com/od/famous_family_trees/p/trump.htm

By Kimberly Powell, About.com Guide”

A more succinct account below:

Donald’s father, Frederick Christ Trump, was born in New York, to German immigrants. Donald’s mother, Mary Anne (MacLeod), was Scottish, born in Stornoway, on the Isle of Lewis. Donald’s family’s surname was originally “Drumpf”.

Donald’s paternal grandfather was Friederich/Frederick Drumpf/Trump (the son of Christian Johannes Drumpf/Trump and Katherina Kober). Friederich was German, born in Kallstadt, Pfalz. Christian was the son of Johannes Trump/Drumpf and Susanna Maria Bechtloff. Katherina was the daughter of Johann Jakob Kober and Elisabeth Peter.

Donald’s paternal grandmother was Elizabeth Christ (the daughter of Christian Christ and Anna Maria Rathon). Elizabeth was German, born in Kallstadt, Pfalz.

Donald’s maternal grandfather was Malcolm/Calum Macleod (the son of Alexander Macleod and Anne Macleod). Malcolm was Scottish, born on the Isle of Lewis. Alexander was the son of William MacLeod and Catherine MacLeod. Anne was the daughter of Alexander Macleod and Ann Mackenzie.

Donald’s maternal grandmother was Mary Smith (the daughter of Donald Smith and Mary Macaulay/Macauley). Donald’s grandmother Mary was Scottish, born in Stornoway, on the Isle of Lewis. Donald Smith was the son of Duncan Smith and Henrietta MacQueen/McSwane. Donald’s great-grandmother Mary was the daughter of John Macaulay and Isabella Murray.

Sources: Genealogies of Donald Trump – http://www.geni.com
http://genealogy.about.com

A little research will reveal that on his father’s side,  Donald Trump has Ashkenazy Jewish ancestry.

His paternal grand-father Christian Drumpf (the German name was anglicized to Trump) was married to Katherine Kober.

Kober is a German Jewish  (Ashkenazy) occupational name derived from the Biblical name Jacob, aka Israel, the patriarch from whom Judahites descend.

Kober means basket-maker.

So Donald’s paternal great-grand-mother Katherine Kober was Jewish and so was her father.

Katherina Kober’s mother was Elizabeth Peter.

The name Peter – despite its use in the New Testament  –  is often used by Jews, including Rabbis.

And what of the mother of Christian Drumpf (Donald’s paternal great-grand-father)?

Christian Drumpf’s mother was Susanna Maria Bechtloff.

I couldn’t find anything about the name, but the name Becht appears as a Jewish name in the Central Zionist Archives for Romania at Ancestry.com.

Bechtel, moreover, is a very common Jewish name.

And Bechtloff could well be a contraction/corruption of Bechtel-ov (off) or  “son of Bechtel.”

Trump’s paternal grand-mother’s parents had the sur-names Christ and Rathon, also from the same area.

Both Christ, amazingly, and Rathon are Sephardic Jewish names.

As for Drumpf, this was the name of a family of wine-growers in the area as far back as 1600s.

Kallstadt is on the German wine-route in the Palatine-Rhineland area.

These Drumpfs (and the related Trumps) appear to be Trump’s ancestors and they descend from an itinerant lawyer Hans Drumpf who came to Kallstadt from elsewhere.

I cannot find anything on the Internet about the origins of the name “Drumpf” which is pronounced to rhyme with “oomph.”

On the other hand, the German name Trump is said to originate with the Middle High German Trumpe, meaning drum.

It could also come from the region Trampe in medieval Pomerania (now Brandenburg).

Trampe was an important name in the early rise of German nationalism.

A Willeke Von Trampe was a Pomeranian knight in the 13th century AD and the name appears prominently in important social and political developments. It originates from East Elbia in Prussia, that is from Prussian nobility.

Trump, Trumpf, and Trumph, and several other similar-looking names appear in avotaynu.com’s consolidated data-base of Jewish names.

These data-bases do include names used by non-Jews who intermarried with Jews, but the data from Jewish cemeteries is confined to Jews.

The name Trump, using the Jewish cemetery data, is not only German, it is Jewish.

But Drumpf doesn’t show up at all.

However, “itinerant lawyer” (Hans Drumpf) doesn’t sound like a  native agriculturalist to me.

Whatever the case, the area of Germany in which the Drumpfs, the Trumps/Trumpfs, the Peters, the Christs, the Rathons, the Bechtloffs,  and the Kobers lived – the Kallstadt, Pfalz – Rhineland-Palatinate area include the specifically Jewish communities of Mainz, Speyer and Worms.

These were centers of  Medieval Jewish life.

They were also centers of the Protestant Reformation.

The Sanhedrin – the Jewish elite – was deeply involved in the Reformation.

Even after the immigrant Drumpf/Trumpf/Trump family of wine-makers had prospered so greatly as to feel they were the cream of the countryside, they were seen by the local aristocracy as loud, coarse arrivistes.

Again, there is the suggestion in all this of an ethnic divide between the locals and the immigrants at Kallstadt.

Fast-forward a couple of centuries to the 1880s.

Now the Drumpfs, well-settled in Kallstadt, move on to the New World.

Donald Trump’s grandfather Friederich Drumpf comes to New York and works as a barber in the city.

Later, he moves out West and runs what is euphemistically called a restaurant. It is in the Yukon at the time of the gold rush.

All reports confirm that the place was in a sleazy part of town and involved the services of unsavory women.

The cold truth is that Fritz Drumpf ran brothels in Alaska (and elsewhere).  Very likely he was mixed up with the opium trade as well.

Whatever the exact nature of his business, Fritz Drumpf did get into some legal trouble over his businesses.

That’s why Trump makes a good elite mouth-piece for rants about illegal immigrants and crime.

His own background is enough to scuttle his credibility immediately.

It is also enough to permanently short-circuit any sensible discussion of immigration and crime.

If Drumpf  is a non-Jewish name, the change to the English version, Trump, can only be understood as a way to cover up his German origins.

But why the cover up, if  Trump was a German Presbyterian?

German Presbyterians are echt Americans. There was not much discrimination against them.

However,  there was discrimination against Jews, from Germany and from anywhere else.

And there were waves of immigration from Germany and Eastern Europe in the late 19th century.

Mostly this was due to economic hardship at home and reports of a booming American economy, especially in the 1880s, with the Gold Rush.

The Palatine-Pfalz area supplied a very high number of such immigrants so that in America there were complaints about the Germanification of whole neighborhoods by the immigrants.

Important German immigrants of the period included Heinz (of Ketchup fame) and Hellman (of Hellman’s Mayonnaise).

Many of the German immigrants were Jewish, but Jews were by no means always welcome in Christian lands.

They were kept out of work, for one thing.

The kind of business in which Drumpf finally landed up suggests that he had found it difficult to get into any other line of work.

That could suggest Jewish ethnicity.

Presidential hopeful, John Kerry, has a similar story.

Despite the Irish-sounding name, there is nothing Irish about “Kerry.”

The name was picked by random by his Austrian-Jewish father (Fritz Kohn) and his Hungarian-Jewish mother (Ida Lowe).

But in Trump’s case, Trump is already a name used by Jews.

So why would the non-Jewish ‘Drumpf’ be changed to the German and Jewish ‘Trump’?

Perhaps, because Trump sounded English and more suitable for English-speaking America.

Frederick Trump, the English-sounding “entrepreneur,” is better than the foreign-sounding Fritz Drumpf, the brothel-keeper and (alleged) opium-dealer.

Now what about Trump’s maternal line?

Jewishness is after all decided by maternal descent.

Trump’s mother, the wife of Fred Trump, was Mary Ann McLeod of the Outer Hebrides island of Lewis, near Scotland.

[The MacLeods of Lewis are said to have no relation to the Clan MacLeod of Scotland.]

Trump’s family line includes the Lewis MacLeods, the Mackenzies, the Macaulays and the Murrays.

Tracing back the crucial maternal line,we get:

Mary MacLeod  (Trump’s mother)

Mary Smith (Mary MacLeod’s mother)

Mary Macauley (Mary Smith’s mother)

Isabella Murray (Mary Macauley’s mother)

Beyond that, it gets difficult to find anything on the web.

However, according to an article in the Daily Mail, both Trump and Hillary Clinton are related through a royal Scottish ancestor of the McLeod line (for him) and the Rodham line, (for her):

“John of Gaunt, a royal in the 14th century, was the son of King Edward III and featured in the Shakespearean play Richard II, named after his nephew.

[Katherine] Swynford was at first Gaunt’s mistress, but they later married and their offspring were legitimized.

Gaunt’s children by [Katherine] Swynford include Trump’s 17th great-grandfather John Beaufort and Clinton’s 17th great-grandmother Joan Beaufort, according to MyHeritage.

The Duke of Lancaster’s son by his first wife Blanche, would later go on to become Henry IV. “

The Beauforts were a very wealthy and powerful family that gave its support to the House of Lancaster during the English War of the Roses.

It was out of that conflict that a relatively obscure scion of the Beauforts emerged to claim the throne of England – Henry Tudor.

The alliance of Donald Trump’s parents now makes perfect sense.

An Ashkenazy plutocrat of Prussian/Teutonic lineage, embedded in the highest levels of government and speculative finance, cemented his social position by marrying the impoverished descendant of England’s most storied royal house – the Tudors.

This lineage convincingly establishes Trump as a major spokesman of the New World Order, which is short-hand for describing the combined interests of the families of the banking/financial elites and the royal houses of Europe.

Trump is the essence of the Anglo-Zionist elite.

This is proved by Trump’s newly legitimized (and much publicized) Scottish coat-of-arms,which bears a double-eagle on the shield, representing the Scottish/Tudor (royal) and Prussian/Ashkenazi (Jewish/priestly) lines that combine in him.

It was from this twin elevation (of blood and money) that Trump made his  contemptuous reference to the “cracker” Jesus.

In doing so he called the body of Christ a lifeless idol (in contrast to his own priest-hood as an Ashkenazy) and low-class trash (in contrast to his own royal descent).

There’s your white nationalist Christian hero, America.

 

 

 

 

Sanatana Dharma Of Jesus

Christian Gospel (John 1:1) :

In the beginning was the Word

And the Word was with God

And the Word was God.

[Written circa 50-100 AD]

Indian Vedas:

Prajapatir vai idam agre asit
Tasya vag dviitiya asit
Vag vai paraman Brahman

In the beginning was Prajapati (Brahman)
With whom was the Word;
And the Word was verily Brahman.

[Lila: Brahman and Prajapati both mean God, the former in his utterly transcendent and immanent form and the latter in his form as creator of the world.]

(Krishna Yajurveda, Kathaka Samhita, 12.5, 27.1; Krishna Yajurveda, Kathakapisthala Samhita, 42.1; Jaiminiya Brahmana II, Samaveda, 2244

Approximate date: 1000-1200 BC, with a strong possibility from internal evidence, of being even earlier.

Chesterton On A World Of Untamed Virtues

G. K. Chesterton, the great Catholic writer, describes what happens when societies are re-engineered:

“The modern world is not evil; in some ways the modern world is far too good. It is full of wild and wasted virtues. When a religious scheme is shattered…it is not merely the vices that are let loose. The vices are, indeed, let loose, and they wander and do damage. But the virtues are let loose also; and the virtues wander more wildly, and the virtues do more terrible damage. The modern world is full of the old Christian virtues gone mad. The virtues have gone mad because they have been isolated from each other and are wandering alone. Thus some scientists care for truth; and their truth is pitiless. Thus some humanitarians only care for pity; and their pity (I am sorry to say) is often untruthful.”

How Many Church-Going Americans Are There?

I often think about that insightful statement I read somewhere to the effect that America is a nation of Indians under a ruling class of Swedes. (It’s actually from sociologist Peter Berger).

It got me thinking about how different the average American is from the way he/she is portrayed in Hollywood or in the mainstream media.  Church hardly figures in the media except as the object of raised-eyebrows and patronizing smiles, if not outright scorn.

But a large percentage of the population goes to church and goes regularly. One in five goes every single week-end.

That says something. I am a believing Christian but I go only a handful of times in a year, although there are reasons for my lack of attendance that probably don’t hold good for most people.

Anyway, here are the numbers:

Q: What’s the size of U.S. churches?
A: The median church in the U.S. has 75 regular participants in worship on Sunday mornings, according to the National Congregations Study (NCS) http://www.soc.duke.edu/natcong/ . Notice that researchers measured the median church size — the point at which half the churches are smaller and half the churches are larger — rather than the average (186 attenders reported by the USCLS survey http://www.uscongregations.org/charact-cong.htm ), which is larger due to the influence of very large churches. But while the United States has a large number of very small churches, most people attend larger churches. The National Congregations Study estimated that the smaller churches draw only 11 percent of those who attend worship. Meanwhile, 50 percent of churchgoers attended the largest 10% of congregations (350 regular participants and up).
Want to know more? Check the websites for the National Congregations Study (NCS) at http://www.soc.duke.edu/natcong/ The US Congregational Life Survey (USCLS) website has statistics about congregations by religious traditions at http://www.uscongregations.org/ The Faith Communities Today national study of churches www.faithcommunitiestoday.org 2010 study also contains size and other congregational findings.

Approximate Distribution of U.S. Protestant and Other Christian Churches by size *based on NCS study
(excluding Catholic/Orthodox)

ATTENDANCE # OF CHURCHES WEEKLY WORSHIPERS PERCENT

7-99

177,000

  9 million 59%

100-499

105,000

25 million 35%

500-999

12,000

  9 million 4%

1,000-1,999

6,000

  8 million 2%

2,000-9,999

1,170

  4 million .4%

10,000-plus

40

  .7 million .01%

TOTALS

approx. 300,000

approx. 56 million 100%

 

upQ: How many people go to church each Sunday?
A: For years, the Gallup Research Organization has come up with a consistent figure — 40 percent of all Americans, or roughly 118 million people, who said they attended worship on the previous weekend. Recently, sociologists of religion have questioned that figure, saying Americans tend to exaggerate how often they attend. By actually counting the number of people who showed up at representative sample of churches, two researchers, Kirk Hadaway and Penny Marler found that only 20.4 percent of the population, or half the Gallup figure, attended church each weekend.
As added proof for the accuracy of this smaller percentage of churchgoers, if 20.4% of Americans (approximately 63 million in 2010) attended the nation’s 350,000 congregations weekly then the average attendance would be 180 people per congregation which is almost exactly the figure that numerous research studies have found.”

Fall Of Jerusalem Was Biblical “End-Times”

Christian Zionists need to study Biblical prophecies in the light of 1st century politics in the Roman Empire, rather than 21st century politics under the American empire.

If they did, they would quickly realize that the textual and historical evidence points overwhelmingly to the Fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD as the “end-time” and “Day of the Lord.”

From Preterist Central.com:

Let’s survey some of the many passages whose characters and events tie the second coming to the fall of Jerusalem. 

Gen. 49:1, 10“And Jacob called unto his sons, and said, Gather yourselves together, that I may tell you that which shall befall you in the last days…the scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.” 

This passage, spoken by the patriarch Jacob upon his deathbed, ties the “last days” to events bound up with Biblical Israel and the coming of Christ. Since the “last days” are tethered by this prophecy to Biblical Israel, when the nation terminated and ceased to exist so did the last days.     Indeed, the “last days” are coterminous with the last end and closing days of the Jewish state. Jacob does not directly describe the destruction of the Jewish nation, but his saying “what will befall you in the last days” certainly carries ominous overtones suggesting that event. In saying that the monarchical power would not depart from Judah until Shiloh (Christ) had come, Jacob alludes to the political end and existence of the nation. With the appearance of Christ, a new dynasty and world epoch would begin, in which the government would devolve upon Christ, who now reigns [sic] earth’s nations from his throne in heaven. In transferring the government to heaven, Christ removed the mantel of authority from national Israel upon earth. And since the Jews murdered Christ and persecuted his church, Jesus sent and destroyed the nation by the armies of Rome.

Num. 24:14-25 – “And now, behold, I go to my people: come therefore, and I will advertise thee what this people shall do to thy people in the latter days…I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but now nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab and destroy all the children of Sheth. And Edom shall be a possession, Seir also shall be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly.”

This is Balaam’s prophecy of events that would occur in the latter days. Like Jacob’s prophecy, Christ was to appear in the latter days while Biblical Israel still existed. Jesus is referred to under the imagery of a “Star” and “Sceptre,” and “he that shall have dominion.”     Christ’s “possessing Edom and Seir” should be compared with the prophecy of Amos about the restored tabernacle (house/throne) of David, “that they may possess the remnant of Edom” (Amos 9:11, 12). James said the prophecy of Amos was fulfilled in the apostles’ day, as Christ reigned from heaven and the Gentiles came into the church (Acts 15:16, 17). As Balaam’s prophecy treats of the same events, it too was fulfilled in the first century. The last prediction in Balaam’s prophecy states (Num. 24:24):

“And ships shall come from Chittim and shall afflict Asshur, and shall afflict Eber, and he also shall perish for ever.”

The prophet Daniel mentions “Chittim” in a context that makes unmistakable reference to Rome (Dan. 11:30), and is witnessed by the Septuagint version of the Qumran community and the Vulgate in this place, both of which render “Chittim” “Romans.”[1]     “Asshur” is Assyria and represented the extreme eastern border of the Roman Empire. “Eber” was the forebear of Abraham (Gen. 10:21; 11:17, 26), and is believed to be the root of the word “Hebrew.” In saying “he also shall perish for ever,” Balaam’s prophecy becomes the first direct prediction the A.D. 70 destruction of Jerusalem by Rome. Spiritual Israel (the church) would do valiantly and conquer the world, but national Israel would be destroyed.”

200-Yr-Old Body Of Monk Defies Decomposition

From The Siberian Times:

A mummified monk found in the lotus position in Mongolia is ‘not dead’ and is instead one stage away from becoming a real-life Buddha, it has been claimed.

Forensic examinations are under way on the amazing remains, which are believed to be around 200 years old, having been preserved in animal skin. But one expert has insisted the human relic is actually in ‘very deep meditation’ and in a rare and very special spiritual state known as ‘tukdam’.

Over the last 50 years there are said to have been 40 such cases in India involving meditating Tibetan monks.

Dr Barry Kerzin, a famous Buddhist monk and a physician to the Dalai Lama, said: ‘I had the privilege to take care of some meditators who were in a tukdam state.

‘If the person is able to remain in this state for more than three weeks – which rarely happens – his body gradually shrinks, and in the end all that remains from the person is his hair, nails, and clothes. Usually in this case, people who live next to the monk see a rainbow that glows in the sky for several days. This means that he has found a ‘rainbow body’. This is the highest state close to the state of Buddha’.

He added: ‘If the meditator can continue to stay in this meditative state, he can become a Buddha. Reaching such a high spiritual level the meditator will also help others, and all the people around will feel a deep sense of joy’.

Initial speculation is that the mummy could be a teacher of Lama Dashi-Dorzho Itigilov.

Born in 1852, Dashi-Dorzho Itigilov was a Buryat Buddhist Lama of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, best known for the lifelike state of his body.

Mummified monk is ‘not dead’ and in rare meditative state, says expert


 


Ganhugiyn Purevbata, who is the founder and professor of the Mongolian Institute of Buddhist Art at Ulaanbaatar Buddhist University, said: ‘Lama is sitting in the lotus position vajra, the left hand is opened, and the right hand symbolizes of the preaching Sutra.

‘This is a sign that the Lama is not dead, but is in a very deep meditation according to the ancient tradition of Buddhist lamas’.

The mummified remains, which were covered in cattle skin, were found on January 27 in the Songinokhairkhan province of Mongolia.

However, there is more to the story and now police have revealed that the monk had been stolen from another part of the country and was about to be sold off.

An unnamed official said that it was taken from a cave in the Kobdsk region by a man who then hid it in his own home in Ulaanbaatar.

He had then been planning to sell it on the black market at a ‘very high price’, with local media claiming he wanted to take it over the Mongolian border. Police uncovered the plot and quickly arrested a 45-year-old, named only as Enhtor.

According to Article 18 of the Criminal Code of Mongolia smuggling items of cultural heritage are punishable with either a fine of up to 3million roubles ($43,000) or between five and 12 years in prison. The monk is now being guarded at the National Centre of Forensic Expertise at Ulaanbaatar.”

Rabbi’s Shemitah Prophecy Is NWO Fraud

Some Christian web-sites are skeptical of Jonathan Cahn’s Shemitah theory and his attempt to make America the duplicate of ancient Israel:

The Berean Call says:

This imposed Shemitah judgment was very specific and involved  only the nation of Israel . Since no Gentile nations were ever obligated to keep the Shemitah, there is no scriptural basis for suggesting that any other nation would ever experience an imposed Shemitah judgment. Yet, this is precisely what Jonathan Cahn suggests that America has experienced.

Cahn also wrongly implies that the Shemitah is essentially a universal  principle  that is somehow integrated into the order of the universe. Cahn makes the following assertion in his book:

[KAPLAN] “Seven years—the biblical period of time that concerns a nation’s financial and economic realms.” [This and all quotes are taken from: Jonathan Cahn,  The Harbinger  (Lake Mary, FL: Frontline, Charisma Media/Charisma House Book Group, 2011)]

Although Israel was on a seven-year economic cycle, no biblical passages support Cahn’s idea that natural economic cycles of seven years exist for nations in general. Furthermore, financial experts have not identified any seven-year economic cycle. —http://www.thebereancall.org/content/october-2014-extra-shemitah

If anything happens during The Shemitah (September 2015), it’s not because of God and a connection to Isaiah 9:10, it’s because the Freemasons who control this world are pushing the buttons and they are making things happen (in cycles of 7 as it’s a ‘magic’ number) for their own purposes to further the progress of a New World Order.”

Israeli Rabbi: Jewish Messiah Arriving Sept. 12, 2015

From Breaking Israel News:

After a lifetime of immersing himself in classical Jewish texts, Rabbi Kanievsky’s study partner informed various media sites that the Rabbi is talking about the messiah “all the time.” Since last summer’s war in Gaza, the Rabbi has been spreading this message of imminent return…….

When asked about the timing of the Messiah’s arrival, Rabbi Kanievsky answered, “At the end of the Sabbatical year.” Several people have asked the Rabbi to verify this and he has given the same answer each time. This year is the Sabbatical year and it will be ending on the 29th day of Elul, which, by the Gregorian calendar falls on Saturday, September 12, 2015.

In answer to Rabbi Kanievsky’s call, the Jews of France have begun to arrive in Israel in blessed droves. The impetus is certainly a reaction to increasing anti-Semitic and Islamic fueled violence across Europe……

Last year, 7,000 French Jews made aliyah to Israel, making it the number one country of origin for new immigrants. The Jewish Agency and the Ministry for Aliyah and Immigrant Absorption are expecting more than 3,000 French Jews to immigrate to Israel this summer alone, many of them families with children who want to arrive and integrate before the beginning of the school year.

It should be noted that it is considered a positive trait to always be anticipating the Messiah. The Chofetz Chaim, Rabbi Yisrael Meir Kagan, a great Torah sage, is  told to have said that any time he heard a loud noise, he would say, “Perhaps the Messiah has arrived?” Similar stories have also been told of the leading Moroccan Kabbalist, the Baba Sali, Rabbi Israel Abuhaseira.”
Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/44534/leading-israeli-rabbi-messiah-imminent-jewish-world/#gZQFjwYySQ88p6ii.99

Bloomsbury’s Creed: Cheap Money & Cheap Morals

Nearly every ideology that has corrupted modern life, from the destruction of the economy by the uninhibited printing of money to the articulation of the one-world state, was propagated by a circle of intellectuals in late 19th – early 20th century Britain called the Bloomsbury Circle.

In his conservative classic,“Keynes at Harvard,” Zygmund Dobbs describes how  Bloomsbury master-minded every corrupt trend in the former colonies of the British empire.

Thereafter, their economic and moral enslavement would proceed apace, despite ostensible “independence,” without much serious opposition:

The works of Keynes, Lytton Strachey, and Bertrand Russell have been, and are today, required reading in almost every college and university in the United States and Canada.

[Note: There were other Bloomsbury icons, including Leonard and Virginia Wolf (literature and philosophy, structure of world government); Havelock Ellis (social psychology, public health);  G. E. Moore (philosophy, language); G.L. Dickinson (literary criticism); George Bernard Shaw (literature, cultural criticism); Walter Lippman (media, politics);John Dewey (philosophy, education), and many more.]

From “Keynes at Harvard”:

In the spring of 1905 Keynes and his lavender cohorts had been thrilled by a conference of Russian revolutionaries in London. British Fabians and Joseph Fels, an American soap manufacturer who was also a Fabian, had financed the Russian gathering and furnished them a hall in a Christian church. Key revolutionaries at this London conference included Nikolai Lenin, Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. The future slaughter of fifty million civilians, and the conquest of one-third of the earth’s surface. rested within the shelter of this gathering. Shivers of excitement rippled down the spines of the socialist homosexuals when they heard that Lenin had openly defended the slaughter of bank guards and stealing of bank funds for the bolshevik coffers. During this time Strachey wrote to one of his intimates: “At this moment Keynes is lying on a rug beside me.”

……..During March of 1917 he [Keynes] confided privately that he supported the bolshevik group among the Russian socialists after the overthrow of Czar Nicholas.

The seizure of power by the bolsheviks in November of 1917 elated Keynes and the rest of the Fabian coterie. At Leftist parties in London, Keynes and his fellow perverts celebrated by dressing in women’s clothes and performing lewd dances. He had as his consort an eighteen-year-old-boy who was ensconced as his assistant in the Treasury Department.

Just before the Bolshevik Revolution, Keynes had made a hurried trip to the United States for the British Government. Here he had a chance to make contact with the American Fabians who were similarly entrenched, via the Frankfurter-Lippmann group, in key positions of the Wilson Administration……

Keynes’ deviate socialist circle was almost completely pro-bolshevik. One month after the Revolution, J.M. Keynes wrote his mother”

“Well, the only course open to me is to be buoyantly bolshevik; and as I lie in bed in the morning I reflect with a good deal of satisfaction that, because our rulers are as incompetent as they are mad and wicked, one particular era of a particular kind of civilization is very nearly over.”

On February 22, 1918, Keynes proudly boasted of “being a bolshevik.” Yet the British Government blindly sent Keynes to the Versailles peace talks. There he joined forces with his Fabian American comrade, Walter Lippmann, who was among those representing the equally blind U.S. Government. The ensuing pro-bolshevik and anti-American machinations were largely responsible not only for laying the basis for continuing Red victories, but also for setting off the chain of events that eventually brought Hitler to power.

In 1919 Keynes authored The Economic Consequences Of The Peace, which was promptly acclaimed from Moscow by Nikolai Lenin, himself. The Red dictator declared: “Nowhere has the Versailles treaty been described so well as in the book by Keynes.” A special edition of The Economic Consequences was printed under the label of the Fabian Society; and, Frankfurter and Lippmann brought the manuscript to the United States and arranged with Harcourt and Brace to publish it here. The volume became required reading among American socialists and Communists.

However, Keynes’ value as a hidden Red was in danger. The Fabians had developed the posture of “respectability” to a fine art and the value of Keynes’ book as an “impartial work” was in jeopardy. With Keynes’ future usefulness in upper-class circles at stake, Lenin had personally come to the rescue. He pulled the classic Leftist double-twist, praising Keynes’ book as a model for Communist revolutionaries and at the same time covering for Keynes by labeling him as “anti-bolshevik.” Nikolai Lenin rose before the Second Congress of the Communist International and declared:

“I will quote another economic source which assumes particularly great significance, the British diplomat Keynes, the author of The Economic Consequences Of The Peace, who on the instructions of his government, took part in the Versailles peace negotiations, watched them directly from the purely bourgeois point of view, studied the subject step by step, and took part in the conference as an economist. He arrived at conclusions which are stronger, more striking and more instructive than any a Communist revolutionary could advance, because they are conclusions drawn by an acknowledged bourgeois….”

Thus was launched the career of Fabian leader Keynes as a “non-Leftist” and “non-Communist.” continued apace…..

[The Fabian socialists were preoccupied with ] sadistic beating of young boys, “compulsive pre-occupation with male reproductive and excretory organs” and voyages to the most depraved dens of perversion throughout Europe, North Africa and Asia.

The Fabian homosexual circle was incredibly successful in gaining influence and control in a wide area of activity. They staked out the entire British Empire and the United States as well. Lytton Strachey wrote to Keynes:

Oh dear me!, when will my heaven be realized? – My Castle in Spain? Rooms, you know, for you, Duncan and Swithin, as fixtures – Woolf of course, too, if we can lure him from Ceylon; and several suites for guests. Can you conceive anything more supreme! I should write tragedies; you would revolutionize political economy, Swithin would compose French poetry, Duncan would paint our portraits in every conceivable combination and permutation, and Woolf would criticize us and our works without remorse.”

This projection was incredibly prophetic. J. M. Keynes became the mastermind behind the economic structure of British and American socialism. Strachey was responsible for writing books that undermined the Christian ethic of the Nineteenth Century and set the tone for the pornographic and depraved literature of today. Leonard Woolf worked out the details of the socialist drive for World Government. He was not only the architect of the League of Nations but outlined the structure of the United Nations.

Others of this perverted group of Keynesians have set the tone in art, music, education, and religion. Today [1971], alas, even the President of the United States says: “I am now a Keynesian in economics.”