Nanny-Gate Architect Believer In Global Al Qaeda Threat

The diplomat who was behind the Sangeeta Richard “slave-nanny” case has some highly relevant views:

Here are Mr. Wayne May’s own words

“For the immediate future, terrorism will remain a major transnational problem, driven by continued ethnic, religious, nationalist, separatist, political, and economic reasons.Terrorism based on extremism, especially that which is supported by designate terrorist states like Iran and organizations such as Al Qaeda, remains the primary threat to American interests around the world. and missile proliferation, especially with regard to chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons and missile delivery systems, will continue to be a major concern for the United States as well.

“In addition, growing humanitarian issues—which can drive extremism and conflict—will continue to concern the United States. My role as a DS Agent is to monitor and understand these trends so I can be proactive against the threats that we are facing today and ready for the threats of tomorrow.”

If this is not a smoking-gun statement, I don’t know what is.
Here are all the ingredients that go to make a good, red-blooded “liberventionist” of the type that produces a jolly old color revolution, in which entire continents get destabilized, economies destroyed, and tens of thousands of people displaced, injured or killed, so that bureaucrats can calmly move pins around on a map and fulfill quotas to expand their department empires.

1. He believes in an over-arching global terror threat posed by a singular outfit called Al Qaeda, ranging around the entire world, undetected by the NSA and its galaxy of spy programs.
2. He believes Iran is a terror state.

3.He has global humanitarian concerns.So has Soros and the entire CIA, see Tony Cartalucci, Land Destroyer Blog.

4. He wants to be proactive to stop terror. Would that be proactive as in Rumsfeld’s P2OG (Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group)?

Intelligence Caper To Destabilize India Undone

So here we have the principals:

Sangeeta Richard, a Syrian

(Correction: I went back and checked and I cannot find evidence that she was a Syrian Christian. She is from Kerala and Christians there can be either Syrian Christian, Latin Christian or CSI).

the Kerala Christian maid whose in-laws once worked for a senior US diplomat – that would likely be Wayne May, who is a member of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, which is the security and law enforcement arm of the US Department of State.

Let that sink it.

Sangeeta Richard’s immediate family was working for the USD security detail in India (and other members were working for the US embassy) when SHE APPROACHED Khobragade to get a job in 2012.

It was she who REQUESTED THAT MONEY BE DEPOSITED IN INDIA, which is the reason the second contract was drawn up.

Devyani K. drew it up at Sangeeta’s request.

Sangeeta had always wanted to emigrate to the US. That is documented.

Sangeeta [at least, from the diary that was published] was just fine with her work at the Khobragade’s.

Then,  Wayne May, colluding with officials of the State Dept (of which he is a part) and with lawyers from Safe-Horizon (which is funded by the US government and US corporations) concocted a case that turned the investigation against Khobragade.

The Indian court that looked into the charges of extortion was ignored and the maid was “evacuated” out of India,  fraudulently using Indian tax law exemptions intended for diplomats.

Meanwhile, Preet Bharara, also a part of the Democrat political machinery and a politically ambitious “fixer” who has ignored the serious crimes of the big banks in favor of low-hanging dark-skinned fruit (Rajat Gupta, for sure; Matthew Martoma, quite likely), gets in on the act.

This is clear from his outrageous use of the word “evacuate” to describe the plot to spirit Sangeeta out of India.

Then, there’s the illegality of the arrest, first, because it turns out that DK actually had full immunity at the time;

second, because diplomatic protocol under the Vienna Convention argues against it;

third, because if the contract shown to the Visa office was a fraud, the visa office is fully complicit in the fraud, since it knows the salaries of Indian diplomats and Indian maids and has OK’d many such contracts;

and fourth, because under UN terms, maids traveling on official passports given by lawful governments cannot by definition be trafficked.

The only unusual aspect of the matter was the second contract, which was drawn up expressly at the instigation of the maid, which, in the circumstances, makes the whole affair a text-book entrapment.

If we add to all this, the simultaneous tour of sensitive areas in India by Safe-Horizon’s chief; her liaising with media in those same sensitive regions; and the USG’s advocacy of software -sharing with India, it  is an easy guess that the whole Khobragade scandal was planned to coincide with the high-profile corporate “modern slavery” campaign, yet another episode in the ongoing Rothschild/Soros-funded  “color revolution” in India.

Anti-Terrorism Boss Behind Fake Slave Case Expelled From India

Didn’t I spot this for a a set-up and an intelligence psyop as soon as it broke? Yes, I did.

(In comments here and here and here . See below post for actual comments made at EPJ on this).

Now, bingo, here’s our man – a meddlesome anti-terrorist (read, neocon) turns out to be chief hatcher of the slave-nanny psyop plot:

Regional security officer Wayne May, who has been asked to leave India, was the coordination officer of the India-US anti-terrorism assistance programme and a special agent of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the division of the US State Department that is also the complainant against Khobragade in the New York case.

New Delhi believes May and his wife, Alicia Muller May, who too is a diplomat and is posted at the US Embassy as a Community Liaison Officer, were central to the entire issue of evacuating domestic help Sangeeta Richard’s family and the action against Khobragade.

Wayne, who has put in over 27 years of service in the US government and managed the more than 420 security staff and investigative officers at the mission in New Delhi, was the main liaison to Indian police agencies for high profile visits from the US and was the coordinator from the American side to the anti-terrorism assistance programme.

The expulsion, sources said, was ordered as India had “reasons to believe the diplomat is closely involved in the processes relating to the case and the subsequent unilateral action by the US”.

– See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/us-diplomat-told-to-go-back-had-helped-nannys-family-leave/#sthash.v842KZb4.dpuf

The senior US diplomat expelled by India Friday allegedly played a central role in the case against IFS officer Devyani Khobragade in New York as well as the evacuation of her domestic help’s family to the US last month.

Regional security officer Wayne May, who has been asked to leave India, was the coordination officer of the India-US anti-terrorism assistance programme and a special agent of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the division of the US State Department that is also the complainant against Khobragade in the New York case.

New Delhi believes May and his wife, Alicia Muller May, who too is a diplomat and is posted at the US Embassy as a Community Liaison Officer, were central to the entire issue of evacuating domestic help Sangeeta Richard’s family and the action against Khobragade.

Wayne, who has put in over 27 years of service in the US government and managed the more than 420 security staff and investigative officers at the mission in New Delhi, was the main liaison to Indian police agencies for high profile visits from the US and was the coordinator from the American side to the anti-terrorism assistance programme.

The expulsion, sources said, was ordered as India had “reasons to believe the diplomat is closely involved in the processes relating to the case and the subsequent unilateral action by the US”.

As an officer of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Wayne was also allegedly coordinating with his counterparts in New York who had filed the official complaint of trafficking against Khobragade.

Sources said India had initially thought of taking action against Alicia, a diplomat of the first secretary rank, as she had allegedly used her privileges to buy tax-exempted air tickets for the husband and children of Richard who left on trafficking visas.

This, sources said, was illegal as only diplomats and their families are eligible for the tax exemption.

However, New Delhi subsequently decided that “reciprocal action” should be taken against a diplomat of the same rank as Khobragade, resulting in the notice to the US to withdraw Wayne, who is a consular level officer.

Wayne, who has served in the Diplomatic Security Bureau since 1988, has worked in Thailand, Colombia, Niger, Singapore and Greece before being posted to India in 2010. He was in charge of the entire security and investigation team in India that included a “deput

– See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/us-diplomat-told-to-go-back-had-helped-nannys-fa

mily-leave/#sthash.Ex9bTStw.dpuf

MY EARLIEST COMMENT THAT THIS WAS A PSYOP WAS AT ECONOMIC POLICY JOURNAL: ON DECEMBER 21, ALTHOUGH I SENSED IT RIGHT AT THE OUTSET.

  1. @Heath

    Actually, the diplomat is from the lowest rank – a Dalit, what used to be called Untouchable.
    That is precisely why she was chosen, since the banking cartel (Rothschild related) work WITH older families, higher castes, who have traditionally aligned themselves with foreign interests over Indian ones.

    For eg. the Tatas, now so respectable, made their money through the opium trade and the addiction and impoverishment of the Asian masses. The Tatas worked then and now with the Rothschilds, who also made money in the opium trade in India.

    Bharara, a Sikh (a community at odds with Indian interests over the years), has a Jewish wife, incidentally, and his brother’s business was bought out by Amazon for hundreds of millions of dollars. He’s also deeply embedded in the NY and NJ Democrat political machinery, through his work with Chuck Schumer

    Perhaps because of this, he has avoided going after any major wrong-doers on Wall Street (except for Cotzein), and has gone after patsies. Even with the non-patsy, SAC, he avoided going after major wrong-doing, and just slapped a fine on it for insider-trading, a marginal issue. He is seen as a grand-stander and politically ambitious, as well as rather unscrupulous (duh).

    The Devyani story seems to be an intelligence pysop, just like the Rajat Gupta affair. Gupta, was a patsy thrown to the wolves to save Blankfein’s skin at Goldman Sachs, because of his status as a director at McKinsey, the firm most responsible for outsourcing American jobs, which had nothing to do with the financial crisis, but made Gupta a good target in a time of job loss and xenophobia.

    More crucially, Gupta was a power player in the rise of the Indian lobby in DC and of South Asia in the financial world, which the banking cartel wanted to curb, thus again making him a ripe target.

    I believe Devyani’s targeting is similarly political. It is part of a pattern of targeting the Indian Foreign Service, the elite cadre of the civil service.

    This group is actually LESS corrupt than others. And the civil service itself is less corrupt (at least until the last few years) than the larger group of politicians.

    The targeting of the IFS would make India less effective in diplomatic circles.

    Why do I suspect an intel psyop?

    There has been a history of CIA infiltration into India, especially in recent years.
    The maid’s family worked for the US embassy. She was interested in getting a more permanent visa to the US than the one she got through her employment with the diplomat, who from the account of the maid’s own daughter, treated her well. The maid is a Christian convert from a highly unionized state (Kerala) with a strong communist and Christian (Zionist Christian) influence.

    The maid tried to extort and blackmail the diplomat, who filed a case against her in India,

    Instead of letting that case take its course, the USG along with a NY NGO interfered in the judiciary in India, by spiriting the maid out of the country, and giving her and her family different visas – very strange behavior in the circumstances.

    All this happened over the months leading up to the arrest of the diplomat and while the Indian gvt was keeping the US gvt informed, the US gvt appeared to be conspiring with the maid to arrest the diplomat, along with the human-trafficking NGO, Safe Horizon, whose Board of Advisers gives the game away – it’s all big bank (Rothschild-related -JP Morgan, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, UBS and so on).

    Safe Horizon is a prominent New York NGO, working closely with the NY government and therefore probably quite close to NY AG Preet Bharara, who was the lawyer in the Gupta case too.

    http://www.safehorizon.org/index/about-us-1/board-of-directors-88.html

‘Further comments at EPJ:

From ZeeNews:

8:15 pm: Was US govt aware of whereabouts of Khobragade’s maid?

Even though the US government feigned ignorance, it may have been aware about the whereabouts of Sangeeta Richard, the maid of Indian Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade who is at the centre of a diplomatic row.

Indicative of this is that Sangeeta’s father-in-law is believed to be working in the US Embassy here.

Sources said the mother-in-law of the maid was also known to the American government as she had worked with a senior diplomat of the US Embassy here.

Besides these, Sangeeta’s husband Philip, a driver with Mozambique Embassy here, was given visa to travel to the US easily and quickly.

Indian government wonders whether all the requirements for grant of visa to him were fulfilled, particularly those related to adequate salary and financial deposits in his bank account. – PTI

More:

7:10 pm: US committed visa fraud: India

India today said its Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade was trapped in a “conspiracy” and accused US of a fraud by granting a visa to the family of her absconding maid.

“She is innocent… It is not the illegality that she (Khobragade) is accused of, but the illegality she refused to oblige,” External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid told Parliament.

Khurshid further said Americans facilitated a visa fraud even after being told by India that there was a risk of illegal immigration by Sangeeta and her family.

6:15 pm: Maid’s family flew to NY on Dec 10

Devyani Khobragade’s absconding maid Sangeeta Richard’s family flew to New York on December 10, just two days before the diplomat’s arrest, government sources said.

Also, India was in touch with the US since June after the official passport of the maid was cancelled and subsequently told about the anti-injunction suit order by an Indian court, they added.

5:40 pm: India freezes diplomatic perks for US consulates

Reply

Opinion in India is completely against the USG’s action on this. Don’t be fooled by so-called Indian comments supporting the action on Indian sites. These are almost hundred percent spurious comments by fake persona, intelligence plants or brainwashed commie students. Most Indians are too poor to spend time blogging and commenting and the net is not always up.

India’s English language media is OWNED by the West and tries to steer public opinion on gay rights, female empowerment and such, by the twitterati. Here’s the ownership structure.

Who owns the media in India ?

There are several major publishing groups in India, the most prominent
among them being the Times of India Group, the Indian Express Group, the
Hindustan Times Group, The Hindu group, the Anandabazar Patrika Group, the Eenadu Group, the Malayalam Manorama Group, the Mathrubhumi group, the Sahara group, the Bhaskar group, and the Dainik Jagran group.

Let us see the ownership of different media agencies.

NDTV: A very popular TV news media is funded by Gospels of Charity in Spain that supports Communism. Recently it has developed a soft corner towards Pakistan because Pakistan President has allowed only this channel to be aired in Pakistan. Indian CEO Prannoy Roy is co-brother of Prakash Karat, General Secretary of Communist party of India.His wife and Brinda Karat are sisters.

India Today which used to be the only national weekly which supported BJP is now bought by NDTV!! Since then the tone has changed drastically and turned into Hindu bashing.

CNN-IBN: This is 100 percent funded by Southern Baptist Church with its
branches in all over the world with HQ in US. The Church annually allocates
$800 million for promotion of its channel. Its Indian head is Rajdeep
Sardesai and his wife Sagarika Ghosh.

Times group list: Times Of India, Mid-Day, Nav-Bharth Times, Stardust , Femina, Vijaya Times,Vijaya Karnataka, Times now (24- hour news channel) and many more. Times Group is owned by Bennet & Coleman. ‘World Christian Council’ does 80 percent of the Funding, and an Englishman and an Italian equally share balance 20 percent. The Italian Robertio Mindo is a close relative of Sonia Gandhi.

Star TV: It is run by an Australian, Robert Murdoch, who is supported by St. Peters Pontificial Church Melbourne.

Hindustan Times: Owned by Birla Group, but hands have changed since Shobana Bhartiya took over. Presently it is working in Collaboration with Times Group.

The Hindu: English daily, started over 125 years has been recently taken over by Joshua Society, Berne, Switzerland. N.Ram’s wife is a Swiss national.

Indian Express: Divided into two groups. The Indian Express and new Indian Express (southern edition) .ACTS Christian Ministries have major stake in the Indian Express and latter is still with the Indian counterpart.

Eeenadu: Still to date controlled by an Indian named Ramoji Rao. Ramoji Rao is connected with film industry and owns a huge studio in Andhra Pradesh.

Andhra Jyothi: The Muslim party of Hyderabad known as MIM along with a
Congress Minister has purchased this Telugu daily very recently.

The Statesman: It is controlled by Communist Party of India. Kairali TV: It
is controlled by Communist party of India (Marxist)

Mathrubhoomi: Leaders of Muslim League and Communist leaders have major investment.

Asian Age and Deccan Chronicle: Is owned by a Saudi Arabian Company with its chief Editor M.J. Akbar.

The ownership explains the control of media in India by foreigners. The
result is obvious.

  1. I am sure that if Laura Bush had had her rectum probed it would be a big problem and people would speak up, far more than if Jane Blow had hers. That’s normal, not hypocrisy.
    Plenty of Indians have spoken up about abusive treatment of ordinary people in India and elsewhere.
    But I guess racists like Tony wouldn’t know because they don’t read anything except what’s written by fellow whites in English, right?

    Firstpost World

    Time we returned the insult to US liberally by R Jagannathan Dec 18, 2013

    The despicable treatment of Devyani Khobragade, Indian Deputy Consul general in New York, should be another wake up call for India and talk-circuit liberals….

    We should not take such affronts lying down anymore. In a limited sense, the transgressions of US minimum wages law by Khobragade will draw the usual Indian liberal nonsense: if we are in contravention of their law, we are the guilty party….

    . Our general assumption that the US law enforcers are merely doing their duty is rubbish. If alleged violation of US visa laws by Infosys can be settled with a fine, why couldn’t the US have done so for Khobragade? Or is a woman diplomat fair game for US law enforcers?

    Indians are the most gullible goops in the world when it comes to discerning the difference between an honest effort to implement the law and using laws to project power and blackmail other countries. The American government is the most sophisticated legally illegal enterprise in the world when it comes to dealing with people from other countries…..//

    The truth is American agencies have sophisticated ways of using their laws against foreigners to defend their interests. Their laws may oppose torture, so they will use Guantanamo Bay to for torture and waterboarding against prisoners. President Obama vowed to shut it down, but Guantanamo is still around.

    Even if it is shut, they will ask allies in brutal Africa or Thailand to do their dirty work. Americans are forbidden by their own laws to indulge is assassinations abroad, but Obama has converted the CIA into a killing machine. Two years ago, they killed one of their own nationals – Anwar al-Awlaki, for example – because of his alleged terror links (not proven in a court of law). The Americans regularly use drones against civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan and South Yemen on the plea that one among them may be a terrorist.

    To have plausible deniability, they even use private surveillance and security agencies as surrogate CIA agents. (Read Mark Mazzetti’s eyeopening book, The Way of the Knife, to get a glimpse into this). Their freedom of religion laws will be used against the one country which actually allows everyone to practice and propagate his religion (India), but top allies like Saudi Arabia will get a free pass on this law. America will swear by free markets to lobby for Wal-mart, but will not recognise freedom for labour movement. Is free enterprise only about the movement of capital and not other factors of production?

    The Americans practice sophisticated racism. Thus they will use a Preet Bharara to target Khobragade (or Rajat Gupta or Raj Rajaratnam) so that it looks like Indian-Americans are implementing the law, and hence not racist, but the same laws will not be used to humiliate the Hispanics or Afro-Americans or the Saudis or American icons like the late Steve Jobs or to convict Richard Nixon or Bill Clinton.

    (Read the comments on a Washington Post story on Preet Bharara, where the commenter accuses Bharara of not following up on the alleged misdemeanours of some pillars of the American judicial establishment.)

    Reply

Corrupt Fat-Cat NGO Behind “Slave-Nanny” Fraud

The truth about the corrupt, crony-corporate NGO, backed by the US government, big corporations and banks that rakes in $56 million dollars a year, yet begs for money constantly and can’t find enough victims for its services:

“Safe Horizon’s financial statement for the year 2012 reveals that the NGO invested over $10,500,000 (Over `65 Crore) in bonds, mutual funds and shares. The NGO which claims to work in areas like domestic violence, criminal justice and human trafficking is funded by big corporates like AGT International, AVON, US government agencies, Philips Van Heusen Corporation and Capital One Bank.

Its expenditures are more intriguing including an average $161,000 or `1 Crore on lobbying every year. It pays its high flying CEO more than $339,000 or `2 crore per annum. A US based group Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (SAVE) claimed money paid by Safe Horizon is more than what a member of the US House of Representative receives as annual salary.

The federal government spends $1 billion a year for programmes to curb domestic violence. But these programmes lack accountability and transparency, giving rise to bloated salaries, mismanagement and outright theft,” SAVE claimed.

A political commentator Carry Roberts who exposed several frauds masterminded by US NGOs wrote in ‘Renewamerica’ that “victims of battering are in short supply these days. So when no victim is known to exist, the solution is obvious: fabricate one.”

“Like other abuse shelters, Safe Horizon makes a grand show of being perpetually hard-up for cash…..But how many would-be donors know Safe Horizon resembles Citicorp or Bank of America, far more than a grass-roots organisation dedicated to providing succour to persons down on their luck?” Roberts wrote, adding that Safe Horizon rakes in nearly $56 million every year and pays skyscraper salaries that would put many bail-out bank executives to shame.

US state attorney Preet Bharara was peeved that Indians were not talking about hapless and real victim Sangeeta, who is now at the mercy of the US Department of Justice and Safe Horizon. Perhaps Bharara is not aware of the conflict of interest between Safe Horizon and the US Justice department. In its financial statement, the NGO claimed it received money to the tune of $ 952,000 from the Justice Department which will announce the judgement on the plea of the NGO it fund.”

Nanny-gate: Fraudulent Charges By the US

A brilliant piece by Satybrata Pal in The Hindu about the flagrant US breach of protocol and law in the maid case:

“While the U.S. argues that anyone in New York paid less than the minimum U.S. wage is being ill-treated, what is in fact the case is that anyone who has to live only on that wage is — as the U.S. NGOs so vehemently argue — condemned to a life of poverty and hunger. Forbes pointed out in an article earlier this year that the unemployed who live on welfare get more in several States than those who work for minimum wages. In New York, Forbes calculated the annual take-home from welfare at $43,700 a year, or $21.01 an hour, almost three times the minimum wage.

It is important to remember this because a help employed by an Indian diplomat has none of the expenses that are assessed to compute either a minimum or a living wage. She stays in a room in the diplomat’s house, with her food, clothing, medical bills and transportation all paid for. Every dollar she earns is saved. If Sangeeta Richard was paid $500 a month, she was saving that a month. No one living on minimum wages in the U.S. has savings; most are up to their eyes in debt. Saving $500 a month for them is a pipe dream. The black and Hispanic women who work as domestic help and charwomen in the U.S., and form its underclass as the societal and lineal descendants of slave labour, would happily trade places with Sangeeta Richard.

Members of our civil society who argue that she was bonded labour, as defined in our Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, perhaps do not know the terms under which domestic help are employed by Indian diplomats. Neither that Act, nor any of the judgments of the Supreme Court which interpreted it, applies to them.

Convention and obligations

Those who claim that the Indian government has no interest in protecting domestic workers, and therefore is indifferent to Sangeeta Richard’s plight, ask why it has not ratified Convention 189 of the International Labour Organization (ILO) “Concerning Decent Work for Domestic Workers,” which came into force in September 2013. This is unfair because the government of India voted for the draft, and has since prepared a draft “Policy for Domestic Workers,” incorporating many of the provisions of the Unorganised Workers’ Social Security Act (UWSSA), 2008.

It is also not germane to this case because ILO Convention 189 would protect a domestic worker abroad only if the host government has ratified it. Like India, the U.S. government also voted for the Convention in 2011, but made a remarkably candid statement in explanation of vote: “In the case of the United States, a number of the provisions present complex issues with respect to our existing law in practice, including in regard to our federal system of government. Accordingly, we want to make clear that our vote to adopt this Convention entails no obligation by the United States to ratify it.”

Convention 189 offers all the protections that the U.S. claims Sangeeta Richard was denied. If these are already statutory requirements in the U.S., it is hard to understand why the convention presented it with “complex issues,” which had to be reconciled with its laws.

What is disturbing is that the U.S. “evacuated” the Richard family after issuing them “T-visas,” given to the next of kin of victims of human trafficking. This meant that, in its view, Sangeeta Richard was a victim of human trafficking as defined in the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, which supplements the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC).

The protocol defines “trafficking in persons” in detail. None of the conditions precedent applies to Sangeeta Richard, and a person travelling on an official passport of a democracy run by the rule of law by definition is not someone who is being trafficked. Moreover, when the Indian Embassy had asked the U.S. government to help trace her when she absconded, the T-visas in response make it clear that the U.S. considered the Indian government complicit in human trafficking.

It follows that the U.S. does not have the slightest intention of abiding by Article 8 of the Protocol, which sets out the terms under which a victim of trafficking is sent back to her country. In turn, this violates the assurance the U.S. gave when it ratified the protocol, to which it entered a reservation, but clarified that “this reservation does not affect in any respect the ability of the United States to provide international cooperation to other Parties as contemplated in the Protocol.”

Iran case

Instead, the U.S. claims that its laws were broken, and since a consular officer does not have the full immunity of an accredited diplomat, Ms. Khobragade was not immune from either arrest or subsequent prosecution. This, though, is not what the U.S. argued as the applicable international law when its diplomatic and consular staff were taken hostage in Iran in 1979, and the government in Tehran threatened to prosecute them for acts that were, in its view, crimes in Iranian law. The U.S. moved the International Court of Justice and in its submission, claimed inter alia that: “Pursuant to Articles 28, 31, 33, 34, 36 and 40 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the Government of lran is under an international legal obligation to the United States to ensure that … the consular personnel of the United States be treated with respect and protected from attack on their persons, freedom, and dignity; and that United States consular officers be free from arrest or detention. The Government of Iran has violated and is currently violating the foregoing obligations.”

The court ruled in favour of the U.S. on all points, by a large majority on most, but unanimously on the U.S. contention, examined at length in its judgment, that the Iranian threat to prosecute diplomatic and consular staff was a violation of the Vienna Conventions. The court held that: “no member of the United States diplomatic or consular staff may be kept in Iran to be subjected to any form of judicial proceedings or to participate in them as a witness.”

The U.S. therefore does not really have a case, on either moral or legal grounds. What is surprising is that it was prepared to offend a country that is now of some strategic and commercial interest to it, and so blatantly breach the Vienna Conventions that protect its diplomatic and consular agents as much as they do all others. Except, it seems, in Iran in 1979 and in the U.S. in 2013.

(Satyabrata Pal, a former High Commissioner to Pakistan, is a Member of the National Human Rights Commission.)

Gore Vidal WAS A Pedophile, Says Family

UPDATE

Further substantiating my accurate analysis that Vidal’s “anti-establishment” stance (including his “antiwar” stance) was not in anyway a principled objection to abusive power, notice from this report that he craved the status granted by elite institutions like Harvard (not having gone to college himself); notice that his hatred of the state was mixed with feelings of thwarted ambition because he’d always wanted to be president; notice that his anti-establishment rants were mingled with constant remembrances of status symbols and the upper-class gilded life to which he belonged and in which he reveled; notice the opulent life-style he lived (not that I have anything against that) and his $37 million estate); notice the deep alcoholism and madness in which he ended his life.

Now put against that the FACTS about Gandhi:

1. Was in excellent physical and mental condition late into life, when he was undergoing month-long fasts.

2. Was repeatedly offered leadership positions in the state and turned them down. Counseled against imitating Western state structures.

3.  Although once prosperous, gave away most of his belongings and was left with nothing more than a watch, his glasses, his loincloth and shawl, and a bowl out of which he ate.

4. Died not from alcoholism and insanity, but from a bullet delivered by an assassin. His last words were “He Ram” (Oh God).

No need to demonize Vidal, of course.

He was a talented, clever, witty man, who said many true things about history and government and he was a prolific, popular novelist of varying ability. He was a fine essayist, no doubt.

But he was also a compulsive  promiscuous pedophile (and most likely a child rapist) who publicly defended  other child rapists (Roman Polansky, Catholic priests).

He was nasty to friends and foes, envied others and relentlessly slandered them. He harbored demons to the end of his life that he was too weak to overcome. He deserved  the prayers and intervention of his friends and family in life, not the mindless adulation of strangers in death. He doubtless victimized scores of children, Thai children, whom we’ll never hear about. Safe Horizon, so exercised about the Indian nanny fake-slaver case should perhaps be called in about this compelling example of real child-sex tourism.

The American media can keep Gore Vidal for a hero. He fits their values.

I’d rather look among hundreds of unsung activists/writers for mine.

ORIGINAL POST

Gore Vidal’s family supports the long-standing rumors of Vidal’s pedophilia that I published here and that I decided, after analysis, were credible.

For that, this blog was hacked, and a week or so later, some spooky electronic harassment took place. I’m not really sure how that happened. I only know it took place.

I think I was alone among antiwar bloggers, most of whom praised Vidal to the skies, ignoring everything except the fact that his position on war was theirs.

I usually wouldn’t criticize a man on his death, but the universal praise of such a deeply flawed man, just after the contemptible and untruthful slurs against Gandhi, cried out to be corrected.

So here’s the post I wrote: Vidal, Polanksy and Kinsey, August 4, 2012.

In contrast, here’s Justin Raimondo’s piece “The Last Jeffersonian,” August 3, 2012

[I have always liked Raimondo’s investigative pieces on the Israeli lobby, one of the more dangerous areas for writers, so this isn’t meant as an attack on him.]

Here’s another libertarian Bill Kauffman on Vidal.

Now for the main points from the Daily Mail piece on Vidal:

“In a feature that appeared in the New York Times, Ms Straight – who had a ‘turbulent though close relationship’ with Vidal – said the openly-gay author had had sex with underage men.

“She described the alleged circumstances as ‘Jerry Sandusky acts’, referring to the former Penn State assistant football coach convicted of child molestation.

“Mr Steers – who directed the Zac Efron film Charlie St Cloud – said that conservative columnist William F. Buckley – who had a long-running public feud with Vidal, which also played out in court – had evidence linking Vidal to the alleged crimes.”

AND

“The New York Times article also says that the ever-opinionated Vidal had a strange and controversial take on the abuse perpetrated by Catholic priests.

“‘He would say that the young guys involved were hustlers who were sending signals,’ Mr Steers said.

[Lila: Based on this statement alone, I would give credibility to the charges against Vidal.]

“However the author of the article, Tim Teeman, wrote that ‘other friends of Mr. Vidal told me they doubted he had sex with underage men’.

“I”Vidal suffered from dementia and alcoholism towards the end of his life.

“Mr Steers said he would drink single male scotch ‘until he collapsed’.

Vidal also had ‘wet brain’ – proper name Wernicke-Korsakoff – a syndrome characterized by a number of symptoms, including confusion and hallucination.”

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2496631/Family-Gore-Vidal-allege-pedophile-challenge-writers-37-million-will.html#ixzz2q2g6wNOz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Vidal was not only a pedophile, it seems he beat up gays, so intense was his own self-loathing.

[Lila: I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not his “pedophilia” but his involvement in even worse – violence against  male child prostitutes that might be the real story and the “yes he was a pedophile” simply a diversion. After all, pedophilia apologias have already appeared in mainstream media, like The Atlantic.]

Consider the reverential treatment given to this insane, addicted, unpleasant man, who was a self-confessed pederast. His well-documented compulsive lifestyle was passed over in silence by the establishment media, since he was “one of them,” from the ruling class.

But of Gandhi, a man who fought his devils all his life bravely, with the utmost candor, and engaged, successfully or not, in one of the biggest social upheavals in modern history,  the same media has recently had nothing but scurrilous and easily discredited innuendo.

Malicious critics called him a bisexual pedophile molester, based on deliberate falsification and exaggeration of historical evidence. They called him a hypocrite, whereas the truth was he was compulsively open to his critics, even begging them to write the worst they knew about him.

Why so much venom? Because Gandhi was Indian and the media in the West has over the last two years been engaged in a systematic campaign of vilification and half-truths against India, along with literal provocations, as I’ve amply documented.

While Vidal,  a hero of  modern liberals, lived in terror of the truth about himself coming out, Gandhi courageously reported every passing sexual feeling in his diaries, urged his critics to say the worst about him that they could, and berated himself endlessly for even mental failures of continence.

Here’s more about  the new claims about Vidal:

“Vidal accused Buckley of being a “crypto-Nazi”; Buckley responded by labelling Vidal a “queer” and telling him to stop his insults or Buckley would “sock [him] in the goddamn face”.

Their argument ended up in the courts, where Buckley first lost an expensive lawsuit against Vidal for libel, before winning a settlement from a magazine that republished Vidal’s written attack years later.

Vidal once estimated he had slept with 1,000 men before he was 25, and boasted of having had sex with Fred Astaire, Rock Hudson and Noel Coward, according to Mr Teeman.

While enjoying a 53-year relationship with his long-term partner, Howard Austen, before Austen’s death in 2003, he wrote in his 1995 memoir, Palimpsest, that he was “attracted to adolescent males”…….

…Buckley’s son, Christopher, has said that while clearing out his late father’s study, he found a file labelled “Vidal Legal”, which he threw into a dumpster…….

An unidentified “longtime friend” of Vidal’s added that the author had once shocked a guest at his home in Ravello, Italy, by announcing: “You know I’m a pederast”.

This friend focused on Vidal’s time spent in Bangkok, Thailand, a city notorious for its sex trade. “He did go to Thailand every year, and he was definitely having sex with male prostitutes there, and they weren’t older male prostitutes,” the friend said.”

Evil people lie about good people for one principal reason – vanity.

They cannot stand being shown up by anything or anyone better than they are.  A couple of years ago, the Catholic Archbishop of Philadelphia, wrote about the profound intolerance of sin for anything that rebukes it, in an essay, “Evil preaches tolerance only when it’s weak.”

So also lies cannot tolerate truth.

But  the world is not built on lies.  And man cannot live on lies.

At the end, when the mud and the bile and the envious distortions of petty men have had their day, the truth will be vindicated.

US diplomat involved in engineering row asked to leave India

I have been blogging repeatedly about this case, because I’ve felt instinctively that it was only the tip of the iceberg.

As I’ve shown at my blog, there has been a history of what looks, to an impartial observer, like unfriendly acts by the US toward India.

I am not sure this whole story wasn’t engineered in some way. Diplomatic rows often precede economic…and even military…rows.

It’s to be hoped it won’t go that far, but in a time of recession, it’s easy to whip people up against dark-skinned foreigners, with a culture and appearance you don’t like. Displaced anger is perfectly understandable in the population.

But from the media?

The so-called intelligentsia has been inflaming and exaggerating dozens of issues (from rape to trafficking to Indian labor to the financial crisis) in the most irresponsible way. What is their responsibility?

BBC:

“India has asked the US to withdraw an official from its embassy in Delhi in a row over the arrest of an Indian diplomat in New York……

The question now is whether this draws a line under the messy diplomatic spat between the two countries.

Of greater importance is the longer-term impact this may have on bilateral ties. India, a democracy and rising power in Asia, is seen in many quarters in Washington as a natural fit to become a special partner of the United States. The US has sought a closer strategic and military partnership with Delhi but to a large extent has been rebuffed.

India is cautious about advancing ties too quickly. It doesn’t want to antagonise Beijing and many Indians still see the US as having been far too close to Pakistan.

Ms Khobragade has always denied any wrongdoing.

Some local reports say Washington has been asked to withdraw a diplomat of a “similar rank” as Ms Khobragade from its Delhi mission.

Others quote an unnamed government official as saying the US official was involved in the case relating to Ms Khobragade – although this is yet to be confirmed.”

NDTV describes the US diplomat being expelled as someone who had instigated and assisted in spiriting Sangeeta Richard out of India in contravention of Indian laws.

Ernst Nolte & Robert Conquest On Auschwitz

Ernst Nolte: “The Gulag came before Auschwitz.”

Robert Conquest:

“For Russians – and it is surely right that this should become true for the world as a whole – Kolyma [one part of the Gulag] is a word of horror wholly comparable to Auschwitz … it did indeed kill some three million people, a figure well in the range of that of the victims of the Final Solution.”[9]

Excerpted from Ralph Raico: “The Taboo Against Truth,” LRC, June 8, 2010

Indian Trafficking: Bogus Numbers By Foreign NGOs

More evidence in this piece that the human trafficking crisis is one created by the NGOs (backed by the CIA and the Rothschild cartel)with little purchase in reality:

“Facts, lies and statistics

One of the pre-requisites for dealing with this problem is the availability of accurate data from reliable sources. Media coverage on trafficking of women and children clearly reveals scanty and unverified data. Often, data is cited without quoting the source, and even when sources are quoted, the data is varied and contradictory. What is of more concern is that inaccurate ‘facts’ are regularly recycled in the media in the face of evidence that reliable data is scare. Discrepancy in agency reports is particularly significant, because the same report is picked up by publications across India, almost assuming the status of ‘fact’.

There are conflicting statements given out on these issues by organizations such as the UN and the NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau). One such instance is about the main region from where the majority of women are trafficked. Nepal, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal are variously quoted, with these reports finding their way into the press. Another such glaring dichotomy is evident in that a Press Trust of India (PTI) report quotes Malini Bhattacharya, member of the National Commission for Women, India, calling human trafficking a “kind of international terrorism”. Yet, the same news item says that it is estimated that 90% of India‘s sex trafficking is internal. The usual stereotype in press accounts is of equating trafficking with prostitution, as evidenced by the “selling girls for prostitution” reported from various police stations in the country. Further, by mentioning ‘girls’, it is not clear if it actually means minors, or whether ‘girls’ also includes adult women. Such ambiguity does not enable an accurate assessment of the problem.

Very little data is available on the actual implementation of the anti-trafficking law, and convictions arising out of this. A rare report can be found on nepalnews.com date November 2, 2007 (‘5,000 sex workers in Valley: A study’). According to this report, “About 7% out of the total of 2,210 prisoners are serving jail terms in the Kathmandu

valley in cases related to human trafficking. Most of the imprisoned male traffickers are from Sindhupalchok, Nuwakot, Dhading and Makawanpur districts.” However, no source for this data is quoted.

Recycling unverified data

The analysis of newspaper clippings and electronic clips revealed that published data tends to make the rounds of media outlets. Even if the data is not attributed to any reliable source, it is quoted repeatedly. The following is one such example:

The Dainik Bhaskar (Hindi), New Delhi, of January 14, 2007, in a report titled ‘Deh vyapar ka karobar ek lakh karod ka’ (Flesh trade to the tune of one lakh crore) contains some interesting facts and figures:

1. After drugs and arms trafficking, trafficking in children and women is the next biggest money-spinner in the world.

2. These women and children are used in the sex trade, and the business amounts to 10 billion dollars annually.

3. India shares 1/4th of this booty.

4. In India, 1 crore women are trafficked, and 1 lakh crore rupees change hands.

5. In Mumbai, the women involved in sex trade goes up to 1 lakh.

6. In India, there are 500,000 women from Nepal and Bangladesh.

7. Every year, around 10,000 women from Nepal, and 7,000 women from Bangladesh are trafficked to India on the promise of employment and better marriage prospects.

8. Most of these are below 16 years of age.

9. The girls from Nepal are sold for Rs 2000-60,000.

10. According to the Centre for Development and Population Activities, 200 women are added to the sex trade in India everyday.

A point to note is that the source for the data for points 1 through 9is attributed to “various human rights agencies and NGOs” without naming them.

Significantly, these statistics were quoted in two news reports on major TV channels in India: The report ‘Tackling Trafficking’, aired on NDTV 24×7 on December 4, 2007, while reporting the newly launched Ujjwala scheme, quotes the Dainik Bhaskar data, but no primary source. Similarly, a report on Doordarshan on the same day (December 4, 2007) on the Ujjwala scheme, also quotes the same Dainik Bhaskar figures. Journalists must be alert to the process of recycling data without checking original sources, especially when the data thus quoted is contradictory.

Getting off the beaten track

The majority of the reports that appear in the media can be called hand-out journalism – either from official sources, press releases, or NGO publicity materials.”

And here is a detailed academic analysis: The NGO-ification of the anti-trafficking movement in the United States,” Jennifer Musto, University of California, Los Angeles.

It deals with the confusion in the way the issue is conceptualized; the extensive government funding of these so-called “non-governmental organizations”; the ambiguity and falsity in measurement and statistics churned out by the industry; and the problems for victims, tax-payers, and sovereign nations, created by the funding imperative.