The Corporate Media: Suffering From Truth Emergency

We have an elite that has a stranglehold on what gets heard through its grip on professional societies and the major print and TV news. Prizes, media attention, peer approval go to very few media outlets. It’s well- known that only reporters and columnists at a handful of papers get serious attention. That’s a truly dangerous state of affairs and we’re suffering the fall-out from it. What makes it even worse is that news itself is more and more swept aside by trashy, sensation-seeking reporting, which leaves the audience with misinformation or simply a great black hole of ignorance.

Mickey Huff and Peter Phillips analyze the “truth emergency” ravaging the corporate media in the West (and to a lesser degree, everywhere):

“Truth Emergency: Keeping the Facts at Bay

The truth comes as conqueror only because we have lost the art of receiving it as guest.
– Rabindranath Tagore

What are some of these truths, that not knowing them creates a literal state of emergency for human society? Here are two of many possible examples. A 2008 report from The World Bank admitted that in 2005, over three billion people lived on less than $2.50 a day and about forty-four percent of these people survive on less than $1.25. Complete and total wretchedness can be the only description for the circumstances faced by so many, especially those in urban areas of so-called developing nations. Simple items Americans take for granted like phone calls, nutritious food, vacations, television, dental care, and inoculations are beyond the possible for billions of people.6

In another ignored but related story, Starvation.net logged the increasing impacts of world hunger and starvation. Over 30,000 people a day (eighty-five percent of children under five) die of malnutrition, curable diseases, and starvation. The number of deaths has exceeded three hundred million people over the past forty years. These stories should be alarming headlines, certainly more significant than celebrity tripe and tabloid hype.7

Continuing on the theme of human poverty and its ramifications, farmers around the world grow more than enough food to feed the entire world adequately. Global grain production yielded a record 2.3 billion tons in 2007, up four percent from the year before, yet, billions of people go hungry every day. The website Grain.org describes the core reasons for continuing hunger in a recent article “Making a Killing from Hunger.” It turns out that while farmers grow enough food to feed the world, commodity speculators and huge grain traders like Cargill control the global food prices and distribution. Starvation is profitable for corporations when demands for food push the prices up. Cargill announced that profits for commodity trading for the first quarter of 2008 were eighty-six percent above 2007. World food prices grew twenty-two percent from June 2007 to June 2008 and a significant portion of the increase was propelled by the $175 billion invested in commodity futures that speculate on price instead of seeking to feed the hungry. This results in erratic food price spirals, both up and down, with food insecurity remaining widespread.

My Comment:

Some of this commentary of course paints speculation with too broad a brush. Futures markets can, and do, provide efficient allocation of resources if they function as they should. The problem is not the futures market but the corruption of the market and the constant meddling in it by the state, which blunts the normal checks that the market would otherwise provide.

And again that goes back to public culture and professional standards that have become debased. The deeper question is how they became debased.

Which, of course, leads us to the government’s manipulation of the interest rate. That is where the problem lies.

But meanwhile, where is the media in all this? Providing the context so people can understand what’s going on?

No. It’s rooting around in John Edward’s trash can……

One thought on “The Corporate Media: Suffering From Truth Emergency

  1. After reading the original article that Huff and Phillips cite, I am left with the uneasy feeling that they are guilty of that which they accuse others of. The point of the Grain.org article is that there is not a supply problem with food, but rather a distribution problem that is exacerbated by globalization and government policy. It seems to me that Huff and Phillips attempt to score cheap points with their sympathetic readership by attacking Cargill, Monsanto and evil speculators.

    Our present system gives anyone so inclined the ability to get at the truth. 20 years ago, I would have never heard of the Grain.org article much less had the opportunity to pull it up and read it for myself. The real problem is that our system of education has created a passive populace who expects to be spoon fed and then believes everything it is told. Maybe it’s always been that way. I don’t know. I do know that since we’re talking about distribution that news distribution is better than it has ever been for those interested in the truth and willing to make an effort to get it.

    Regrettably, what we all lament is that too few people care about what we care about. If they did and were so inclined to seek the same, the Internet would be locked down so quickly that it would make your head spin. I expect that this will eventually occur anyway. Fortunately, I have no doubt that somebody, somewhere will find another way to communicate, allowing those who care about such things to continue to find the truth that we are seeking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *