Trump Impeachment

Schmuel Klatzkin in The American Spectator:

There is no precedent for a former official being tried and barred from office after returning to private life. It was attempted once, with a secretary of war in Grant’s Cabinet. But since the man was acquitted in the Senate, no precedent was established. But even had a precedent been established, a Cabinet officer is not someone elected by the People.

And what is being proposed now is a trial to be held before the Senate of someone who will be a private citizen. It clearly won’t be for the purpose of removing him from office. More importantly, it will deprive the People of their right to elect a person of their choosing to public office.

Nowhere does the Constitution say or suggest that one can impeach and try someone who is not in office. Nowhere does it grant Congress the power to remove a person’s right to run for office except as part of the process of removal from office.

The Senate has no right to act as a judiciary body to try a private citizen, only to remove someone’s hands from power. And most certainly the Senate was never given the power by the People to tell them they may not elect this private citizen if they so choose.

To hold this trial would be to undo the protection the Framers had set in place in their careful recrafting of impeachment. It would usurp a power that was never delegated to Congress by the Constitution by trying a private citizen before the Legislature and, without benefit of judge or jury, to deprive him and the People of their rights. If a law has been broken, the only place to try a private citizen is in a court of law. The process of trial before the law was firmly and finally removed from the legislative branch by the Framers.

And lurking behind this all is the goal of denying the People the right to have the person of their choosing in office. It is hard to think of any act more undemocratic.

In Which I Try My Hand At Baking…

…or whatever they call deciphering one of Q’s enigmatic drops.

Because a commenter who posts at DeepCapture brought up a drop that rang a bell for her [she follows Q]:

Real Pam Says:
February 6, 2021 at 11:58 am
Is this a clue? I happened to remember something about ‘puppy show’ so searched the website and found this drop

4484 06/20/2020

The stakes are high.
They will fight.
Super bowl > puppy show
Q

https://qagg.news/?q=puppy+show

Anonymous Says:
February 6, 2021 at 3:43 pm
I heard it mentioned by x22 as well. In my opinion, another Q hopium.

Lila Rajiva Says:
February 6, 2021 at 9:30 pm
Know nothing about football, games and TV shows, but pulled this out.
Apparently, the puppy bowl goes on at the same time as the Superbowl which is on Sunday, Feb 7 at the Raymond James Stadium in Tampa
https://www.nfl.com/super-bowl/
Kansas City Chiefs versus Tampa Bay Buccaneers

The Bidens’ dogs Champ and Major, two rescued German Shepherds, will make an appearance at the puppy bowl and will be part of a pitch for wearing masks.
https://wgnradio.com/sports/biden-dogs-to-make-appearance-during-puppy-bowl/

The impeachment trial begins February 9.
Maybe there is some veiled reference to that…I don’t know, I prefer tea leaves, when soothsaying..:<

Real Pam Says: February 7, 2021 at 12:06 am

Wow, that is really interesting about the Biden dogs. Q has often predicted the future but no one knows if they consult a psychic, or the legendary (mythical?) Project Looking Glass or former CIA remote viewers. As with most Q predictions we usually figure it out after it happens. People like mysteries and puzzles. Great research, Lila. I can never find anything online when I search for it.

Anonymous Says: February 7, 2021 at 3:08 am

well, Q is fake news media, so why even bother

Lila Rajiva Says: February 7, 2021 at 4:33 am

Maybe, maybe not. I haven’t researched it enough to say myself, but if so it doesn’t look good for Trump, Flynn or Powell who have all supported Q or Qesque statements. Either Q is benign or all of them are a bit suspect too.

Lila Rajiva Says: February 7, 2021 at 4:57 am

Superbowl > puppy show
The real big time football game > the fun dog world alternative at the same time
Puppies = Biden’s puppies = reference to Biden
Therefore, Trump presidency > Biden sh**show
POTUS > NOPOTUS
Maybe Q is nothing more than a political Rorschach test.
DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT FOLLOW Q, X, Y, OR Z.

Lew Rockwell Backtracks [Thank God] And Goes Full Q

Way ahead of you, guys.

You finally discovered Neon Revolt, didn’t you, and realized that taking your.. er.. Q from REUTERS [!!!!] and Alex Seagram Jones and calling it FBI Cointelpro is a bit odd….

Especially from a website that followed Assange and Snowden….products of Mossad/MI6 and the US Deep State IMHO…like lambs.

I was an early unfollower of Julian, summing up my findings in a 3 part series at Veterans Today, itself an outlet for military disinformation, but with a wide circulation and one of the few places interested in such a critique in the heyday of Assange’s credibility:

At Veterans Today:

  1. Zionist Mind Control: The Case Against Wikileaks, Part I
  2. A Giant Psyop: The Case Against Wikileaks, Part II
  3. An Intel Front: The Case Against Wikileaks, Part III

and my posts at this blog.

Edward Snowden. See comment here and my posts at this blog.

As I’ve said, libertarianism…any ideology really… can tell apples from oranges, fair enough. Who can’t? But at the business of telling oranges from oranges, they fail. For that you need practice in reality.

Trump speaks his mind, come what may, with no visible ideology, as pointed out by none other than Noam Chomsky.

Then too he is loyal, often to a fault. His main failing is he’s abrasive, has no social niceties, knows he’s smarter than the people who criticize him….and lets them know it.

For instance,  he had the guts to retweet and support Marjorie Taylor Greene, without any hemming and hawing, no matter how much of a moral leper everyone else said she was.

He doesn’t toe party lines or intellectual ones. It’s always the individual with him.

I’m kind of that way too. Which is why I’ve come to like the guy. No, make that RESPECT the guy.

 

 

Trump As Coriolanus

Glenn Ellmers at American Greatness:

“Coriolanus turns the impudence of his accusers back on them. They are the true betrayers of the republic who, by rights, should be expelled. Trump, in my opinion, should use this line: “I impeach you!”—and then spell out the details of the Democrats’ shameful conduct, which has undermined the Constitution.

Let every feeble rumour shake your hearts!
Your enemies, with nodding of their plumes,
Fan you into despair!

These lines—about the melodramatic cowardice of the accusers—seem especially appropriate in light of the hysterical overreaction to the events of January 6. The so-called insurrection is now being used to prepare public opinion for draconian new measures against “domestic terrorism,” and to justify a proposed wall around the Capitol complex reminiscent of a Third-World dictatorship. This, in spite of conflicting and uncertain accounts of what happened, as well as video evidence of Capitol police opening the doors to the protestors, and even engaging in friendly banter with the “Viking guy”—who hardly appears to be leading a murderous coup.

Still your own foes, deliver you as most
Abated captives to some nation
That won you without blows!

This means, “You idiots are just tools of our country’s enemies!” The mob is so consumed with partisan jealousy and bloodlust, they don’t even notice or care that they are weakening the nation, and making themselves patsies for foreign powers. (Of course, it’s possible they do notice, and don’t mind.) Consider, in this context, that the despots in Beijing are surely smiling right now at this spectacle of the United States destroying itself from within, while they don’t even have to lift a finger.

Thus I turn my back: There is a world elsewhere.

It’s not clear what Trump will do with his wealth and influence now that he is out of office. Rumors are circulating that he will start an alternate media empire. This is certainly a more measured response than what Coriolanus did: he joined up with his old war enemy to threaten an invasion of Rome. In the play, that conflict is resolved when Coriolanus’s mother helps to broker a peace. In our time, this farce may still lead to tragedy.

The late professor of political philosophy Harry Jaffa explained that in Coriolanus, Shakespeare shows, “with all the poetic genius that only he could command . . . the inner connection between virtue and republics.” No political stunt can change that.

Shakespeare’s deepest lesson, according to Jaffa, is “the inexorable and inescapable vindictive power of the moral universe.” With control of all three branches of the federal government, the Democrats may imagine there are no limits to their power. But they will never remake the human soul. It may be possible for a while to pretend that passion can replace virtue, and that ideology can replace truth—but this can’t last. Even Washington, D.C. cannot defeat the nature of reality.

Dominion’s Election Guard Designed By Gates

From Natural News, via  Patriot Daily Press:

In a new video, the illustrious Roger Stone drops a major bombshell about Dominion Voting Systems, alleging he has proof that Microsoft, at the direction of billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, designed the software used to commit election fraud.

The longtime political veteran who is helping spearhead the “Stop the Steal” movement for election integrity in the United States says that Microsoft developed what is known as Election Guard, which is capable of hiding votes, switching votes and altering election outcomes.

Election Guard has “been used by Dominion, as well as Election Services, Hurt Intercivic, Clean Ballot, Election Systems and Hardware, BPro, and Smartmatic,” Stone claims.

“In other words, 100 percent of the voting machines and voting systems in this country are using the same software that Dominion has been using to switch votes.”

And maybe that’s the real reason why Roger Stone is now being investigated  by the Trump impeachment managers in Congress for ties to the Oathkeepers, the conservative militia three of whose members were charged with conspiracy to interfere with law enforcement or obstruct a proceeding of Congress in the wake of the Capitol Rally on January 6, 2021.

Mike Lindell: Absolute Proof

Top Scholar Says Trump Impeachment Constitutional

Volokh Conspiracy, the blog of leading constitutional scholar Eugene Volokh, has cited a piece by another influential scholar, Michael McConnell, that Trump was impeached by the correct body, the house, at the correct time, before his departure from office on January 13.

Therefore, argues McConnell, since the constitution allows ALL impeachments to be tried, Trump can in fact be tried even though he is now out of office.

Another proof that the law and the courts are NOT the answer, but a part of the problem, in America.

 

Trump Supports Q-Loving Georgia Rep

Josh Marshall from the influential left-liberal blog Talking Points Memo thinks that this tweet makes Greene the most important Republican representative and practically untouchable, despite her espousal of what the media mocks as “conspiracy theories,” among them, those spread by “Q”.

Mike Flynn’s Brother To Command US Army Pacific Forces

Charles Flynn, brother of former National Security Advisor, General Mike Flynn, recently made a 4 star general, was appointed to lead US Pacific forces.

Despite initial denials, DOD has confirmed that Charles Flynn WAS in the room when the DC police chief called in to request the assistance of the National Guard during the Capitol protest on January 6 and when one or more of those officers present discussed the optics of such a move.

The fact that Flynn’s brother had earlier called for a limited military redo of the fraudulent election and was known to be a supporter of the enigmatic insider called Q or, incorrectly, QAnon, whose cryptic “drops” called for a second American revolution, concerned some DOD officials, it’s reported.
While Mike Flynn and another brother Joseph, as well as sister, Barbara Redgate, are Q sympathizers, it’s not clear where Charles’ sympathies lie. Still, the fact that he was appointed to a top post indicates that while Q may be a ‘terrorist’ to some and  FBI cointelpro to the likes of Reuters, his sympathizers are in favor in the military.

More about Trump’s retweeting of Q and Q’s more speculative and controversial claims about pedophile rings and the elites here. More on Weiner’s laptop here.

Lin Wood Needs Mental Check Up To Practice Law Again

From Newsweek:

“The State Bar of Georgia told me today that they would demand a mental health exam from me if I wanted to keep my law license.

“My mind is sound. I have broken no rules. I asked what I had done wrong, I was only told it was about my social media comments. My speech.”