Ukraine War: India, China, Pakistan Reactions

The gist of the Western media’s position on the Ukraine situation is that the entire world is with Ukraine, except for a few renegade states  under the Russian thumb.

This is far from the truth. The Anglophone world, meaning the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and to a lesser extent the EU, are on average on the same page.

But, in Asia, Latin America, and Africa, the case is entirely different.

Here, the Western position has been met with skepticism and seen as an occasion to reassert the non aligned position and develop economic and strategic alliances beyond the West.

India:

Despite the threat of US sanctions, should India continue to buy military equipment from Russia, informed opinion is solidly on the Russian side. Indians see NATO’s expansion as posing an existential threat to Russia as a nation. There is also a good deal of contempt for the moral posturing of the West on this. People remember how the US tried to bully India when Mrs. Gandhi intervened to end the blood bath in Bangladesh, surely the very definition of a just war. People also remember the devastation of the entire Middle East by American intervention and America’s indifference to Pakistani and Chinese encroachments on Indian territory.

As well, Russia has offered to discount by 25% the cost of wheat purchases by India and is considering bilateral trade in rubles and rupees. Meanwhile, the shortfall in global wheat production from the war’s impact on the two leading wheat producing nations of Ukraine and Russia offers an opportunity for Indian wheat exports to expand.

China:

In the left wing English language paper, The Hindu, China complained about third parties trying to create a wedge between China and India and insisted the two had a valuable relationship the Chinese were not going to jeopardize, even over border disputes.

China also said that the QUAD should not be turned into an Asian version of NATO.

China emphasized that while it advocated for a peaceful resolution in Ukraine, it felt that Russia had indeed been provoked and had justification for its response.

From Japan Today:

China has said that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all nations must be respected — a stance that runs counter to an invasion — while also opposing sanctions on Russia and blaming the U.S. and NATO’s eastward expansion for being the root cause of the crisis.

“China is trying to have its cake on Ukraine and eat it too,” Asia Society president and former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd wrote in a post on the Asia Society Policy Institute website. He noted that China has lifted import restrictions on Russian wheat, which could offset some of the economic pain of sanctions.

For many of those imposing sanctions, China’s actions amount to support for the invasion.

Pakistan:

EU members published a joint and open letter suggesting that Pakistan should have condemned the Russian invasion. This provoked an outburst from PM Imran Khan that Pakistan was not the slave of Western powers and would follow an independent policy. It was on good terms with Russia, with the US, and with the EU and saw no reason to change that status.

“What do you think of us? Are we your slaves … that whatever you say, we will do?” Khan said while addressing a political rally.

 

 

 

 

Ukraine War: US BioWar Labs Found

Russia has publicized documentation showing that on Feb. 24, 2022, the Ukrainian government ordered the emergency destruction of dangerous pathogens stored in labs close to the Russian border, with US knowledge and support. The pathogens include those that cause cholera, plague, tularemia, and anthrax, whose development and stockpiling are expressly forbidden by Article I of the UN Convention Against Bacteriological [Biological] and Toxin Weapons.

From Sputnik News:

A network comprised of some 30 biological laboratories was formed in Ukraine, with the activities conducted in these labs being commissioned by the US Ministry of Defense, Russia’s Defense Ministry has announced.
Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov, head of the Russian Armed Forces’ Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Protection Troops, stated that the biolabs’ activities, as well as the “so called reform program of Ukraine’s healthcare system executed by the US” have led to an increase in cases of “highly dangerous and economically significant infections.”
According to Kirillov, biological laboratiries in Lvov were conducting work with infectious agents of plague, anthrax, and brucellosis, while the labs in Kharkov and Poltava were working with infectious agents of diphtheria, salmonellosis, and dysentery.
Kirillov also declared that the government in Kiev had sent to the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in the United States thousands of patient’s serum samples, primarily from patients of “Slavic ethniticy,” under the pretext of testing COVID-19 treatment methods.”

The Russians have also charged that the Ukrainian government was using the elevated level of radiation at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant as cover to work on the development of a dirty bomb.

In a related investigation, George Webb, an investigative journalist in the US, has been following the trail of money fleeced from Ukraine through PrivatBank by a consortium of corrupt oligarchs headed by Igor Kolomoisky and fronted by Zelensky.  He reports that it was laundered into US real estate, especially in Cleveland, a conclusion supported by earlier reports in the mainstream media in the USA.

From the Organized Crime & Corruption Reporting Project:

The former chairwoman of Ukraine’s central bank dubbed it one of the biggest financial scandals of the 21st century.

Valeria Hontareva was describing the alleged theft of US$5.5 billion from PrivatBank, once the country’s largest commercial lender. The suspected masterminds are the bank’s two oligarch owners: Ihor Kolomoisky and Hennadiy Boholiubov, who stand accused of absconding with an amount roughly equal to 5 percent of the country’s gross domestic product. According to court records, both men are said to have recently been living in Switzerland, though Kolomoisky appears to be spending time in Israel.

Reporters also uncovered numerous previously unknown Swiss and French assets controlled by Kolomoisky’s sister.

“Large-scale coordinated fraudulent actions of the bank shareholders and management caused a loss to the state of at least $5.5 billion,” Hontareva said in March 2018. “This is 33 percent of the population’s deposits … [and] 40 percent of our country’s monetary base.”

Webb locates the headquarters of this corrupt scheme, apparently tied to Ukrainian bioweapons research in, no surprise here, Boca Raton [Rat’s Mouth], Florida.

A detailed account of the US involvement in regime change in Ukraine in 2013/2014 has been put together [here and here ] by Jim Holt from The Gateway Pundit, where I was commenting during the run up to the initial election of Trump and his replacement by the fraudulently installed regime of the pseudo Catholic Joe Biden, whose beliefs have been endorsed by none other than the pseudo Pope Jose Bergoglio, aka Francis.

Biden was in Ukraine during Euromaidan [as that regime change in Ukraine was called], when George Soros the ubiquitous financier of Democrat and CIA causes intervened to protect his oil and gas interests in the country and install a friendly billionaire, Petro Poreshenko, instead of the more neutral/Russia friendly Yanukovych.

Apparently, one of the criteria for the selection of Poroshenko was his willingness to allow US bioweapons facilities masquerading as health monitoring stations to be set up in Ukraine, something the previous government had refused to do. Poroshenko also facilitated the creation of an army of mercenaries to fight the pro Russian Donbass separatists. They were financed by Soros’ preferred consortium of coethnic billionaires, specifically Kolomoisky and Boholyubov.

In 2014, the Wall Street Journal, saw fit to publish a laudatory article on Kolomoisky, then governor of Dniepropetrovsk, claiming the was helping fight pro Russian separatists in Ukraine. Indeed he was, including committing war crimes.

Biden’s son, Hunter, as well as a former CIA official Cofer Black, were installed on the board of Burisma, a gas exploration company, actually owned by Kolomoisky through PrivatGroup, the holding company of Privat Bank.

For American consumption, the story was that Biden was in Ukraine to help clean up the corruption that prevented the country from receiving IMF aid. In actuality, Biden was there to benefit from the corruption and stop the probe into Burisma, by ousting the Ukrainian prosecutor who was pursuing it.  When candidate Trump and his cohorts entered the fray to blow the whistle on this corrupt action, he found himself the target of accusations of colluding with Russia, which were subsequently proved false.

The case filed against Kolomoisky and Boholyubov and their agents in America by the USG in Florida can be found here.

Readers of this blog will recognize that as the HQ of the Russian [Jewish] Mafia on the US east coast and one of the prominent centers, along with Tampa, FL, of mortgage fraud during and after the 2008 financial collapse.

As Ukraine and the US authorities have tightened the screws on Kolomoisky over his money laundering scheme, he has started turning more pro Russian, including revealing the extent of US bioweapons installations in Ukraine.

In 2021, Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev when asked by the news outlet Kommersant if he knew if China was behind the Covid virus, replied that the US was vastly increasing the number of its biological labs all over the world, especially on the borders of China and Russia. The US Dept. of State dismissed the charge, claiming that the facilities were simply there to help local scientists to fight dangerous diseases in new ways.

Patrushev told Kommersant,

“We and our Chinese partners have questions. We are told that there are peaceful sanitary and epidemiological stations near our borders, but for some reason, they are more more reminiscent of Fort Detrick in Maryland, where Americans have been working in the field of military biology for decades.”

 

 

Ukraine War: List Of Useful Sites

There is a huge dearth of decent commentary on the war, or, when there is good commentary, it is scattered between blog posts and video, making it hard for busy people to get the gist of what is happening without an enormous expenditure of time.

For the self absorbed among us, for whom a war is just another excuse to update Facebook this hardly matters, but the rest of us need to know what we are supporting before we open our mouths…or the blood is on our hands too.

Sanctioning Russia implies the collective guilt of its citizens for not overturning Putin.

Well, what about the collective guilt of Americans in allowing into the White House a man in serious mental decline, incapable of handling international crises?

Shouldn’t ordinary Americans be punished for that too?

Or for Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, and endless other interventions which had less justification than Putin’s?

But who will sanction the sanctioners?

With that, here is a list of sites that could help  understanding the war in Ukraine.

NOTE: I DO NOT ENDORSE ANY OF THEM.

I have serious problems with about 3/4 of what is on them, and likely most, if not all, have some intelligence ties, or toe the intelligence line, or they would not flourish. You can take that as you wish. I know nothing about the owners, funders etc., although in some cases I can take a good guess.

But from bitter experience I will keep those guesses mostly to myself.

I am not part of any organized resistance, communist, anti-communist, Russian, Prussian,  or anything else. The only resistance I am whole-heartedly part of is resistance to my own unwanted habits, weaknesses and failings. The only line I toe is, whether something is true and helpful or not. There are true things that are not useful.. such as the personal crimes or sins of some of our oligarch enemies and friends. Interesting, but not necessarily relevant.

However, where relevant and useful,  there is also another consideration. If I put this information up, will the blowback be worth it, for someone who has only her wits and a couple of hours of free time, to aid her?

Will I go under too, like a thousand other small blogs and sites in the great purge that began in 2015-2016 and has accelerated ever since?

So I hold my tongue, which is now black and blue from the effort.

WEBSITES/BLOGS

Michel Chossudovsky’s website, Center for Research on Globalization [Long-standing researchers on geopolitics from a parapolitics angle. Criticizes as pushing Chinese and Russian propaganda.]

GreatGameIndia: Shelly Kasli’s wonderful investigative site that hasn’t been given sufficient credit for the ground breaking work it did on Covid, and before that, on demonetization and the cash ban. Possibly vetted by Indian intelligence, but not certain.

Zero Hedge: Lots of good stories mixed in with some disinfo, as I am almost certain this site is a group effort.

Strategic-Culture Foundation [reportedly part of the pro-Russian ecosystem, allegedly linked to the Russian state, just as all other media is linked to the ecosystem of the US, UK, EU, and their allies]

Oriental Review  Ditto

Covert Shores: Good analysis of Moskva sinking, open source intel from a naval guy. Western viewpoint.

War Zone The Drive 

Very good analysis of  war and armaments. Western

Intel Slava Z on Telegram

Unz.com [Counterpunch writers and some others who’ve migrated to a site run by Ron Unz, a tech entrepreneur and smart Jewish dissident; likely to be some disinformation, intended to co-opt so-called anti-Semitic criticism]

Voltairenet [Theirry Meyssan is excellent]

Dissident Voice [left centered dissident opinion on a variety of topics]

Counter-currents [ed. Binu Matthews] Socialist, people oriented, pro-global warming.

Indian Punch-line [M. Bhadrakumar, a retired Indian diplomat]

Life-site News [pro-life Catholic site]

The Saker.is – Orthodox Russian resident in the US, economically left, culturally right. Very pro Russian.

A Son of the American Revolution [American military analyst]

Andrei Martyanov’s blog [Russian military analyst. Very pro Russian]

The Gateway Pundit [pro-Trump right, conspiratorial]

National File [investigative, non mainstream right]

The Last Refuge [pro Trump Christian right]

Moon of Alabama

Lew Rockwell [Libertarian pro-market, antiwar site] Paleolibertarian and Christian libertarian

Revisionist Review, from Michael Hoffman, a so-called holocaust denial site, but I can vouch that it is entirely free of Nazi sympathy of any kind. Deep analysis of staged events, masonic conspiracy, and Talmudic influence.

Sputnik News  

and TASS

[Russian state outlets]

Srb.info [Serbia news] Pro Russian Serbian news site.

Gonzalo Lira [Chilean businessman on site in Kharkiv, has now gone missing]:  First-hand account of events in Kharkhiv, ear-to-the-ground reports of other areas.

Patrick Lancaster: Ex-US Navy, on the ground at battle fronts, with Russian army.

The Duran

[Have not watched this much, will add, when I find time to.]

That’s all for now. I don’t necessarily agree with the positions of these sites on other issues, or even with everything they say about the war, but they carry useful information to counter the incessant propaganda about Ukraine and Russia.

The best weapon against the media war is

Accurate information about the background and progress of the war

Clear understanding of the motivations and justifications of the different actors

Healthy skepticism toward the moral grandstanding of third parties with no skin in the game.

 

 

We Won The Victory We Needed

At Affirmative Right, I find confirmation for my own view that the past few months have NOT been a defeat, but the only possible victory the right could have had in the circumstances: the awakening of the mass of right-leaning and many centrist voters to the truth about politics in the USA:

It is unfixable by more politics.

So let’s move onto a brighter side of the blackpill: its tendency to turn, once properly digested, into a whitepill. Or, at least, into something more colourful than a blackpill. 

The whitepill is that the Alt-Right has won a victory against the regime. It has done so at a heavy cost – some of its number are imprisoned, some persecuted, some bankrupted, some humbled, some discredited – and at the price of its own dissolution as a coherent movement. But all the same, it has won its victory – not the victory that it wanted, but the victory that it needed.
To understand this, you must be blackpilled enough to know that those in power have won nothing that they did not already possess. No, they did not just stage a revolution and overthrow the American Constitution. I know the brains of democrats pass through the waters of Lethe every election cycle, but surely we can cast our minds back a mere four years. Surely we can recall how Trump was elected to the executive in a landslide, how his party initially controlled the legislature too, how he eventually managed to appoint one-third of the top-level judiciary – and how he still got nothing done.
The permanent government that gelded Trump, and now represses his supporters, has never once left power since it was established in the early 20th century. To all intents and purposes, it is a totalitarian state overlaid by a ceremonial elected government. It permits no legal path to its own overthrow (like, duh), and has defeated or co-opted every popular challenge to its power, from McCarthyism to Reaganism to Trumpism. It has also reproduced its basic form throughout all its foreign satrapies – so everyone in the West lives under the same system, or else is having it forced upon them right now.
So what is the Alt-Right’s victory? To have exposed this permanent government to public view. It did so unknowingly, in a fit of inchoate defiance, like Truman veering off-script on the set of his show – not so much exposing the power structure, as prompting it to react to unpredictable moves and expose itself in the process. 
But now that it has done so, millions of people can now see – or at least suspect – that the media is lying, elections are rigged, conservatism is a toy-opposition party, progressivism is a pro-government astroturf movement, and that freedom, progress, tolerance, etc. are Orwellian paradoxes. That is why the regime must seek its security in the tools of hard power. Contrary to appearances, its position behind its stormtroopers is much weaker than it was when it could hide in plain sight – and leave its subjects to consume the fake news, blow off steam at the ballot box, and rationalise every facet of its misrule through democratic religious casuistry.
But to repeat: this is the victory that the Alt-Right needed, not the victory that it wanted. And as a movement half in hock to democratic lies, it is at once the victor and the victim. All its own fantasies of victory – capturing the conservative party, winning a landslide election, smashing the Left off the streets, exposing a cabal of shadowy evildoers, storming the temple of government – have been played out as farce, and revealed to be tragically futile.”

Charles Burris Calls It Quits At LRC

Update: [March 16, 2022]

Thankfully, Mr. Burris has been resurrected at LRC, where he can continue his zealous education of those with eyes wide shut.

ORIGINAL POST

The conclusion of yet another internecine spat [see here and here and here] at Lew Rockwell results in the departure of Charles Burris, whose writings were more historically informed and  parapolitics-wise than that of many of his colleagues.

I didn’t agree with some of Mr. Burris’ posts, especially ones in which he touted the “Camp of the Saints” while on every other day professing that collectivism of any kind was anathema to libertarianism. I marveled at the cognitive dissonance.

On the other hand, he was fascinated by the Kennedy assassination, power-elite analysis and conspiracy, and wasn’t  a purist too good for the real world, as many of his confreres are.

His support for Governor Noem was the hill on which his blogging life ended. I daresay the angels didn’t like his support for Marjorie Taylor Greene either.

But I did.

I went through something similar while commenting at Robert Wenzel’s site where I often had a pack of libertarians nipping at my ankles and howling at alleged “authoritarianism” or “statism” …terms they  hardly seemed to understand…but used more or less as imprecations whenever someone adopted a position not considered kosher by the libertarian, er, collective..Rothbard cultists…Mises mob…. whatever you choose to call it.

Ah well. I too have ended up tending my garden.

A literal one.

While the curs still waste their efforts circling and nipping at some other poor sod’s socks, my angel mist bamboo has gone from 15 feet to over 40.

Two wind-burned royal poinciana saplings that I wrestled onto the back of a pickup have spread their parasols over the roof of the house and their writhing shade over the blazing sidewalk.

My oyster shell mulch has bleached and crumbled almost to beach sand in the yard.

I quadrupled more than quintupled my investment in money terms and I gained something priceless while doing it, something which still seems to elude so many people on the web:

Perspective.

A sense of proportion.

Thank you for your well-researched writing at LRC, Mr Burris.

 

 

Greatest Radio Voice In American History Goes Silent

Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Republican king-maker; talk-radio host without parallel; canny, original, and razor-sharp thinker; middle-America’s heart and voice; and the daily companion of hundreds of millions of people scorned and ignored by the chatterati, died of lung cancer on Wednesday morning at the age of 70.

I was an early adopter of Rush, recommending him to people in the beginning of the Clinton years, long before he became the mainstream phenomenon he is today.  In many ways those early years were his best days.  There was his musical mockery of the Paula Jones scandal [“Me and Mrs. Jones…we’ve gotta thing going on…”];  the chipmunk routine [“algore! algore! algore!”], scores of skits and parodies that indelibly changed our view of people and politics.

Dozens of words and phrases he coined entered the lexicon, from feminazis to drive-by media and camp-eye [supposedly the plural of campus, a jab at ivory- towered intellectuals].

Those whom he scorned he destroyed with well turned monikers….Chuck-u Schumer comes to mind. He, on the other hand, was the Maha-rushi…

But the humor never became bitter or poisonous …or vulgar… which was one of the secrets of his broad appeal. There was always that strong undercurrent of decency and humanity and a genuine love of people that enabled him to answer even the most inane caller with a patience that could not be faked.

One of the greatest failures of mainstream political analysts has been their complete misunderstanding of the phenomenon of talk radio itself, of which Rush was the greatest avatar. Though “the people” are the pretext for the leftist’s schemes and theories, the actual living people before him he dismisses with contempt and derision.

So it was with Rush and his ditto-head supporters.

The intellectual class wrote him off as a crude semi-literate  demagogue with an audience of hicks and rubes. In fact, he was one of the sharpest minds in politics, with a wonkish interest in the details of policy-making, argumentative skills that would have made his lawyer father proud, and an ability to articulate the deepest sentiments and unspoken thoughts of his contemporaries with a penetration that ripped off the mask of political correctness forever.

I listened to Rush nearly every day except when I went abroad. His show was the background for lunch, work, and hanging out. I never met the guy, or called in, though I liked to tell myself that a few things from this humble blog had somehow drifted up to his ken. I devoutly hope so.

I listened even when I was furious at him for many things that he did not get right….that he got spectacularly wrong.

After he shot up in the ranks of right-wing stars, his views began to converge with those of the neoconservatives whose toxic influence derailed the right from its roots in non- interventionism.  This was the Rush who excused Abu Ghraib as college-hazing. He was wrong then and he was wrong on many other issues where he ended up a gate-keeper for the neoconservatives and globalists. That was unfortunate, because it delayed the awakening of middle America by more than a decade.   A decade in which much was lost.

But even when I loathed what he said, I was never really turned off by the guy himself. He was too big, too likeable, too real. I knew instinctively that he was much more than a radio host.  He was a buddy, the leader of the band, the big brother always ready to drop by and punch the bully media in the kisser.

I knew instinctively also that if I ended up hating him, I would be hating America itself.. and I would be hating the part of myself that was American, because there was no one who embodied heartland America with all its flaws and virtues better than this big cigar-smoking emperor of the airwaves, who bragged endearingly of being a “talent on loan from God.”

Well, God took back his loan on Wednesday.

Mega Dittos, Rush. Rest In Peace.

 

 

 

 

A Leftist Defends Trump As America’s Champion

Emmanuel Pastreich a leftist with intellectual integrity has written a defense of Donald Trump’s real achievements that  puts the backstabbing buffoons of the Republican party to greater shame than that which they heaped on themselves during their sniveling wimp-out on January 6.

Pastreich credits Trump with

opposing foreign wars;

opposing trade agreements that destroy the working class;

opposing immigration used as a tool against the country;

bringing the Federal Reserve more under the control of the Treasury;

opening up public discussion of the vast conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy and declassifying documents that relate to it and other crimes;

questioning the official story about 9/11 and many other conspiracies;

undermining the major media and promoting alternative media;

doing his best to defend us against the pandemic police state;

promoting the use of HCQ despite universal mockery;

supporting the hunt for pedophile blackmail rings;

and unveiling and publicizing the criminal corruption of the swamp.

It was for this last, says Pastereich, that he paid the price. He suddenly came down with Covid and shortly after was targeted by a vast election cyberhack involving multiple nations, all profiteering from the vaccine regime of the pandemic police state.

The finale of this world historical sabotage is the minor fracas now entered into official history as the Capitol Insurrection of January 6, for which Trump, painted as Miami’s answer to Osama Bin Laden, is being held solely responsible. This, argues Pastreich, is a prelude to making any dissent from the vaccine regime or the official election narrative a form of domestic terrorism subject to the full weight of the totalitarian state apparatus,

The only failing in this otherwise admirable essay is the needless pearl-clutching about Trump’s garish tastes in decor, multiple marriages, and ties to casinos and mobsters. Pastreich says he has “grudging respect” for Trump’s fundamental decency as a human being, considers him a much better president than Obama, Bush, or Clinton, but wouldn’t buy a used car from him.

Ah well. Thus ever the chattering classes. Even the very best among them would be useless on a battlefield.

We don’t have “grudging respect” for Trump. We  unequivocally like the guy. If the best you can bring to the endless inquisition about not so much Trump’s character as his style is status-signaling about your superior taste in clothes and houses, then you have established yourself only as a snob without a sense of proportion.

If his multiple wives…all of whom seen to stay friends with him… are the worst of his sins, then in the vicious dens of DC he is an innocent indeed.

 

Did Amy Kremer and Chris Barron Sabotage the Capitol Rally?

Note: This still needs additional research and links, but I am posting it to identify how the walk to an area near the Capitol building was sabotaged.

SUSPECTED SABOTAGE OF JAN 6 EVENT BY WOMEN FOR AMERICA EMPLOYEES 

I previously posted the signed public statement by the founder of STOPTHESTEAL, Ali Alexander, that he has had information for some time that the march to the Capitol on January 6, 2021,  was sabotaged by two people, one of whom worked for Women For America First, a group founded by the Kremer family; the other is a Trump campaign advisor.

He adds that there was “at least one campaign advisor,” which suggests that there may have been more than two saboteurs.

STOPTHESTEAL is one of several groups involved in the two Capitol Hill events and was permitted to use Lot 8, near the Capitol building, for its ONE NATION UNDER GOD event. The first event, the Save America rally, was held at the Ellipse, which was permitted to Women For America First.

It is this group that Ali claims produced the two saboteurs.

WHO ARE THE SUSPECTED WOMEN FOR AMERICA FIRST SABOTEURS?

Women For America First put out this statement about the aftermath of the Capitol, denouncing the violence and distancing itself from it.

SUSPECTED SABOTEUR I:   CHRIS BARRON

Note: These are my suspicions based on the resumes of the people involved, their history of subversion. Most likely, the suspects acted through underlings whose names will only surface from a police investigation. However, the underlings would not have been able to act without the go ahead from their superiors. So, fingering these two people is justifiable in the context of the awful national consequences of what happened on January 6.

Barron’s Current Position

The founder of WAF is listed as Amy Kremer and the press statement gives a contact, Chris Barron. with an email address with the domain name rightturnstrategiesdc.com

Right Turn Strategies is a PR/lobbying/strategizing group, adept at working both inside and outside DC and they explain what they do thus:

“Within our communications practice we offer a variety of services including traditional public relations, marketing support and brand development, media training, and crisis management.  As a result, we are fluent in crafting both proactive and reactive strategies. We understand that some clients seek us out to raise their profiles- or that of their business- while others have come to us in an effort to stay “under the radar.” 

Experienced in both paradigms, we quickly assess the situation, and craft and execute a plan to further our client’s objective.  

More often than not, the most important component of a successful strategy is getting the messaging right for the targeted audience. In today’s world, this might mean crafting multiple, nuanced messages to reach different audiences.”

The reference to crisis management and under the radar operations suggests that the group might be adept at subverting a movement from within using deceptive techniques.

Chris Barron seems to be the “Trump campaign advisor” that Ali Alexander refers to in his allegation, since Barron’s biography at the end of a  piece on NeverTrumpers has this:

Chris Barron is President of Right Turn Strategies. He is a contributor to The Hill, and a regular on the Kennedy Show on FOX Business and Unfiltered on Headline News. He was a media surrogate for the Trump campaign and organized LGBT for Trump.

An LGBT advocate is going to have a hard time with the conservative Christian positions of the mainstream of the pro Trump movement and his presence in the campaign seems like a plant.

I think we have one of the two suspects in the sabotage.

Sabotage has also been the modus operandi of the Lincoln Project, which poses as Republican, but actually makes common cause with Democrats to subvert more traditional Republicans, in this case, Trump supporters.

Barron’s History of Subversion

Confirming this suspicion, only a few years ago, Chris Barron was the spokesman of a liberal Republican group [one that is Republican in Name Only] called Mainstream Republicans  whose sole purpose was to undermine limited government groups, like the Tea Party and Freedom Works, and substitute big government, liberal positions for theirs:

Main Street Advocacy, a Republican establishment advocacy group that received seed money from K street, is an organization created expressly to fight limited-government groups who challenge Republican Party officials and to promote liberal and moderate Republicans in government positions.

The group believes that the Tea Party is costing them valuable seats in the Congress.

So Barron has a history of creating astroturf Republican outfits, using money from K street, which was created to finance groups advocating lower taxes,  to undermine genuine grass-roots small government outfits.  To make the situation worse, the original Tea Party formed from a base of anti-Federal Reserve, pro-hard money, Christian conservative, and anti-NWO groups that were followers of Republican candidate Ron Paul, had by then itself been subverted into the later Tea Party, funded by the Koch brothers.

This latter Tea Party, already closer to the statist mainstream than its original base, was the one targeted by Barron’s deceptively named Mainstream Republicans.

MR’s positions in truth more resembled those of mainstream liberal  Democrat groups. Indeed, the two worked together to undermine first, the Tea Party, and then its resurgence in the shape of MAGA [Make America Great Again].

Barron’s profile and history show clear evidence of intentionally subverting the base that became the core of Trump’s following.

So why was he an advisor to the campaign and a coordinator of the single most important public event in the entire Trump presidency?

II SUSPECTED SABOTEUR II:  AMY KREMER

Amy and Kylie Jane Kremer’s Position

We find the same profile and history in the case of Amy Kremer, the other suspected saboteur, who with her daughter is the founder of Women For America First, a 504c foundation. 504c’s  do not need to reveal the sources of their funding.

Kremer’s daughter Kylie Jane is the  director of Women for America First and the permit for the January 6 event was in her name.

Amy Kremer’s History

Kylie Jane’s mother is referred to as a former Tea Party activist, but further research shows that Amy Kremer is actually a liberal Republican or RINO with a history of subverting the Tea Party, just like that of Chris Barron.

Kremer founded Tea Party Patriots, which left-liberal reporter David Wiegel, who followed and misrepresented the Tea Party movement for years, describes as the original grass roots movement.  However, TPP was only created in 2010 and the original Tea Party came out of the Ron Paul libertarians around 2005- 2007. By 2010, that movement had been coopted by mainstream Republicans receiving Koch funding and a rift existed between the two groups’ motivations and goals. Kremer’s TPP was thus, already a mainstream Republican group, something Wiegel’s unreliable narrative fails to state.

On top of that, Kremer then subverted this group by leaving it to form Tea Party Express, a spin- off from another astro-turf group and locked down TPP’s resources during her exit, thereby effectively neutering it. It’s likely that that was her goal all along, which means she too has a history of turning grass roots Republican movements into  liberal Republican or RINO projects.

Exactly like Chris Barron.

HOW THE PLANNED EVENTS OF JAN 6 WERE SUBVERTED

The Jan 6 events were subverted in two distinct ways:

  1. The main speakers, including Trump, were lined up only 2-3 days before the first event at the Ellipse, although PDJT had been promoting the event from mid- December onward. To add to the confusion, at least one data science speaker was cancelled a couple of days before the event and didn’t even go to DC. The slots for the remaining data scientists, Patrick Byrne, and General Flynn, were all cancelled at the meeting itself. No special preparations had been made for them, reportedly, so the decision to cancel was seemingly not last-minute, but taken earlier, while the speakers were notified at the last minute. This suggests that the person who cancelled didn’t want to allow for explanations, substitutions, or any fall-back planning. That is a sign of sabotage not confusion.
  2. The second event at Lot 8 was also sabotaged, because programming and instructions about how to get there from the Ellipse were never given at the first event, which was the original plan.  People observed a younger crowd, smelling of marijuana, and dressed in ways unusual for Trump supporters, coming in to the previous night’s event, as well as the events of Jan 6. Some of this younger crowd seems to have left before Trump’s speech got under way and gone on ahead to the Capitol building, from where they got into the building and engaged in some vandalism. The police appear to have been negligent in protecting the building and were also seen in many videos actively helping people enter and looking the other way, on one hand, while also engaging in unprovoked aggression, including pepper- spraying, tasering, and releasing smoke-bombs.

From StopTheSteal’s statement above and other news items, we get the following:

  1. There was an event at the Ellipse of the President’s Park or South Lawn, permitted to Women For America First, hosted by a variety of groups, including Ali Alexander’s StopTheSteal, Women for Trump, and Women for America First, etc.
  2. The permitted event was to begin at 9 AM and continue to 5 PM
  3. President Trump’s speech was scheduled for 11 AM but it was delayed by and hour and went on to 1 PM??. It seems that while POTUS boosted the event from mid-December onward, he only knew he was scheduled to speak on January 3rd, on the weekend before the event. Could this be why the speech sounded mundane? The Trump team denied that any member of his campaign staff was involved in the organization, operation, or funding of the rally. And if any contractors or former members were, it was without the authorization of the campaign. Thus, Barron as a media liaison of the campaign, would have acted on his own.
  4. Patrick Byrne, Michael Flynn had been told they would speak on January 6 at the invitation of Women For Trump, according to Patrick Byrne. Byrne implies he was told sometime after January 2 and before January 6, which fits with when Trump was told.  On January 5, he was told that one of the 3 or 4 scientists and analysts who had been asked to speak for a few minutes each had had his slot cancelled.  When Byrne and Flynn got to the Ellipse on the 6th, there was no slot for them. They listened to the speeches right up through some of Trump’s. Flynn was later invited on stage by an embarrassed organizer, but he refused. The two left in the beginning or middle of POTUS’ speech.
  5. Eric and Don Jr. gave speeches.
  6. Alex Jones was told that he would be leading a procession to the Capitol and his signal would be the moment when Secret Service police came up to him at the event. But he found that people had gotten there ahead of him.
  7.  The second part of the event was the One Nation Under God event at Lot 8 near the Capitol building, which was organized by and permitted to StopTheSteal. Programming and instructions about walking over there from the Ellipse were supposed to be given to the audience and televised on a large screen at the first event at the Ellipse. Through the deliberate sabotage of  two employees of the Women For America, according to Ali Alexander, this never happened.  Instead, the crowd was left to wander over  mistakenly to the Capitol building itself, where, unknown to them, a trap was ready to be sprung.
  8. At Lot 8,  Senator Paul Gosar [R- Arizona] was supposed to raise the original objection to the election certification and then Senator Ted Cruz [R-Texas] was to propose a Commission to review the merits of the objections. StopTheSteal anticipated that the gathered crowd of OVER A MILLION would add their voices to strengthen the resolve of the wavering Republicans. This and only this was what President Trump intended. Not the march to the physical Capitol building, where, again, unknown to the protestors, additional security had been refused, security had been told to let in people, and infiltrators of many stripes were present, posing both as Trump supporters, as well as opposition, like BLM and Antifa. There were actual BLM supporters present, as well as agent provocateur right- wing groups like Proud Boys posing as BLM, thus adding dense confusion to the events that followed.

 

 

JFK Assassination Obsession Unique To Libertarians?

Says Charles Burris.

Uh no, Mr. Burris,

I’ve been fascinated by it a long time….and aware that it was not the DEEP STATE but the NWO elites using their tool Johnson who assassinated Kennedy.

Left liberals who worship Kennedy are the premier group obsessed with the Kennedy assassination…….

Because they want to retain the myth of Camelot and understand how it was taken away from them.

Christians or conservatives don’t usually care much for Kennedy in the first place …or for Camelot…and place the cementing of control of the NWO much earlier, some with FDR, others earlier, with Wilson.

Libertarian analysis of this conspiracy ends up mythologizing Kennedy even more, which is hardly something a cultural conservative would want to do.

Besides, the whole analysis of the NWO COMES from Christian writers from a century and more back; their  ideas were imported, repackaged and reattached to a variety of non Christian writers whose view points were more consonant with that of the elites than Christianity.

I have patiently read through a good bit of the Christian literature on the subject and that’s where it emerges.

Still way ahead of you.

Libertarianism is a decent framework for contemporary politics. And any rationalization aka ideology that you can dream up for it after the fact.

It is not a particularly convincing framework to tackle anything else.

The teachings of Christ and the teachings of Murray Rothbard or Mises are incompatible in anything more than a superficial or temporary way.

They provide good cover for Christians who are embarrassed to profess Christianity publicly because it undermines their standing in academic and intellectual circles.

But to be a friend of this world is to hate Christ.

And to love Christ is to hate this world.

Just as one might be what is deemed a great patriot or freedom fighter and even highly moral, for conducting espionage on behalf of your own country, hacking other people’s private information, or perhaps, even more dreadfully, seducing a honey pot on behalf of the white hats, the fact is you cannot be a follower of Christ and do it.

At least, you might do it, but you would not be proud of it. You would look at it as an evil necessity and eat bread and water and flagellate yourself until the stink of it in your soul was gone. And even then you would shudder at the moral AIDS you had contracted and know that your spiritual health had been forever compromised.

Your seduction puts you only one step away from the sexual torturers of Abu Ghraib, who likewise instrumentalized their own genitals into weapons of war. They were uneducated youngsters, with  no one to tell them better. What is your excuse?

That is what undercover operations in the James Bond vs. Pussy Galore genre mean….they reduce genitals into weapons at the level of a Venus fly trap, and transform the human into the insect world.

But a vast number of people go along with such things, because we have all been conditioned by movies in the Cold War genre to accept that white and black hats differ only in their ends, not in the means they employ.

But that is ultimately as soul destroying a belief as the esoteric philosophies that were for many years my own temptation. Very likely more destructive.

Coming out of Babylon involves much greater effort than changing the color of the flag under which we do battle….libertarian or liberal or progressive…

Or American or Russian or Chinese.

It means fighting only for the cross, which is Christ.

Known to the secular world as Truth……

Not for an ideology.