Autogynephilia: The Truth Behind “Transgender”

 

Lady in red: Kerry says that many men enjoy female masking but that it's a taboo even among the cross-dressing community“Transgender” as an identity equivalent to a biological male or female is the latest intellectual legerdemain intended to hoodwink the American population.

Some radical feminist bloggers have spotted “transgenderism” accurately as an attempt to erase the notion of biological women in favor of  male autoerotic sexual obsession – autogynephilia –  a condition that is associated, apparently at alarming rates, with sexual offenses ranging from public exhibitionism to rape and murder.

[Note: transgender activists adamantly deny the centrality of autogynephilia to transgenderism and consider it quack science.

As for me, I find it plausible, but not as a medical condition so much as a moral condition.

In my lay opinion, there are no such fixed identities as homosexuals, autogynephiles etc. These are reifications of acts chosen by human beings, under more or less erotic compulsion.

As a Christian, I consider such acts disordered or immoral on the basis of their non-conformity to the injunction to regard our bodies as the temple of God, who appears to favor the missionary posture and reproductive sex over everything else.]

Despite the language of “feminine essence” employed by political activists, it is not female “brain sex” but male fetishism – autogynephilia – that is behind the large majority of transgender cases that develop in adulthood.

Perhaps to disguise this fact, transgender activism has lately become centered on feeding puberty-delaying/suppressing hormones to children who display even the most innocuous divergence from the expected behavior of boys or girls.

In a two-step regime, this blocking is followed with hormone therapy to induce the secondary sex characteristics of the desired sex.

The hormone blockers are the first stage of the treatment, but there’s a second stage that’s possible. Once children have postponed puberty for three or four years, at around age 16 they can choose to begin maturing sexually into the opposite gender, the gender they want to become. To do this, they begin taking the hormones of the opposite sex. For males, taking estrogen at this point will bring on breast and hip growth — and all the attributes physical and emotional of females. The reverse will happen for girls who take testosterone. Spack says this treatment can help make an adult transgender male almost indistinguishable from a biological male in terms of physical appearance.”

But there’s a catch in this gender wonderland:

Taking testosterone or estrogen immediately after blocking puberty will make a teenage patient sterile.”

To repeat  –   transgender therapy following puberty-blocking therapy results in sterile adults who cannot, and will never, reproduce.

How different is this really from Nazi human experimentation?

And who gives either the medical profession or the parents the right to make such monstrous changes in the sexuality of their children?

What irony that people who are so quick to denounce Muslims for female genital mutilation, even of a relatively circumscribed nature, have no problem with destroying forever the fertility of their children.

Fertility, moreover is not adventitious but central to sexuality.

Regardless, the rush is on to swap organs and hormones at will.

One can see why.

With government funding and elite backing, transgenderism and its attendant therapies, surgeries, drug-regimes, social-conditioning, judicial monitoring, legislative framing, and media promotion, make for a huge financial bonanza for the professions, NGO’s, and government agencies involved.

In the UK, the Tavistock and Portman Trust has taken the lead in transgender therapy, which has seen a 75% increase there from 2002 to 2015.

The Tavistock and Portman Trust is a specialist mental health branch of the National Health Service (NHS) of the UK under private control. Note, private control.

It is an off-shoot of the Tavistock Clinic, founded in 1920 to treat shell-shocked soldiers returning from World War I.

The Portman clinic was founded in 1933 to study and treat delinquency.

The Tavistock Clinic and the Portman joined forces in 1994 and then became a foundation trust of the NHS in 2006.

The work of the Tavistock Clinic was expanded by the Tavistock Institute, founded in 1946 with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.

It planned to study/assist organizations with an amorphous mandate best described by its own web-site:

(They) integrate different approaches from the social sciences to give our clients a deep understanding of their issues and potential ways forward. (They) bring assumptions to the surface and work with the unpredictable, including what is hidden, and sometimes, unconscious.” [2]

So-called conspiracy researchers are almost unanimous in concluding from this vague jargon that the Tavistock Institute’s real goal is far more subversive and anti-social than its stated one.

Tavistock has become synonymous with mind-control of the masses.

Another of the elite backers of transgender therapy, this time in the United States, is influential billionaire and former US army lieutenant-colonel James (now Jennifer) Pritzker.

Pritzker has publicly admitted that he is an autogynephile, that is, a man who is aroused at the thought of himself as a woman.

Pritzker has also come out publicly as a transsexual, a man who makes himself into a woman through surgery.

Pritzker’s family, one of the richest in the America, owns and operates the Hilton chain of hotels and his own personal net worth is around $1.5 billion.

His extended family’s fortune is over ten times that.

Sadly for its public image, aging male fetishists like James Pritzker are the primary fans of the trans-gender movement.

It has therefore cleverly fastened onto transgenderism in children as a way to diffuse that awkward fact.

But the transgender children end up being paraded by their adult care-takers in a pornified spectacle catering to the same fetishistic males:

The “Transgender Chicken Circuit”, for the uninformed, is a patchwork of media appearances, news and feature articles, talk shows, documentaries, convention and seminar appearances that savvy parents can weave together into a modest cottage industry of transgender child celebrity. Think of it as a Munchausen-marinated transgender version of “Toddlers and Tiaras” whose fans are aging cross-dressing male autogynephiles in possession of both a wistful longing for an unexperienced girlhood, and a generous disposable income. These men are the funders of the agencies and lobbying groups promoting the medicalization of childhood gender nonconformity. The best known example is billionaire financier and lifelong closeted crossdresser (and father of three) James “Jennifer Natalya” Pritzker whose Tawani Foundation single-handedly funds the experimental pediatric transgender drug clinic at Children’s Hospital of Chicago.”

To sum up, transgender activism in the UK (Tavistock) and in the US (Tawani) caters to the sensibilities of adult male fetishists and is both driven and funded by the private foundations (Tavistock and Tawani) of the super-rich ruling elite.

To be more specific:

The Pritzkers, a rich, powerful, and influential family of Ashkenazy Jews, are behind the transgender therapy movement in the US.

The king-pin Ashkenazy Rothschild family and the Sephardic converso Rockefeller family, which merged financial interests in 2012, are behind the same thing in the UK.

The Rockefellers fund a wide-range of political and social programs whose overarching themes are those of what is called the New World Order – feminism, environmentalism, one-world government, sexual license, sterility, abortion.

Those who think that the crypto appellation for the ostensibly Protestant Rockefellers is an anti-Semitic canard should read “The Grandees: America’s Sephardic Elite,” by Stephen Birmingham.

The author cites a book meant only for Jewish eyes that lists older established Sephardic Jewish families in the U.S in order to distinguish them from the post-1848 parvenus, among whom are many of the Ashkenazy banking elites.

Who would expect to find, for example, the Rockefellers in The Book? They are there, along with such old-family members of American society as the De Lanceys, the Livingstones, the Goodwins, the Stephensons, the Ingersolls, the Lodges, the Ten Eycks, the Tiffanys, the Van Rensselaers, the Hopkins, and the Baltimore McBlairs.”

Now a little more about the Pritzker family: Penny Pritzker, the current Secretary of State is Obama’s top fundraiser.

The Pritzker family co-owned the Superior Bank with the New York developer Alvin Dworman (also Jewish) at the time of its spectacular crash from gross mismanagement, a collapse that was the largest of its kind in a decade.

The Pritzkers pretended not to have known anything about the management, even though they collected exorbitant dividends, let the federal thrift insurance fund take a hit of $440 million dollars for the bank’s covered losses, and coming out relatively unscathed themselves.

In short, your typical crony-capitalist hustlers.

Guy Russo’s book, “Supermob: How Sidney Korshak and His Associates Became America’s Hidden Power Brokers,” (2006) describes how Pritzker’s grand-father and great-grandfather became wealthy as tax lawyers for the Chicago mob, the Outfit.

But the Pritzker’s association with crime does not stop there.

It extends to banking with the criminal BCCI bank; CIA ties through the off-shore racket, looting of thrifts; labor racketeering; and sweet-heart deals with the government.

The Pritzkers are allied with another Ashkenazy crime family – the Crowns, according to Christopher Bollyn, citing Sherman Skolnik (h/t to Abel Danger) who says that the Crowns are affiliated with Israeli intelligence and have repeatedly exerted pressure on Obama to attack Iran and to attack researchers on 9/11.

With that bit of background, let’s return to what the Pritzker money has wrought in the realm of transgenderism.

First:

It has funded studies at the Palm Center of  San Francisco State University that urge the military to open its doors to transgendered individuals, despite their elevated risk for suicide and psychiatric illness.

The Palm Center also wants the military (the tax-payer) to subsidize the drug-therapy and surgeries that transgenders might require.

Second:

The Pritzker money funds the Center for Gender, Sexuality, and HIV Prevention at the Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago.

There, younger and younger children are being given hormones that block puberty or bring on opposite sex characteristics that cause irreversible changes, including loss of fertility.

Many of these patients are 14 and younger at the time they give their “consent.”

Ironically, many of these gender non-conforming children would, if allowed to develop, simply choose to act homosexually.

In other words, the transgender activists are demanding that childrens’ bodies conform to their moral/sexual choices about sexuality.

It is not wonder that many homosexuals, lesbians, and radical feminists have found the transgender agenda alarming, although they have erroneously identified the problem as conservative heterosexual conformism.

Even more dishearteningly, the Lurie children’s program is run by an HIV-positive homosexual who admits that he has no idea what the long-term result of hormonal interventions will be, but nonetheless has few qualms about using confused children and their anxious parents as guinea-pigs in his quest for glory.

It is hard to understand in what way this odious project is different from the human experimentation of Nazi scientists, who also induced sterility in their victims.

Moreover, adult transgenderism is not associated by medical researchers with opposite sex identification (or same sex interest) in children, although some activists have created a narrative that argues as much.

Adult transgenderism is linked most obviously to autogynephilia, a behavioral addiction that, unchecked, can lead to obsessive cross-dressing at one end of the scale, and sexual reassignment surgery at the other.

Less remarked is the large number of autogynephiles who commit assaults, rapes, and murders.

Colonel Russ Williams, the commander of a Canadian air-force base,  broke into women’s bedrooms to steal their underwear for years before he raped and murdered two subordinates.

A cross-dressing fetishist, he routinely masturbated in his victims’ undergarments after his crimes and meticulously recorded everything for his future gratification.

Serial killer Ed Gein, the inspiration for the horror films, “Psycho” and “Silence of the Lambs,” was obsessed with creating articles of clothing from the sexual organs of his victim.

In the minds of these injured males, wearing women’s clothes is equated with wearing women’s skins and sexual organs….a male erotic fantasy that they enjoy as males, not females.

Far from being a case of “women hiding in men’s bodies,” as the media presents it, autogynephilia is a case of men hiding in  men’s bodies, and in the case of a related erotic fetish – female masking –  men hiding in women’s bodies.

Autogynephiles remain men intent on mimicking the appearance of women to enhance their sexual experience as men.

They “wear” their victim/target’s appearance/clothes in order to erase the women outside them – real biological women – in favor of their own narcissistic and erotic mimicry.

In that sense, the autogynephile is not becoming a woman, as he would like us to believe.

He is consuming or assimilating woman-hood to complete his self-contained and injured masculinity.

By definition, autoeroticism – like porn – is fundamentally at odds with other-directed, reproductive, biological sex, although it can parody it grotesquely.

That is to say, transgenderism is sterile in theory as well as in practice.

And this sterility coincides with the stated objective of the New World Order to eliminate or reduce reproduction, which is why it is being promoted vigorously by the establishment media.

But to observe as much in this increasingly deranged society is to be counted as paranoid and bigoted.

All aberrations must be tolerated by the tolerant society except the aberration of  calling things aberrant.

 

St. Peter Damian On Public Reproof

I was worrying whether I ought to have criticized Pope Francis.

What right have I to judge his faithfulness to Catholic doctrine, when I am not a Catholic and not a regular church-going Christian either and certainly hold a few heterodox beliefs.

But then I came across this letter by St. Peter Damian, who got a lot of criticism for his forthright denunciation of homosexual clerics in his day (1007-1072 AD).

Unlike Pope Francis who famously said, “who am I to judge,” in reference to homosexuals, St. Peter Damian says, “Who am I not to judge…”.

[Christians are not supposed to “judge” (that is, condemn or consign to damnation), but they are explicitly instructed to “judge” in the sense of reprove, when their reproof might be the only means to save someone from more self-destructive actions.]

… I would surely prefer to be thrown into the well like Joseph who informed his father of his brothers’ foul crime, than to suffer the penalty of God’s fury, like Eli, who saw the wickedness of his sons and remained silent. (Sam 2:4) … Who am I, when I see this pestilential practice flourishing in the priesthood to become the murderer of another’s soul by daring to repress my criticism in expectation of the reckoning of God’s judgement? … How, indeed, am I to love my neighbor as myself if I negligently allow the wound, of which I am sure he will brutally die, to fester in his heart?[48] “So let no man condemn me as I argue against this deadly vice, for I seek not to dishonor, but rather to promote the advantage of my brother’s well-being. “Take care not to appear partial to the delinquent while you persecute him who sets him straight. If I may be pardoned in using Moses’ words, ‘Whoever is for the Lord, let him stand with me.’ (Ezek 32:26)” [49]

 

 

NWO Shill Says Forget NWO

One Jake Anderson of Anti-Media says forget about the New World Order  – it’s sophomoric. Deep thinkers, such as Anderson, use sophisticated terms like Deep State….

Oh.

And I thought people used that term to distract attention from the people behind the Deep State.

And to make sure that readers stick with Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, Peter Dale Scott (all name-checked in the piece), and the rest of the Anglo-American mouth-pieces making sure that the eyes of 7 billion people world-wide watch only what those activists tell them to watch, repeat what those activists repeat, and listen to them.

Seven billion.

All those interests and voices must be screened out for a dozen or so over-exposed Westerners.

Can propaganda be any more transparent? Is this the best intelligence can come up with?

 

Orthodox Warning About False NWO Opposition

Update 2: 10/13/15

As I’d begun to suspect (see update 1 below), there is something amiss here and despite the correct assessment of disinformation in Western alternative media, the Orthodox Father must himself be looked at with reserve. It turns out, from my research so far, that he was charged by several sources with the abuse of young men and was forced to leave his post for disobedience, without any comment on the underlying charges.

This is not the first serious critic of the powers-that-be who has ended up tarred with sex abuse allegations that are unclear. One doesn’t know whether Podmoshensky was simply slandered in order to discredit him because of his activism or whether he was chosen to disseminate anti-NWO views, because it was known that he was a sexual predator and that would serve to discredit those views ultimately. This is the same issue that rises with Eustace Mullins, who turns out to have had a long interaction with the FBI.  it is the same kind of thing we find in many patriot and right-wing circles, which turn out to be fully in bed with the intelligence agencies.

Yet another instance when a little sense of unease turned out to be predict a larger problem accurately.

UPDATE, September 10, 2015 @ 17:12:01

I see an approving reference to Jonathan Cahn, who has been hyping the shemitah judgment on the US, which several Christian sites have thoroughly debunked, not least for the reason that the Shemitah had to do with a covenanted nation – Ancient Israel – not the US.

The site talks about the dangers of Christian Socialism, identifying it with the red dragon and it talks about the New Age and ecumenism as dangerous.

Fair enough.

But now that people are grasping the idea that there is a fake NWO-resistance, it will not be long before that too is co-opted.

So reader beware.

ORIGINAL POST

It warms my heart to think that there are religious who take the time to understand the nuances of politics and the fake opposition that is deceiving so many anti-war or anti-empire people.

Here, Father Herman Podmonshenksy of Orthodox Australia talks about the real NWO that will rise from the fake anti-NWO resistance.

And, he too sees through Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, Glenn Beck, Alex Jones, and the rest – all theater for the home crowd and smoke-and-mirrors for outsiders:

Harlan K. Ullman, the principal author of the “shock and awe” doctrine and current Chairman of the Killowen Group which advises government leaders, who also writes for the Atlantic Council, a prominent think tank based in Washington DC, warns that an “extraordinary crisis” is needed to preserve the “new world order,” which is under threat of being derailed by non-state actors like Edward Snowden.

http://www.infowars.com/think-tank-extraordinary-crisis-needed-to-preserve-new-world-order/

In an article entitled War on Terror Is not the Only Threat, Ullman asserts that, “tectonic changes are reshaping the international geostrategic system,” arguing that it’s not military superpowers like China but “non-state actors” like Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning and anonymous hackers who pose the biggest threat to the “365 year-old Westphalian system” because they are encouraging individuals to become self-empowered, eviscerating state control.

“Very few have taken note and fewer have acted on this realization,” notes Ullman, lamenting that “information revolution and instantaneous global communications” are thwarting the “new world order” announced by U.S. President George H.W. Bush more than two decades ago.

In a similar article, Brzezinski, a co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, seems to decry the ‘Global Political Awakening’ which “is making the Syrian war difficult”.

http://www.storyleak.com/brzezinski-global-political-awakening-making-syrian-war-difficult/

This is not the first time Brzezinski “denounces” the global awakening:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCWgksGGPQ0

So here we have it all, the plan in plain view – the elites are seen loosing control and their NWO plan derailed  by the rebels – just like in Star Wars.

No dear Orthodox brothers and sisters, it is not that simple. As much as they would like us to believe that this is the case, the real NWO Bush was referring to, when he talked about forging “a new world order where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations”, is not about what the think-tank is suggesting, that is just the diversion. The real new world order will come about from this resistance movement that is carefully orchestrated by the same powers of darkness.

Yes, the coming world-wide tyranny under the “current” NWO is to be denounced and its true nature needs to be exposed, but we should not loose sight of what “the other hand” is doing.

Unfortunately every single member of the alternative media that have been warning about the impeding catastrophe, be it Alex Jones, David Icke, Glenn Beck etc, they are all identifying the current elites and the current NWO as the prime “enemy”, and see the resistance movement as the way to conquering it, but they give no thought to the possibility that the whole NWO thing being a diversion for the real NWO George Bush talked about – which will bring about a “more just system”. They all see these sort of news of the elite being defeated as battles won in their long war, not thinking that the victories may not be theirs at all.

It is really hard for anyone in the west, which has been under Catholic and Protestant chiliastic influences for centuries, to really see the deception, and pause for a second and take a look at the whirlpool that sucks everything in. It is hard for them to see the deception because they do not put Christ first, rather they see themselves as fighters for freedom for the sake of freedom, not understanding that the real freedom only comes from God as a gift for righteousness and repentance.

The real NWO is being prepared in secret and will be revealed by bringing the antichrist to the world scene as a liberator from the rising tyranny and coming wars, and will most likely be a leader of this movement of “awakening”. As our Holy Fathers have said, the antichrist will be Orthodox which is why the deception will be complete. He will be Orthodox, but of the World Orthodoxy – the ecumenist Orthodoxy.

Therefore we would like to ask you, our reader, to please take a moment and read some of our other related articles, and if you think that what is written here is true, help spread the message before it is too late.”

 

Replies To Mail

Had a few notes from readers, while I was away.

Thanks to everyone.

I’ll reply in this forum:

  • Reader who asks to send information without posting: I don’t read my email often, so posting will get a quicker reply. You can post anonymously and just use someone else’s computer, if you don’t trust encryption.
  •  Douglas V. has a couple of articles, including an interview. I’ll post them, when I have a chance to read them.
  •  M. asks about archives. Well, they’re accessible now.

Besides the mail, I had a rethink about  my comments about LRC/Mises/Rand and Ron Paul etc.

I am thinking of rewriting more politely some past criticisms of them and of various neocons and liberal/leftists, as well as stalkers and critics.

I’ve always shied away from the Hindu teaching that you should not focus on the negative, feeling that it was some thing wrong in Hinduism.

But as I read the Orthodox fathers, I come across similar teachings about not condemning.

I know they were talking about personal life, not political blogging, which, by it’s nature is confrontational and critical.

But still…

So if you see something changed or modified, I’ve not “gone wobbly” or “covering-up” for people.

I’m just trying to tone down the finger-pointing and make the criticism more peaceable.

Hard for me, being a bit trigger-happy, when I blog.