Category Archives: Media

Fake News Reporter Preps Hit Piece On Powell, Byrne

Posted on by

Update [3.41 pm, Jan 27 IST]:
I added another tidbit to my comments at DC on Jo Becker’s forthcoming hit piece on Byrne and Powell for exposing Dominion Voting Systems’ fraud:

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/new-york-times-begs-court-to-dismiss-project-veritas-defamation-lawsuit/

The link goes to an article demonstrating the abysmal incompetence and bad faith of major reporters today. The NYT was hit by a defamation lawsuit after it claimed that its video was unsourced, when there were multiple witnesses that the Times just couldn’t be bothered to track down. Then, the Times admitted that its own take on Project Veritas was based on what it read on Wikipedia….

ORIGINAL POST

Over at  Deep Capture, Patrick Byrne, former Overstock CEO and crusader against Wall Street and election fraud, has published an email from Jo Becker, a NY Times reporter asking for Byrne’s comment on a piece she is writing about his funding of Sidney Powell to the tune of $500,000 to research Dominion Voting Systems for fraud during the 2020 presidential election, a story she has heard from some unnamed source, she says:

“I have been told and am preparing to report that you gave the lawyer Sidney Powell $500,000 to investigate Dominion and the role it’s voting machines may have played, allowing her to continue to pursue this line of inquiry.”

As I blogged earlier, one of the most important things that digital warriors can do is to provide the  background of the pressitutes and hacks that pass for the 4th estate these days.

Jo Becker, with three Pulitzer Prizes under her belt, is clearly a mouth-piece for elite narrative-shaping, because, these days prestigious prizes are awarded mainly to those inclined to play that role.

My comments at Deep Capture summarize what a little research into her history found:

Patrick,

She couldn’t be bothered to research this story so she went with an obviously incorrect tip, if there really was a tip. She couldn’t be bothered to check her grammar, so she added an apostrophe incorrectly to a possessive pronoun.

Any NYT reporter who uses anonymous sources [“have been told”] to prepare media reports to help Dominion in its retaliatory lawsuit against Powell and Guiliani for over a billion dollars, is likely an asset of some kind and not playing fair.

That’s just an educated guess for now, but I would urge the digital warriors on this blog to check into it.
People have been asking what they can do. Well, here it is.

Delve into Jo Becker’s past reporting, any connections to the financial cabal, or even to Coomer himself, proof of Mockingbird status, ties to Dem financiers or hacks, affairs with Coomer’s lawyers, business irregularities, court filings, and the rest of her history. Give these propaganda outlets a taste of the medicine they dish out to others.

Particularly look for her stories covering Trump, RussiaCollusion, and any BFF status with Obama and Hillary associates.

This will extract a price from reporters…and the people behind them… for intimidating anyone who exposes cabal corruption.”

OK guys, got some background.
Becker is a 3x Pulitzer winning reporter, who left the WashPo for NYT.
WashPo is even more of a Mockingbird outlet than any other paper.
So that is strike one.
Strike two. She has an extensive background in negative reporting on Trump, including pushing Russian collusion stuff.
Strike three. Her husband Serge Kovaleski, also of WashPo, now at NYT, is the son of Fred K. who was a CIA spy. Kovaleski goes back decades in interaction with Trump. He is the guy with the disability who was allegedly mocked by Trump. I would say what I dug up in just one minute is already looking bad for her objectivity in writing about Dominion.

[I know I did not put hyphens in some places, but that is because my keyboard isn’t working right not because I cannot be bothered.]

 

  1. More on ”reporter” Jo Becker and her direct ties to HILARY ROSEN AND KEN MEHLMAN, whose interests evidently guide her reporting.

    Becker’s Pulitzer Prize was not given because her gay marriage book was great: it’s been trashed even by the Guardian, from the left, as a kind of rewrite of the history of marriage equality to give credit only to “rich, white” guys….

    What the Guardian should have said is that CREDIT WAS ONLY GIVEN TO DEMOCRAT ACTIVISTS.
    In other words, those kinds of prizes go to those who promote the CABAL NARRATIVE.

    Becker’s book promoted Chad Griffen, who ended up heading HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN, a very important part of the Democrat power base.

    Becker’s promotion of Griffen and Human Rights Campaign ties directly to HRC’s HILARY ROSEN, one of the most powerful women in politics, Democrat political strategist, lobbyist, CNN analyst, Trump hater, and handler of Hillary, Feinstein, and other swamp critters on the left.

    ON HILARY ROSEN’S TDS
    https://dldnews.com/two-elephants-in-the-room/

    “Hilary Rosen thinks that media will bitterly regret the day they have started treating Trump as a “normal politician.”

    ON BECKER’S BOOK
    https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisgeidner/the-new-book-about-the-marriage-equality-movement

    “But Becker’s reliance on the AFER (and, later, HRC) team — primarily lawyers Olson and Boies, staffers Griffin and Adam Umhoefer, and consultants [HILARY] ROSEN and KEN MEHLMAN]— is ultimately the book’s downfall. Almost any contextualizing of the case is done by people with a vested and open interest in advancing the narrative that Griffin, with Olson’s help, rescued a cause that Becker claims “had largely languished in obscurity.”

    Correction:

    Correction:

    I lumped Ken Mehlman in with Rosen as a DEM operative, but in fact he is a gay Republican…one time chair of the RNC, whose position at HRC misled me. A RINO most likely, as he seems to be very active in Green investments. He is chief of Environmental Social governance at KKR, one of the largest private equity firms in the world. We know that private equity is heavily invested in Dominion Voting systems…and I would guess Mehlman has a hand in investments at KKR…and they are likely invested in Dominion as well. Must find a concrete link for that.

Indian Jan 6?: Farmers Breach Republic Day Barriers, Clash With Police

Posted on by

The Republic Day parade in the Indian capital, Delhi, has turned chaotic, as protesting farmers, given permission to hold a rally after the parade, arrived early, broke through barriers, and clashed with lathi-charging police, in what looks like a reprise of the instigated and staged violence,  at the January 6 Capitol protests in the USA.  Violent riots, reportedly instigated, are now unfolding in Putin’s Russia as well. Billionaire leftist change maestro, George Soros, has poured money into attacking Trump, Putin, and others.

Meanwhile, the Italian PM has resigned.

Dinesh D’Souza: Trump Nice Guy, Should Start Network

Posted on by

Fake News Claims Nameless Frenchman Funded Capitol Protest

Posted on by

Probably in an attempt to create a counter-narrative to the massive globalist coup that stole the election for Joe Biden, the mainstream media has come up with a story that one inflammatory speaker at the Capitol protest, Nick Fuentes, was funded by “dark money,” including a $500,000 contribution in BitCoin from a 35 year old French computer programmer, who wanted to leave his money to people and causes he believes in, and so sent it in BtC to Fuentes largely, but also to various Alt Right groups, including anti-immigration groups like VDare and others, such as,the Unz Review…

The Unz Review and VDare are part of the mainstream “dissent” category and that itself suggests a bogus story, besides the convenient fact that the computer programmer has now supposedly committed suicide and his obituary, even in a Google web cache has been wiped clean. Google. Uh huh.

We are to take this claim at face value, but affidavits,IP addresses, captured packets of data, images from hardware, statistical analysis…all the mountain of evidence behind Italygate and StoptheSteal is pure guff, outlandish conspiracy, and alternative reality.

Yes, the real foreign interference is not the documented mega- hack by Iranians, Chinese, NATO members and others, directed by the transnational climate-change cabal, but this  BTC- loving corpus-ex-machina.

See, this is why I oppose cryptocurrencies and any amateurish encryption.

At least, if you stick to your own credit-card, a check- book, paper receipts and cash, there is a trail you can use to prove you were framed. If you play around with BTC and VPNs, anyone can pin anything on you…

What’s the real story? I haven’t got deep into this, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some globalist/cabal affiliated group sent money to the Trump protest through these controlled opposition groups.

The reliable and shrewd Mish Shedlock thinks it was stolen money...which is again quite possible with untraceable cryptocurrencies.

At the very least, the whole story is extremely odd.

 

 

The Most Unusual “Inauguration” In US History

Posted on by

I would not call the Biden event an “inauguration.” The correct term for it is “installation.”

For instance, the Japanese empire installed the puppet Manchukuo regime in 1932.

The globalist cabal has shunted aside the overwhelming will of the people; committed the gravest of crimes, from fraud to extortion to treason; and, having sedated us with a witch’s brew of legal hocus pocus and media legerdemain, is now trying to induce over a hundred million people to say that what they saw happen on election night did not happen; that if enough powerful people say so, a lie is better than the truth; and that statistics, forensics, data, and affidavits only count if they add up on their side of the ledger, not ours.

Joe Biden, a man whose mental condition would not fit him to drive a car responsibly, is now behind the wheel of the most powerful nation on earth despite overwhelmingly losing the presidential election.

To assert as much is no longer possible on social media without a black-out of your account. In the real world, it will cost you your job, publishing contracts, and your social circle…. it may well haunt you for the rest of your life.

There has even been talk in mainstream circles of detention camps and cult deprogramming for Trump supporters and indeed anyone with the temerity to deny the official narrative that black is white, up down, and 2+2, 5.

In keeping with that fun house mirror of reality, Biden’s installation has now racked up the following “unique” identifiers [my comments are in color below]:

1.The first virtual inauguration.

Corona virus is the excuse, as it was with the mail-in votes; the real reason is to conceal Biden’s overwhelming lack of popular support and by corollary the fraud of his supposed “election.”

2.The first inauguration where crowds of supporters will be replaced by some 200,000 flags from all over the country.

Quite fitting, since he was installed by a consortium of enemy nations and domestic traitors who decided what was best for the American people, because they didn’t like the answer they got when they asked.

3. The first inauguration where the sitting president has not called the successor to congratulate him on winning.

Why would he? Trump knows Biden didn’t win. Biden knows Biden didn’t win. Everyone knows Biden didn’t win.

4. The first inauguration where the previous president has never officially conceded to the new one, despite the MSM mislabeling as concession a speech in which Trump mentioned a new administration without naming it in anyway.

He didn’t concede because he didn’t lose.

5.The first inauguration for a man whose name has never been mentioned in any speech by the current administration.

Perhaps this is because Biden’s is only a puppet regime whose strings are being pulled by the globalist cabal. He is completely replaceable by any other puppet. The only question is which side, Americanist or Globalist, will emerge victorious from the power struggle now unfolding behind the scenes, as well as overtly.

6.The first inauguration where the sitting president has not invited his successor to  the White House, as is customary. Melania Trump has also refused to meet Jill Biden and has not invited her for the customary walk through the private quarters of the White House. However, to demonstrate that it was not personal pettiness that made him break with tradition, but rather his knowledge of the fraudulent nature of the election, PDJT did write a gracious, personal note to Biden.

Biden broke into the White House, via cyber fraud. Denying him the official  White House tour reflects that reality.

7. The first inauguration in which the current president has limited his cooperation during the transition. PDJT’s civilian advistors have reportedly withheld from the Biden team pre-decision information such as those relating to troop strengths and movements and special operations missions related to counter-intelligence, as well as the vaccine distribution effort, Operation Warp Speed. However, they claim it is the Biden team that has made an overwhelming number of demands for information and that a transition team is not authorized to access sensitive classified information.

Rightly so. Biden has been documented to be the corrupt tool of the Chinese government and the Globalist climate cabal with HQ at the Vatican/City of London and any sovereign government would be loathe to let him share national security intelligence for any reason whatever.

9. The first inauguration in which the current president will not be in attendance.

See 5 and 6.

10. The first inauguration where the successor has been denied [by PDJT] the usual government-sanctioned military plane to fly him in to DC. The Bidens flew in to Andrews Joint Base on a private charter from Delaware.

This is not a matter of pettiness, as it is being described by the mainstream media. Trump was lawfully elected; Biden is simply a pawn installed through a conspiracy of domestic and foreign enemies. These enemies plotted and executed a seditious and treasonous coup that they are now propagandizing as a valid succession, but the military and PJDT are not buying it.

11. The first inauguration in which the number of National Guard troops and a smaller contingent of military  on the ground exceeds the number deployed by the military in Iraq and Afghanistan. Troop numbers have been estimated at around 30,000 in DC, with many more around the country, although the mainstream media is underestimating that by over 10,000. At least one official has used the figure 65,000. In addition, unlike deployments at previous inaugurations, these troops are armed lethally and are authorized to use lethal force. And although vastly in excess of any threat detected so far, they look like they’re sticking around.

12. The first inauguration in which reports are that large numbers of the National Guard turned their back on the pretender’s motorcade.

13. The first inauguration in which FLOTUS’ wardrobe conveyed political messages to the base.

Notice that Melania Trump wore a black suit in the signature style of Jackie Kennedy, shortly after PDJT was virtually assassinated by his vice president in collusion with the cabal, in much the same way that decades ago, Kennedy was physically assassinated by his vice-president Lyndon Johnson, at the behest of the cabal. Files on the Kennedy assassination were among the FBI files declassified in a massive dump by POTUS over the last few days. Melania Trump’s dress, with orange hexagons, recalls the military symbol for fire, according to some observers.

14. The first inauguration where the Capitol is surrounded by a 7 ft high security fence topped with razor wire, rather than barbed wire, with multiple roads and bridges blocked off, and military check points for entry and exit.

 

Three Narratives About The Massive Troop Presence In DC

Posted on by

NOQReport sums up different narratives about the presence of massive numbers of troops in DC:

“Right now there are two mainstream ideas as to what is really going on with Washington DC’s military control. The mainstream narrative is that it’s a natural reaction to the violence that occurred on the Capitol Building on January 6th. The problem with this theory is that there have been no credible calls for an armed protest on Inauguration Day. In fact, Conservative voices have been telling people to stay home and to NOT come to DC. The only credible report that I could find of ANYONE planning on showing up was the Boogaloo Boys, but they are so few in number, that would not warrant the 35,000+ troops on the ground.

On the Conservative side, there’s the claim that this is Donald Trump playing 5D chess, and that the military is there to arrest all of the Deep State who are traitors to the United States of America. They cite the fact that there are fences facing inward, which appear to be designed to keep people IN as opposed to OUT. Now, if that happens, that would be epic and a total Trump move. But is that the game plan, or is there something more sinister going on?

Could this be yet another setup by the Deep State to take out conservatives once and for all. Just as much of the Capitol Riots were designed as a setup to discredit the Conservative Movement, this could be yet another one. They are setting the stage that the Right is extremely violent, and the visual cue for that is the thousands of troops protecting our nation’s capitol. But what happens if there’s an attempt of violence that they thwart or actually allow to occur? This could justify the outright targeting and persecution of all conservatives, treated as an enemy of the state.”

Well, this is was always one of my great fears and the reason I didn’t vote for PDJT the first time around. I thought his whole presidency might be a Trojan horse to discredit conservatives.

I don’t think that now, having watched him for 4 years. And right now, I don’t think this is a set up. The other side is absolutely desperate and the infiltration of the Jan 6 rally, like the hacking of the election software, is a Hail Satan pass born out of sheer desperation at the persisting support for PDJT.

 

National Guard Chief Says 65,000 Soldiers And Airmen In DC Now

Posted on by

I came across this video in which National Guard Bureau chief Dan Hokanson says that 65,000 soldiers and airmen of the NG [3 times the number being reported in the media] are on the ground in DC.

Trump Incitement Timeline Fully Debunked

Posted on by

‘From CNN via DCPatriot:

“Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led investigators to believe the attack on the US Capitol was not just a protest that spiraled out of control, a federal law enforcement official says.

Among the evidence the FBI is examining are indications that some participants at the Trump rally at the Ellipse, outside the White House, left the event early, perhaps to retrieve items to be used in the assault on the Capitol.”
This reference to the crowd at the Ellipse is interesting because it appears that it was pioneer alternative news provider Alex Jones who organized the crowd at the Ellipse.
The observation that the movement to the Capitol came from the crowd at the Ellipse is seconded in this piece at USA Today:
Many of the rioters came directly from President Donald Trump’s “Save America Rally” that began hours earlier on the Ellipse, a park near the White House. Trump spoke to them for more than an hour, insisting that the election had been stolen.
USA Today’s timeline has the rally at the Ellipse starting around 6 am with some supporters arriving the previous night. It has the Save America Rally beginning at 11 am with speeches by Eric Trump and Don Jr. and Rudy Guiliani, followed by Trump at around 11.50 am.
The speech goes on for about an hour and during the time Trump urges supporters to walk down with him to the Capitol and tell Congress to do the right thing.
USA Today claims the protestors at the rally started the walk at the end of the speech at around 1 pm.
But Raheem Kassam has debunked this “Trump incitement” time-line. The speech was not easy to hear, was mostly a laundry list of election fraud with nothing new in it, and began late, so people wandered off before it ended toward the Capitol.
Kassam points out that the first protestors arrived at around 12.40 pm at the Capitol, a half hour before Trump ended his speech at 1.11 pm and over 76 minutes before any supporter could have made the 45 minute walk from the Ellipse to the Capitol following the speech. The outer perimeter of the Capitol had been breached and police chief Sund was calling for the National Guard before the President had even finished his speech. In fact, to do what investigators found them to have done, those who breached the Capitol would have had to have left the Ellipse before Trump began speaking.
The SGT Report published an eye witness account of the Ellipse rally and the walk to the Capitol, which contradicts the mainstream reports on several points.
Apparently the rally at the Ellipse was to run from 9 to 11, followed by another gathering at the North lawn of the Capitol building at 1.  This was announced at the website wildprotest.com which now brings up a 404 error sign.
Other participants have also mentioned the confusion arising from two planned events and the first one running an hour late.
The SGT Report account mentions young men with scary masks but Revolutionary symbols on the backs of their clothes boarding trains running into DC. It also mentions the unusual smell of pot at the Ellipse, but, other than that, nothing unusual about the crowd of mostly white but some Asian and a few black supporters.
He does observe that the earliest people to get to the Capitol were on average younger than the group at the Ellipse and they were the ones scaling the walls and pushing through the metal barriers. He saw smoke, smelled tear gas and heard ceremonial cannon fire but he saw no violence from the protestors and knew nothing about the entry into the Capitol until he heard it from someone else. Then he saw what he thought was an Antifa infiltrator breaking glass to enter the building. Later he heard that a woman had been killed.
As mentioned earlier, Alex Jones paid half a million to book the Ellipse and he said he was asked by Trump to lead the march. The secret service was supposed to call him out earlier to do that but he found that people had already gone on ahead.
“Jones also said he paid close to $500,000 to book the Ellipse, the park where Trump’s supporters initially gathered, and other areas near the Capitol. He said 80% of the money came from an unnamed donor.”
The second interesting point is that investigators are using a counter-terrorism strategy of picking up people who might be of concern in the future on very minimal charges. The targets mentioned in the piece are both Proud Boys leaders who were taken in on fairly innocuous infractions, such as destroying a BLM banner and making ominous online postings. Proud Boys is supposedly a far- right outfit that has picked up a reputation for standing up to BLM and Antifa, which, of course, means that in the mainstream narrative they are violent murderous fascists. I say supposedly because several savvy observers think PB are agents provocateurs themselves.
The final point made in the piece is that investigators are looking for evidence of any kind of command and control behind the protestors, which suggests that they don’t think that the more violent aspects of the rally were set off spontaneously by what Trump said in his speech, which is the mainstream narrative. They think there was a coordinated plan in motion, well before Trump even got to the protest.

Alex Jones Paid For Part Of Capitol Rally

Posted on by

I found this piece at the NY Post really interesting and possibly significant.

Alternative news pioneer, Alex Jones, of Info Wars fame, paid $500,000 of his own money to book either the Ellipse or another venue [it isn’t clear from the article] at the January 6 Capitol protest.

The idea was for Jones to lead the walk to the Capitol, but people were already on their way in the hundreds of thousands before he got there.

One of the things that participants noted was the disorganization of the event, from the poor quality of the audio that meant that Trump’s speech wasn’t easy to hear to the division of the crowd into two venues organized by different groups.

It looks from this piece as if Jones was one of the organizers.

Trump seems to have publicly praised Jones and invited him to organize.  So one thing I’d like to follow up on is why Jones  did not coordinate with the other organizers.

The second question I have is about the size of the crowd.

I got the impression when I watched the rally on videos on pro-Trump sites like The Gateway Pundit, The Donald, Conservative Treehouse, and Centipede Nation, that it was over half a million and maybe even a million, but public accounts of it are much more modest, usually saying something like 200 to 300,000. But that’s still vastly more than the official estimates before the event, which anticipated a maximum number of 80,000.

On India Today, an American Indian Republican official of some kind mentioned a figure in excess of a million, but I have not been able to find a printed transcript of the interview.

This is the first printed estimate I have seen which is close to my own observation.