Few newspapers have commented on the organization that first brought the Ebola virus to world attention on April 1, 2014.
DOCS WITHOUT BORDERS HYPES EBOLA
It was Doctors Without Borders (Medecins Sans Frontieres), a French humanitarian medical team, founded by the French doctor and politician, Bernard Kouchner.
While WHO has played down fears of the Ebola virus, MSF has from the start played them up.
It should be asked if their motives in doing so are entirely above suspicion.
Kouchner, it seems, is not simply the philanthropist he is taken for.
BERNARD KOUCHNER’S MILITARISM
Of late, his tremendous popularity in France has eroded. There are crasser motives underneath the facade, critics say.
One of those critics is Pierre Pean whose book, “Le Monde selon K.” (The World According to K), created a scandal in 2009.
In a review of the book by Christopher Caldwell, we learn of Kouchner’s political ambitions, his corruption, his friendship with Hillary Clinton, and, most importantly, his intellectual ties with Bernard-Henri Levy, the neo-conservative philosopher of the European project.
Kouchner too is a Eurocrat.
“Without borders” is simply another iteration of cosmopolitanism, claims Pean, bringing down the wrath of the entire left-liberal establishment on his head and fulminations about a new Dreyfus.
(Kouchner, like Sarkozy, is of Jewish paternity).
Yet, what else is one to think?
BHL (Levy) is a war hawk, as noted here.
“Fouad Ajami, Elliott Abrams, Paul Berman, Eliot A. Cohen, Robert Kagan, William Kristol, Bernard-Henri Levy, Tim Palwenty, James Traub, Eric Edelman, Karl Rove, Dan Senor, Martin Peretz and Leon Wieseltier……”
And here.
Thus when Kouchner claims that BHL is his “conscience,” we must understand that Kouchner is confessing to the same delusions of military grandeur that drive his mentor.
Kouchner has supported every military intervention of the West in recent years, from Kosovo to Iraq to Libya, and he has urged intervention in Syria and in the Ukraine.
His “cosmopolitanism” amounts to the collapse of national sovereignty in favor of Western (read, Anglo-Jewish) domination, disguised as “humanitarianism.”
This is the man who’s behind the claim that Ebola requires a massive globally co-ordinated intervention.
Shouldn’t one think carefully why he might be promoting panic?
FRANCIS BOYLE CLAIMS THAT EBOLA IS A US BIO-WEAPON
Another angle that deserves consideration: Noted antiwar activist and human-rights campaigner, Francis Boyle, a professor at the Illinois College of Law, has claimed that US bio-weapons research is behind the new Ebola strain.
US government agencies have a long history of carrying out allegedly defensive biological warfare research at labs in Liberia and Sierra Leone. This includes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which is now the point agency for managing the Ebola spill-over into the US,” Prof. Francis Boyle said.
“Why has the Obama administration dispatched troops to Liberia when they have no training to provide medical treatment to dying Africans? How did Zaire/Ebola get to West Africa from about 3,500km away from where it was first identified in 1976?”
Boyle is a strong critic of humanitarian intervention, so he is not a neo-conservative or liberal hawk.
But is he truly against the powers of the New World Order? Or does he merely wish to roll-back the nation states, a roll-back that seems to be in perfect accordance with the ultimate aims of the New World Order?
Zahir Ebrahim has justly indicted Boyle as only another gate-keeper of the elites:
Finally I seem to have penetrated the dark mystery of why such a distinguished, moral, and fearless professor, Dr. Francis Boyle, can exhibit such severe myopia that he begins to resemble my former professor Noam Chomsky…….
And where has Dr. Francis Boyle laid his justice eggs at the International Criminal Court? Right – chasing the old retired errand boys, and for what crimes – Extraordinary Rendition – never mind indicting the new ones perpetrating new abhorrences as we speak, forget ever mentioning the puppetmasters, and 9/11 as an inside job orchestrated to create the right sequence of crises to launch the oligarchs’ transformation towards Global Governance………
But, solely paying attention to the henchmen and the trigger-pullers while ignoring the prime-movers, is the core unsolved problem. It is what makes protest futile. it is what lends zero efficacy to all moral activism for justice and peace. See “Who is more guilty of monumental war crimes – the prime-movers or trigger pullers?”. This same blindsight is what makes all attempts at meaningful reform destined to fail so long as the prime-movers are left intact to protect their turf.“
Boyle never mentions the global financial cartel, the printing of money, the subversion of the media, and the judicial tyranny, whereby the American state, like so many others, is simply the mechanism by which the oligarchs perpetrate their rule.
He doesn’t name those oligarchs or analyze their motives and goals.
That is the first proof of his controlled status.
The second is the fact that he advocates “human rights tribunals” as the method by which the global order is to be policed.
This is simply war by another means.
Find a nation guilty of genocide (and some genocides will always be more genocidal than others), then you can drag it to court and bankrupt it through litigation. This is conquest and pillage by another name. The uses to which the oligarchs can put such a technique are as many as the uses they might make of bio-weapons.
We need only remember that billions of dollars have been paid to the survivors of one holocaust, while other much greater ones have not even been universally admitted, let alone compensated.
” An American lawyer, Francis Boyle, filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Chechen government. Boyle previously won a case for the Republic of Bosnia and Hercegovina against Serbia and former Serb president Slobodan Milosevic.
And, likewise, when the Western establishment turned against Sri Lanka, so that the Tamil Tigers went from being the most feared terrorists on earth to being preferred victims in the USG’s policy directives, then too there was Professor Boyle, champion of human rights, filing cases and
scribbling books, replete with Tamil propaganda, against the Sri Lankan government.
Boyle….like Chomsky, like Assange, like Greenwald…. serves as the counter-point to the overt militarists, presenting a humane face to the public, but nonetheless posing no obstacle to the oligarchs as they pursue their end-game of consolidating all power into their own hands.
So, when the great professor pronounces, from a Russian paper no less, that the Ebola virus is a US bio-weapon, I remain skeptical.
(Correction: I should clarify that I think it’s plausible that it came out of biological weapons research, intentionally or accidentally. It might possibly have been released with the intention to create a panic that would justify martial law, forced vaccinations or some such measure. But I do not think, at this point, that there’s much evidence that it’s a depopulation project).
He would make an excellent and credible mouth-piece for disinformation put out by the powers-that-be.
Disinformation about Ebola being put out?
The swine-flu piece got a lot of hits and was read by many conservatives.
The CBS report only touched one angle – the misreporting of swine-flu.
My piece dealt comprehensively with the financial issues at stake.